bought new BH-5!

[Sup3rman]

I just received same KHX3200K2/512 today that I bought new for $85.00 plus $7.85 shipping.

It's working good, I'm running it at 295FSB x 9 @166 2-2-5 and I can pass Spi 32m.

Everyone said you can't buy new BH-5, your wrong.

[Dissolved]

pics?


295fsb@166 whats the point in that?

[conrad.maranan]

Around 236MHz...that's average. Fair price for 512MB, though.

[EnJoY]

Why not try some 1:1 action. That stuff should fly past 250fsb with 3.2volts or more.

[Sup3rman]

I was trying to get a good SuperPi #.
My 3200 winchester seems to like the 9 better than 10 multiplier.
For some reason I get better results with the 9 multi and ram @ 166. I was able to do SuperPi 1M 30s for the first time.

What do you want pictures of?

[EnJoY]

I want pics of your highest 1:1 oc, at whatever cpu multi you want...make it 6x for highest possible mem oc. ;)

[VetteTheHeretic]

i coulda swore BH-5 came as PC-3500, what voltage are you using?

[jumanji969]

i coulda swore BH-5 came as PC-3500, what voltage are you using?

It used to come as everything... PC-3200, PC-3000, PC-3500...

[Sup3rman]

I want pics of your highest 1:1 oc, at whatever cpu multi you want...make it 6x for highest possible mem oc.

http://sierramarie.com/270mem.png
http://sierramarie.com/270.png

not bad for $90?

[conrad.maranan]

Not bad at all, especially for $92.85. ;)

[viccyran]

http://sierramarie.com/270mem.png
http://sierramarie.com/270.png

not bad for $90?
how many volts are you throwing at that? nice :toast:

[TEDY]

where did you get it

[NiSMo]

very nice indeed, how many volts is goin through that ram? has it passed memtest etc?

[Sup3rman]

how many volts are you throwing at that? nice
3.7v


where did you get it
Compuvest "Item 311003690-00"



I was very skeptical but it work out for me.

they also have 2X512 but that was $275.00,
1GB DDR PC3200 (2x512mb) 400MHz 184pin Kingston KHX3200K21G
SKU: 311001163-02

[bachus_anonym]

they look like great sticks, Sup3rman..... push'em hard :cool:

just a little something to get you on the right path.... 2x256MB @ 273x10 6-2-2-2.0-1T.
Remember - BH-5 still RULEZ :D :cool:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=22967&stc=1 (http://www.clockmehigh.com/xtreme/Neo2/31555_small.jpg)

[blinky]

Compuvest "Item 311003690-00"link plz :)

[MaxxxRacer]

some really nice results.. almost seems that i should have gotten some bh5 instead of my tccd. But hopefully I will be able to run my tccd at 300 when i get a new cpu.

[gundamit]

link plz :) I can't find KHX3200512 sticks on the Compuvest site. Item number given does not come up in search on site. "A" version is available.

[bachus_anonym]

some really nice results.. almost seems that i should have gotten some bh5 instead of my tccd. But hopefully I will be able to run my tccd at 300 when i get a new cpu.
I have a feeling that DDR600 on TCCD is not going to be enough to beat DDR540 out of BH-5.....

EDIT: I'm thinking of getting Gskill PC4800 LA 2x256 and see how it goes....

EDIT 2: I would love to someone compare BH-5 @ DDR540 with TCCD 8-3-3-2.5-1T @ DDR600... Some SuperPi 16M, 3D action an maybe some games....

[Sup3rman]

I can't find KHX3200512 sticks on the Compuvest site. Item number given does not come up in search on site. "A" version is available.
I would just call them and ask about availability, give them them the part # 31100690-00 for 2x256 $85.00 or 311001163-02 for 2x512 $275.00

[charlie]

BH-5 still has it's place, obviously....
However, Winchester is best buddies with tccd. You see.... 9 x 300, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3 is faster than 9 x 300, 5:4 @ 2-2-2. Now 10 x 270, 1:1 2-2-2 is faster than BOTH of them....
When you get Winchester's cranked up to near 3g's, though.... the 9x and 10x multi's become useless with BH-5, though... and to get a 3500+ pushed north of 3100mHz, BH-5 is out of the equation, too.
What we REALLY need is a good TCCD vs. BH-5 FX-55 comparison....

11 x 270 = 2970, 1:1 @ 2-2-2
vs.
9 x 333 = 2990, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3

or on the NF4 it seems we may be able to run our G.Skill LA/LE tccd up to near 350.....

[Sup3rman]

You see.... 9 x 300, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3 is faster than 9 x 300, 5:4 @ 2-2-2.

Is 9 x 300, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3 still faster than 9 x 300, 5:4 @ 2-2-2 after useing A64Tweaker with CodeRed's setting?

[enzoR]

i dotn think so.

[charlie]

Is 9 x 300, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3 still faster than 9 x 300, 5:4 @ 2-2-2 after useing A64Tweaker with CodeRed's setting?

Well, of course you use the A64 Tweaker on both ;) and 300 is faster than 240. But why stop at 300....tccd is good for MORE.

C

[Sup3rman]

Isn't thier greater gain in performance when using A64Tweaker on BH-5 @ 2-2-2?

Also at 9 x 300/166 is memory @ 246

I would think BH-5 @ 246 2-2-2 is more command and stable than TDDC @ 300 2.5-3-3

TDDC over 300 seem exotic where as BH-5 @ 245-255 average.