PDA

View Full Version : whats the best for me? G.SKILL LA or LE



Gaz123
01-20-2005, 10:59 AM
I have a DFI NF4 DR and a amd 3500 64

so can you help please and tell me why

gaz123 :banana4:

Torin
01-20-2005, 11:11 AM
Do you play games or just bench?

For 2x256mb (benching) go for 4800 LA.
For 2x512mb (gaming) go for 4400 LE.

Onepagebook
01-20-2005, 11:13 AM
Gaz123, YGPM..but I said samething as Torin did.:D

Gaz123
01-20-2005, 11:20 AM
well i just want the best and i am after 1gig of ram.
best all rounder would be good.

gaz :banana4: 123

Torin
01-20-2005, 11:22 AM
1GB, definitely PC4400 LE.

Gaz123
01-20-2005, 11:28 AM
1GB, definitely PC4400 LE.

cool thanks just has i was thinking to before i knew about LA.

but my place dont have any LE in stock atm dont know if i can wait.

i have to think about it.

gaz123 :banana:

VetteTheHeretic
01-20-2005, 11:45 AM
is LA availible in 1 gig kits?

Gaz123
01-20-2005, 12:36 PM
is LA availible in 1 gig kits?

yes it is

gaz123

Torin
01-20-2005, 12:39 PM
Yes but it's only rated to run at PC4800 in 2T.

Gaz123
01-20-2005, 12:51 PM
Torin is there some thing eles i should look at maybe,i was going to get some gail utra X before i seen the G.skill.

gaz123

perry_78
01-20-2005, 01:21 PM
Why is LE to be preffered in 1GB kits?

LA is technically speaking better ram..

Torin
01-20-2005, 01:29 PM
LA is only rated to run 2T at the high speeds in 2x512MB. In 2x256MB it can run 1T, but the performance loss you get running 2T with LA and 2x512MB, you are better off with LE running 1T at high speeds.

And no Gaz, G.Skill is pretty much the best TCCD around.

perry_78
01-20-2005, 01:39 PM
Ok GSkill...

I don't quite understand the reason behind rating the same memory at 2 different "T"

What is 1T and 2T exactly?

Torin
01-20-2005, 01:43 PM
1T and 2T refer the command rate, or CPC (command per clock). Running the ram at 2T compared to 1T will decrease your memory bandwidth because of how the memory controller processes information with the different command rates. This is a very simple explanation, but it is generally a universally accepted thing that 2T decreases memory bandwidth, thus decreasing performance. 1T however stresses the memory controller more, thus reducing your memory overclock. However, the difference in bandwidth between higher clocks at 2T and lower clocks at 1T usually always shows that 1T, even at lower clocks is a better option for max performance. Someone I'm sure will pipe in with a more detailed explanation. :)

tjj
01-20-2005, 01:47 PM
LA is only rated to run 2T at the high speeds in 2x512MB. In 2x256MB it can run 1T, but the performance loss you get running 2T with LA and 2x512MB, you are better off with LE running 1T at high speeds.

And no Gaz, G.Skill is pretty much the best TCCD around.

mhm, no :)

Both series, LA & LE are rated 2T. Personally, i would go with LA, since the new LA package is rated 2.5-4-4-8 @ PC4800 (instead of CAS 3, as stated at g.skill's website). You might score better with these.. 437/440 Samsung TCCD chips.

Torin
01-20-2005, 01:49 PM
Think what you want, but go read OPB's threads on LE and LA, and you'll see he says the exact same thing. Scroll up to the top where he agreed with my simple recommendation....

LE is rated 1T at PC4400, LA is rated 2T at PC4800. OPB will confirm this, regardless of what G.Skill's website says or doesn't say.

tjj
01-20-2005, 01:51 PM
Think what you want, but go read OPB's threads on LE and LA, and you'll see he says the exact same thing. Scroll up to the top where he agreed with my simple recommendation....

LE is rated 1T at PC4400, LA is rated 2T at PC4800. OPB will confirm this, regardless of what G.Skill's website says or doesn't say.

oo, it's getting interesting.. :) Hmm, i'm rather sure LE is rated 2T @ PC4400.. Going to check this once more, again..

Torin
01-20-2005, 02:37 PM
Honestly, I won'tthink LA 1g kit will better than LE 1g!
LA 1g was tested under DDR600 2t at that time but LE was tested under DDR550 1t:)
That's all I have to say. :p:

c42
01-20-2005, 02:59 PM
As stated above, the LE kit will be your best bet in 2x512, LA in 2x256.

Onepagebook
01-20-2005, 03:42 PM
oo, it's getting interesting.. :) Hmm, i'm rather sure LE is rated 2T @ PC4400.. Going to check this once more, again..
who tell you LE is rated as 2t...:slapass::D

Jupiler
01-20-2005, 11:40 PM
oo, it's getting interesting.. :) Hmm, i'm rather sure LE is rated 2T @ PC4400.. Going to check this once more, again..

LA is rated 300Mhz, 2T, not the LE.

perry_78
01-20-2005, 11:43 PM
Still seems idioitic to rate the same branded memory (LA) at different command rates, depending on the amount of memory. Makes no sense to me :(

Now I'm stuck with the LA's, just hope they do DDR600 1T otherwise it will be quite fun for oc-wear.de...

Vincentvega18
01-21-2005, 04:49 AM
so are they basically the same thing? b/c some le has been making 300 1t does that mean theres a possibility of 300 1t on the la's (but not guaranteed). My head is basically spinning now.

Torin
01-21-2005, 05:08 AM
It is possible to get 300 1T on LAs, but in 1T, LEs have a better change of getting higher speeds.

Simply put, LEs are better for 2x512MB, LAs are better for 2x256MB.

tjj
01-21-2005, 06:32 AM
Honestly, I won'tthink LA 1GB kit will better than LE 1g!
LA 1GB was tested under DDR600 2T at that time but LE was tested under DDR550 1T

You mean factory tested, or user tested? ;)

tjj
01-21-2005, 06:42 AM
Still seems idioitic to rate the same branded memory (LA) at different command rates, depending on the amount of memory. Makes no sense to me :(

Now I'm stuck with the LA's, just hope they do DDR600 1T otherwise it will be quite fun for oc-wear.de...

Bwah, come on.. :D You picked the right sticks, no doubt.

LA 1GB => LE 1GB.

Indeed, it sounds quite idiotic. That's why i believe sticks are rated 2T PC4400 & PC4800 both. It wouldn't really make much sence the other way. Although you can't find direct specifications on LE (CMD rate) anywhere, but LA are 2.5-4-4-8 @ PC4800 2T for sure. Is there a price difference between LA & LE?! Well, i've been picking some nice TCCD RAM for a long time, and i've observed many reviews & cases of G.Skill's production. Actually, hitting 300HTT 1T with LE is a rather serious task & hardcore duty. Only if your lucky with DFI NF4 + good A64 on-die memory contoller. It's just that people have been buying LE all the way, so they are confident in some way of this PC4400 series. But when the matter concerns 2x512MB (1GB) PC4800 LA, uhm - little information known. I've only seen OPB's 300HTT 1:1 screenshots of 2x512. LA is technically rated higher than LE and lower CAS. So apparently, you might score better with LA for sure.

Torin
01-21-2005, 06:46 AM
Whatever testing is done to determine what it's rated for on the little label they stick to the ICs...

Onepagebook
01-21-2005, 08:47 AM
You mean factory tested, or user tested? ;)


if you are talking about user test, then we must change the sticker everyday.;);)
you might wanna ask amd or intel to get more boxes too.:D

Hombre
01-21-2005, 02:27 PM
@ OPB:

You wrote here one day that your current legendary 1GB LE sticks that you are using were originally RMA'd. Which TCCD 04xx are they? Thanks! :)

perry_78
01-22-2005, 03:50 AM
One thing strikes me as funny.

In SPD, the 1GB kit of LA's is 2,5-4-4-8 @ DDR400 What IS up with those sticks? They run DDR400 2-2-2-5 without any issues, why is the SPD different then?

DDR600 is something wack as well, i think it says something like 3-6-6-13.

This is all on a S754 MSI K8N Neo which i used for testing at DDR400 only.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=23047&stc=1
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=23048&stc=1

enzoR
01-22-2005, 03:52 AM
just to prevent compatibility issues. who cares about SPD anyway.

perry_78
01-22-2005, 04:22 AM
Ok the pictures are up. SPD is still pretty amazing. 3-6-6-13

neokenzo
01-22-2005, 04:37 AM
If the LE uses PC4400 at 1T, wouldnt the LA be able to do the same at PC4400 speed as well?

charlie
01-22-2005, 12:55 PM
LA work just FINE @ 300+ 1T :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=23058

Bennah
01-22-2005, 01:20 PM
Nice result Charlie ;)

Torin
01-22-2005, 01:33 PM
Keep in mind the contention here about LA charlie is running 2x512mb in 1T, not 2x256mb like yours are.

Onepagebook
01-22-2005, 02:44 PM
@ OPB:

You wrote here one day that your current legendary 1GB LE sticks that you are using were originally RMA'd. Which TCCD 04xx are they? Thanks! :)


It's 0437!
I remember , the customer said that not even stable or can reach 260 3-4-4-8..:)
On the DFI and MSI NF4 can both do over DDR600 2.5-3-3-6:D

OPB

enzoR
01-22-2005, 02:47 PM
Lol :d

Dumo
01-22-2005, 05:07 PM
Gskill LE all the way :D

perry_78
01-23-2005, 02:20 AM
:toast:

Yeah charlie!

Gaz123
01-23-2005, 05:30 AM
thnaks you all for the help but i have gone for the LE now has i was in 1st place.

thanks all

gaz123 :toast:

CapFTP
02-22-2005, 01:41 AM
It's 0437!
I remember , the customer said that not even stable or can reach 260 3-4-4-8..:)
On the DFI and MSI NF4 can both do over DDR600 2.5-3-3-6:D

OPB

Hi OPB....finally I have my gig pc4800 LA.

I can confirm now (from first quick test) they pass Goldmemory test
300 2.5-4-4-8 1T on DFI nf4 SLI-D
305 3-4-4-8 1T (same mainb)

Other test to come...;)

jack_tung
02-22-2005, 02:49 AM
This is The DDR550 2.5-3-3-7 SPD.
But This is very critical Value to memory.
If I write this spd value,most of all motherboard can not boot.
It must be by manual method.
This is the reason why I write 2.5-4-4-8 SPD Value.

http://www.gskill.com/rma/7.JPG
http://www.gskill.com/rma/8.JPG



I will write the 1.51 edition(Pattern 5 & pattern 8).
Because I know some-user like Only run 5 and 8 24 hour.

Best regards
jack