Dont need VX check BH-5 :D 280-1,5-2-2-0 :D [Archive]

andL64

01-12-2005, 12:39 PM

Hi

little test of my new bh-5 bought from SBT on oc.at :D they r really nice !

give ya the link because cant load up here all pics!

thx to codered 4 the great amd64 tweaker again!

thx to xtremesystem as a source of clocking :)

LINK:

http://www.overclockers.at/showthread.php?s=&threadid=134322

mcnbns

01-12-2005, 12:46 PM

People only rave about VX because of its ability to get near BH-5 results with 2x512MB modules.

However, after seeing your pics, you deserve a :toast:. Nice work, man.

andL64

01-12-2005, 12:53 PM

yeah man i just get stopped testing went down and got a sweet and cold BEER :D

thx man

bachus_anonym

01-12-2005, 01:31 PM

nice clocks...
got anything else than just CPU-Z and Sandra ??? have you run both sticks?

also, people rave about VX for very important reason: ability to get STABLE speeds of DDR480-520 with - stay focused - 2x512MB with 6-2-2-2.0 1T timmings.

still, nice going there....

Zanr Zij

01-12-2005, 01:36 PM

very nice... congrat...

TCCD can do same timing but low bus

andL64

01-12-2005, 01:39 PM

spi and everst are also down there => link

what should i bench? maybe i ll do it next time because i have a machII here but i m moving in my own flat in vienna, and i got 3700+ with 280x10 1:1 @ 2,8 ghz with this ram and that timings for spi :D

seEn

gO fOr bench!n soOn :D 3Dmarks and so on...

conrad.maranan

01-12-2005, 01:39 PM

also, people rave about VX for very important reason: ability to get STABLE speeds of DDR480-520 with - stay focused - 2x512MB with 6-2-2-2.0 1T timmings.
I'd say this is the most important reason. ;)

andL64

01-12-2005, 01:47 PM

lol sure 260 2-2-2-5 or tighter are stable i could gurantee.....

but still not enough time to checkt that out

Rabbi_NZ

01-12-2005, 01:51 PM

Very nice :toast:
How many volts did you give that memory?

Like others have said though... 2x512MB is another story.
I HAVE seen guys running 2x512 BH5 at 260 100% stable so it's not impossible... but VX (eg, Winbond UTT chips) seem to be doing the same 2x512 speeds with less vDimm than most BH5 needs.

andL64

01-12-2005, 01:59 PM

until 270 i ran 3,5-3,6V and for 270+ with 3,8-3,85 more i cant get with this board here maybe a mod on the board would help and some OVP Nonprotection Bios or something :D

seEn

Rabbi_NZ

01-12-2005, 02:06 PM

Just for reference... here's some VX in action

Conrad.. let me know if it's not cool to host these pics, I dont want to eat up all your bandwidth.

SiSoft Sandra on 3.3v-3.4v (http://webpages.charter.net/conrad-digital/Rabbi_NZ/9x270%202-2-2-10-1T%20Sandra.JPG)
Screen Shot on 3.3v-3.4v (http://webpages.charter.net/conrad-digital/Rabbi_NZ/8x275%202-2-2-10-1T.JPG)
3Dmark01 on 3.3v-3.4v (http://webpages.charter.net/conrad-digital/Rabbi_NZ/9x270%202-2-2-10-1T%203D'O1.JPG)
SuperPI 32MB on 3.3v-3.4v 2x512mb (http://webpages.charter.net/conrad-digital/Rabbi_NZ/7x268%20superpi%2032mb%202x512.jpg)

andL64

01-12-2005, 02:12 PM

HARDCORECLOCKER

01-12-2005, 02:17 PM

:D Yep - that's it, get my BH-5 next week and do also need 280 with 2-2-2-5.

Hope it will work with the booster.....................

:toast:

Rabbi_NZ

01-12-2005, 02:23 PM

the last is 1,5-2-20 on 268? :D nice clock but what score did ya get with 1M? i could hit on 2590 2590 1,5-2-2-0 33sec but i really like to know how it would go with 280x10 :)

also a big bid could ya send me the smartguardian .exe per pm or to my email because cant get it installed from the cd got an error *grml*

seEn and tia

PS: nice scores dude
Thanks, you too :toast:

10x263 SuperPI 1MB (http://webpages.charter.net/conrad-digital/Rabbi_NZ/10x263%2015-2-2-0-7-15%20SuperPI%201MB.JPG)
10x270 SuperPI 1MB (http://webpages.charter.net/conrad-digital/Rabbi_NZ/10x270%2015-2-2-0-7-15%20SuperPI%201MB.JPG)
I think I need 10x272 or 10x273 to get 31s... as soon as I can feed these 3.5v+ hopefully my CPU will let me run that speed :)

My CD is at home and I dont have the internet at home yet... I am at work right now too so I can't send it sorry. But, see if the DFI home site has it for download. Sorry dude.

andL64

01-12-2005, 02:29 PM

ok no problem i didnt use such progs for showing voltage and C for 1-2 months dont need them anymore... :D know how amd64 works got 3 one here :)

but still very nice i tried with my watercooling (btw. whats ur cooling?) to hit under 33sec i got this with the bh5 and adatapc4800 but i m moving as i said to vienna so i dont want to do the work to put the mach2 on.... :) still lazy because tomorrow i ll get the key for the flat :D yippieee!

so IHS is also on and the 3700+ does max 2850 as i checked out until yet. maybe i ll hit 2,9 without but i got bad contact with my mach2 without ihs on my 3200+ on the 3000+ its also still on and this does 2750 with the IHS but the 512kb let me feeel it....

seEn

Rabbi_NZ

01-12-2005, 02:38 PM

Cooling in sig... I have a mobile CPU though so the IHS is already removed.
The fan is quite low speed also... with phase Im pretty sure this badboy would hit 3GHz or very near to it.

Another thing I have heard is that phase change often allows memory to clock higher due to the memory controller being cooled, so you may get higher yet! :D

Good luck with the move, and let us know how the phase change goes when you get round to installing it.

andL64

01-12-2005, 02:52 PM

lol i didnt recognize... the beer...:)

wohooo thanks man good news :D

ok i ll hold ya ontopic but it wil be hard because it ll take some time bevore i ll get an i-net connection in the new flat....

wow man u do this with ac :D pretty insane *lol* this is best quote:"quite low speed..." :D

Zanr Zij

01-13-2005, 09:14 AM

new new new :D

andL64

01-13-2005, 09:38 AM

uuhhhh sweeettt with ur tccd? how much voltage do u feed em ? :D

Zanr Zij

01-13-2005, 09:55 AM

uuhhhh sweeettt with ur tccd? how much voltage do u feed em ? :D

not TCCD, BH-5 :D ... 3.7v

situman

01-13-2005, 10:13 AM

some of u guys mentioned NEW BH-5? where at?

andL64

01-13-2005, 10:21 AM

just bought from an austria forum :D and its clocks sweet :)

ojdr2001

01-13-2005, 11:06 AM

My mushkin Level II @ 1,5-2-2-5

http://www.ojdr2001.com/sand280.jpg

Jeager

01-13-2005, 12:51 PM

ojdr2001 2x512 ? stable ? i dream ? :D

Zanr Zij

01-13-2005, 01:08 PM

My mushkin Level II @ 1,5-2-2-5

very nice score and effect, multi 12 and LS ? Show ur timing plzz.. like me :D. On Air so can get higher..

http://img56.exs.cx/img56/8572/28115220zz6kq.jpg

Zeus

01-13-2005, 01:14 PM

Wow, BH-5 at 1,5-2-2-5 doing 280MHz..TWICE!!
Congrats guys, superram! :toast:

Awaiting the first UTT or VX 280+ screenies...

ojdr2001

01-13-2005, 01:28 PM

It's 2x256 of course. Don´t know any 2x512 capable of these timings @ 280 :)

Timings in A64 tweaker

1,5------------16
7 -------------128
12------------- D
2-------------- D
2--------------7
5--------------6
2--------------4
2--------------16
1--------------E
1--------------200
200 3,9

WiCKeD

01-13-2005, 01:32 PM

What kind of clocks can you get stable with those?

ojdr2001

01-13-2005, 01:38 PM

What kind of clocks can you get stable with those?

SPI and 3DMark2001 @ 277 Mhz

Zanr Zij

01-13-2005, 02:07 PM

:) and Me Pi, Prime and 3DMark @276 :D

andL64

01-13-2005, 03:12 PM

got spi @ 279,7 mhz see the link FIRST POST :D

seEN

choseone214

01-13-2005, 03:19 PM

Heres mine very efficant I think for 269mhz almost matching that guy with 281mzh :)
These sticks are also up for sale now Im moving on to bigger and better things, so if your in the usa drop me a line. :

http://www.jason57.iwarp.com/recordstuff/ddr2.JPG

ojdr2001

01-13-2005, 04:20 PM

got spi @ 279,7 mhz see the link FIRST POST :D

seEN

Not difficult with one stick and single. :)

choseone214

01-13-2005, 04:21 PM

Not difficult with one stick and single

;) exactly

andL64

01-14-2005, 12:33 AM

but i still not ocing that much of rams so its something i ve never seen befoe and still im pressive for me but i like these guys which got em in dual channel :D

seEn

Nazaar

01-14-2005, 12:57 AM

very nice, that kinda kicks VX's ass )

Zanr Zij

01-14-2005, 12:59 AM

andL64

01-14-2005, 01:19 AM

dont understand ya spoke of ram ocing only a fan puttin ovr for 4.0-4.1 shown on the booster :D but in real it was 3,85V for this but its weird theres no matter if i go with tight 1,5-2-2-0 or 2-2-2-5 i cant go over 280 1:1 DDR560 !

seEn

PS: multi was 9x above 260

mikead_99

01-14-2005, 06:51 AM

chosen214, kinda interesting to me. I'm pretty much matching you with 270 MHz, but my cpu speed and Tweaker timings are a bit lower than yours. Both of those should have increased your b/w over mine by a decent amount. Are your sticks error free there? Don't take the question wrong, I'm not knocking you or your clocks, just wondering why no difference. I know mine were memtest86+ and SuperPi 32M stable there. Tweaker settings Left column: 2-10-12-2-2-5-2-2-1-2-15.6us/200 Right Column: 16x-128-D-D-7x-6ns-5ns-256 clks-E-200. Dynamic Idle Counter didn't make up the difference here I'm sure.
http://mysite.verizon.net/res6otqr/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/Sandra_8305_8233.jpg

And back on topic, VX really does pretty well against BH-5. At 12x265 my VX are giving me 8138/8072 in Sandra...not that far off for lower clocks even if they won't go higher.

Mtemel

01-16-2005, 06:01 AM

where can you buy these new bh-5 ????????

k|ngp|n

01-16-2005, 06:49 AM

Great bh5 ownage shots guyz...
Can I play?
http://pic8.picturetrail.com/VOL256/1324330/2517856/80222424.jpg
btw--sandra is a joke for stable bench testing, sp kind of is too :P
pifast and 3d are better IMO...

andL64

01-16-2005, 06:53 AM

arent new one this is the good old stuff made from winbond :D

choseone214

01-16-2005, 06:57 AM

mike>sisoft is crap really you can get higher bandwith with diff timings and settings, but real world stuff is best the way I do it ;)..

as for error free yeah I think so ;)

andL64

01-16-2005, 07:11 AM

sisoft is ok but everst is better and u have everytime lower scores in everest than sisoft also testing if its stable benching the 3dmark01 is very good.

seEn

mikead_99

01-16-2005, 08:38 AM

mike>sisoft is crap really you can get higher bandwith with diff timings and settings, but real world stuff is best the way I do it ;)..

as for error free yeah I think so ;)

Oh, and I agree, but that is the bench that was posted so that was what I used to compare. But taking Sandra for what it is, I still would have expected some difference is all. 270x10 to 270x11 to 270x12 all shows incremental increases in b/w for me, but I've not played with CL1.5 and it could well be that Sandra doesn't handle/treat it well, I don't know, but that's kinda what I'm wondering.

@ k|ngp|n: Yeah, not suggesting Sandra for stability testing, only pretty pictures. ;) For stability I use a whole battery of testing, memtest86+, win memtest, large SPi runs, and of course, 3d. :toast: