View Full Version : The new EE SL7RR
Charles Wirth
10-13-2004, 02:27 PM
http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/list.asp?ProcFam=483&PkgType=ALL&SysBusSpd=ALL&CorSpd=ALL
Now has a order code for OEM and retail box
Box Order Code
BX80532PG3400FS
OEM Order Code
B80532PG0962MS
.09 micron
2MB L2 cache
no L3 cache
M0 core
Looks good and runs on lower voltage.
caater
10-13-2004, 02:37 PM
almighty intel had typo?
almost first google link (http://triointernational.com/store/TNI.cfm?partNo=BX80532PG3400FS&stat=streetprices) for prod code..
Cache Memory
Installed Size L2 - 512 KB - L3 cache - 2 MB
Bennah
10-13-2004, 03:06 PM
Thats wrong. Intel are right ;)
This new EE hopefully will perform good.
FUGGER, you got one on the way :D?
Charles Wirth
10-13-2004, 03:09 PM
I dont think so, several things odd.
.09 + M0
It should have shorter pipeline too, unlike prescott
My email from Intel has same specs 2mb L2
dothan has 2mb L2 as well.
yes, on order.
My Dothan ES will be here by very soon.
freecableguy
10-13-2004, 04:09 PM
Wow. 90nm Northwood? 2MB L2 cache? 800Mhz FSB? 775? Where do I sign up?
caater
10-13-2004, 04:57 PM
what mobo are you planning to use with this?
afaik only aopen has normal mobo for pent m's (agp+3 pci slots).
or there is something we don't know? ;)
My Dothan ES will be here by very soon.
Bennah
10-13-2004, 04:59 PM
My Dothan ES will be here by very soon.
:slobber:
Oh BTW, what happened to the 3.4EE ES + IC7 max3 combo?
masterofpuppets
10-14-2004, 06:00 AM
Looks like it's time for me to go 775 :D
Bennah
10-14-2004, 12:17 PM
It looks like it ;)
FX Freak
10-14-2004, 01:14 PM
looks nice, i hope thats a very fast cpu, faster than the FX55:D
Charles Wirth
10-14-2004, 02:04 PM
I still have most of the Max3 still intact. I pulled the raid drives and CPU out.
Hallowed
10-14-2004, 04:30 PM
Let me guess, another $1000 chip that performs like a midrange A64? ;)
Hopefully it clocks well. Gallatin has always performed better than Preshott and the L2 Cache should have improved latency characteristics vs. the predecessors L3.
FUG: any word on a 1066 version?
jjcom
10-14-2004, 05:05 PM
mmm..I think that might be a typo. Intel was going to make LGA775 NW (I think...I remember Ithink Donnie said it...if not sorry Donnie.) 90nm NW wouldn't surprise me tho.
masterofpuppets
10-15-2004, 07:28 AM
To be honest, I am gonna wait for the last gallantin revision (1066 BUS) after thinking a bit.
Iridium192_217
10-15-2004, 11:09 AM
I can't even keep track of all the Intel chips these days.
Kanavit
10-15-2004, 12:21 PM
wow, it should perform like a beast! just wished that intel stuck with the northwood core and worked with it by increasing cache size to 1mb instead of bringing all new core to replace it.
Bennah
10-15-2004, 12:36 PM
Yea I hear ya, but the scotties are overclocking like monsters. 5GHz stable through 3d mark now. This is only the begining :D
Anemone
10-15-2004, 06:39 PM
Well some of the Presc updates I did look forward too, tweaked memory controller, tweaked HT and SSE3. Add those to a nice L2 cache of 2mb and I'd think you'd have a nice core machine.
So 90nm makes me think the this SL7RR is Prescott based, just not @1066 bus, but can't say. EM64T support? SSE3? And will the 1066 FSB cpu's be bad oc'ers such that the SL7RR is a better buy for oc?
Lots more questions on this news... :)