View Full Version : 1000 users?
`schr0et
09-25-2004, 06:29 PM
Am I seeing things or what?
Where did these 850 extra users come from? (usually there's 140ish people on)
Dissolved
09-25-2004, 06:30 PM
58 members and 868 guests...
Should be the other way around, but i guess its going good so far.
`schr0et
09-25-2004, 06:37 PM
bug in the update or something?
All Kill3r
09-25-2004, 06:42 PM
maybe the 6ghz thread ?
Dissolved
09-25-2004, 06:47 PM
maybe the 6ghz thread ?
I Would Say so :)
Karnivore
09-25-2004, 07:04 PM
peaked at 1270 so far, The Server was getting [H]ammered, hardocp linked the 6ghz thread on there front page... no bug...
Dissolved
09-25-2004, 07:18 PM
peaked at 1270 so far, The Server was getting [H]ammered, hardocp linked the 6ghz thread on there front page... no bug...
Better Then Kiddies From Baghdad Dos'in the Server :P
sandman
09-26-2004, 08:50 AM
well, 39K and 6ghz. Both are big.
eva2000
09-26-2004, 08:57 AM
nice 800+ guests and tweaked server and forum is handling it fine :)
masterofpuppets
09-26-2004, 11:03 AM
Looks like the new server really is better than the mouldy old one :)
DeathMonk
09-26-2004, 12:53 PM
I thought it was a lousy DoS attack..
Crankster
09-26-2004, 02:18 PM
It did slow down the server, quite a bit. Nothing it couldn't manage though. I probably added to it by just opening all the sections i visit in tabs.
eva2000
09-26-2004, 07:15 PM
IIRC, the old server that recently crashed was when it was bombarded with 1000 users heh
and Fugger hasn't even properly recompiled the smp linux kernel to see the 2nd virtual cpu too :D
masterofpuppets
09-27-2004, 12:33 AM
Lol. FUGGER, recompile the kernal this instant! We need to hold out with all these [h] thread viewings! xD
Karnivore
09-27-2004, 12:53 AM
Probably not much relief in site, Story has also been picked up by slashdot, inquirer, and probably a few others by now.. :p:
masterofpuppets
09-27-2004, 02:47 AM
I saw it on slashdot yesterday.
Charles Wirth
09-27-2004, 03:32 AM
Checking into more bandwidth now
Rodzilla
09-27-2004, 08:21 AM
It's the 6GHz thread that Fark.com thought was cool... and linked to... :banana: :banana:
We got noticed by Fark!!!!!! That's just too cool! :cool:
damn 1400+, I am clicking links then reading part of a book before it loads ;)
Crankster
09-27-2004, 09:54 AM
BUT, it loads
def. Not complaining about the speed, just amazed at the number of users.
p4z1f1st
09-27-2004, 01:36 PM
I thought it was a lousy DoS attack..
first i thought that too....but a lot of "bit sites" linked the 6ghz-record....
xbitlabs.com for example.....
damn kiddies, GO AWAY :D
All Kill3r
09-27-2004, 01:48 PM
damn kiddies, GO AWAY
:lol:
it's starting to speed up finally !
p4z1f1st
09-27-2004, 02:07 PM
yeah, only 813 now :D
Attitudx
09-27-2004, 03:07 PM
LMAO YOU was FARKED hehehe
p4z1f1st
09-28-2004, 02:56 AM
DAMN, xbitlabs.com posted the 3.6GHz-record of FX53, yesterday!!
kiddies are coming again :slash:
saaya
09-28-2004, 03:13 AM
Even though AMD’s Athlon 64 FX processors have never been good overclockers...
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/display/20040928015459.html
WHAT????? :stick:
p4z1f1st
09-28-2004, 03:39 AM
just idiots, nothing else :rolleyes: