PDA

View Full Version : UT2003 benchmark



zakelwe
09-17-2002, 11:21 AM
Although this is a 3dmark2001 forum I was wondering whether anyone had done the UT2003 becnhcmark and what their score was at 1024 x 768 ?

It seems to be quite nice in that the flyby is more video card dependant whereas the botmatch is more cpu limited.

My score was a lowly 129 and 47 respectively, but then I only get 10500 in 3Dmark

Hey, don't blame me, there is no www.tepidsystems.org for me to go to ;)

Regards

Andy

IFMU
09-17-2002, 11:26 AM
Mind sharing where you can get the UT2003 Bench? I for one am not that much into it. Just cant afford the 300 some odd dollar cards, but still like to see what I can do. And of couse I really like to see some kickin graphics on my "POS" system.

Charles Wirth
09-17-2002, 11:28 AM
I checked out the benchmark,

I scored like 215 flyby and 78 botmatch @ 1024x768
285 flyby and 78 botmatch @ 640x480
170 flyby and 78 botmatch @ 1600x1200

Kinda makes me wonder how people with less CPU/video post higher botmatch scores over on MO website.

Charles Wirth
09-17-2002, 11:31 AM
The benchmark is in a subdirectory of the DEMO

More scores and links can be found here (http://discuss.madonion.com/forum/showflat.pl?Board=gaminggeneral&Number=1197964)

IFMU
09-17-2002, 11:44 AM
Ok, and where do you get this demo? or is it a buy only thing too? I havent been able to see it anywhere.... yea just call me gamin schmuck too.......

*EDIT*
Found finally.................

IFMU
09-17-2002, 12:41 PM
Great Graphics.... to bad I dont like these kinda games.... lol

So can someone tell me what the hell all this means?

benchmark.txt
10.415980 / 22.985937 / 43.989147 fps -- Score = 22.991837 rand[13345]
6.027519 / 41.404995 / 73.835190 fps -- Score = 41.431747 rand[21621]
13.650757 / 28.996662 / 50.635563 fps -- Score = 29.008627 rand[25084]
11.178945 / 27.194895 / 54.491173 fps -- Score = 27.242620 rand[5118]
37.920456 / 102.364349 / 300.799713 fps -- Score = 102.449753 rand[21893]
25.940687 / 74.796074 / 193.514679 fps -- Score = 74.977226 rand[26746]

lowframerate
dm-antalus
10.415980 / 22.985937 / 43.989147 fps
Score = 22.991837

br-anubis
6.027519 / 41.404995 / 73.835190 fps
Score = 41.431747

dm-asbestos
13.650757 / 28.996662 / 50.635563 fps
Score = 29.008627

ctf-citadel
11.178945 / 27.194895 / 54.491173 fps
Score = 27.242620

dm-asbestos
37.920456 / 102.364349 / 300.799713 fps
Score = 102.449753

ctf-citadel
25.940687 / 74.796074 / 193.514679 fps
Score = 74.977226

Charles Wirth
09-17-2002, 12:46 PM
run this program c:\ut2003\system\benchmark.exe

If you installed ut2003 on a different drive change the drive letter from above example.

This program will give you the option to change the resolution it is run at. Also there is a way to change from default d3d to opengl. I have not done this yet as it run so fricken nice now. It is a bummer that the nvidia logo is at the start but it damn sure looks better on the ATI currently.

IFMU
09-17-2002, 01:14 PM
Originally posted by zakelwe
My score was a lowly 129 and 47 respectively, but then I only get 10500 in 3Dmark
Andy
LoL.... lowly.....

Hrm.... welll heres my scores...
GF2 w/64 (250/401) @ 275/491
256 mem best settings
800Duron @ 7x127

Unshra
09-17-2002, 08:56 PM
I think I need to vmod my g4

sysfailur
09-17-2002, 11:26 PM
This benchmark takes way too long. I don't like it.

SKATAN
09-18-2002, 12:50 AM
lol takes much less time than 3dmark :p :p :p

sysfailur
09-18-2002, 12:56 AM
Originally posted by SKATAN
lol takes much less time than 3dmark :p :p :p

Yeah but 3dmark looks cooler and is more involving what with changing clock frequencies and what have you. heh I dunno, they should've made the demos more intensive rather than just flying around... like they shoulda had in your face action, and a bit shorter and I would enjoy running it more than I do now. Well, I don't enjoy running the UT bench at all :P

zakelwe
09-18-2002, 05:59 AM
Fuggers point on people getting higher scores does raise the issue that it has bugs that need ironing out. I did see one guy with a score of 1378 in botmatch but obviously did not take it seriously as he got about 100 in flyby.

I must say I don't prefer it to 3dmark but I do prefer it to 3dmark which hangs at dragothic, if you see what I mean.



Regards

Andy

Spystar
09-18-2002, 11:55 AM
P4 2.8 @ 3.33GHz / 158FSB/ Mushkin PC3200 @ 212MHz. R9700 @ 348/675. These are my games-playing settings.

http://www.spyster.net/PC/640.png http://www.spyster.net/PC/800.png http://www.spyster.net/PC/1024.png http://www.spyster.net/PC/1280.png http://www.spyster.net/PC/1600.png

BigDov
09-19-2002, 07:31 AM
On my XP1600+, Ti4400, 256mb ram system (no OC right now) I got:

Flyby: 155.45
Botmatch: 57.83

at 1024x768. Gotta get the cooling worked out in the new case and then do it again......