D749
05-13-2011, 10:32 AM
So up until now I've only use BP compression fittings. I like them a lot but moving parts in and out of a loop is a pain in the ass. So I've decided to try quick disconnects (Koolance VL4N).
At first I was going to use one set per tube run and place them in-line. But then I was thinking why not get crazy and put the quick disconnects at every port so that the tubing can be completely removed when I need to swap parts. However, that would double the number of quick disconnects required and my concern is restriction.
I know there have been some tests on VL4N and they seem pretty good restriction wise but I'm wondering what you all thought of going from 3 to 6 VL4N fittings in a single loop. How much of an impact would that have? The loop would comprise 2 full cover GPU blocks, a PMP-450S, a RP-452X2 and Norprene (1/2" 3/4") tubing.
Thank you.
At first I was going to use one set per tube run and place them in-line. But then I was thinking why not get crazy and put the quick disconnects at every port so that the tubing can be completely removed when I need to swap parts. However, that would double the number of quick disconnects required and my concern is restriction.
I know there have been some tests on VL4N and they seem pretty good restriction wise but I'm wondering what you all thought of going from 3 to 6 VL4N fittings in a single loop. How much of an impact would that have? The loop would comprise 2 full cover GPU blocks, a PMP-450S, a RP-452X2 and Norprene (1/2" 3/4") tubing.
Thank you.