zalbard
12-02-2010, 05:46 AM
Excuse me if this's been reiterated one million times...
I am looking at possible SSD options atm. Good all around performance is what I am aiming at. I do not really need a huge Raid 0 (R0) array, so I am looking at 2xR0 60GB SF1222 vs 2xR0 64GB C300.
I have a few questions...
1. What would perform better?
I am aware of the fact that SF1222 drives use compression, so they are not as good as C300 in reality (while matching on paper... quite a few benchmarks show 'fake' numbers). Then again, 64GB C300 is quite gimped compared to 128GB model, so I am not sure whether it's worth it or not.
2. Performance degradation in Raid 0.
SF1222 has some interesting Garbage Collection (GC) method, which is supposedly even better than TRIM (according to OCZ). So looks good on paper. However, I read that they took ages (well, ok... days :p:) to recover.
Then again, I read (http://www.anandtech.com/show/3812/the-ssd-diaries-crucials-realssd-c300/8) about C300 write performance degradation, and I am not sure that's been fixed.
3. SF1222 firmware (FW) mess.
So, there used to be this kind of ridiculous stuff present:
http://benchmarkreviews.com/images/reviews/storage/OWC-SSDMXRE100/Iometer_Random_4K-IOPS_30QD_Results.png
Do Vertex 2 Extended (V2Ext) drives perform as good as Corsair Force (CoF) ones now (after the FW updates)? If not, can one flash a V2Ext drive with this old CoF FW?
And can one actually upgrade CoF FW without ruining these nice performance numbers these days?
I also read some good things about C300 FWs. One of them (0006) was released recently. Does it improve the performance of the drives compared to 0002 (I assume 0002 was used for reviews) or enhance GC?
Your input is appreciated! :)
I am looking at possible SSD options atm. Good all around performance is what I am aiming at. I do not really need a huge Raid 0 (R0) array, so I am looking at 2xR0 60GB SF1222 vs 2xR0 64GB C300.
I have a few questions...
1. What would perform better?
I am aware of the fact that SF1222 drives use compression, so they are not as good as C300 in reality (while matching on paper... quite a few benchmarks show 'fake' numbers). Then again, 64GB C300 is quite gimped compared to 128GB model, so I am not sure whether it's worth it or not.
2. Performance degradation in Raid 0.
SF1222 has some interesting Garbage Collection (GC) method, which is supposedly even better than TRIM (according to OCZ). So looks good on paper. However, I read that they took ages (well, ok... days :p:) to recover.
Then again, I read (http://www.anandtech.com/show/3812/the-ssd-diaries-crucials-realssd-c300/8) about C300 write performance degradation, and I am not sure that's been fixed.
3. SF1222 firmware (FW) mess.
So, there used to be this kind of ridiculous stuff present:
http://benchmarkreviews.com/images/reviews/storage/OWC-SSDMXRE100/Iometer_Random_4K-IOPS_30QD_Results.png
Do Vertex 2 Extended (V2Ext) drives perform as good as Corsair Force (CoF) ones now (after the FW updates)? If not, can one flash a V2Ext drive with this old CoF FW?
And can one actually upgrade CoF FW without ruining these nice performance numbers these days?
I also read some good things about C300 FWs. One of them (0006) was released recently. Does it improve the performance of the drives compared to 0002 (I assume 0002 was used for reviews) or enhance GC?
Your input is appreciated! :)