PDA

View Full Version : Full HD : 23 or 24 size LCD?



WaterFlex
01-07-2010, 05:17 AM
Which size is more native and better for 1920x1080? They say, 23 is better then 24. What do you think about it ?

YukonTrooper
01-07-2010, 01:07 PM
Well, it will be sharper due to the smaller size at the same resolution. However, I'd still suggest a 1920X1200 24" over both.

zalbard
01-07-2010, 01:26 PM
Agreed! :up:

WaterFlex
01-07-2010, 01:33 PM
Ahh guys, but 16:10 LCD are quite rare nowdays...
What do you think about Samsung SyncMaster XL2370 LED ?

zanzabar
01-07-2010, 05:49 PM
ces is going now so in the next few weeks with all of the 3d BS we should get not blurry lcds (120hrz native displays) so buying now is a sucker move unless u are doing text work.

with the current models the 24 and 23 are about the same the 24 are about 22.8 viewable and the 24 are about 23.5 viewable so whatever has what u want

YukonTrooper
01-07-2010, 06:12 PM
Zanzabar makes a good point about 120Hz displays. I actually have a 2233rz on order because NCIX had a great price on them during their Boxing Day Sale. I'm on a 24" 1920X1200 P-MVA right now, but TN tech has come a long way in the last few years and the contrast ratio on the 2233rz kills the contrast ratio on my LG. The hardest thing will be losing the size, and I thought about waiting for the 24" 120Hz displays, but like hell I want to spend the entry price for one of those plus $700 on video-cards just so I can run games above 60FPS at 1920X1080. No point in buying a 120Hz display and not running above 60FPS. However, if a single Fermi card can do a 24" 120Hz display justice, I'll definitely be spending more money.

STEvil
01-07-2010, 07:50 PM
Contrast ratios ratings are by and large crap these days.

YukonTrooper
01-07-2010, 10:53 PM
Contrast ratios ratings are by and large crap these days.
I'm speaking of the measured ratios, not the advertised ratios. Yes, advertised contrast ratios mean absolutely nothing.

BatteryOperated
01-07-2010, 11:49 PM
Which size is more native and better for 1920x1080? They say, 23 is better then 24. What do you think about it ?

I think 23 and 24 both suck. Buy a larger monitor.

jiggyghallam
01-08-2010, 07:16 AM
I think 23 and 24 both suck. Buy a larger monitor.

Wow great help you are

zanzabar
01-10-2010, 03:06 AM
there is the new nec IPS thats 60hrz and about $300, then there is a new line of 3d ones from lg and samsung. i couldent find much but there is info on cnet and i would expect more stuff on monday for exact specs. but the nec was dated for march.

i was hoping that this was the year of the small e-ips but i saw nothing about them

aznsniper911
01-12-2010, 10:12 PM
there is the new nec IPS thats 60hrz and about $300, then there is a new line of 3d ones from lg and samsung. i couldent find much but there is info on cnet and i would expect more stuff on monday for exact specs. but the nec was dated for march.

i was hoping that this was the year of the small e-ips but i saw nothing about them

Do you know if most of them are going to be 1920x1080 or 1920x1200? I would so jump on those LED lcd monitors if they were 1920x1200!

YukonTrooper
01-12-2010, 10:52 PM
Do you know if most of them are going to be 1920x1080 or 1920x1200? I would so jump on those LED lcd monitors if they were 1920x1200!
There is nothing special about the currently available LED monitors, considering they lack local-dimming. There are much better standard CCFL options out there.