PDA

View Full Version : Test Phenom II X4 AM3



Dumo
03-13-2009, 09:08 AM
http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/4319/screenshot048b.jpg

On air with Asus M4A79T Del, cold later..

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/6703/screenshot046r.jpg

4X1GB mem.
1.5 Vcore

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6241/screenshot017j.jpg


MSI 790FX-GD70

http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/8986/screenshot005esc.jpg

Spi 32M AMD's time...

http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/7070/screenshot006cgt.jpg


Back to M4A79T with DI

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/9754/screenshot019z.jpg

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7725/screenshot021.jpg

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9873/screenshot022bay.jpg

LowRun
03-13-2009, 09:48 AM
Nice start, keep 'em coming.

Setup?

shaolin95
03-13-2009, 09:53 AM
Sweet sweet. :-)

stangracin2
03-13-2009, 09:57 AM
looking great

leoy
03-13-2009, 10:45 AM
Is it the 3.2 deneb we are expecting in april/may?

FlanK3r
03-13-2009, 12:44 PM
what is it? x4 955 ES?Tell me :)..

edit: i want this model to buy (x4 945 or x4 955, 945 will be too BE??)

Raiderman
03-13-2009, 04:26 PM
C'mon Dumo, spill the beans! What is it?

chew*
03-13-2009, 04:34 PM
We still don't know.....Its an ES sample thats all.

iandh
03-13-2009, 04:34 PM
3.2Ghz @ 1.25v stock? Me likes.

Dumo
03-13-2009, 04:46 PM
Its not 950/955. Its an ES chip.

It can go stable @ 3.6Ghz with stock Vcore, which any good retail 940 able to do it:)

Rig:
M4T deluxe / 2X1gb Diablo 2000 / Zippy 1200W

haylui
03-13-2009, 06:10 PM
nice.hopefully it could come out ahead of schedule.

Benny Lodewijk
03-13-2009, 06:41 PM
Nice stuff Dumo !!! can't wait more result

Terimakasih

charged3800z24
03-13-2009, 07:13 PM
So, what is the actual stock voltage of the chip? is it really that low?

msimax
03-13-2009, 07:34 PM
1.250v

shaolin95
03-13-2009, 07:51 PM
Now that I see this, isnt the 720 also recognized as 1.25 on the Gigabyte mobo at least? Mine is, in fact I can go up to 3.2 or 3.4, dont recall now, at 1.25v.
I thought that was the stock voltage...

chew*
03-13-2009, 08:21 PM
1.325 for the 720

shaolin95
03-13-2009, 08:31 PM
Does it show 1.325 on your gigabyte mobo bios and on CPU-Z when bios is all default? Mine shows 1.25v

charged3800z24
03-13-2009, 08:37 PM
Does it show 1.325 on your gigabyte mobo bios and on CPU-Z when bios is all default? Mine shows 1.25v

Mine shows 1.325 in CPU-z

Dumo
03-13-2009, 10:58 PM
Its not 950/955. Its an ES chip.

It can go stable @ 3.6Ghz with stock Vcore, which any good retail 940 able to do it:)

Rig:
M4T deluxe / 2X1gb Diablo 2000 / Zippy 1200WAlso chew*s TT Big Typhoon:)

chew*
03-13-2009, 11:59 PM
Also chew*s TT Big Typhoon:)

the Ultra 120 xtreme conversion :D

ajaidev
03-14-2009, 12:02 AM
Also chew*s TT Big Typhoon:)

An ES chip huh :rolleyes: which is 3.2 Ghz at birth may bear a FX logo on the box.

What ever the case the fact that it can reach almost 4Ghz with a TT Big Typhoon is quite impressive to say the least and we need something like this to counter the new stepping of the i7 920. "Ya ya i know PhII= C2Q & != i7"

chew*
03-14-2009, 12:07 AM
An ES chip huh :rolleyes: which is 3.2 Ghz at birth may bear a FX logo on the box.

What ever the case the fact that it can reach almost 4Ghz with a TT Big Typhoon is quite impressive to say the least and we need something like this to counter the new stepping of the i7 920. "Ya ya i know PhII= C2Q & != i7"

It has an unlocked multi......It can be set at any speed....preety sure it defaults at 2.4 ;) not 3.2

Dumo
03-14-2009, 12:17 AM
the Ultra 120 xtreme conversion :DThis cooler already touched many generation of AMD:D

chew*
03-14-2009, 12:20 AM
I think I even tossed that on some 754 chips at one point......before that was 462 and my thermalright and alpha pal......alpha pal was better at not chipping cores. That and the home made waterchiller.

ajaidev
03-14-2009, 12:21 AM
It has an unlocked multi......It can be set at any speed....preety sure it defaults at 2.4 ;) not 3.2

Well the fact that its total cache is 8MB on top of that it is DDR3 on top of that its AM3 and if it was 2.4Ghz "Really" it would have already launched as a part of the PhII 8xx range.


Also the voltage seems to be very good for a low end 2.4Ghz part.

chew*
03-14-2009, 12:22 AM
Well the fact that its total cache is 8MB on top of that it is DDR3 on top of that its AM3 and if it was 2.4Ghz "Really" it would have already launched as a part of the PhII 8xx range.

If it is a new part of the 9xx range how does it posses such a high multiplier :eek:

Also the voltage seems to be very good for a low end 2.4Ghz part.

940 BE has a high multi, 720 be has a high multi.....all es chips have unlocked multis........even chips that were destined to be LE 1200's....

ajaidev
03-14-2009, 12:26 AM
This cooler already touched many generation of AMD:D

You make that sound so so naughty :D Reminds me of Michal Jackson's parody from some show. :shrug:


I think I even tossed that on some 754 chips at one point......before that was 462 and my thermalright and alpha pal......alpha pal was better at not chipping cores. That and the home made waterchiller.

What about 939 ?? lol

chew*
03-14-2009, 12:40 AM
You make that sound so so naughty :D Reminds me of Michal Jackson's parody from some show. :shrug:



What about 939 ?? lol

O yah but he knows I used that on 939, most of the time I was on phase or water though, the TTBT just binned all my chips.

Here's the same ES chip stock volts as you seemed curious. Max mine could prime without touching any voltage.

http://members.cox.net/bostonreefer3/esupdated.JPG

Dumo
03-14-2009, 12:50 AM
I think I even tossed that on some 754 chips at one point......before that was 462 and my thermalright and alpha pal......alpha pal was better at not chipping cores. That and the home made waterchiller.Still have that Alpha Pal:D
Palomino/t'bred core breaker if not careful...

http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/4523/screenshot050r.jpg

chew*
03-14-2009, 12:52 AM
I see a nice DI pot candidate :p: better not leave it at my house by accident

some oldies I still have lying around that you didn't see when you were here.

http://members.cox.net/bostonreefer4/oldies.jpg

_d_
03-14-2009, 04:32 PM
can't wait :D

imamage
03-15-2009, 10:37 AM
Its not 950/955. Its an ES chip.

It can go stable @ 3.6Ghz with stock Vcore, which any good retail 940 able to do it:)

Rig:
M4T deluxe / 2X1gb Diablo 2000 / Zippy 1200W

Dual Channe lDDR3 @ 1T ?! Nice RAM you got there :up:

HondaGuy
03-16-2009, 07:40 AM
Write up on Dumo : http://techreport.com/discussions.x/16583

'Phenom II X4 955' sample surfaces, is overclocked to 4GHz

Dumo from the XtremeSystems Forums shows the 955 engineering sample running at the stock 3.2GHz speed with a 1.25V voltage setting. At 1.45V with air cooling, the poster claims he was able to hit a cool 4GHz by pushing the HyperTransport speed from 200 to 250MHz—and he even has a screenshot to prove it. That screenshot shows Dumo also overclocked his memory to 1666MHz, which netted over 11GB/s of read bandwidth according to a Lavalys Everest benchmark.

The Phenom II X4 955 exists, and it's a pretty nice overclocker. At least, that's the impression you might get after reading a thread at the XtremeSystems Forums, in which a member has posted CPU-Z screenshots of the unannounced AMD processor running overclocked in the Windows 7 beta.

As you might remember, we last wrote about this purported Phenom II X4 955 two weeks ago. Back then, word was that the 3.2GHz quad-core CPU would hit stores in April, and that it would be a Socket AM3 part with a 125W thermal envelope and support for DDR3-1333 memory. That chip was also said to be a replacement for a 3.1GHz Phenom II X4 950, which AMD supposedly canceled because of better-than-expected yields.

chew*
03-16-2009, 07:47 AM
Write up on Dumo : http://techreport.com/discussions.x/16583

'Phenom II X4 955' sample surfaces, is overclocked to 4GHz

Dumo from the XtremeSystems Forums shows the 955 engineering sample running at the stock 3.2GHz speed with a 1.25V voltage setting. At 1.45V with air cooling, the poster claims he was able to hit a cool 4GHz by pushing the HyperTransport speed from 200 to 250MHz—and he even has a screenshot to prove it. That screenshot shows Dumo also overclocked his memory to 1666MHz, which netted over 11GB/s of read bandwidth according to a Lavalys Everest benchmark.

The Phenom II X4 955 exists, and it's a pretty nice overclocker. At least, that's the impression you might get after reading a thread at the XtremeSystems Forums, in which a member has posted CPU-Z screenshots of the unannounced AMD processor running overclocked in the Windows 7 beta.

As you might remember, we last wrote about this purported Phenom II X4 955 two weeks ago. Back then, word was that the 3.2GHz quad-core CPU would hit stores in April, and that it would be a Socket AM3 part with a 125W thermal envelope and support for DDR3-1333 memory. That chip was also said to be a replacement for a 3.1GHz Phenom II X4 950, which AMD supposedly canceled because of better-than-expected yields.

Nice Dumo :up:

They just lost some credibility though ( tech report ) sometimes misinformation is worse than none at all.

msimax
03-16-2009, 08:41 AM
:D:rofl:

Mechromancer
03-16-2009, 08:49 AM
I was about to comment on the fact that XS posts are deemed so important, they are shared with the world community on internationally known sites like Tech Report. Seems a lot of people have high expectations of AMD's next CPUs.

Dumo
03-16-2009, 09:09 AM
The fact is this cpu or upcoming AMD retail will be good. I believe in that

chew*
03-16-2009, 09:54 AM
/\ +1

ajaidev
03-16-2009, 12:47 PM
The fact is this cpu or upcoming AMD retail will be good. I believe in that

I also agree. The CPU market sucks now a days in retail at least. AMD has its canon's placed in the dead center market there is where most money is anyways. Most people tend to buy a affordable processor with performance rather than only performance. Also on top of these OEM's also seems to like the PhII so that can only mean good things for the old green. :D

I really don't know what people do buying processors like the i965, etc. If you are a enthuse you should be able to OC a i920 to reach near i965 performance. Not only Intel even some highly priced AMD FX processors were similar in the "who gives a crap about money" category :shakes: .

mngdew
03-16-2009, 02:17 PM
Its not 950/955. Its an ES chip.

It can go stable @ 3.6Ghz with stock Vcore, which any good retail 940 able to do it:)

Rig:
M4T deluxe / 2X1gb Diablo 2000 / Zippy 1200W


Either I'm very unlucky or doing something wrong. I've tested at least 10 940's and none of them could do 3.6ghz with stock Vcore. Does having all memory slot occupied (total 8Gb) affect the overclockability?

mngdew
03-16-2009, 02:18 PM
I also agree. The CPU market sucks now a days in retail at least. AMD has its canon's placed in the dead center market there is where most money is anyways. Most people tend to buy a affordable processor with performance rather than only performance. Also on top of these OEM's also seems to like the PhII so that can only mean good things for the old green. :D

I really don't know what people do buying processors like the i965, etc. If you are a enthuse you should be able to OC a i920 to reach near i965 performance. Not only Intel even some highly priced AMD FX processors were similar in the "who gives a crap about money" category :shakes: .

Better take a look at this article before jumping into a conclusion. AMD might have to hold the aim for a long time.

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=14588

chew*
03-16-2009, 02:45 PM
Either I'm very unlucky or doing something wrong. I've tested at least 10 940's and none of them could do 3.6ghz with stock Vcore. Does having all memory slot occupied (total 8Gb) affect the overclockability?

I would at least try pulling 2 sticks and see if it makes a diff ;) temps have a lot to do with as well.

knopflerbruce
03-16-2009, 04:24 PM
940 BE has a high multi, 720 be has a high multi.....all es chips have unlocked multis........even chips that were destined to be LE 1200's....

I have a couple of ES chips "floating around" here: My 3 B0 Phenom/Barcelona I ES's run at 1.6GHz... I wish they were unlocked, the way they perform at stock an OC'ed 9850BE would beat both Barcelonas in a socket F mobo:p: Same with my X2 4600+ socket 939 ES. Not unlocked, but it's no doubt an ES. I also have a socket 940 ES, and old Sledgehammer. 2Ghz stock, not unlocked. Ah... and the 2 socket 754 ES's... 9 and 10 multi, and nothing more. I have an FX57 ES and a Phenom 9900 ES. Both unlocked, but that's not so shocking I think.;)

I'm curious about the "part number" of this 945 ES. It's pretty straight forward to find out the stock speed then.:) Which will help us deciding what PN it may have when it's released as a retail chip.

PaganII
03-16-2009, 05:31 PM
I bought an AM3 board and 720be to set up so when the faster 4 cores arrive I'll be ready to drop one in.

Bought a 2nd hand 939pin X2 3800 a year or so ago and kinda remember seeing an ES in CPUZ. Remember 1 core running warmer than the other. Guy probably sold me one that "dropped of the truck".

tbone8ty
03-16-2009, 07:35 PM
so im confused which processors will be able to use both ddr2 and ddr3 memory?


or is that just a myth

bingo13
03-16-2009, 07:51 PM
Either I'm very unlucky or doing something wrong. I've tested at least 10 940's and none of them could do 3.6ghz with stock Vcore. Does having all memory slot occupied (total 8Gb) affect the overclockability?

Since you are running 8GBs of memory, one would assume you are also running XP/Vista 64. If that is the case, the 64-bit OS actually makes a huge difference in your clock rates and voltages. Clock rates will be down compared to Vista 32/XP Pro SP3 while voltages will need to be increased to improve stability at like clock rates.

Daveburt714
03-16-2009, 09:18 PM
so im confused which processors will be able to use both ddr2 and ddr3 memory?


or is that just a myth

All AM3 chips have working IMC's for DDR2 or DDR3, depending on the mobo you put them in. I'm not sure, but I don't think you can mix the memory (even if the board has slots for both). Pretty sure it has to be one or the other...

Bingo13 is online right now, if anyone would know for sure that would be the man with the answer... :p:

Brother Esau
03-16-2009, 09:35 PM
Hey, Fellas what is ETA on 945 BEand new X3 BE Chips Please?

Daveburt714
03-16-2009, 09:52 PM
For what it's worth BroE, Fudzilla says we can expect new chips in April. Although it doesn't particulary mention the 945 it does say to expect chips in the 3.1Ghz range.

It's Fudzilla, so take it with a grain of salt, but it sounds like we will see some new chips next month. :D

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12480&Itemid=66

xVeinx
03-16-2009, 09:57 PM
Except the 910 was supposed to be released in Februrary. The price of the 940 is dropping though, so they are likely trying to phase it out soon, making way for the 945...

chew*
03-16-2009, 10:19 PM
Hey, Fellas what is ETA on 945 BEand new X3 BE Chips Please?

If we knew and also had permission we would say.....we honestly don't know though...

Zeus
03-16-2009, 11:31 PM
Somebody, hook me up with one of these chips! Me likes!!

Smartidiot89
03-17-2009, 09:04 AM
Phenom II x4 945 3,1ghz AM3 has been slated, it won't be released (due to better then expected yields?).

Instead we'll get Phenom II x4 955 AM3 3,2ghz which will be released on the 20th of April :D It will still be rated at 125W TDP.

tbone8ty
03-17-2009, 05:24 PM
All AM3 chips have working IMC's for DDR2 or DDR3, depending on the mobo you put them in. I'm not sure, but I don't think you can mix the memory (even if the board has slots for both). Pretty sure it has to be one or the other...

Bingo13 is online right now, if anyone would know for sure that would be the man with the answer... :p:

cool cause i wanted to wait to upgrade to this cpu (955) rather than get the 940, so i can upgrade to ddr3 later on down the line...

wiak
03-18-2009, 12:57 AM
cool cause i wanted to wait to upgrade to this cpu (955) rather than get the 940, so i can upgrade to ddr3 later on down the line...
same here thats why i skiped the 940, atm i got a 9850 BE ;)

the scaling is not bad
http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/amd_phenom_ii/crysis-oc.gif
source is is LostCircuits review of 940 (http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=51&Itemid=1&limit=1&limitstart=17)

charged3800z24
03-18-2009, 09:45 AM
@ Dumo

Man, I did a search today for Phenom II 955 on google and your screenshots are all over the net.

charged3800z24
03-18-2009, 11:13 AM
same here thats why i skiped the 940, atm i got a 9850 BE ;)

the scaling is not bad
source is is LostCircuits review of 940 (http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=51&Itemid=1&limit=1&limitstart=17)

What I found interesting while looking through the whole review was this...
SSE4 enhancemnet on vs off... Notice that it seems even Intel's CPU's benifit from it being off. Look how well the Phenom 940 does compared.
Source = http://www.lostcircuits.com/mambo//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=51&Itemid=1&limit=1&limitstart=12
SSE4 on
http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/amd_phenom_ii/vdub1.gif

SSE4 off
http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/amd_phenom_ii/vdub2.gif

Zeus
03-18-2009, 11:31 AM
@ Dumo

Man, I did a search today for Phenom II 955 on google and your screenshots are all over the net.


Its not 950/955. Its an ES chip.

How funny is that? :ROTF:

charged3800z24
03-18-2009, 01:19 PM
How funny is that? :ROTF:

I know.. It seems everyone is pulling crap out of there hat to have a way to get hits on there site. :yepp:

dennilfloss
03-18-2009, 04:35 PM
ES or not, that does sound like a mighty sweet chip. :yepp:

Dumo
03-21-2009, 09:39 AM
Set up

http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/6800/screenshot003laa.jpg

+4G with 1.45Vcore air...

http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/8986/screenshot005esc.jpg

Spi 32M AMD's time...

http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/7070/screenshot006cgt.jpg

chew*
03-21-2009, 09:51 AM
That chip with that heatsink is making other heatsinks look stupid :p:

Ahh is that an old x1800/1900 card dumo? gotta let me borrow that for a little while ;) still got a couple "special" bios's for those cards

Dumo
03-21-2009, 09:57 AM
Yep. A good combo with your TT the bear:)

Smartidiot89
03-21-2009, 10:10 AM
Besides the graphiccard, was is that other card you have next to it? :O

chew*
03-21-2009, 10:30 AM
Besides the graphiccard, was is that other card you have next to it? :O

Port 80 diagnostic card, a must have tool for any serious overclocker.....probably seen mine in a few shots of my board as well.

Dumo, I'm tackling something today so i'm busy but tommorow I'm going to see if I can whip up a decent mounting kit for our old phase units.

Very curious what the 720's can do under mach 1's :)

Dumo
03-21-2009, 10:38 AM
My runs with Mach II GT and Vapo LS been erratic because of mounting problems. Sometimes evap only covered 3/4 of cpu.

But if it dead center then NB clocking will be a breeze

Smartidiot89
03-21-2009, 10:40 AM
Port 80 diagnostic card, a must have tool for any serious overclocker.....probably seen mine in a few shots of my board as well.

Dumo, I'm tackling something today so i'm busy but tommorow I'm going to see if I can whip up a decent mounting kit for our old phase units.

Very curious what the 720's can do under mach 1's :)
Is it the same thing as i have on the bottom of my DFI mobo? :p:

chew*
03-21-2009, 11:45 AM
My runs with Mach II GT and Vapo LS been erratic because of mounting problems. Sometimes evap only covered 3/4 of cpu.

But if it dead center then NB clocking will be a breeze

Yep my mounitng kits should be perfect for good contact just need to have a day where I focus on that and that only.

Yah same thing your DFI comes with I guess. Some boards do some don't, that card is how I found out all the issues with both gigabyte boards.......

Smartidiot89
03-21-2009, 12:57 PM
Yep my mounitng kits should be perfect for good contact just need to have a day where I focus on that and that only.

Yah same thing your DFI comes with I guess. Some boards do some don't, that card is how I found out all the issues with both gigabyte boards.......
Thanks

Dumo
03-23-2009, 08:20 AM
4X1GB mem.
1.5 Vcore

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6241/screenshot017j.jpg

Dumo
03-23-2009, 08:43 AM
Cold will be next

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/2991/screenshot001mjg.jpg

chew*
03-23-2009, 08:47 AM
Dumo try to keep the PWM warm, hairdryer, or heatlamp or something to that effect, It will probably respond better the longer you are under cold.

_Manny_
03-23-2009, 11:02 AM
http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/showthread.php?p=3736320#post3736320

that's mine ;)

Dumo
03-23-2009, 10:37 PM
Nice runs there Manny:up:
Hows the NB clocking?

_Manny_
03-24-2009, 01:15 AM
I where @ 2600 mhz but on a m3a78 :( this afternoon I'll try to push it @ 4,4 all core on a m4a79-t deluxe

FlanK3r
03-24-2009, 01:47 AM
Dumo, how much can u get with 1.55V on AIR? 1.45V on AIR is nice, but its stable? And i hope for 4200 with 1.55V :)...

Dumo
03-24-2009, 02:37 AM
Dumo, how much can u get with 1.55V on AIR? 1.45V on AIR is nice, but its stable? And i hope for 4200 with 1.55V :)...I think the new 955 will overclock better than this ES. If you want to run >4.1Ghz then the best way is to go water cooling or Single Stage phase.

Any X4 cpu on air cooling will suffer from heat @ 4.1Ghz and thats not good.

Dumo
03-25-2009, 02:00 AM
DI

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/9754/screenshot019z.jpg

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7725/screenshot021.jpg

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9873/screenshot022bay.jpg

msimax
03-25-2009, 02:05 AM
run xp and retest

EnJoY
03-25-2009, 04:40 AM
@Dumo,

5GHz on DICE is NICE!!! :D

PcCI2iminal
03-25-2009, 04:48 AM
nice going Dumo :)

tell me ,the max HTT clk is 230MHz?

Dumo
03-25-2009, 06:16 AM
Thanks Enjoy, its just a beginning:)

@PC, It can go higher, but I just set it @ 230 for quick testing and it works nicely with ram clocking which I think is about the max for 7-6-5 on D9gtr

scope4live
07-07-2009, 04:04 AM
Dumo,
I am a professional musician using a PC for streaming audio for sampled instruments to mix with my synthesizers.
I love the way the AMD 770 board from Gigabyte looks and I am upgrading to that instead of the i7. I just don't need 2,3 or 4 PCI-e 16X slots.
I am confused on which RAM I should get.
I need to use the optimal speed for my apps which is 1800MHz.
I see you are deep into this as I am in my synthesizers.
I will only need to OC the system far enough to get the RAM ti a stable 1800MHz.
I will be using 4 x 2GB DIMM's.
I would really appreciate any help from you on this matter.

Thanks.



BTW, your help will keep the dance floors of the clubs in Vegas filled......:up:

muziqaz
07-07-2009, 11:02 AM
Dumo,
I am a professional musician using a PC for streaming audio for sampled instruments to mix with my synthesizers.
I love the way the AMD 770 board from Gigabyte looks and I am upgrading to that instead of the i7. I just don't need 2,3 or 4 PCI-e 16X slots.
I am confused on which RAM I should get.
I need to use the optimal speed for my apps which is 1800MHz.
I see you are deep into this as I am in my synthesizers.
I will only need to OC the system far enough to get the RAM ti a stable 1800MHz.
I will be using 4 x 2GB DIMM's.
I would really appreciate any help from you on this matter.

Thanks.



BTW, your help will keep the dance floors of the clubs in Vegas filled......:up:

at the moment none of the amd cpus support memory speeds above 1600mhz. 1600 is hard limit ;)

shadow_419
07-07-2009, 11:09 AM
at the moment none of the amd cpus support memory speeds above 1600mhz. 1600 is hard limit ;)

Not exactly a hard limit now is it?

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=3877285&postcount=20

muziqaz
07-07-2009, 11:23 AM
Not exactly a hard limit now is it?

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=3877285&postcount=20

and couple of mhz here and there does not count. chew ran his at what, 1672mhz? that is hardly amazing :)try doing 1800 or 2k :)

and he is asking about 8gb of ram, that is extra load on mobo and cpu and ram :)

scope4live
07-07-2009, 03:33 PM
For my needs 1600 Might work fine as long as the CL settings can be a stable 7 or 8.
Thanks for the insight.
BTW I will go 64bit by years end and will be using 16GB's w/ 4 x 4GB DIMM's.
Unfortunately my apps take advantage of huge RAM that sometimes can choke a desktop Mobo.
We have 100's of 1000's of buffers stored that allow us to have realtime ( low latency ) audio by triggering the first portion from RAM, then streaming the rest of the triggered notes from the HDD's.
Even though some posers claim RAID adds more polyphony or bandwidth, there really isn't a need unless you are playing 512 stereo tracks and mastering in real time.
I use a poweful 1U DSP rack full of ADP21369's for that.
Anyone who thinks CPU's are great at doing virtual synthesis should hear this.

http://www.cwaudio.de/en/products/xite-1.html

Thanks for the help guys, I am going with the Gigabyte 770 using the PCI-e 1X and save a bundle.
It seems like the X4 955 can handle a little bit of OC'ing to get the RAM up to 1600, so I will post it's success/failure within the month.

chew*
07-07-2009, 03:43 PM
and couple of mhz here and there does not count. chew ran his at what, 1672mhz? that is hardly amazing :)try doing 1800 or 2k :)

and he is asking about 8gb of ram, that is extra load on mobo and cpu and ram :)

http://www.techreaction.net/forums/showthread.php?t=712

1712 one set and 1760 another set done with 2x2gig a while ago

when you figure out how to get 2000 LMK ;)

OP Dumo has been MIA for awhile now, we lost contact with him.

muziqaz
07-07-2009, 03:45 PM
scope4live, if you want cas 7 at 1600, get OCZ Platinum AMD Edition
if you want cas8 at 1600, get OCZ Gold AMD Edition. These two kits will guaranty you those speeds. While other ram even from same company has difficulty playing nice at 1600 and need quite some tweaking :)
besides those two are Low Voltage kits :)

chew*
07-07-2009, 03:55 PM
yep thats the sets I use, they do 1680 rather easy, the Lv triple channel kit is tricky, am3 kit easier to tune.

muziqaz
07-07-2009, 04:10 PM
http://www.techreaction.net/forums/showthread.php?t=712

1712 one set and 1760 another set done with 2x2gig a while ago

when you figure out how to get 2000 LMK ;)

OP Dumo has been MIA for awhile now, we lost contact with him.


CHEW, the thing is: will you be able to run your PC 24/7 at those speeds stable? You can pull whatever numbers you want for a brief moment with a bit of luck. The guy is running some kind of music factory at his place, so he needs atmost stability from his system, and he will not be running super pi on his pc ;)
and 1600 is plenty at least for me, no need on going for those crazy speeds. And I do not need to try to get to 2k, we have Tony from OCZ for that :D
But I see I forgot that this is extreme systems forum, so forgive my a bit different point of view towards PC usage ;)

chew*
07-07-2009, 04:14 PM
CHEW, the thing is: will you be able to run your PC 24/7 at those speeds stable? You can pull whatever numbers you want for a brief moment with a bit of luck. The guy is running some kind of music factory at his place, so he needs atmost stability from his system, and he will not be running super pi on his pc ;)
and 1600 is plenty at least for me, no need on going for those crazy speeds. And I do not need to try to get to 2k, we have Tony from OCZ for that :D
But I see I forgot that this is extreme systems forum, so forgive my a bit different point of view towards PC usage ;)

You said try to hit 1800 then complain?

3 diff sets of ram aren't luck nor is 32m but whatever.

Super PI 32m is the choice for showing ram stability......15mins + not very brief.

I ;) becasue I think 2k is impossible

As far as ram for everyday Use I like my OCZ AM3 kit.

muziqaz
07-07-2009, 04:35 PM
I said 1800 and 2k. My point is, amd cpu officially support 1600, everything else is luck (some people call it a skill, but whatever). That is why you do not see any kits with speed above 1600 for amd. MSI gd70 has some numbers on the box saying memory speeds 2k+ or something, but everyone in the industry are saying that you will not see these speeds, unless amd will release new revision with tweaked MC or something. Unless you want to spend couple of days getting those extra mhz and not getting the performance boost. Instead try tightening the timings while staying within the limits of the CPU memory controller.
15mins is not 24/7 of crucial work. I here not to pick up a fight, just trying to help a person who needs an advice, that's it.
In couple of days I, myself will be testing my new rig (msi gd70, ocz platinum amd edition, 955be). I will make sure to try that magic 2000mhz :D

chew*
07-07-2009, 04:48 PM
I said 1800 and 2k. My point is, amd cpu officially support 1600, everything else is luck (some people call it a skill, but whatever). That is why you do not see any kits with speed above 1600 for amd. MSI gd70 has some numbers on the box saying memory speeds 2k+ or something, but everyone in the industry are saying that you will not see these speeds, unless amd will release new revision with tweaked MC or something. Unless you want to spend couple of days getting those extra mhz and not getting the performance boost. Instead try tightening the timings while staying within the limits of the CPU memory controller.
15mins is not 24/7 of crucial work. I here not to pick up a fight, just trying to help a person who needs an advice, that's it.
In couple of days I, myself will be testing my new rig (msi gd70, ocz platinum amd edition, 955be). I will make sure to try that magic 2000mhz :D

Yah I forsee a wall at 952 or at least thats where Titon hit a wall.

1904 effective no clue.

Gigabyte seems to have a lower wall around 1880.

Honestly that OCZ kit will run 1680 24/7, after that speed all bets are off its purely for benching.

There is a performance boost if timings are good at 1800......advanced tuning of ram is the only way it will happen so its not luck. you must realize i'm tuning for 6gig sometime's, what works well at 3.6-3.8 does not necessarily ring true at 6gig +.

I tested 1500 5-5-5 and it fell flat on its face at 6 gig..... 3.6- 4.0 it shined...

My bench partner has the same sticks as me could not hit 1800 I sent him a few pointers via AIM on tweaking and he hit 1800 as well.................

The truth of it is tighter and lower is just alot easier for the same performance limited to 3.6-4.0 gig cpu speeds........

Unfortuantely as I told Tony, I must lead 2 lives.....one of the hardcore bencher the other as the 24/7 stable rig....

scope4live
07-08-2009, 03:13 AM
I have been warned to stay away from the newest Elpida stuff that OCZ uses, but my key tech informed me assuming I was going with the usual Intel design I have used since '99.
Sure I am taking a chance and this is a mission critical set up.
I do all of this in real time live and blend it with analog synthesizers of yore for a truly immense amount of GFLOPS in DSP and CPU combined.
1800 is the utopian streaming speed but after some in house tests on the 790 Gigabyte board and 8GB's of RAM, we were noticing pops and clicks since the RAM is the second stage in the sub system, so backing it down to 1333 and CAS7 using 8GB's worked flawlessley but it does steal some of the sampled instruments voices when doing the high polyphony of a Grand Piano with a symphony sized string section ( 32 violins ).
I think tonight he will push it back up to 1600 and try again.
But this is GSkill 1066 RAM at CAS 7.
I suppose a higher rated RAM like OCZ will help that out.
This sure is fun though.
After 3500 USD for a DSP soundcard the idea of an entire new DAW using the AMD 955 and 770 mobo w/ 4U atx chassis and all new parts for under 1000 USD is most refreshing.
The very first CPU I used when I started this :banana::banana::banana::banana: in'99 was 1 GHz Coppermine. The CPU alone cost me 1099 USD,..........so it's my turn to thank AMD for keeping Intel honest.

Thanks Guys.


JAV

muziqaz
07-08-2009, 03:36 AM
I am very curious about that 'staying away from elpida' part. can you elaborate? All i know, that those AMD edition kits are 100% guaranty to you that they will work at advertised speeds at advertised timings. if it says 1600c7 it will work at that speed. Sure you can try other stuff from other companies and even from OCZ themselves but you will have to spend some time tweaking the memory to work at certain speeds.

scope4live
07-08-2009, 07:42 AM
My DAW buddy is a pro video archiver here in LV and has some incredibly powerful Xeons w/ RAID 3 cards and SAS drives. So he's pretty up to snuff w/ the video stuff and lets me tinker with his audio/video apps which most are streamer based.
But for his gaming box he just sent back 2 x sets of high end triple channel RAM with low latency @ 2000 that used Elpida chips whatever that is. One set being defective wouldn't have raised an eyebrow both both sets seem to be untested and sold.
Seems as though lot's of this is happening during an econmy where everyone is cutting costs. R & D cutbacks are not wise, but QC seems logical to me.
I won't ever need that RAM until developers jump into the technology and actually optimize for SSE4, etc. Audio developers are just now getting around to 64bit and core assignments on quads.
I do have one more question though if you got time.
I have always bought RAM based on the stock voltage of the motherboard.
Would I be wise to keep that in mind or go ahead and get the RAM that is advertised at 1.65v to 1.9v in hopes the AND 770 chipset & BIOS will OC to a higher stable voltage.
Sorry it's my first time doing this and my friend is only knowledgable w/ dual i7 Macs and Xeons mostly. The i7 is his first gaming rig so he still isn't up to snuff, and it's even possible the RAM troubles he is having could be a mistake on his part.
Anyways the voltage thing is still confusing me a little.
On old Intel boards we had trouble posting if the RAM voltage wasn't identical.


Thanks Brotha' Man...:cool:

muziqaz
07-08-2009, 08:01 AM
as I told you before. OCZ amd edition ram will work as advertised, that is speed, timings and volts, although depending on motherboard you might need to add 0.0something volts to ram, but not more.
regarding Elpida chips, you are comparing some ram manufacturer who provides memory to apple with OCZ who are known to us as one of the best memory manufacturers and they are liked by most of us because they really deliver and their customer service is brilliant. with their ram you get lifetime warranty, and I am sure that they test their memory extensively :)

scope4live
07-08-2009, 01:14 PM
Sorry for requiring the extra assurance on the AMD choice.
And I have had OCZ Gold series before so I know they make great products.
The RAM I spoke of was 2000+ Triple Channel Kits for the gaming i7.
The Dual Xeon PC and Dual Nehalem MacPro are custom built and tweaking around with those will void the generous warranty and service provided from Avid.
He is tweaking his i7 gaming rig and is interested in water cooling, etc. Stuff I am sure is fun and rewarding but not really good for a stable 24/7 audio DAW.
The AMD DAW is going to be fun and I can't remember the last time I paid 175USD for 8GB;s of RAM.
I should actually stay in XP32 and make 2 of these w/ 4GB's and and access more RAM w/ the 3GB PAE Switch I currently use.

Thanks For The Help....

CiaoMein.

salad
07-08-2009, 01:40 PM
I have been warned to stay away from the newest Elpida stuff that OCZ uses, but my key tech informed me assuming I was going with the usual Intel design I have used since '99.
JAV

http://www.tweaktown.com/news/12636/elpida_hyper_memory_deaths_reported/index.html
http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=3596

Elpida Hyper chips have been having problems apparently. Corsair GT was just pulled off the market

muziqaz
07-08-2009, 03:10 PM
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/12636/elpida_hyper_memory_deaths_reported/index.html
http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=3596

Elpida Hyper chips have been having problems apparently. Corsair GT was just pulled off the market

I wonder what is OCZ stance in this. I just bought 8gb of platinum amd edition. Will see what happens :) they use elpida.

scope4live
07-08-2009, 05:24 PM
Well the advice was correctamundo.
The locally bought RAM was 30 bucks more but whats a few bucks when it comes to a mean lean audio machine.
I have just recieved a call that I can come by and test the machine.
It is running everything in 64bit right now but the RAM tip works fine according to the builder. My apps are mostly 32bit but a few are 64bit and they are working under XP64 with no troubles.
I really hope I can upgrade next year to the 4GB DIMM's for 16GB total in Windows 7.
I hate M$ but being able to assign cores efficiently is really useful for multiple audio apps.
If I feel the need to OC the 770 for extra juice I hope you guys don't mind a moron like me asking for more tips.
It seems like you guys know your hardware.

BTW how do you post a jpeg here when it asks for a URL and I only have a camera and HDD pictures?
I could show you guys how happy the 770 looks inside of a 4U ATX chassis.
I use 4 x Raptor 150's in a SATA RAID cage but only because the silence and cooling are needed, not the RAID.

Anyways thanks again and as Douglas MacArthur said............I shall return.
:cool:

shadow_419
07-08-2009, 05:30 PM
Upload the picture to an online hosting like image shack or photo bucket and put the direct link url in the box when prompted. I'd love to get a look at what it looks like.

muziqaz
07-09-2009, 02:41 AM
scope4live. At the moment it a challenge to run 8GB (4x2gb) in an AMD box at reasonable speeds(though OCZ does that at 1600c7), but I would think that it will be a bit bigger challenge to get to work 16gb of ram in 770 motherboard :)

salad
07-09-2009, 02:43 AM
I wonder what is OCZ stance in this. I just bought 8gb of platinum amd edition. Will see what happens :) they use elpida.

It's just the Elpida "Hypers" apparently, not every Elpida.

muziqaz
07-09-2009, 02:47 AM
It's just the Elpida "Hypers" apparently, not every Elpida.

hopefully you are right :)

scope4live
07-09-2009, 10:09 AM
scope4live. At the moment it a challenge to run 8GB (4x2gb) in an AMD box at reasonable speeds(though OCZ does that at 1600c7), but I would think that it will be a bit bigger challenge to get to work 16gb of ram in 770 motherboard :)

Well that's the beauty of AMD. If it doesn't work, the price to build another is so ridiculously cheap and powerful I will have no problem building 2 x w/ 8GB's.

But I am getting ahead of myself here. The most important app. I use for streaming is still in BETA for it's 64bit upgrade. I will upgrade by the end of summer. I don't think that I will see problems in 64bit w/ 8GB's, but 16GB's is a crapshoot. People who do what I am doing spend thousands on i7 and Dual Xeon builds.
Pro builders who design DAW's for big production facilities of course want me to spend 5 large on a DAW while they laugh about the AMD. " You're going to have crashes Live.....OMG."
They are just pissing on my back and trying to tell me that's it's raining.
5 Large for a simple streaming DAW.................that Dog Don't Hunt.
If I fail, I shall be quiet, but if this DAW works, even though the Gods tell me it won't, I should start building these for 2 grand and steal the business from these Intel/Mac elitists.

So It Shall Be Written, So It Shall Be Done.............Yuil Brennar as Ramsees the II in Exodus........ MGM Universal 1956.