View Full Version : Highest DDR3 freq ever...?
M.Beier
04-09-2008, 04:37 PM
Ohh, one of them darn lame topics by me :)
Im wondering, what is the highest freq ever hit on DDR3 ???
Thing is, I've never seen anything above 1210, yet, but I've only seen results with relatively tight timings....
Someone I know who visited Cebit spoke with some memory companies, and an engineer mentioned 1400mhz had been hit in the labs..... Do you find this realistic...?
I dont know if I find this possible... If so... What kind of crazy NB will allow it? Or can it only have been in a DDR3 tester... (I know those units are 10,000 USD+ :mad: )
Please enlighten me..
Kunaak
04-09-2008, 04:38 PM
http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php
M.Beier
04-09-2008, 04:41 PM
http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php
Thanks kunaak, I know that URL :)
Im told it was in a lab... Not public, thats why I ask in forum... Because maybe some of the ram-company representatives can reveal if its a false claim....
I can imagine that at the current state, NB is the main problem for DDR3...
1400mhz DDR3-2800 is quite high....
EDIT:
Before any asumptions are made, I can tell, it wasnt in planet reseller... So no, not that company :p:
Kasparz
04-10-2008, 12:33 AM
Ohh, one of them darn lame topics by me :)
Im wondering, what is the highest freq ever hit on DDR3 ???
Thing is, I've never seen anything above 1210, yet, but I've only seen results with relatively tight timings....
Someone I know who visited Cebit spoke with some memory companies, and an engineer mentioned 1400mhz had been hit in the labs..... Do you find this realistic...?
I dont know if I find this possible... If so... What kind of crazy NB will allow it? Or can it only have been in a DDR3 tester... (I know those units are 10,000 USD+ :mad: )
1200MHz is really realistic. I've done 1150MHz CL7 and little higher with CL10. Board was limit here, not memory. With proper X48 or nF790i 1200MHz would be very possible to do. Also, this was done on air, some cold on northbridge and memory for sure would add some healthy boost.
saaya
04-10-2008, 12:42 AM
for screenshots... :D
Kasparz
04-10-2008, 12:51 AM
No, for validations. Screenshots needs more stability :D
It can be done with FSB (and cold) loving 65nm dual cores :)
dinos22
04-10-2008, 02:13 AM
1400MHz is really realistic. I've done 1300MHz CL7 and little higher with CL10. Board was limit here, not memory. With proper X48 or nF790i 1400MHz would be very possible to do. Also, this was done on air, some cold on northbridge and memory for sure would add some healthy boost.
if i don't see any screens i don't believe it :p:
nut311
04-10-2008, 04:17 AM
1400MHz is really realistic. I've done 1300MHz CL7 and little higher with CL10. Board was limit here, not memory. With proper X48 or nF790i 1400MHz would be very possible to do. Also, this was done on air, some cold on northbridge and memory for sure would add some healthy boost.
i want screen....
saaya
04-10-2008, 04:29 AM
No, for validations. Screenshots needs more stability :Dhehehe :D you were joking right?
well the problem is, if you know how, you can get validations of 3000+ since the cpuz validation was cracked apparently :(
but im sure thats not what you mean, or was it? :D
Kasparz
04-10-2008, 06:55 AM
i want screen....
There is thread about it.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=180672
if i don't see any screens i don't believe it :p:
You always don't believe everything i say, i said D9JNL is good, you said crap. Oh yeah, that crap gets binned at 2GHz. Don't believe everything you seen at Corsair or STT labs.
dinos22
04-10-2008, 04:27 PM
There is thread about it.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=180672
You always don't believe everything i say, i said D9JNL is good, you said crap. Oh yeah, that crap gets binned at 2GHz. Don't believe everything you seen at Corsair or STT labs.
lol
does your computer not load smilies
overclockerd
04-26-2008, 10:03 AM
http://valid.x86-secret.com/records.php wow! these are some nice records as i can see:)