Martinm210
02-10-2008, 06:11 PM
Just ran a little experiment logging my crystal fontz, TAT, and Coretemp all at the same time to feel out the differences in the results.
This was just a simple 90 minute idle run with a D-Tek Fuzion all stock
Here is the big picture, a bit of a mess...
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/1738/tatvscoretemp1tk6.png
And to get a better picture of a short period of time to see the fluctuations in TAT and CoreTemp:
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/274/tatvscoretemp2wl6.png
Hmm I thought, it's been a long time since doing any statistics stuff, maybe I can make sense of this another way. So here that is:
First TAT
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/3948/tatvscoretemp3qe0.png
Then CoreTemp
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/5702/tatvscoretemp4gn4.png
In the end, I guess neither one is as consistent as I had hoped, no wonder people have a hard time picking a result by watching it.
Seems at least with this one test, CoreTemp is very slightly more stable as indicated by the smaller standard deviations.
What bothers me with both of them is the distribution to one side. The little spikes off to one edge of the mean should theoretically be the same on both sides. I can only guess there is some sort of wierd CPU internal interference causing this.
Not much you can do about it, but average it out I suppose...:confused:
I guess more important may be running the exact same test again and comparing water/core delta from one run to the next and seeing what the percentage of repeatability is...:confused:
Also noteworthy is how TAT gave a larger deviation between cores than CoreTemp. And they were all recorded at the same time, yet a good 1 degree difference there..:shrug:
This was just a simple 90 minute idle run with a D-Tek Fuzion all stock
Here is the big picture, a bit of a mess...
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/1738/tatvscoretemp1tk6.png
And to get a better picture of a short period of time to see the fluctuations in TAT and CoreTemp:
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/274/tatvscoretemp2wl6.png
Hmm I thought, it's been a long time since doing any statistics stuff, maybe I can make sense of this another way. So here that is:
First TAT
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/3948/tatvscoretemp3qe0.png
Then CoreTemp
http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/5702/tatvscoretemp4gn4.png
In the end, I guess neither one is as consistent as I had hoped, no wonder people have a hard time picking a result by watching it.
Seems at least with this one test, CoreTemp is very slightly more stable as indicated by the smaller standard deviations.
What bothers me with both of them is the distribution to one side. The little spikes off to one edge of the mean should theoretically be the same on both sides. I can only guess there is some sort of wierd CPU internal interference causing this.
Not much you can do about it, but average it out I suppose...:confused:
I guess more important may be running the exact same test again and comparing water/core delta from one run to the next and seeing what the percentage of repeatability is...:confused:
Also noteworthy is how TAT gave a larger deviation between cores than CoreTemp. And they were all recorded at the same time, yet a good 1 degree difference there..:shrug: