View Full Version : EVGA 780i /Qx9650 everything on Air
Hey guys
I'm back from FINALS with an overlock hope you guys like it
http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/7386/4ghzdonefy7.jpg
Highst temp undearload 50c:up:
Only Air cooled
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/9661/548043dmark2001hz5.jpg
What do you guys think?:D
systemviper
01-11-2008, 07:45 PM
I think those r some big pictures:shocked: , good work...
Robilar
01-11-2008, 08:39 PM
what you need is a better cpu cooler mate...
Antinomy
01-11-2008, 08:48 PM
I think, that bus 400 says nothing about the efficience of the ability of 780i to overclock quad core CPU. Lower the multi and rise the FSB towards 500, then this will be good. Cause the DFI P35 can do 475. And if 780 can beat this, it's good.
Chewbenator
01-11-2008, 08:56 PM
what you need is a better cpu cooler mate...
Uh? He does? ~25C bad temps for idle? 50C max bad?
Nice clock, where did you get your CPU?
Uh? He does? ~25C bad temps for idle? 50C max bad?
Nice clock, where did you get your CPU?
newegg OEM
dragonhunter
01-11-2008, 09:46 PM
Is that rock solid stable?
Nice clock!!!
Robilar
01-11-2008, 09:52 PM
Uh? He does? ~25C bad temps for idle? 50C max bad?
Nice clock, where did you get your CPU?
he has a zalman 9700 in his sig. If he's not using that for his "air" testing then what is he using?
Leeghoofd
01-12-2008, 03:02 AM
I think, that bus 400 says nothing about the efficience of the ability of 780i to overclock quad core CPU. Lower the multi and rise the FSB towards 500, then this will be good. Cause the DFI P35 can do 475. And if 780 can beat this, it's good.
Why does everybody think a new mobo is able to push the CPU's further then where we are at now ? most Yorkfields have a lower or similar FSB limit then the older kentsfields... most top out at 460-480 with normal (air/water) cooling. Today we are more CPU limited in regards of FSB wall then mobo limited...
Bu tot be honest I'm really not impressed with that performance ( CPU looks good though ), SuperPI is way slow (I know it's an Nvidia chipset), 3dmark with 8800GTX in SLI is really bad (Bad Vista support ?) What frequency is ya ram running at ? somehting is a not okay here...
I score 69K with a single GTX and a Q6600 at 4ghz, SuperPI is around 13min mark on an Intel P35... that's under WinXP Pro 64 though...
CLPDJ
01-12-2008, 04:32 AM
try to go on high fsb's... i wold like to know the maximum fsb that the evga780i can go on a qx9650... nomaly x38 mobos go to 450 +- ... let go C.Ron7aldo
ntw: Cristiano Ronaldo is portuguese just like me :D
joe.denice
01-12-2008, 04:16 PM
hey, what would be a good price for selling off an oem qx9650??
tet5uo
01-12-2008, 06:01 PM
hey, what would be a good price for selling off an oem qx9650??
900 bones?
joe.denice
01-12-2008, 06:15 PM
ok well i have one for sale then. also a evga 780i board as well.
HEy guys long time
Ok I'm back with Another Overclock
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/5970/41ghzdonema5.jpg
I tryed 1680 FSB (420) cant load windows i think the board cant handel it:shakes: .
I could be wrong cuz i'm runing 800mhz RAM i overclocked it to 1026mhz cant even load windows (i incrased the Voltage to V2.0).
I even unlinked the RAM and still Windows wount load.:down:
aaanyway... i'm a rocky overlocker would love some Xpert opinion:shrug:
here is my 3DMrake2006 Score
http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/2992/199553dmark2006tt9.jpg
Highst Temp 55C
These are my temps on stock clock
http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/3441/normaltempsbm0.jpg
All Fans On High and The room Window is opend :P
Speederlander
01-13-2008, 08:13 PM
That 32M Spi time seems slow for 4 GHz....
Maybe that's a 780i + Vista effect?
AriciU
01-13-2008, 08:19 PM
Your 3dmark01 score is lower then mine (setup in my sig) by around 16000 points :eek: Tweak better mate. You have kickass parts but you can't just leave them untweaked.
Your 3dmark01 score is lower then mine (setup in my sig) by around 16000 points :eek: Tweak better mate. You have kickass parts but you can't just leave them untweaked.
i dont think 2001 work verygood with SLI whats ur 2006 score?
AriciU
01-14-2008, 11:23 AM
06 is useless for me (dual core). My 06 GFX scores (single GTX) are SM2.0 - 6231 ; HDR - 6559.
Either way, you should be getting over the 20k with your setup in 06 IMO.
EDIT: nevermind... just noticed that you are on Vista :D
xgman
01-14-2008, 01:52 PM
nice cpu temps/ you will need to bump up the vcore to get higher cpu speeds. With those temps I see you should have some room to go up a bit more.
nosboost300
01-16-2008, 07:26 PM
what are you gtx's clocked at?
Kunaak
01-16-2008, 07:40 PM
4 g's and a GTX and all you got was 54k?
4 g's and a GTX and all you got was 54k?
It´s on Vista, i get 56000K with my GTX@OC and 4GHz on CPU so SLi is not working in 3Dmark01 with Vista.
Itīs on Vista, i get 56000K with my GTX@OC and 4GHz on CPU so SLi is not working in 3Dmark01 with Vista.
Not working?
I think it requires a bit more investegation and tweaking, i don't see how sli would work in games but not in 3d mark.
It does work in 03 so why not in 01?
Not working?
I think it requires a bit more investegation and tweaking, i don't see how sli would work in games but not in 3d mark.
It does work in 03 so why not in 01?
Donīt know, but in this case it is not working since i get higher scores with only one GTX.
But my post was just a response on the question on low scores in 01
Leeghoofd
01-18-2008, 03:19 AM
Well something is a miss as with 4ghz and one GTX (650/1612/2000) I get 66K under XP, don't think Vista robs ya 10K, there must be more to look for...
http://users.pandora.be/OAP/3dmark2001N.JPG
That only goes to show how hard Vista stinks for benching.
I think when we can get Vista well tweaked the difference with XP will be much less.