PDA

View Full Version : APS@Home addition to the DC-vault



russkris
09-05-2007, 07:55 PM
G'day Everyone,

I have posted on the Vault forum. I have asked for people who currently run the project to post in the thread about it's UP's and DOWN's.

I really would like this project to be added to the DC-Vault..

So pop on by and post ya thoughts about APS
http://www.team-ninja.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=41598

RUSTY

vaio
09-05-2007, 11:54 PM
Hi Rusty :)

I tried it and processed a lil work but since then I have endlessly received "no work from project" message.

From what I gather the work gets distributed in lil batches rather than a constant flow.

EG: Just this minute tried a connect:

06/09/2007 08:55:12|APS@Home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user
06/09/2007 08:55:12|APS@Home|Requesting 1731949 seconds of new work
06/09/2007 08:55:18|APS@Home|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 511]
06/09/2007 08:55:18|APS@Home|Deferring communication for 7 sec
06/09/2007 08:55:18|APS@Home|Reason: requested by project
06/09/2007 08:55:18|APS@Home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
06/09/2007 08:55:18|APS@Home|Reason: no work from project


Ho hum.

Paladin
09-06-2007, 12:48 AM
Hey, I've seen projects like that which are already Vaulted.



9/6/2007 1:38:36 AM|boincsimap|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work
9/6/2007 1:38:36 AM|boincsimap|Requesting 18824 seconds of new work
9/6/2007 1:38:41 AM|boincsimap|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 511]
9/6/2007 1:38:41 AM|boincsimap|Deferring communication for 58 min 45 sec
9/6/2007 1:38:41 AM|boincsimap|Reason: no work from project

vaio
09-06-2007, 12:50 AM
Indeed.

I've been waiting for this one (http://cleanenergy.harvard.edu/go/?ira=participate) to get going....looks interesting.

[XC] DragonOrta
09-06-2007, 07:38 PM
Hey, I've seen projects like that which are already Vaulted.



EoN springs to mind.

Paladin
09-07-2007, 12:56 AM
I've been waiting for this one (http://cleanenergy.harvard.edu/go/?ira=participate) to get going....looks interesting.

Hehe, that one seems a bit "at odds" with itself. In order to save electricity a large group of people are expected to leave their computers on 24/7 at 100% cpu usages. ;)