PDA

View Full Version : 3DM2001 low clock challenge



Micutzu
05-29-2007, 06:44 AM
I know we need a thread like this, so here it is :D.

This is all about skills showoff, and the rules are pretty simple: try to get the best possible 3DM01 score at given clocks for CPU and VGA. Singlecard scores only, any FSB / RAM / video shader clocks are allowed.

The limit for CPU's should be 3.6Ghz as almost any Core 2 Duo can do it. After some dicussions I've settled to the following limits for VGA's:

8800Ultra - 711/1200
8800GTX - 661/1100
8800GTS - 661/1000
HD2900XT - 870/1025

They are a little difficult to get on completely stock cards but doable with voltmods on stock coolers, enough to make the challenge a bit harder but still available to as many people as possible.

This is limited only to current gen highend cards as i don't have the time to update the ranking all the time. That won't stop you to submit well tweaked scores with any type of cards though ;).

RANKING


8800Ultra 711/1200
71620 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2251981&postcount=64) - k|ngp|n
71104 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2242333&postcount=58) - Micutzu
71005 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2226326&postcount=33) - elmor
67136 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2339189&postcount=110) - NapalmV5

8800GTX 661/1100
69832 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2257654&postcount=75) - sang
69736 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2253746&postcount=70) - Micutzu
68804 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2263959&postcount=79) - Gorod
68413 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2271425&postcount=86) - pasatoiutd
67754 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2258071&postcount=76) - bonzo_catalin
67745 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2229220&postcount=39) - gandalfone
67164 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2310513&postcount=108) - GazC

8800GTS 661/1000
65337 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2272323&postcount=91) - Moonman
64371 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2272942&postcount=93) - lasse.j5
64197 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2272339&postcount=92) - giorgos th.
62225 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2255648&postcount=73) - memory

HD2900XT 870/1025
67580 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2264385&postcount=80) - GHZ
67454 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2261349&postcount=78) - sang
67399 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2258307&postcount=77) - andre X_X
66520 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2273979&postcount=95) - 1Day
66190 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2242218&postcount=54) - Gautam
65454 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2343495&postcount=113) - funkflix

Micutzu
05-29-2007, 06:47 AM
And to give the go-ahead, here's a start score on DDR3 platform. So far it's way slower than good DDR2.

E6700 @ 3.6Ghz
8800U @ 700/1200
2x1GB DDR3 @ 720Mhz 6-7-6-18

69523 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9207094)

BenchZowner
05-29-2007, 06:55 AM
8800GTX @ 660/1100

Setting the GPU Freq at 660MHz for all standard 8800GTX's results in 648MHz real op. frequency.
So 648MHz core clock for the 8800GTXs, right ?

N3RO
05-29-2007, 07:21 AM
The limit for CPU's should be 3.6Ghz as almost any Core 2 Duo can do it. 8800GTX @ 660/1100 or 8800Ultra @ 700/1200 is OK (each in a separate class), i still haven't seen enough R600's around but we could set some limit-clocks for them too if necessary.

1100MHz for mems it's a bit higher.... maybe 1040 it's a good spot to everyone ;)

DEVIL K-ce
05-29-2007, 07:51 AM
Setting the GPU Freq at 660MHz for all standard 8800GTX's results in 648MHz real op. frequency.
So 648MHz core clock for the 8800GTXs, right ?

Right :) The same situation with 8800 Ultra


1100MHz for mems it's a bit higher.... maybe 1040 it's a good spot to everyone ;)

Yes, 1040-1060MHz is ok, 1100MHz some [ not moded ] GTX not can do.


btw ; :rofl: 700GPU for Ultra at this moment ( pretty hot ) also on night is not posible for me ( not only me :rolleyes: ) :( Max I can do 660/1130MHz :shrug:

Martin

phelan1777
05-29-2007, 08:08 AM
What about 8800GTS?

I know I can get decent (8800 GTX Single) card scores on my GTS SLI ;)

Have not run Single card and my Quad core. That and I have yet to see if I can get stable @ 3.6

Though I have a E6300 that should be able to get to 3.6

burton
05-29-2007, 09:14 AM
Yea can the GTS guys play along?

andre X_X
05-29-2007, 09:49 AM
this is my R600 result, just to compare... it still Stock Clock though... 65k-66k still achievable, but 68k will be challenging...

http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/6766/2k1defaultmi1.png

M.Beier
05-29-2007, 09:57 AM
Hey man, is my X1900XTX that much outta' style ? :p:

Im in if class will become crowded :)

funkflix
05-29-2007, 01:03 PM
I try to compare with my GX2. :)

http://www.abload.de/img/zwischenablage02xb1.jpg

Viss
05-30-2007, 02:01 AM
An old one with stock X1950XTX.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v292/Viss1/20016005-5-5small.jpg

sang
05-30-2007, 03:52 PM
nice thread,little one :)
20 minutes and a very few setting gave me this:
http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/4513/3dbbqk8.th.png (http://img236.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3dbbqk8.png)

though shaders are a bit low.

Micutzu
05-30-2007, 08:42 PM
Setting the GPU Freq at 660MHz for all standard 8800GTX's results in 648MHz real op. frequency.
So 648MHz core clock for the 8800GTXs, right ?

Those were just some round clocks, i've edited now so you can enter with 661Mhz for GTX and 711Mhz for Ultra.
Not anyone can do those limit-clocks on stock cards but with voltmodded cards it's easy even with stock cooling. A good tweaker won't be stopped by a voltmod here and there.

All in all, let's warm up the competition a little bit, shall we ?

BenchZowner
05-31-2007, 02:38 AM
Agreed ;)

hipro5
06-01-2007, 01:33 AM
I'll be here but with the 8800GTX @ 621MHz coz the ultras are insulated now......and with ATI R600 too... :)

zakelwe
06-01-2007, 10:35 AM
Excellent idea

How about a 8800GTS comp with max clocks 600/1700 to see who can pull the most out of the masses ?

Regards

Andy

Gautam
06-01-2007, 10:39 AM
Great thread Micutzu. :D

phelan1777
06-01-2007, 10:50 AM
I'll be here but with the 8800GTX @ 621MHz coz the ultras are insulated now......and with ATI R600 too... :)

no see your level of OCing experience and sick benches should not be able to stomp on us little guys, hell most of us are struggling with a 20-50% OC............not the monster 80%-100%OCs :nono: .


Excellent idea

How about a 8800GTS comp with max clocks 600/1700 to see who can pull the most out of the masses ?

Regards

Andy

For real? Those of us that have GTS are we not qualified? Also those of us that are SLI GTS? Cause I KNOW I can run @ least @ Stock GTX Speeds

BenchZowner
06-01-2007, 10:57 AM
Sure we can add the GTSs in the mix as well ;)

p.s. silently goes away, awaiting the ultra to arrive :D

zakelwe
06-01-2007, 11:24 AM
no see your level of OCing experience and sick benches should not be able to stomp on us little guys, hell most of us are struggling with a 20-50% OC............not the monster 80%-100%OCs :nono: .



For real? Those of us that have GTS are we not qualified? Also those of us that are SLI GTS? Cause I KNOW I can run @ least @ Stock GTX Speeds


I think you miss the point compeltely, this is not who can get the most overclock it is about the best result at a certain achievable frequencies so showing good tweaking skills, hence why I suggested 600/1700 GTS scores. Mind you how do you stop cheating ?

Regards

Andy

afireinside
06-01-2007, 03:54 PM
600/1700 works fine... I'm playing with it right now on my 680iGOSLOW board. Wish I had my xbx2 for this... Anyone else want to step up to the plate?

fhpchris
06-01-2007, 05:09 PM
Ive been running 4ghz runs all day before you really decided on 3.6, and if I can do it on a quad, you should be able to do it on a dual core!

afireinside
06-01-2007, 05:13 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v448/zero-IGN/LCC1.jpg

Ah freed from that 109mhz PCIE limit on xbx2 at least. I need a vdimm mod so I can get a decent trfc going on and push 600mhz ram :)

EVGA 8800GTS 600/1700 shader modded BIOS
EVGA 680i
Crucial Ballistix pc5300 2*512

BenchZowner
06-01-2007, 05:26 PM
chris, let's just stick with the threads' rule.
3.6G only m8

fhpchris
06-01-2007, 05:35 PM
This morning I distinctly remember seeing a thread with 661/1050 @ 4ghz with someone holding 72,000 points, so I must be in the wrong thread...

3.6 is not even daily speeds for a dual core...

afireinside
06-01-2007, 05:42 PM
3.6 is not even daily speeds for a dual core...



I think you miss the point compeltely, this is not who can get the most overclock it is about the best result at a certain achievable frequencies so showing good tweaking skills, hence why I suggested 600/1700 GTS scores. Mind you how do you stop cheating ?

Regards

Andy

:with:

BenchZowner
06-01-2007, 05:44 PM
there's another thread with the same name by Micutzu, that thread was 'cpu freq' free

fhpchris
06-01-2007, 06:01 PM
Either the thread you are talking about got deleted, or this was edited...

STEvil
06-01-2007, 06:04 PM
FSB limited to 2.8ghz for now.. X1900GT stock cooling.

0 tweaks.

BenchZowner
06-01-2007, 07:04 PM
Either the thread you are talking about got deleted, or this was edited...

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=144963

p.s. this one should be edited and non-related posts should be deleted ;)

fhpchris
06-01-2007, 07:09 PM
I was not talking about elmor's thread.

This thread earlier said 4ghz/661/1050 and someone with a GTX had a score of 72,000 already, I think that changing it was a little daft.

Gorod
06-02-2007, 12:53 AM
Edit : score updated (+100 points :))

8800GTX

X6800 @ 3.6GHz , 400x9
XBX2 i975X
4x1024Mb C3DF 1:1 , 400MHz @ 3-3-3-5
8800GTX @ 661/1100

Very bad mobo :slapass: , it takes 1.7V MCH just to reach 400MHz FSB :(
I will try to mod it , 450x8 @ 1:1 should give a nice boost :D

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9208864

http://img115.imageshack.us/img115/9158/67735jz5.jpg

elmor
06-02-2007, 01:38 AM
I woke up early this morning and had some time to spare. Just one round as it runs too easy on these clocks :)

X6800 @ 515x7
DFI Infinity 965
2x1GB Teamgroup OPB ed 1:1 4-4-4-10
XFX 8800GTX @ 702/1188
Tagan 1.1kW

http://bandwidth.se/images/1151.jpg

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9208856

A bit over 3.6ghz (set 514x7 in bios) so how about a 10mhz +/- margin? :D

Micutzu
06-02-2007, 01:51 AM
Wow, competition is heating up. My jaw just dropped seeing that LH :shocked: .

afireinside
06-02-2007, 05:02 PM
Nice score Gorod! You sure you can't get more than 400 fsb? Mine did 438 before mods. Try without 4x DIMMs. FAST board though, 450*8 3-3-3 will put you way above everyone else ;)

Good job Elmor setting the bar at 71k. Will be interesting to see if 72k is possible!

Anyone else going to give it a shot with a GTS? I need incentive to Vdimm mod my board.

TiN_
06-02-2007, 11:33 PM
Wanna added GTS to contest, it can be faster than 2900XT ;)

And maybe good idea to add AquaMark, it's pretty old-school too, like 3dm2001

Gorod
06-03-2007, 12:28 AM
You sure you can't get more than 400 fsb? Mine did 438 before mods. Try without 4x DIMMs. FAST board though, 450*8 3-3-3 Yah man ... i tryed everything , 2 dimms , with other memory , all possible settings but no go . That particular mobo i have realy sucks , with default MCH voltage only ~ 350MHz FSB 3D benchstable . I had a nice XBX1 before , that did 450 fsb no problem ... too bad she's dead now lol . Anyways i will mod it in next few days and will see how it goes :) .

Btw , nice thread for sure - thx Micutzu :up: , spent 4 hours yesterday playing 3dmark tweaking "game" :) , very addicting i must say :D

hipro5
06-03-2007, 01:25 AM
Btw , nice thread for sure - thx Micutzu :up: , spent 4 hours yesterday playing 3dmark tweaking "game" :) , very addicting i must say :D


3DMark2001 is an "art" bench.......This is the ONLY bench that you can tweak your system to the maximum coz it's system related.....When done, ALL benchies will be fast and accurate..... :) ;)
Tweaking 2k1 (except LOD of caurse coz it's only for the VGA), you are sure that your system is well tweaked for everything.....Then you find your VGA's levels.... :)

......and YES this thread IS VERY usefull and it was missed ALL this time.... :)
Thanks Micutzu......

gandalfone
06-03-2007, 11:19 AM
x6800@400x9
dfi dark
team 1200
bfg 8800gtx@648/1080(is this the limit of gpu or not??)


60039

Micutzu
06-03-2007, 01:29 PM
I think it's better if the limits remain as established in the first post.

afireinside > OK, feel free to submit GTS scores also, i will do my best to update everything. I'd choose some clocks hard to do without mods as i didn with Ultra/GTX, just to make it a little tricky; i don't have too much experience with GTS's but i guess 641/1000 is hard enough right ?

Gorod > nice run mate, 450 1:1 will be screaming fast as the CH is already just behind elmor's killer DFI. Any gain from using 4 dimms ? Because only 2 should get you more FSB.

hipro5 > 100% true, in a week of benching 6 days is 2k1 tweaking and one day is 03, 05 and 06 benching. You're welcome about the thread, actually i wanted this thread also for a long time ;).

afireinside
06-03-2007, 01:35 PM
afireinside > OK, feel free to submit GTS scores also, i will do my best to update everything. I'd choose some clocks hard to do without mods as i didn with Ultra/GTX, just to make it a little tricky; i don't have too much experience with GTS's but i guess 641/1000 is hard enough right ?


Almost all GTS should run 660/1000 but Andy suggested 600/850 so that's what I went with. Feel free to choose your own limit since it's your thread :)

Micutzu
06-04-2007, 06:22 AM
OK, 661/1000 for 8800GTS then. Let's see the scores :D.

Here's a quick 975X run for GTX class: 68953 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9209941).

The board is pretty old now but the BIOS still has some nasty bugs and lacks some very important options (like Vfsb and PCi-e freq adjustments), but it's fast and that kinda makes up for it. There's still some stuff untouched, but elmor's score will be hard to beat.

hipro5
06-04-2007, 08:45 AM
Mmmmmmmm.........I'll smack you..... :slapass: :D

Use uGuru V. 3.0.3.0 and UPLOAD the PCI-E at ~127MHz.... ;)

Micutzu
06-04-2007, 09:20 AM
Thanks for the tip, i'm already on it :D. I have a question for you about AW9D on PM.

gandalfone
06-04-2007, 03:54 PM
wow Micutzu, very nice score;)

what's timing ram??

Hazzan
06-04-2007, 04:30 PM
@Micutzu : Nice Score :up: :up: :up: !!! same Question with gandalfone ....what's timing ram ? :)

Micutzu
06-04-2007, 08:32 PM
Thanks, 3-3-3-4, tRFC=18 ;).

hipro5
06-04-2007, 11:06 PM
Ahhh.......I forgot to add that IF you want higher PCI-E on AW9D-MAX mobo, you HAVE to feed it with over 1.9VMCH AND use a PATA HD and not a SATA HD coz you'll have freezes......Sorry....... :yawn:

hipro5
06-05-2007, 02:07 AM
Guys try Uguru V.3.0.3.3 .....:)

k|ngp|n
06-05-2007, 01:30 PM
Great thread and lots of solid scores aleady too!
Maybe I can add some results soon. Think I have one just under 71k with 680i, when I was testing dom 10ks before. Interesting to see what platforms are faster with the clock limitations.

M.Beier
06-05-2007, 01:35 PM
Great thread and lots of solid scores aleady too!
Maybe I can add some results soon. Think I have one just under 71k with 680i, when I was testing dom 10ks before. Interesting to see what platforms are faster with the clock limitations.

Heh, now no backup scores this time :p:

.. That title is impossible to read KP :shocked:

afireinside
06-05-2007, 02:27 PM
Xtreme 3dmark whore ;)

Micutzu
06-06-2007, 02:12 AM
Thanks to George for few valuable tips on getting the AW9D up to speed, he's a great guy and very helpful ;).

I'm trying to give elmor a run for the money until more guys join the party, it's a pain to keep up with the DFI in system scores.

71034 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9210779)

Same setup as before, a little more tweaking and bumped VGA + PCI-e clocks.

Gautam
06-09-2007, 10:18 AM
I've got an idea...lets ban drag and nature. :D

Micutzu
06-09-2007, 10:36 AM
Heh, nice one bro, those ATI sure let the CPU power loose :up:
What mobo were you using ? Is it OK if we agree on your clocks VGA limits for everyone ?

Gautam
06-09-2007, 10:38 AM
Asus Commando.

Yes, I should think these clocks are reasonable...they're lower than what I see most people posting on air.

I didn't notice that andre had already done one at stock GPU though.

elmor
06-09-2007, 10:40 AM
Thanks to George for few valuable tips on getting the AW9D up to speed, he's a great guy and very helpful ;).

I'm trying to give elmor a run for the money until more guys join the party, it's a pain to keep up with the DFI in system scores.

71034 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9210779)

Same setup as before, a little more tweaking and bumped VGA + PCI-e clocks.

Great run there! I got a buyer on my 8800gtx so now there is only two 2900xt here :D

Micutzu
06-09-2007, 11:19 AM
Gautam > PM :)

elmor > Thanks mate, it wasn't easy to catch up with you and to be honest I had to use your bench order to get there. You go bench those 2900's now, I have a feeling they ask for coldness :D.

As for me, this is my last score on 975X as I moved to 680i in the meantime. A little slower PCI-e clock but higher shaders.

71104 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9212450)

andre X_X
06-10-2007, 05:03 AM
Update:
HD2900XT @ 870/1025

http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/204/870102566900wa4.png

andre X_X
06-10-2007, 05:50 AM
update...
HD2900XT @ 870/1060 (nature @ 1160mhz memory)
got really nice boost on Nature 20fps :D

http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/5421/870106067454fq8.png

Micutzu
06-10-2007, 05:59 AM
andre_X_X, let's keep the VGA clocks at 870/1025 so we can compare results from now on. BTW, what mobo are you using, P5B ?

andre X_X
06-10-2007, 06:17 AM
oopps sorry, i forgot to read 1st post again, i see you limit the clock to 870/1025, anyway can i go lower mem freq? btw, im using P5B Deluxe

andre X_X
06-10-2007, 09:01 AM
here my latest run,
870/1025 for all benchmarks...

http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/8518/870102567103tz2.png

k|ngp|n
06-14-2007, 05:12 AM
Great job so far fellas :up: Impressive work by everyone.

@Gautum: Man you need to lose the you know what ;)

Been having a little 01 platform shootout over here last day or two trying to determine where the diff chipsets stand with each other in an all clocks equal situation on cpu and taking what the chipset will give in terms of strap/mem speed. Now I ran these all with the same vid card and vid bios using all same clocks/shaders etc. 3604mhz on all and on all chipset except 680i, I kept the pci-e mhz under 130. Used the same set of memory for all benches as well. I think 975x could benefit more from using tighter memory with some tighter adv. timings, so I might go ahead and do that next time. 975x probably got the least effort from me in it's defense as the dom 10k's really arent the best clockers for that mobo I think, though they rule on some of the others :D.
I tried to keep within the same test orders on most, though some platforms require a diff approach to test order. That's where the legwork will pay off.
And the fun part of dicovery is.

Inluded some of my first DDR3 benching on the ASUS P5K3 with some samsung reference modules, which I kept at 1.85v for it's 3600mhz 01 session :D.
Guess I'll start with lowest to highest scores and the p5k3 first. I think this ddr3 is a great score considering the mem voltage used (1.85v). This rig took about 50% of total time on all five boards just to get this far believe it or not. It shows nice potential IMO:
http://www.overclockingpin.com/3600mhz%205%20platforms/ddr3%203600mhz%2070939%20713-1179.gif

P5k3 DDR3 8800ULTRA COMPARE (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9214348)

Next up 680iSLI with the striker. Pushing the pci-ex a little harder on this mobo and can always pull better natures with it:
http://www.overclockingpin.com/3600mhz%205%20platforms/striker%203600mhz%20713-1179.gif

STRIKER 680iSLI 8800ULTRA COMPARE (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9214347)

Here is the 975x one. May re-run with some tighter mems though:
http://www.overclockingpin.com/3600mhz%205%20platforms/975x%203600mhz%20%20713-1179.gif

P5WS64-PRO 8800ULTRA COMPARE (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9214346)

P5B-DELUXE on 2:3 strap laying down some nice runs:
http://www.overclockingpin.com/3600mhz%205%20platforms/p5b%203600hz%20713-1179.gif

P5B-DELUXE 965x 8800ULTRA COMPARE (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9214345)

Finally, P5K-DELUXE screaming at 515mhz fsb/ 617mhz ddr2 cas4. I am really liking this mobo atm :eek: :
http://www.overclockingpin.com/3600mhz%205%20platforms/71620%20p5k%203600hz%20713-1179.gif

P5K-DELUXE P35 + 8800 ULTRA COMPARE (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9214343)

These are ALL relatively great numbers and this was really fun to do, but higher can still be achieved ULTRA fine tuning each platform for EXACTLY what it needs.

Gautam
06-14-2007, 05:57 AM
@Gautum: Man you need to lose the you know what ;)

What was that Vince? You want me to lose 10 FPS in LL and 15 in CH? :lol:

Damn, seriously good work with the whole line-up. It's really interesting to see how 975 and 965 stack up...they've each got their own strengths. Also nice to see 680i pushing out the highest raw GPU power.

Micutzu
06-14-2007, 06:12 AM
That's what i was expecting :D

Awesome runs Vince, alot of useful info to chew. I've also tested Abit AB9 QuadGT, Abit AW9D-MAX and EVGA 680i SLI and the results look pretty much the same (even if the QuadGT couldn't run 7x514, bad board).

Nice touch with the running order, it seems it's a little faster than mine. LL/DL/etc right ? :p:

sang
06-14-2007, 04:52 PM
and a tiny update to my GTX score.
And i really like this cheap and versatile mobo.
She could run like a top 965 in 2:3 or neck by neck in 3-3-3 1:1 with I975.
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/2577/69469fo5.png

69469 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9214837)

Gautam
06-14-2007, 05:15 PM
I see you haven't lost any of your talent. :) Are you running 10MHz below just to make things harder for yourself or what. :p:

sang
06-14-2007, 10:58 PM
nice to see you,my friend. :toast:
Ive put on hold my 2900xt benching just to have another try on GTX.Even she's not the most powerfull VGA,ati cards offers more fun to play than G88 Nature monsters. I really hate them.. :)

Micutzu
06-14-2007, 11:40 PM
Nice work sang, what RAM clock/timings ? DH seems a little slow, you're maybe running it too late ?
You knew I had this stashed somewhere, so here it is: 69736 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9214951) for GTX class. CL is bad tho' :(.

sang
06-15-2007, 01:06 AM
ha, nice one.
i was on 3-3-3 1:1
And you're right about DH. But ill try a 9x400 2:3 these days. System score should be better but i guess DL will go down a bit couse of low BUS.

andre X_X
06-15-2007, 11:28 AM
im using this order:
LL-LH-DL-DH-CH-CL-N.... what do you guys think? whats your order? would you share?

memory
06-15-2007, 09:00 PM
CPU: 6420
Memory: gskill GBHZ 1gb x 2 kit
GPU: INNO 3D 8800GTS 320mb @ 650/990 (Stock cooler and stock volt)


http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/8761/01se62225rg6.jpg

bonzo_catalin
06-16-2007, 12:37 PM
A run on the rush . I'll try to catch up with you guys , but will be hard . :( . The heat of the room it's outrages , around 38C . Doesn't fit with G80 .

http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=2001lv5.jpg

sang
06-17-2007, 12:17 AM
one more with 450 4:5 4-4-4-4
looks like 450 its the minimum BUS speed for DL.Otherwise, 150-200 3dmark points are wasted.

http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/7879/69832oj9.png (http://imageshack.us)

valid link (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9216017)

bonzo_catalin
06-17-2007, 06:24 AM
67754 with gtx at 660/1000 and rams 800 4-3-3 1T . :(

http://img120.imageshack.us/my.php?image=lowclockcontestbd2.jpg

andre X_X
06-17-2007, 08:53 AM
update...
now running 1:1, high bus with mod strap on P5B Deluxe

http://img.techpowerup.org/070617/870-1025 67399.png

sang
06-18-2007, 05:10 PM
first try with my 2900XT love :)

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/7838/67454bz2.png (http://imageshack.us)

link (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9216878)

and a compare 2900XT vs. 8800GTX, same system settings

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/1913/2900xtvs8800gtxzj6.png (http://imageshack.us)

Gorod
06-19-2007, 08:13 PM
8800GTX Update with 680i :

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9217406

http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4013/68804ev3.jpg

G H Z
06-20-2007, 01:09 AM
Ran a couple tonight, need to put in some benching time or vdimm mod to reach 68K. PL levels introduce alot of new configs to explore - thnx The Stilt & FELIX :)

142mhz PCIe
PL @ boot - 10

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v31/canny/67580.png

sang
06-20-2007, 08:52 AM
nice one, GHZ. I like your DL and Nature. MOstly your DL since i cant find a 514 FSB cpu. Been through 2x 6800,2x 6700 already..but no chance on air.

5:6 will be great at 4-4-4 :toast:

G H Z
06-20-2007, 03:02 PM
Thanks sang, took some work to catch you even with higher card clocks :toast:

Have you tried P35 board yet? You mean CL? That was somewhere around run #20 I think, you can see the best score from the previous run in the main result window ;)

k|ngp|n
06-20-2007, 04:08 PM
Nice Run G :clap:

1Day
06-20-2007, 11:09 PM
Great run there GHZ nice ram settings.

bonzo_catalin
06-22-2007, 05:32 AM
Gorod what rams do you have ? And what V ?

pasatoiutd
06-23-2007, 02:08 PM
68413 - pretty bad run, as the VGA is the limiting factor and Car Low froze during the second run and the board in running on the 1333 strap (Asus P5B Deluxe).

sang
06-23-2007, 07:42 PM
Got something left in my dewar,so i was curious how's the 2900XT scalling with CPU.
Full rush run,nothing optimised,PCIE 100 , GPU 870/1025.

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/750/86198oh5.png (http://imageshack.us)

link (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9219139)


Running out of ln2 and trying to heatup my container,finally managed (@-80C - LOL) to get a 514 BUS for the low clock contest.


http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/5228/67664yj0.png (http://imageshack.us)

link (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9219142)

gandalfone
06-24-2007, 12:55 AM
Wow that's score!! it's a hard competition:)

G H Z
06-24-2007, 02:30 AM
Good work sang, I need to switch boards to match that :toast:

LN2 @ 3.6ghz haha :D :clap:

1Day
06-24-2007, 02:44 AM
:up: Gotta love XS - Sang you rock :clap: :clap:

Moonman
06-24-2007, 03:22 AM
Here's mine 8800GTS GPU@648MHz, MEM@999MHz
E6700 L628B343 ->:kissbutt:<- me :D
P5B dlx
2x1024 Crucial D9GMH
Boot@ 514MHz, PCI-e 110MHz

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/1155/2k1lowclockic4.th.jpg (http://img505.imageshack.us/my.php?image=2k1lowclockic4.jpg)

giorgos th.
06-24-2007, 03:48 AM
a quick one from me too.
E6700 @ 3600 (450*8) / GSkill HZ @ 1125 - 5-4-4-8 / 8800GTS @ 648/999

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8743/011qc3.th.jpg (http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=011qc3.jpg)

lasse.j5
06-24-2007, 11:36 AM
Just did a run too

E6420 @ 8 x 450 = 3600 MHz
Asus P5K Deluxe
Crucial Tenth Anniversary @ 900 MHz 4-4-4-4-9
Inno3D 8800 GTS @ 661/1000

ORB Link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9219427


http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/6193/3dmark0164371md2.jpg

sang
06-24-2007, 02:11 PM
Good work sang, I need to switch boards to match that :toast:

LN2 @ 3.6ghz haha :D :clap:

Thanks G H Z, :toast:
514 BUS run was indeed a funny one. Started at -80C and in a few minutes i got already -10 C and only one CL ran - bad one,ofcourse :).
After my lucky 6th run --> T is +15C. Quick printscreen and saveproj.,then blue screen..Close,indeed.

Dewar refill tomorrow;got to find a better way to maximize this CPU. IT boots at -160C basetemp but load windows only at -115C,regardless of voltage.Also,any other value beside default one for Vtt (1.20v) -->BlueScreen.
Im hunting down 400 CH. Could be done,i think, under 5300MHz.

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/9605/ch5106mhzms6.png (http://imageshack.us)

1Day
06-25-2007, 12:14 AM
My effort 66520

@ sang :) Unfortunately with not a whiff of LN2 within miles of my setup - the best I could manage was some open window cooling :rofl: :rofl:

G H Z
06-26-2007, 08:12 PM
Not bad 1Day, we need to see the test details to see how your really doing :)

OK sang where's the 90K :D

sang
07-04-2007, 11:15 PM
well,the 90's arent done yet,but with my new E6700, me thinks its doable :)

my first goal: mission accomplished

http://img54.imageshack.us/img54/9214/409cme6.png (http://imageshack.us)

Last night,with my friend Micutzu,we had a few hrs of ln2 fun. For the most part of it,we tried to max the cpu and when we finnaly hit some ceiling,almost 25 of 30L dewar were gone.
First,the limit came from Vcore bios setting (+787) which is 1.96v reported.
Then we changed my 2900 with one of Micutzu's Ultras. But dewar was empty and we ran out of ln2 in the middle of some crazy numbers. Video only at 980/1218,ln2'ed too.

blind_ripper
07-05-2007, 01:13 AM
nice clocks on the cpu sang , what stepping ?

M3kk
07-05-2007, 01:32 AM
Stepping B2, as you can see :).
FPO : L630Bxxx :D

sang
07-05-2007, 02:17 AM
another shot

http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/3708/1000gpukt7.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Gautam
07-05-2007, 10:21 AM
well,the 90's arent done yet,but with my new E6700, me thinks its doable :)
:eek: That's a ridiculous 3D clock...good god.

GazC
07-05-2007, 12:53 PM
Time to throw my hat in the ring. The ORB is lying in my result, I promise you that my CPU is running at 3.6ghz. I think the speed is being mis-read because of the 8x multi.

*link removed*

I think I'd need to abuse my ram with voltage to score higher with tighter timings, and I don't fancy doing that!

Micutzu
07-05-2007, 01:04 PM
sang, do we have the screen with 1688fps DL on the HDD ? :D

GazC, i think your VGA clocks are not applied correctly, the Nature is way too slow.

GazC
07-05-2007, 01:10 PM
sang, do we have the screen with 1688fps DL on the HDD ? :D

GazC, i think your VGA clocks are not applied correctly, the Nature is way too slow.

I noticed that too, Riva tuner sets them too low, ATitool implements them correctly, so I'm going to have another go now.

Edit: tried again,

*link removed*

http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/6171/screenieef1.th.jpg (http://img386.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenieef1.jpg)

Edit2: found out what I was doing wrong,

66795 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9224497)

bonzo_catalin
07-06-2007, 05:30 AM
sang, do we have the screen with 1688fps DL on the HDD ? :D



You are on hollyday , right ? :ROTF: CF or SLI ? O no , it's single card ?

mit78
07-06-2007, 08:33 AM
romanian people ,great scores.

korby
07-06-2007, 09:17 AM
Iar tu?! :shocked: :mad:

=

You again?! :shocked: :mad:

GazC
07-15-2007, 12:28 PM
My score needs updating.


67164 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9228958)

It looks like I'm going to have to try sacrificing some bandwidth and go for some low latency runs.

Edit 2: lol, just looked at my result again. As much as I'd like to have been, i wasn't running at 6.9Ghz! :o

NapalmV5
07-29-2007, 09:56 PM
heres a laugh @ my 3dmark,

MSI 8800ultra @ default 660/2300 no LOD
http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/2302/80093323qr8.jpghttp://img403.imageshack.us/img403/2677/28337375cc8.jpg
http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/3056/18895668kd7.jpghttp://img297.imageshack.us/img297/4431/87414681wl5.jpghttp://img261.imageshack.us/img261/7222/92443628zk0.jpg

NapalmV5
07-30-2007, 12:30 AM
MSI 8800ultra @ 680/2350 no LOD,

http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/4631/33752278md7.jpghttp://img175.imageshack.us/img175/8132/18853538dq7.jpg
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/5697/99556106zm9.jpghttp://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1921/23413037pe6.jpg

time to try the new p35...

M3kk
07-30-2007, 01:52 AM
Time to use LOD.

NapalmV5
07-30-2007, 02:55 PM
rivatuner crashes the 158/162 drives

what other way of setting the LOD?.. used to be @ nvidia control panel

funkflix
08-01-2007, 12:12 AM
Anyone knows how big is the difference between B1 and B2 on '01?

http://www.abload.de/img/zwischenablage01kby.jpg

Can't get more out of my system..

over@locker886
08-04-2007, 07:16 AM
56261 (http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/9491/56261vw2.jpg)

VGA: Asus 7900GS:p: