Super pi 1M @3.6ghz

[Bigchrome]

Not really sure if this should go here, but anyway...

Who wants to race super pi at 3.6ghz? (this is up to and including 401 fsb on 9X multi btw, so 3.609 is the cutoff)

Reason being it is simple for almost everyone to get to 3.6ghz and it will be a test of how well you can tweak.

My PB is: 13.891s at 401x9, 4-3-4-5 tref27 :woot:
http://s3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/bigchrome/?action=view&current=13.891s.jpg

Done with rig in sig.

Ranking:
1.Kamel- 13.813s
2.Learn- 13.828s
2.Gautam- 13.828s
2.v parrello-13.828s
3.koda- 13.843s
3.Chicco85-13.843s
3.coop- 13.843s
3.Florent- 13.843s
4.dinamite2-13.844s
5.Learn- 13.859s
-.GHZ- 13.859s
-.shimmishim- 13.859s
-.Misko- 13.859s
6.Dinos22- 13.860s
-.pasatoiutd- 13.860s
7.yotomeczek-13.875s
-.luihed- 13.875s
-.Ad Rock- 13.875s
-.Gandalfone- 13.875s
-.monteboy- 13.875s
-.Jmax_oc- 13.875s
-.before- 13.875s
8.over@locker886- 13.890s
-.Ad Rock- 13.890s
-.andre X X- 13.890s
-.M3kk- 13.890s
-.eva2000- 13.890s
9.staxm- 13.891s
-.Bigchrome- 13.891s
-.Kunaak- 13.891s
10.MidnightMadness- 13.906s
11.krompirusa- 13.909s
12.rick fx- 13.922s
13.=Pseudo=- 13.938s
-.Achill3uS- 13.938s
15.giorgos th.- 13.953s
15.HousERaT- 13.968s
-.Big Joe- 13.968s
16.Garrett- 13.984s
17.wa77ss- 13.985s
18.Warboy- 14.125s
-.1Day- 14.125s
19.douirc- 14.187s
20. Auril- 14.188s
21.road-runner- 14.203s
22.killingspreez- 14.219s




Ranking (2MB):
1.JMKS- 15.031s
2.jumson- 15.171s
3.boblemagnifique- 15.235s
4.Learn- 15.250s
5.Xvys- 15.844s
5. Vatos Locos- 16.796s

[Razor_Sniper]

An E4300 can never win :(

[HousERaT]

I'll take some of that action...... :D

[Bigchrome]

I will make out a table in my Post if that's ok? I'm first, yay! At least for the moment.
Edit: Razor, If this is allowed stay I'm putting up seperate rank for 2mb chips...only fair.

[killert]

Im in, my e6420 arrives tomorrow :woot:

[wa77ss]

Count me in.


RAM and strap will be a HUGE factor keep in mind.

My run -

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/4479/600mhz55581mb36ghzco6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[DAK1640]

I'm in...:banana: :banana: :banana:

[dinos22]

i've got some screenshots on hard drive at home ~13.8xx :) at 3.6GHz

you should just make it 3.6GHz i reckon so it's easier for everyone as most of us probably have screenshots already

[Kunaak]

someone run 6 x 600 ;)

[dinos22]

someone run 6 x 600 ;)

lol i will give it a shot with my Asus P5K (P35 chipset) mobo this weekend :D

hopefully they clock FSB as well as Andre's heheh

[rick_fx]

Here is what I've managed so far, all details are in the screenshot's "Notepad" :)

SPI_1M - 13.922sec @3.6Ghz
http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/8396/3600e68501mlowdq0.th.jpg (http://img261.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3600e68501mlowdq0.jpg)

[ineedaname]

zzzzzzzzz my 680i board has troubles breaking 14 seconds.

[dinos22]

zzzzzzzzz my 680i board has troubles breaking 14 seconds.

if you can run your RAM at 600MHz 4-3-3- or 5-3-3 or 4-4-4 or 5-4-4- you should be able to break 14seconds

[over@locker886]

13.890s

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7093/13890zj5.jpg

[Achill3uS]

nice work bro' :toast:

[staxm]

http://img182.imageshack.us/img182/1135/screenshot010dn7.png (http://imageshack.us)

@ over@locker886
on yours setting i have 13.935s,can you try mine,i think that you will have better result ;)

:wave:

[Gautam]

Here's one...

[Bigchrome]

Nice Gautam! What board is that?

[yotomeczek]

Nice Gautam! What board is that?

P5B DLx propably (or DFI 965)

[JMKS]

Ahh, I see the 2MB category, nice ;).
So here is my result:
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/5999/2mb36ghzbl7.jpg

[krompirusa]

Abit Quad gt mobo+ only 2 tweaks:fact:

http://shrani.si/thumbs/zaxsjezpsq.png (http://shrani.si/?zaxsjezpsq.png)

[Gautam]

P5B DLx propably (or DFI 965)

Asus Commando. :)

[krompirusa]

i will post some scores with commando to:fact: , but now im testing Quad GT which is not such a good ram oc-er:nono:

[yotomeczek]

http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/3701/1m36007x514mem51413s875mq0.jpg

[rithina]

Asus Commando. :)

nice score.. i never able to tweak mine to 600mhz for my ram to boot to bios.. :slobber:

[krompirusa]

rithina its easy on commando, to go over 600:fact: , just give your ram 2.95v and thats the score you get:D
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=189806

[koda]

13.859
OS : XP SP2
VDDR : 2.6v

http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/3082/sp1m362qx1.th.jpg (http://img520.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sp1m362qx1.jpg)

I got a nice 32M too ;)

[Gautam]

I see why Xavier speaks highly of you. ;)

[HousERaT]

I'm interested to see what these Tracers will do on my DFI Dark. ;)

[Gautam]

They'll do awesome for sure, been testing the hell outta them and seems like ~615 4-4-4-6 is 100% stable, as is 620 4-5-4-10. Haven't gotten to CAS 5 yet but 650 should be doable. They don't like voltage that much, keep em around 2.5v.

They're also insane at CAS 3 if you ever get the inkling to try that.

[HousERaT]

I did that run at 2.3v. I'll save the 2.5v for serious bench sessions. :D

[oanvoanc]

hey, i opened the same competition some weeks ago:

http://www.hardwareoc.at/forum/thread.php?threadid=2774

i also did some ram comparison:

2x512 vs. 2x1024 vs. 2x512+2x1024 vs. 4x1024: (durchschnitt means average) (no tweaks - just started spi after booting)

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/3140/4vs3vs2vs1gbdn6jj4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

i tested each setting four times and took the average.
maybe somebody can explain?
thanks

[dinos22]

here's my run 13.860 :)

http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/6877/3609ghz1m13860snm6.png (http://img527.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3609ghz1m13860snm6.png)

[Ad Rock]

Finally got these Ballistix in my rig and running. Only took 5 weeks, plus I got to pay $290 for them instead of $101.

:rolleyes:

Anyway here is my first attempt, hopefully I can get my time down just a little bit more ;) .

http://www.cryo-laboratory.com/upload/userfiles/AdRock/13.890small.JPG

[giorgos th.]

a quick one from me too.

[Bigchrome]

How did you get DDR1000 on the AW9D? I used to be able to do it but I can't remember which bios it was.... If I could I'd prob be a ble to even compete.

[Ad Rock]

I got a better time but I feel like I cheated, I don't know if we should really be allowing any speeds above 3600. Anyway I guess I am now tied for 1st ;) .

http://www.cryo-laboratory.com/upload/userfiles/AdRock/13.859.JPG

[giorgos th.]

How did you get DDR1000 on the AW9D? I used to be able to do it but I can't remember which bios it was.... If I could I'd prob be a ble to even compete.

14 bios,1.8Vmch,2.45Vdimm and voila...

[yotomeczek]

I got a better time but I feel like I cheated, I don't know if we should really be allowing any speeds above 3600. Anyway I guess I am now tied for 1st ;) .



No max speed should be 3600,xx MHz

[JMKS]

1.JMKS- 15.438s (dude, your score sucks! ;) )
I don't think so :). Of course 400x9 2:3 with E4300 or 514x7 with QuadGT should be better, but this is not that bad, just 2MB cache. Anyone with Allendale to compete?

BTW, personally I think that max frequency should be 3600 flat, I don't understand why it should be any higher...

[Bigchrome]

It was a joke JMKS! Max speed is over 3600 as some boards multiply differently and others will not run 400

[JMKS]

Yes I know. The bigger = the better, isn't it? ;) And really - Allendale users, post your results please :). Or there are no "xtreme Allendale users"? ;)

Well, yes, "some boards". But... people with "some boards" can run @ 3598 etc no? Or just discover which boards can run CPU @ what MHz and make it clear. 3609 is as good as 3600 or any other - 401x9 is also a number which "some boards" (I don't know exactly which boards and why ;)) may find difficult to reach "flat". And I think it should be a round number :).

[Gautam]

Most of the similar contests have this sort of leeway and I don't like it either. Btw folks, its not I'm incapable of running at 3609 either. ;) But I'd prefer not to.

[ownage]

JMKS his score is damn good, trying to beat that, but im stuck with my memory. What board are u using JMKS?

I bought a kingston 2gb 667mh kit for 71 euro (cheap) which can hit 1080mhz cas5. I hope it can do better timings at 900mhz then my OCZ pc6400-rev2. Only 100ms left to beat JMKS :P

[JMKS]

Asus Commando. If You are on Abit, You are on 1066 strap (like me, no results on the 1333 is worth mentioning, my CPU reaches its FSB wall slightly after the board @ 1066 strap), so the challenge is fair :). Maybe I can go a little lower but not much if any.
100ms in 1M is huge difference IMO, I remember how I was fighting for sub-14s 1M on unmodded P5B-Dlx (so 1333 strap was the only way to reach 470+ FSB), 514,6x8 (CPU FSB wall), a couple or more hours of hard work and finally 13,985s from the "instant" 14,078 @ 513,3x8 on my 24/7 OS :).

[ownage]

You got really good (sub)timings, what memory are u using??

[JMKS]

GoodRAM PRO, the same (Polish :)) brand as Zbogi used for the X6800 frequency WR IIRC ;). This memory is very good with "normal" voltage, 800 4-4-4-4 @ 1,8V stable, 1000 4-4-4-4 @ 2,225V stable, and 1100 4-4-4-4 even 1M not reachable with any V (2,65V tried). Micron D9GMH but PCB is not that good.
And the subtimings is I believe mostly chipset dependent, not only the memory. In that case 1,85V @ NB in this run to be sure it will be enough ;).

[=Pseudo=]

Here's one of my picks (E6600@3600 -->13.938)

http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/1035/e660036001200spiaws1.th.jpg (http://img517.imageshack.us/my.php?image=e660036001200spiaws1.jpg)

cheers

[yotomeczek]

It was a joke JMKS! Max speed is over 3600 as some boards multiply differently and others will not run 400

It is Your topic so You make rules ...
But i think that 3609 is not equal 3600 ... so I will try 3609 if it is acceptable ...

[Bigchrome]

3609 is no problem, it's what I'm using as this board at 400 sets 399. (but performs slightly higher methinks)
Anyone know how to get Word to keep the place numbers? It's getting really hard to keep track of all these.

I also have a new score at 1000mhz mem:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/bigchrome/improved1000mzspi.jpg

[Gautam]

If your board has a PLL supported by SysTool, that can get you very fine FSB adjustment.

[Bigchrome]

It doesn't.

[Gautam]

Lookin good...nice to see 4:5 doing well.

[shimmishim]

Here's my contribution on an Asus P5N32-E Sli Plus

http://www.johnshim.com/forums/bleedinedge/superpi/1M.3600.5-3-3.243volts.600mhz13.938s.jpg

[spectrum48]

rofl i thought it said 32m don't mind me http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v185/spnikks/banana_rasta.gif

[Xvys]

You want Allendale?
58947

58948

Not too bad for a 2mb cache in this test. :clap:
-------------------------------
Asus P5B \ E6300 \ Crucial 10th Anniv.\ Ati X800XL \ Hec AcePower 420w \ SB Audigy SE

[MidnightMadness]

Test without preparation (it's very old score)

13.906s

http://i80.imagethrust.com/t/1099949/1m4444.jpg (http://i80.imagethrust.com/images/4C97/view-image/1m-4-4-4-4.html)

Mobo is Asus P5B Dlx.
QuadGT waiting for chance ;)

[Kunaak]

this is my best.

plain old windows XP Pro.
tons of tweaks tested.
very few do much of anything though...

[andre X_X]

very good time kunaak....
this is my effort :D ..... looks like i beat you with 0.001s :D
4:5 @ 1066 was fast runner :D

[[XC] riptide]

I'm in. So lets get this straight... big ram speed is good for this right? Never tested the limit of my ram yet. This should be good fun.

[luihed]

Just did 13.890 @ 514* 7x on my E6600..... Pressed ALT + Prntscreen and didnt realized I accidentaly deleted my MS Paint lol...... Anybody know how to reinstal it back? Thanks....

Only if I can get all 4 sticks to run.... 2x512 cant compete w 2gs kit.....

[JMKS]

Paint is just an .exe, it doesn't need to be installed ;).

BTW, maybe someone else with Allendale...?

[luihed]

Here's my score.... My mobo for some reason always adds 1 fsb lol.... I need to get use to it.... Some 1:1 action cos I dont dare use divider on this DFI, FFS its hard enough just running 1:1..... 2x 512bm Ballistix pc5300 @ 4-4-3-12.....

http://www3.telus.net/luis99/oc/3608.jpg

[dinos22]

you guys should use Irfanview and save images with reduced colours to 256 and PNG Out with level=9 compression

images are crazy small in size and MUCH better quality than MS Paint JPEG

crazy low as in 30Kb for Irfanview PNG and 160Kb MS Paint JPEG :eek:

[Galaren]

I just did a quick test while building new 14.313s 9x400 1:1
3060 A-data 533 1gb p5b(bios 0507 no drivers only my pretweaked xp)

[Ad Rock]

Did a little more tweaking and managed to drop my time a little more.

http://www.cryo-laboratory.com/upload/userfiles/AdRock/13.875.JPG

[gandalfone]

Dfi Dark
TeamGroup 1200
x6800


59181

[koda]

Hey Gautam,
You can do it (and maybe better) ;)

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/5882/sp1m363gi8.th.jpg (http://img522.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sp1m363gi8.jpg)

Thx to Stan

[Achill3uS]

I think here is the first P35 result..

8*450 4:5 4-4-4-4 and some tweaks (XP SP2), without memset!!!, only bios selected timings..

valid: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=199654

http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/7724/13938mw3.jpg

[rick_fx]

Wow, very fast time koda! :eek:


Hey Gautam,
You can do it (and maybe better) ;)

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/5882/sp1m363gi8.th.jpg (http://img522.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sp1m363gi8.jpg)

Thx to Stan

[Gautam]

Whoa. No, I don't think I can, not without some sort of a secret. :p:

Even at 3609 most of the time I get 13.844.

[Learn]

13.859s 3608MHz 2:3 5.5.4...
http://overclocking-jp.eu/public/Ballistix%20PC5300/13.859.png

[gandalfone]

Ok;)
3600Mhz with clockgen

dfi dark
x6800
teamgroup 1200@1200 4.4.4.4(with memset:()
win 2k3 server fat32

60264

[Learn]

Another one but 4.4.4
13.828s 3608MHz 2:3 4.4.4...
http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/Ballistix%20PC5300/13.828s_2.png

[gandalfone]

Learn what ram do you use?? and what O.S??
Thanks.

You are very fast!!:)

[Enoc]

nice run Learn :) , what ram are you running 4x512? vdimm?
try to make a 3600 exact run...those few mhz help :p:

[Learn]

thx guys :toast:
@gandalfone
Crucial ballistix PC 5300 C3 pic (http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/Ballistix%20PC5300/000_1490.jpg)
My old windows 2003 version (not the R2 one)

I'll post my O.S settings and tips later :)

@Enoc
2.9v, but 2.75v for the 1M is OK i think :rofl:
yes, sure. .844 / .843 at 3600MHz but .828 it's possible.
I'll try, but with 2.9v :eek: you know...

[Enoc]

thx guys :toast:
@gandalfone
Crucial ballistix PC 5300 C3 pic (http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/Ballistix%20PC5300/000_1490.jpg)
My old windows 2003 version (not the R2 one)

funny thing..today i was going to buy 2gb(4x512) of ballistix pc5300 hehe, 80$, not bad..just for benching :p:


I'll post my O.S settings and tips later :)

thnx, i'll be waiting for that...


@Enoc
2.9v, but 2.75v for the 1M is OK i think :rofl:
yes, sure. .844 / .843 at 3600MHz but .828 it's possible.
I'll try, but with 2.9v :eek: you know...

damn...2.7*2.9 vdimm heehhe :eek: , koda is at 844. , so its possible to go < hehe
keep it up :)

[koda]

Sure, learn is right.
.828 is the goal
But not really easy to reach it (definitely .843 is my best for the moment) ;)

[JMKS]

My latest effort with strap modding ;). Frequency is lower because of FSB-wall my CPU has - 514.4 was the last 1M benchable but with hmm... at least 15&#176;C lower ;).

450x8 (3600) 1:1 @ 1066 strap was 15.438s
509x8 (3563) 1:1 @ modded 1333 is 15.391s :)

http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/926/2mb36ghznowe2cg6.jpg

And still no other Allendales competing... :(

[ownage]

My latest effort with strap modding ;). Frequency is lower because of FSB-wall my CPU has - 514.4 was the last 1M benchable but with hmm... at least 15°C lower ;).

450x8 (3600) 1:1 @ 1066 strap was 15.438s
509x8 (3563) 1:1 @ modded 1333 is 15.391s :)

http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/926/2mb36ghznowe2cg6.jpg

And still no other Allendales competing... :(

I would kick your Computers @$$ if i would have D9 memory. :cool:

I cant get my memory high enough, or otherwise i would need much more FSB, which is almost impossible on 1066strap with this board :shrug:

[Learn]

And still no other Allendales competing... :(

:D

boblemagnifique
3605.4 MHz 15.235s (http://boblemagnifique36.free.fr/Overclocking/CartesMeres/AbitAb9QuadGT/36GP.JPG)

Me
3602.8 MHz 15.250s (http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/benchs/1M_15.250_3602.8.png)

:toast:

[Warboy]

http://img294.imageshack.us/img294/6249/untitledoj2.jpg

is this good? lol

[dinos22]

Hey Gautam,
You can do it (and maybe better) ;)

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/5882/sp1m363gi8.th.jpg (http://img522.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sp1m363gi8.jpg)

Thx to Stan

what tweak are you using there

i've tried many things and .860 seems to be about it

[luihed]

Sure, learn is right.
.828 is the goal
But not really easy to reach it (definitely .843 is my best for the moment) ;)

Did that once, 13.828s but before I can Alt+PS, my buddy came in and smack me in the head.... F*(&ing guy woke me up.....

[koda]

what tweak are you using there

i've tried many things and .860 seems to be about it

XP SP2, tweaks are for 32M run except affinity to core1 :

No drivers (except Video)
Registry (nothing really special) : LSC=1 ...
Maxmem=600, no paging file
small HD (Hitachi 250) partition dedicated to SPI (around 10Gb).

And some patience (maybe 20 runs) ;)

I'm quite sure .828 is possible maybe with maxmem=104.

[Gautam]

2K3 definitely is faster on average for me than SP2. Maybe if you switch to it you will get the 828. :p:

[koda]

thx Gautam
I will try with W2K3 as soon as possible.

Which one is the best from your experience (if there is a difference) ?
Enterprise R2 ? Server SP1 ? another one ?

[dinos22]

i think it's your maxmem value ;) :D :)

[koda]

I hope it could help you dinos22 ;)

[Gautam]

thx Gautam
I will try with W2K3 as soon as possible.

Which one is the best from your experience (if there is a difference) ?
Enterprise R2 ? Server SP1 ? another one ?
I don't think there's a difference. RIght now I'm using standard R2.

I think XP might be better for long calculations and 2K3 for short...

You probably have a better handle than me on this, but the two OSes actually seem pretty different to me in some circumstances. In 3DMark2001SE, server 2K3 behaves more like Win2K. It's not simply a matter of 2K3 being faster all around than XP.

[Learn]

try to make a 3600 exact run...those few mhz help :p:
Done: 13.844s (http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/benchs/13.844-again.png) 3600MHz

XP SP2, tweaks are for 32M run except affinity to core1 :

No drivers (except Video)
Registry (nothing really special) : LSC=1 ...
Maxmem=600, no paging file
small HD (Hitachi 250) partition dedicated to SPI (around 10Gb).

And some patience (maybe 20 runs) ;)

I'm quite sure .828 is possible maybe with maxmem=104.

Minimize the super pi window size...
Dram static read control: fast, faster, it help a bit.

[eva2000]

http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/thumbnails/thumb_Corsair10000C5D_006.jpg (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/photos/Corsair10000C5D_006.html) http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/thumbnails/thumb_Corsair10000C5D_011.jpg (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/photos/Corsair10000C5D_011.html) http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/thumbnails/thumb_Corsair10000C5D_012.jpg (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/photos/Corsair10000C5D_012.html)

http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/thumbnails/thumb_Corsair10000C5D_013.jpg (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/photos/Corsair10000C5D_013.html) http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/thumbnails/thumb_Corsair10000C5D_019.jpg (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/photos/Corsair10000C5D_019.html) http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/thumbnails/thumb_Corsair10000C5D_022.jpg (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/photos/Corsair10000C5D_022.html)



System

Q6600 QUPT B3 ES
Corsair Nautilus 500 (http://www.corsairmemory.com/corsair/nautilus_500.html) 3/8" ID
Asus P5K Deluxe (http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=4027) 0311 official bios
128MB Gainward FX5200 PCI
2x1GB Corsair Twin2X2048-10000C5D (http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/memory/corsair/dominator/10000C5D/html/index.html) in black dimm slots
74GB WD Raptor 8MB on SATA 2 port
Pioneer DVR-08 Burner
Sony FDD
1KW PCP&C SLI psu
WinXP Pro SP2


I managed to pull off some quick tests @3600Mhz and managed my fastest Super Pi 1M and 32M times to date for a quad core Kentsfield Q6600 cpu :woot:

CPUZ Validation
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/Corsair/10000C5D/8x/667/450-562_4445_4-25-434_1.5-A-1.5-2.35-1.4-1.55-1.2/cpuz_validated.png

Super Pi 1M
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/Corsair/10000C5D/8x/667/450-562_4445_4-25-434_1.5-A-1.5-2.35-1.4-1.55-1.2/superpi-1m_13s906ms.png

Super Pi 32M
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/Corsair/10000C5D/8x/667/450-562_4445_4-25-434_1.5-A-1.5-2.35-1.4-1.55-1.2/superpi-32m_single_13m10s829ms.png

[Vatos_locos]

ok I know i'am a looser but i will post my Pi so count me in but in 3,5Ghz :D

http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/8207/96796996194396296494396ui5.jpg

[pasatoiutd]

13.860s - E6600 @ 3605 MHz (515 x 7), Abit AB9 QuadGT, 2*1GB Mushkin D9GMH @ DDR1030 4-4-4-4, Windows XP SP2

[M3kk]

My best until now. :)

http://mekk.homeip.net/imagesharing/uploads/e0fa4fd3b1.png
http://mekk.homeip.net/imagesharing/uploads/83a7fda907.png

[road-runner]

Heres mine

http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/1093/superpi1m14203lj2.jpg

[1Day]

14-125 System spec in Sig

[Garrett]

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/3538/3600superpi13shh0.th.png (http://img183.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3600superpi13shh0.png)
Finally, I broke the 14s wall... I must have had 14.000s for like 6 times or something, but I found the magic timing combo I guess... not bad for a 650i chipset right? :up:

[shimmishim]

http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/3538/3600superpi13shh0.th.png (http://img183.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3600superpi13shh0.png)
Finally, I broke the 14s wall... I must have had 14.000s for like 6 times or something, but I found the magic timing combo I guess... not bad for a 650i chipset right? :up:

yes. it's difficult!!! it took me a while to get my 13.937 on my p5n32-e sli plus.

[shimmishim]

13.906

Abit IP35 Pro
E6600 @ 8x450
2x1 crucial tracers pc8000

http://www.johnshim.com/forums/bleedinedge/superpi/8x450.4-4-4-8-32-5-13-10-3-8-3.4-5.2.55volts.jpg

[Fr3ak]

Too bad I noticed this thread a day too late. I just replaced my P5W with some crappy DDR3 board :/

I could run 4 3 3 4 with tweaked subtimings with the P5W. Can't remember what time I got, but it was 13.8xx something.

[BigJoe]

I was testing tweaks on my Win XP and got some interesting results :)
It is still not like my friend staxm result but...

I was burned my abit QuadGT :(

setup:
Core2 Duo E6850 ES@3600MHz, TT BT cooling
ASUS P5B-Plus Vista Edition
Kingston HyperX PC8500 2x512MB (D9GKX)
...

1M time=13.968s

[Chicco85]

This is my try...

Config:

- DFI 965-S (400*9, 2:3)
- Intel E6600
- Crucial ballistix tracer pc667 c3
- xp sp2 lite with some tweaks

http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/images/5226/1_13_860_mem_2-3_cas_4.jpg

Unfortunately, i made this shot above (before the other), but i could't open cpuz... it's too hot now in Italy, and the ram doesn't like it... :) I will try for a better results

http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/images/5226/1_13_859_mem_2-3_cas_4_cpuz.jpg

[Bigchrome]

I finally got back from real life! The Scores Have been Updated guys!! Some of these are insane!!! I also have a new time of 13.891s:
13.891s (http://s3.photobucket.com/albums/y55/bigchrome/?action=view&current=13.891s.jpg) (my windows install is getting old now! Maybe I'll borrow the drive from the HP downstairs that I just redid, 80MBs memory in use at idle!)

[stepsecr]

do i entitle to join the fun?
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a253/stepsecr/bestresult.jpg

[Bigchrome]

No, it's called @3.6ghz for a reason.

[JMKS]

Strike again with Allendale :).
It's not my 1M Windows (actually it's 16/32M etc) so I think it can be atleast 50ms better, if I will find time do to this (install another P35 Windows) I will post again ;).

Asus P5K-Dlx
E6400 450x8 = 3600MHz @ 1,45V
2:3 675MHz 5-5-4-4-4 :eek: @ 2,55V {end of V @ BIOS :p:} Crucial Ballistix 8000 :) - P35 is making miracles with that RAM ;)

15.219s

http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/7930/1m36ghz2mbcache15219zp8.png


edit:
The Windows is still that non-1M-optimized 2003 (1M on XP is much better in my case) but the chipset is i965 this time - I love that chipset to be honest ;).

4:5 with modded 1333 strap (and from what I see that "modded 1333" is with 4:5 faster than genuine 1066 4:5 :eek:) and a little better - P35 is slower with 4:5 about 1&#37; than i965 4:5 so P35 3:5 5-5-4-4-4 seems slower than i965 4:5 4-4-4-4 :).

http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/5933/1m36ghz2mbcache15203i96wp4.jpg

[Chicco85]

Very small improvement....

Config:

- DFI 965-S (400*9, 2:3)
- Intel E6600
- Crucial ballistix tracer pc667 c3
- xp sp2 lite with some tweaks

http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/images/5226/1_13_859_mem_2-3_cas_4_rid.JPG

;)

[ownage]

Strike again with Allendale :).
It's not my 1M Windows (actually it's 16/32M etc) so I think it can be atleast 50ms better, if I will find time do to this (install another P35 Windows) I will post again ;).

Asus P5K-Dlx
E6400 450x8 = 3600MHz @ 1,45V
2:3 675MHz 5-5-4-4-4 :eek: @ 2,55V {end of V @ BIOS :p:} Crucial Ballistix 8000 :) - P35 is making miracles with that RAM ;)

15.219s

http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/7930/1m36ghz2mbcache15219zp8.png


edit:
The Windows is still that non-1M-optimized 2003 (1M on XP is much better in my case) but the chipset is i965 this time - I love that chipset to be honest ;).

4:5 with modded 1333 strap (and from what I see that "modded 1333" is with 4:5 faster than genuine 1066 4:5 :eek:) and a little better - P35 is slower with 4:5 about 1% than i965 4:5 so P35 3:5 5-5-4-4-4 seems slower than i965 4:5 4-4-4-4 :).

http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/5933/1m36ghz2mbcache15203i96wp4.jpg

Nice OMG :up:

When i have the possibility to reinstall Windows, i try to come below 15,4seconds. I dont have D9 ram, so i can only bench @ low ramspeed.

[Chicco85]

Now it's better:

http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/images/5226/1_13_843_mem_2-3_cas_4.JPG

;)

[JMKS]

Nice OMG :up:

When i have the possibility to reinstall Windows, i try to come below 15,4seconds. I dont have D9 ram, so i can only bench @ low ramspeed.
Thx :), i965 with 4:5 really rocks :D {or 2:3 with P35, but as You can see i965 is still equal or even better ;)}.

Sub15,4 450x8 1:1 could be difficult - I tried to re-achieve my previous 14,437 @ 450 1:1 today and I wasn't able to :p: (another installation of Windows, maybe I changed something important :shrug:). Anyway, good luck! :)

Finally, I can say that this score "doesn't suck" :p: as mentioned in first post of that topic ;).

Yes, that Ballistix I have for some tests is really good - 700 Dual Channel benchable @ 2,55V for example :) {on P35}.

[before]

Another one but 4.4.4
13.828s 3608MHz 2:3 4.4.4...
http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/Ballistix%20PC5300/13.828s_2.png


Congrats my friend :toast:

[dinos22]

Another one but 4.4.4
13.828s 3608MHz 2:3 4.4.4...
http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/Ballistix%20PC5300/13.828s_2.png

WTF
how the heck did you pull that time off :shocked:

[Gautam]

3608 :p:

It makes a large difference...I did this originally but never wanted to post it because I believe that 3.6GHz=3600MHz and no higher. But that's just me.

koda's time is the most efficient so far in this thread, barring none, and that no one can argue with.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gautamb/3607_13828.PNG

[v_parrello]

Here there is a system DDR3 powered.
Asus P5k3
E6420 air cooling
DDR3 SuperTalent 1600 7-7-7 Micron Z9
Win2K3

http://www.atris.it/Forum/photoplog/images/5850/1_superpi_1M_3.6_GHz_best_last.JPG

[Learn]

Congrats my friend :toast:
thx ;)

WTF
how the heck did you pull that time off :shocked:
Some basic tweak, wich everybody know now :rolleyes:

3608 :p:

It makes a large difference...I did this originally but never wanted to post it because I believe that 3.6GHz=3600MHz and no higher. But that's just me.

koda's time is the most efficient so far in this thread, barring none, and that no one can argue with.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gautamb/3607_13828.PNG/

See posts #1 #72 #74 #92 ;)
no :rofl:
There is someone (i know) with a much better efficient ;) and a italian dude also

[Gautam]

Hm excuse me Learn I haven't been keeping up with this thread. :) But koda still is .001 faster than you. :hehe:

I know the Italian time you're talking about....I completely do not understand it.

[Learn]

Hm excuse me Learn I haven't been keeping up with this thread. :) But koda still is .001 faster than you. :hehe:

I know the Italian time you're talking about....I completely do not understand it.

I would like to know too :eek: there is a long road it seems :D

[shimmishim]

oh sweet oogly moogly.. i'd like to see this uber sweet italian's score! :D

but Learn, nice clocks and speed!

it's very good to see early samples of DDR3 doing so well.. then again I guess it was like early DDR2 with Micron fatbodies...

[Gautam]

oh sweet oogly moogly.. i'd like to see this uber sweet italian's score! :D


By C.h.r.i.s-

http://img73.imageshack.us/img73/9135/137813600ev3.png

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2038870&postcount=33

Completely incomprehensible. Even 13.828 is very difficult at 3603. This 781 is a good 3 ticks ahead of any other time in this thread.

[Stapler]

That time really doesn't make sense, I gotta wonder if he's hiding the memory info for a reason, and also what the available system cache was during that run (what makes copy waza faster). The RAM timings are tight, but not tighter than any one elses, and not enough to make a difference, so that can't be it.

[Gautam]

The available real memory is likely part of the key. (See his first 1M result in that post where he shows it)

[StealthyFish]

rithina its easy on commando, to go over 600:fact: , just give your ram 2.95v and thats the score you get:D
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=189806

haha. he makes it sound so easy. Only 2.95V :)

[Timbosan]

That time really doesn't make sense, I gotta wonder if he's hiding the memory info for a reason, and also what the available system cache was during that run (what makes copy waza faster). The RAM timings are tight, but not tighter than any one elses, and not enough to make a difference, so that can't be it.

Did you actually look at anyone else's timings lol? The ram timings are actually tighter than most here - he's at 4-4-3-4, the TRFC is 21 as opposed to 30 - 45+ and write to precharge & tWTR are both 9, and TRRD is 1.

[v_parrello]

Did you actually look at anyone else's timings lol? The ram timings are actually tighter than most here - he's at 4-4-3-4, the TRFC is 21 as opposed to 30 - 45+ and write to precharge & tWTR are both 9, and TRRD is 1.

I think that sub timings are not enough tighter to explain that difference. Here there are some very good tweaks and a very good SO optimization.

If I have a look only to their screenshot (400 FSB, 3603 MHz, DDR2-600 4-4-3-4) I must say this is impossible, but for sure there are something that we do not see with screenshot that make this to be possible.

[C.h.r.i.s]

With my old P5B dlx i found a tweak by changing at every reboot the maxmem dimension in a special order (somewhere i have a big paper about it),with this method the first run (only the first run) of the 1M was faster about 30ms,but this tweak doesn't work with my old asus commando (13.812s@3608mhz) and with my new P5K dlx :shrug: .
That's all .:shakes:

[Gautam]

Strange...though 13.812 is still very very good. (Though is more or less equal in difficulty to 13.843 at 3600)

IMHO though C.h.r.i.s...a few hints here and there are nice but you don't need to share all your Pi secrets. :p: Goodness knows I never do. ;)

[C.h.r.i.s]

Strange...though 13.812 is still very very good. (Though is more or less equal in difficulty to 13.843 at 3600)

IMHO though C.h.r.i.s...a few hints here and there are nice but you don't need to share all your Pi secrets. :p: Goodness knows I never do. ;)
The problem is that from now going ahead when someone will find some new tweaks peoples may not believe and we all knows why...:(
This is not a good thing :(
Anyway with the P5K 515x7 5/6 cas5 i'm very slow :p: ;)

EDIT=Sorry for my bad english :(

[koda]

The problem is that from now going ahead when someone will find some new tweaks peoples may not believe and we all knows why...:(
This is not a good thing :(
Anyway with the P5K 515x7 5/6 cas5 i'm very slow :p: ;)

EDIT=Sorry for my bad english :(

We all know that Pi under Linux is really faster than under Windows.
This fact show us that the hardware is not really the main problem to go faster.

I think that all the tweaks are not yet found ... so C.h.r.i.s, maybe you found something really new to improve your time.

[Enoc]

I think that all the tweaks are not yet found ...

true...and that's the main problem...if a guy comes up...discover a tweak and has a time that no one has...the questioning begins and the accusations fly around, and happens he thinks like Gautam (Does not like to share his tweaks) --> example, then escalates to cheater, guy get bitter and gone or not etc...:(...

let's put an example...can 11:50ms be achievable in 32m pi at 8x500 with P965 chipset ...could it be done? it's difficult to imagine it but does not mean it's not possible ... remember mascaras friend running 4-4-4-9 , maybe a unknown tweak...Gautam saw that post too by mascaras...

-->http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/4774/400032meh9.png

everybody has a different approach to tweaking...;)

[Gautam]

Hey, I'm always willing to help anyone dedicated...but to be honest, I've never let everything I do out of the bag and I don't think any serious bencher out there has.

I myself have done 11:51.4xx at 400x10 2:3 4-4-4 so the same time at 500x8 does not seem too far-fetched to me...

[Enoc]

Hey, I'm always willing to help anyone dedicated...but to be honest, I've never let everything I do out of the bag and I don't think any serious bencher out there has.

lol..it was an example...;)


I myself have done 11:51.4xx at 400x10 2:3 4-4-4 so the same time at 500x8 does not seem too far-fetched to me...

try 500x8...:p:

[Gautam]

I never could get that kind of FSB working. :lol:

[Stapler]

500x8 at 4-4-4-9 would be much slower than with the same tweaks at 2:3 4-4-4-x, I'd say 3-5s or so from my experience, but I don't doubt mascaras time at all. It seems to me like we ought to be less judgemental when looking at other people's times. Not very many are going to give up their secrets after you start a witch hunt.

[G H Z]

Played for an hour with this, damned if I can figure it out :up:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v31/canny/3600_1M_13.859.png

[ziddey]

damn it i could have hit #4 for the 2mb category but I didn't take proper screenshot when I did it. Too late now. maybe I'll try again next week with p35, but my memory seems to have degradated, even though I never fed it more than 2.12v in all the time I've owned it and had 2 60mm's blowing on top

[Stapler]

Nice one GHZ, that ram aint to shabby.

[C.h.r.i.s]

We all know that Pi under Linux is really faster than under Windows.
This fact show us that the hardware is not really the main problem to go faster.

I think that all the tweaks are not yet found ... so C.h.r.i.s, maybe you found something really new to improve your time.

I thought the same thing,but i was not able to repeat that tweak again :shrug:

[killingspreez]

hm my OS seems to be too slow...were to get this xplite?

mfg

ah i almost forgot:

http://img475.imageshack.us/img475/2263/400x91t333qb5.th.jpg (http://img475.imageshack.us/my.php?image=400x91t333qb5.jpg)

mfg&#178;

[JMKS]

Hmm... 2,75Vdimm and 450 2:3 @ i965 (with P35 2:3 it was not that good although it requires only 2,55V [unmodded P5K-Dlx])

450x8 2:3 with Allendale (I really want to test it with Conroe and I think I will shortly ;)) - the comparision between 2:3 400x9 4-4-4-4; 450x8 4:5 4-4-4-4 and 450 2:3 5-5-5-5 is interesting IMHO (and I will probably do this on Conroe)

And a [b]little tweak for those who think that "1066 strap" is an ideal performance deal (of course it requires a strong NB, in my case it was @ 1,95V, I didn't tried lower ;)) - [with PMem] FED1403F and "22" instead of "23" in upper left corner is slightly faster :). It is some tweak for X6800 xtreme benching I think ;) (for the rest CPUs it will be probably impossible due to high FSB).
Edit: I must test it properly (and I will, probably today) because on my daily OS this is unmeasurable - I will post later if it makes a difference or not (with 4:5 surely it does IIRC but with 1:1 and 2:3 I'm not sure ATM).

15.157s - I had some 15.156 (and no screenshot - too small update :p:) with 5-5-4-4 instead of 5-5-5-5 but I'm looking for lower time :).

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/4497/1515736002mbkw1.jpg

[JMKS]

Some comparision, still with Allendales unfortunately but this is optimistic also because with Allendales even with 1M there are some differences in score visible with different memory settings ;).

With jumson's E4400: [it could be his score if author is going to update the rating]
E4400 @ 400x9=3600MHz, RAM 2:3 = 600 4-4-4-4 [known as golden memory settings I think ;)] => 15.171s
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/9099/400x92336ghz1m15171em7.th.jpg (http://img214.imageshack.us/my.php?image=400x92336ghz1m15171em7.jpg)

My improvement:
E6400 @ 450x8=3600MHz , RAM OCZ Reaper 9200 2:3 = 675 5-4-4-4 @ 2,9V :eek: => [B]15.125s
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9915/450x82336ghz1m15125dq2.th.jpg (http://img207.imageshack.us/my.php?image=450x82336ghz1m15125dq2.jpg)
That score is I think the best I can do until I will find some nice DDR3 :).

I hope I will be able to test 450x8 2:3 5-4-4-4 with Conroe shorlty but I'm not sure about it.

[Florent]

Nice results JMKS:up:

Jmax made an very impressive run yesterday :
http://www.jmax-hardware.com/ftpjmax_oc/36GP/15.094s.JPG

[JMKS]

Very good run indeed :). I can tie it with 451x8 = 3608MHz probably.

Unfortunately for that kind of FSB [510+, not 450 of course] my E6400 requires subzero [and that E4400 will not reach it even with LN2 probably although we will fight for ~5GHz with it soon ;) - 4,71GHz under DI so far].

Nice to see someone still fighting with "slow" Allendales :).

[monteboy]

DFI P35-T2R , 2:3 , 1200@CL 4 4 4 4
http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/1571/13890spi1mjc5.gif

[Bigchrome]

Scores have been updated.

[monteboy]

and a new update :)

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/1790/13875spi1mkn8.gif

[dinamite2]

p5k dlx
e6600 l631b022
crucial pc8500
win2k03

http://www.pctuner.info/up/results/_200706/20070630135637_rec.jpg

[coop]

Best I could do. Cas 5 with 4/5 divider does well.

[Kamel]

think i'm gonna get the 1st place!

CELLSHOCK DDR3 1800
ASUS BLITZ EXTREME



http://web.tiscali.it/microcool/csddr3/primo.jpg

[shimmishim]

very nice kamel! but i think ddr3 scores shouldn't be allowed!!! j/k :)

just curious.... what hard drive are you using?

[Kamel]

Seagate SATA II 250gb

[v_parrello]

very nice kamel! but i think ddr3 scores shouldn't be allowed!!! j/k :)

....
I think the only constraint is cpu max frequency at 3609 MHz, the rest is not specified.

[dinos22]

think i'm gonna get the 1st place!

CELLSHOCK DDR3 1800
ASUS BLITZ EXTREME



http://web.tiscali.it/microcool/csddr3/primo.jpg

great run

if that CPU can handle 600FSB you could hit 13.7xx easy :D
i wonder with 128MB maxmem and/or lower trrd would do any better

i'm loving these ddr3 benches

[JMKS]

Allendale striking back ;).

E6400 [under DI, wall on air ~510] 514.7x7 = 3602.8MHz, OCZ 9200 Reaper VDimm 3.2V => 4:5 4-4-4-4, modded strap [10, 24, 03, 04, 09 for those who know what it means ;)], all with Commando

RAM was really nicely scaling with V and it survived many hours with VDimm ~3V.
If sticks are still alive? hmm... half-dead unfortunately, one of them is not booting if VDimm < ~2,8V, although it was already in that state during this bench.

15.031s and it is probably not maxed out :)
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/3435/oczfinish4sg8.th.jpg (http://img210.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oczfinish4sg8.jpg)

[Learn]

Allendale striking back ;).

E6400 [under DI, wall on air ~510] 514.7x7 = 3602.8MHz, OCZ 9200 Reaper VDimm 3.2V => 4:5 4-4-4-4, modded strap [10, 24, 03, 04, 09 for those who know what it means ;)], all with Commando

RAM was really nicely scaling with V and it survived many hours with VDimm ~3V.
If sticks are still alive? hmm... half-dead unfortunately, one of them is not booting if VDimm < ~2,8V, although it was already in that state during this bench.

15.031s and it is probably not maxed out :)
http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/3435/oczfinish4sg8.th.jpg (http://img210.imageshack.us/my.php?image=oczfinish4sg8.jpg)

Great time. Next time sub 15s :D

[jmax_oc]

Very impressive time ! I love your timings ;)

[jmax_oc]

36GP 1M C2D 2Mo
15.094s| Jmax_oc | E6300 | Blitz Formula | Crucial Ballistix PC8500 @ 642mhz @ 5-5-4-1
http://www.jmax-hardware.com/ftpjmax_oc/36GP/15.094s.JPG


36GP 1M C2D 4Mo
13.875s| Jmax_oc | E6850 | Blitz Formula | Crucial Ballistix PC8500 @ 643mhz @ 5-5-4-5
http://www.jmax-hardware.com/ftpjmax_oc/36GP/13.875s.JPG

[douirc]

14.187 G.Skill F2-8000PHU2-2GBHZ

http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/8262/spi1sh9.jpg
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/5352/bios011im8.jpg

[BeardyMan]

13.836 at 3608 400.9 5/8 641Mhz 5-5-5-4-7 PL 5 25 -10 -10 -8

Basic tweaks ,dirty instal, trying to figure out how Eram works , japanse is not exactly my language :D
After clean instal some Gautam ass whooping ;)

[dinos22]

13.836 at 3608 400.9 5/8 641Mhz 5-5-5-4-7 PL 5 25 -10 -10 -8

Basic tweaks ,dirty instal, trying to figure out how Eram works , japanse is not exactly my language :D
After clean instal some Gautam ass whooping ;)

screenshot?
basic tweaks?? bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: basic tweaks.....you've got something good going on there :D
sharing is caring :D:D:D:D

[AuriL]

e6850 @3600
mushkin xp6400

basic tweaks , only 14.188

http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/7697/spi14188br8.jpg

[BeardyMan]

screenshot?
basic tweaks?? bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: basic tweaks.....you've got something good going on there :D
sharing is caring :D:D:D:D

for me those are basic tweaks, the known stuff :D
my final result wil be screened :up:

[Gautam]

I'll tell you what's BS, xx.836 is not a possible Pi time. :rolleyes: Don't try and mess with us.

[dinos22]

I'll tell you what's BS, xx.836 is not a possible Pi time. :rolleyes: Don't try and mess with us.

you reckon
maybe it was a bugged run like that other guy

but looking at his timings i am a little surprised at the time :confused:

[Stapler]

you reckon
maybe it was a bugged run like that other guy

but looking at his timings i am a little surprised at the time :confused:

Seeing what this guy has posted in the past I really don't put anything past him:down:

[dinos22]

Seeing what this guy has posted in the past I really don't put anything past him:down:

really
is he being an idiot?
i would ban him if he's here to :banana::banana::banana::banana: with us

[Stapler]

He's been banned a couple times before.

[Gautam]

you reckon
maybe it was a bugged run like that other guy

but looking at his timings i am a little surprised at the time :confused:

My time is faster than the one he claimed. It's just that 836 is not a possible suffix. Nothing between 843 and 828. No, this ain't quite a bannable offense lol. But he does need to stop screwin with us.

[BeardyMan]

I have reinstalled windows and was able to push my time even lower, made screens coming from 13.922 -13.859 - 13.828.
Tomorow i should get a custom version of 2003 wich should be a little faster for superpi as well and perhaps a better time.:)

[before]

M/B：ASUS P5B-Deluxe 1.03G P965C1 rev., Vcore, Vdroop, Vdimm, Vmch mods
CPU：Intel Core2 E6700 L633A550
CPU cooling：Watercooling Alphacool
Memory：Wintec PC2-8000 C5 1024MBx2
VGA：Jaton 8600GS
HDD：Western Digital 80GB
Power Supply：Antec TP 550W
Vcore：1.360V(Bios)
Vdimm：2.62V(Actual)
FSB Termination Voltage：1.45V
NB Voltage：1.71V(Actual)
OS：Windows Server 2003

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/3246/e6700spi1m13875slh0.png

Notice CPU-Z bug... reports 512MB instead of 2048MB and can't shows specifications of the memory kit.

One of my modules don't want to boot anymore... :( Have to wait a while and give it a try again.

[dinos22]

do you think that one of those RAM modules is looking like it's gonna die

i have a similar thing going on with one of my kits

first one module would not boot at stock voltage and now both

Xavier stick it in a freezer for 5 minutes and boot up after taking it out
it will boot :D

[dinos22]

I have reinstalled windows and was able to push my time even lower, made screens coming from 13.922 -13.859 - 13.828.
Tomorow i should get a custom version of 2003 wich should be a little faster for superpi as well and perhaps a better time.:)

what no more .836 :p:

[BeardyMan]

what no more .836 :p:

Lol dinos :D
*i have reinstalled windows :D *
Wich was a stripped down Windows Xp with sp 2 :)

edit*
Trying some new settings right from the box around 0.1 faster then previous settings.

http://users.telenet.be/kuan/13938.JPG

http://users.telenet.be/kuan/13937.JPG
who said what about 0.043-0.028, lol learn your lesson

[Bigchrome]

Emm, Beardy man, you seem VERY confused! And btw 13.937 is not .1 faster...it's .1s slower.

Scores Have been updated and I've changed the way they're listed to make it easier for me...Hope it's not too much worse??

Really impressed by Your big push JMKS! Much more interesting than the 4mb cat. so far.

BTW, No problems with DDR3 results....it's all welcome!

[BeardyMan]

Emm, Beardy man, you seem VERY confused! And btw 13.937 is not .1 faster...it's .1s slower.

Scores Have been updated and I've changed the way they're listed to make it easier for me...Hope it's not too much worse??

Really impressed by Your big push JMKS! Much more interesting than the 4mb cat. so far.

BTW, No problems with DDR3 results....it's all welcome!

Indeed that was confusing i meant 14.000secs 400fsb ddr2 641 fsb vs 450/676 ;)

[djbon2112]

Well, I think I'm at the back of this pack, but I've got a Q6600 so what do you expect!

http://img451.imageshack.us/img451/755/q6600qj6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Florent]

On DFI P965-S :
http://img395.imageshack.us/img395/3565/36gp13859ue0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img452.imageshack.us/img452/8950/32gp15593va1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[shimmishim]

Well, I think I'm at the back of this pack, but I've got a Q6600 so what do you expect!

http://img451.imageshack.us/img451/755/q6600qj6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

you can't make that excuse when eva2000 who has a quadcore scores a 13.906s :D

you can do better... you just don't know it yet ;)

[shimmishim]

my new personal best

13.859s 7x515

http://www.johnshim.com/forums/bleedinedge/superpi/3600.1M.13.859s.jpg

[eva2000]

my turn :D

7x514FSB 1:1 divider 4-4-4-5 = 3598.9Mhz x 13.890 = 49988.72 1M efficiency

1M

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Commando/results/KaylfrozenSS/e6850_l723a347b/4gb/ocz8000_team6400c3/7x/533/514-514_4445_32539610_1.35-1.4-1.65-2.3-1.6-1.2_faster10mv/spi1_13s890ms.png

[over@locker886]

my turn :D

7x514FSB 1:1 divider 4-4-4-5 = 3598.9Mhz x 13.890 = 49988.72 1M efficiency

1M

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Commando/results/KaylfrozenSS/e6850_l723a347b/4gb/ocz8000_team6400c3/7x/533/514-514_4445_32539610_1.35-1.4-1.65-2.3-1.6-1.2_faster10mv/spi1_13s890ms.png


Nice with 4GB setup;)

[Misko]

New results from Team Serbia.

http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/5649/13859pq2.jpg

http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/9321/screenshot026copyik3.png

[Florent]

With my new Asus P5K-E :)

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/4056/1384336gpaw0.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[aasmaukr]

Here's a quick run with P5K Vanilla and 2x1GB 10th Anniversary sticks:

64845

[Misko]

Team Serbia:

http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/8189/1m360013844sgp1.png

[Florent]

Very good run :up:

[v_parrello]

Good improvement (my previous time was 13.828).

Setup:
Asus P5k3
E6420 air cooling
DDR3 SuperTalent 1600 7-7-7 Micron Z9
Win2K3

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/3769/superpi1m13812mc5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[The_Hardstylez]

http://img187.imagevenue.com/loc539/th_43213_15.578_122_539lo.jpg (http://img187.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=43213_15.578_122_539lo.jpg)

15.578s with my E6400 :)

[tiborrr]

http://shrani.si/files/eastkoastl13ab2.jpg
A contribution of Moonman & myself, the duo known as EastKoast of OC-Lab2 :D

http://shrani.si/f/2y/Yb/1f9C4N5Q/lowclock13875.jpg

[nachthymnen]

Win XP+SP2: Eram+MaxMem
Low FSB:rolleyes:

13.875
http://www.pctunerup.com/up/results/_200710/20071024170518_1M360913.875.jpg

[=Pseudo=]

My Quad @ 8x450 (can't run it @4x514 nor my mems run @4-4-4-x with that clock...:mad:)
anyhow -->13.906s

http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/2403/q66003600spiddw7.th.jpg (http://img518.imageshack.us/my.php?image=q66003600spiddw7.jpg)

[BNDMOD]

Mine:
Un-Tweak....
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/3492/3601mhz600ram2355515yh0.th.jpg (http://img222.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3601mhz600ram2355515yh0.jpg)

[matose]

No tweaks because I was playing with the memory :D!

[marcolecorse]

Hey Gautam,
You can do it (and maybe better) ;)

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/5882/sp1m363gi8.th.jpg (http://img522.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sp1m363gi8.jpg)

Thx to Stan
nice

[dinos22]

13.843s

looks like i'm gonna have to try a little harder ;) :D

http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/822/36ghz1msuperpi823mhz755rk1.png

[Vatos_locos]

i'am so behind :D

[KTE]

I managed to pull off some quick tests @3600Mhz and managed my fastest Super Pi 1M and 32M times to date for a quad core Kentsfield Q6600 cpu :woot:

Super Pi 1M
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/Corsair/10000C5D/8x/667/450-562_4445_4-25-434_1.5-A-1.5-2.35-1.4-1.55-1.2/superpi-1m_13s906ms.png

You can do better than that, sub 13.9. ;)

Here's a slow one compared to all else'. Compare: http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/839/6thbesttimeat3600kx7.png

Look at my timings/subtimings. To keep it simple, no LSC, no maxmem, no CDT, no CW, no Memtest, no other tweak. What you see is what you get. I used SetFSB from low clocks though because BIOS failed to OC and closest I got to 3600 is that.

Don't include my that result on the list please. It 'aint for submission and neither am I into Pi. I just wanted to share the knowledge with this guy or any other thats interested as they can get faster. Don't be daft and say "you can't" just because you don't know it or can't do it yourself. That's what the narrow minded flat earthers believed for thousands of years because of this attitude. It blinds expansion of knowledge and facts. :)

[Monstru]

Ok, here is what I've got until now. The result is pulled out preety much only from RAM clocks and timings, no serious tweaks yet :cool:

13.875s - E6600@3598Mhz, 2x1024MB Crucial Ballistix@1200 4-4-4-4, DFI Infinity P965-S