Sub 4 GHz Pi Thread [Archive] - XtremeSystems Forums

Gautam

12-22-2006, 11:25 PM

I know we had a 3 GHz version for A64's, surprised we don't have one of these already. Only rule is stay below 4 GHz. :)

Edit: Took the liberty of making a list tabulating the top 10 results, along with memory speeds/timings and chipset.

6MB L2 Cache/Core
1. Rol-co..........11.234.......X38........680MHz 5-5-5-8 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2615883&postcount=261)
2. JMKS............11.266.......P35........600MHz 4-4-4-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2585905&postcount=260)

4MB L2 Cache/Core
1. Diegis0n........12.453.......X38........710MHz 5-5-5-5 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2812112&postcount=269)
2. Misko...........12.484.......P35........600MHz 4-4-4-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2544275&postcount=244)
3. 3oh6............12.500.......P35........913MHz 7-6-5-16 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2565805&postcount=254)
3. Gautam..........12.500.......i965.......600MHz 4-4-4-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2172152&postcount=167)
3. Spacemaster.....12.500.......P35........888MHz 7-6-5-17 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2489260&postcount=242)
4. aasmaukr........12.515.......P35........625MHz 5-5-4-5 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2451084&postcount=240)
4. coop............12.515.......P35........625MHz 5-4-4-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2403440&postcount=236)
5. MidnightMadness.12.516.......i965.......553MHz 4-4-4-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2104356&postcount=152)
6. G H Z...........12.516.......i965.......600MHz 4-4-3-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2160791&postcount=158)
6. Rol-co..........12.516.......i965.......600MHz 4-4-3-5 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2069025&postcount=108)
6. dinos22.........12.516.......i965.......600MHz 4-4-4-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2200943&postcount=186)
7. learn...........12.516.......p35........571MHz 4-4-4-4 (http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/benchs/10.08.2007/1M-3999.9-12.516.png)
7. monteboy........12.516.......P35........600MHz 4-4-4-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2346698&postcount=208)
8. andre x_x.......12.531.......i965.......444MHz 4-4-4-5 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2186166&postcount=173)
8. Oldscarface.....12.531.......i965.......666MHz 5-5-4-10 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2078929&postcount=134)
9. Yotomeczek......12.531.......i965.......500MHz 4-4-4-4 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2163801&postcount=164)
9. luihed..........12.531.......i965.......500MHz 4-4-4-12 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2188754&postcount=179)
10.eva2000.........12.531.......i965.......600MHz 5-5-4-5 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2212660&postcount=193)

kiwi

12-23-2006, 06:38 AM

Would be good to mention your chipset :)

Here is p5b dlx but asus needs to fix that 444 > 333 timing glitch and 4:5 problem. Otherwise sub 12.6 is not so easy unless your RAM can do 650+ :D

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/3586/sub4ghz1mtd9.jpg

Supertim0r

12-23-2006, 10:06 AM

click here (http://simon.webideal.ca/Bench/4gig%201m%20fatd9.JPG)

Gautam

12-23-2006, 10:32 AM

Looks good bro, but the rule is staying below 4 GHz. ;)

i975X here, P5W DH.

VictorWang

12-23-2006, 10:48 AM

on AW9D-Max

3997mhz = 12.610

Gautam

12-23-2006, 05:48 PM

If sub 12.6 is what you're looking for, sure. Sub 12.5 is what will be interesting though...need one of the guys that can pull off 400x10 2:3 CL4. How about it Victor? ;)

before

12-24-2006, 02:42 AM

hehe nice times Gautam bro :toast: Theme is good, isn't it? We need to find an ad hoc scheme; we may find something better by customizing it.

So; I'll post my times later :D

Viss

12-26-2006, 02:56 PM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v636/loc_oc/4G.jpg

patrickadizzle

12-28-2006, 11:13 PM

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/290/untitledvp8.jpg

funkflix

12-31-2006, 01:41 AM

Here with my B1 on P5B.

http://666kb.com/i/akk2zjj1tbujrt4t9.jpg

dinos22

12-31-2006, 06:42 AM

Revv23

01-02-2007, 08:52 PM

p5b doesn' t like too tight a timings in case some of you guys didn't realise so back off a little on them :) great times too

when will Anus fix 4:5 divider :slapass: :slapass: :slapass: :slapass: :slapass:

what do you mean? 4:5 works just fine. certainly you clock higher in other dividers but latencies are best with 4:5, and thats all that matters really.

dinos22

01-02-2007, 09:57 PM

what do you mean? 4:5 works just fine. certainly you clock higher in other dividers but latencies are best with 4:5, and thats all that matters really.
problem is that the RAM just doesn't reach nowhere near the other dividers.............i'd like them to loosen it up if necessary just to close that gap a little in clocks as 965 chipset doesn't like CAS3 or tighter timings in general :(

G H Z

01-03-2007, 12:32 AM

Woops I guess I didn't tie you Gautam ;)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v31/canny/4ghz.jpg

kiwi

01-03-2007, 12:02 PM

what do you mean? 4:5 works just fine. certainly you clock higher in other dividers but latencies are best with 4:5, and thats all that matters really.

There are very, very few p5b dlx boards that work 4:5 and > 500Mhz

Viss

01-03-2007, 02:28 PM

Stock P5B dlx.

Mem:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v292/Viss1/1M5-5-5613.jpg

FSB:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v636/loc_oc/FSB572.jpg

However at same voltages max i reach with 4/5 is 453FSB.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v636/loc_oc/4-5.jpg

dinos22

01-03-2007, 03:14 PM

you're lucky your board/RAM can do that...........

my RAM does 543MHz on 1:2 divider and around 480 on 4:5 :(

Gautam

01-03-2007, 05:49 PM

Woops I guess I didn't tie you Gautam ;)

Heh, I was getting nervous for a bit. Still very strong for CAS 4...but you got the 1T on your side. I'm quite impressed, I always thought the 590 was far inferior to the i975 clock for clock, but you're very close if not ahead at the same timings, not to mention no one on the 965 side has caught you yet. :p:

About the 4:5, I personally believe that it is a SPD-related issue. Asus fixed the 4:5 in one of the later BIOSes on the P5W DH. They probably slackened some timing up that's already loose on higher speed (6400, 8000+) If we knew what it was, it could probably be done on the P5B as well.

Nice stuff loc.o. How do things work out at CAS 4 and 4:5?

Viss

01-04-2007, 12:49 AM

Nice stuff loc.o. How do things work out at CAS 4 and 4:5?

Thank you. Cas 4 makes it worse. Memory can do 570 4-4-4-10 but with 4/5 even 450/562 wil make system reboot.

shogo_ca

01-07-2007, 08:06 PM

Cpu is jumping from 3999 to 4010 so you could say it counts..
Its on air cooling
http://www.oliviercouture.com/PC/Benches/SPI_1M_4010mhz.JPG

Mine seems a bit slow compared to yours, tried 4-3-3-4 at 2.35vdimm but didnt boot. maybe 2.5vdimm but seems a bit scary for me...

zakelwe

01-11-2007, 01:37 PM

Here's my effort.

http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/pi1.jpg

Regards

Andy

G H Z

01-11-2007, 02:21 PM

Nice timings Andy, 9X working maybe?

Norz

01-11-2007, 06:56 PM

....and some slow allendale action..lol...
I really suc## in this:D

E6300@3795 Crucial 10th Anniversary PC5300@2,25v
EDIT: norz aka nassuz(diskusjon.no)

http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l98/nassuz/nassuz-bench/th_spi.jpg (http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l98/nassuz/nassuz-bench/spi.jpg)

Gautam

01-11-2007, 06:59 PM

Still very nice speed for a 6300. :)

So, Andy, just how deep into 2D are ya willing to get? :D

zakelwe

01-11-2007, 11:26 PM

Nice timings Andy, 9X working maybe?

Not at 444 that's for sure. Maybe 3-4-3-8 might, will have to try it tonight but I think it will be slower. Will also read the tweaks thread for the first time ever :)

So, Andy, just how deep into 2D are ya willing to get? :D

Not too deep, even during those runs I was thinking about lobby hi :D However I do like a challenge, the runs are over quick and it is nice to not worry about the video cards for once. Should be some payback in 2001 as well.

I seem to be very close, 0.1s, however I get the feeling that might be a big gap in SuperPi when cpu capped, I am not experienced enough to tell.

Regards
Andy

zakelwe

01-13-2007, 07:49 AM

Just volt modded the motherboard. now 2.65v for memory, will see if I can hit 444x9.

Regards

Andy

funkflix

01-16-2007, 04:54 AM

Now on 1066-strap and 500MHz 1:1, but can't get much lower.. B1 and just 2x512MB holding me back.

http://666kb.com/i/al0fsc7cnqevt9xhe.jpg

dinos22

01-19-2007, 03:59 PM

Now on 1066-strap and 500MHz 1:1, but can't get much lower.. B1 and just 2x512MB holding me back.

http://666kb.com/i/al0fsc7cnqevt9xhe.jpg
great result considering it's a b1 and 1GB total :toast:

funkflix

01-19-2007, 04:13 PM

Thx!

It's strange, that i can't get this 500MHz 4-4-4-x on my OCZ PC5400EB Platinum.. They was pretestet 475MHz 4-3-2-6 2,5V.. but on a Bad Axe 304. :confused:

http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/7317/32m470mhz432601joecooltv2.gif

dinos22

01-19-2007, 04:17 PM

funkflix

01-19-2007, 04:19 PM

Yeah, but shouldn't be the ram work fine on 1:1 with that frequenzy and timings too? Or can u clock the RAM higher on i975 with 4:5?

Imho 965P just do not like Fatbodies at all.. that sucks.

dinos22

01-19-2007, 04:25 PM

Yeah, but shouldn't be the ram work fine on 1:1 with that frequenzy and timings too? Or can u clock the RAM higher on i975 with 4:5?

Imho 965P just do not like Fatbodies at all.. that sucks.
from memory that RAM is fatbody.........and there is just something about freaking Anus and fatbody....it likes some and hates others

mostly hates others hehre

I had OCZ 4200EB fatbody RAM and they clocks WORSE on Anus comapred to Gigacrap DS3.........but i managed to get the clocks close to DS3 with some serious sub-timing tweaking....i can't remember what timings were in question but there was a big gain 40-50Mhz from a single subtiming from memory

funkflix

01-19-2007, 04:38 PM

but i managed to get the clocks close to DS3 with some serious sub-timing tweaking....i can't remember what timings were in question but there was a big gain 40-50Mhz from a single subtiming from memory

Ok thx, it seems that i have to invest a few hours more as i already did to get the ballistix working.. :p:

Norz

01-19-2007, 08:21 PM

Im I the only E6300 in here?
I have posted a crappy 1M score,but this 32M i worked hard for:D

A special thanks to my Crucial 10th Anniversary:D ...love`m

Stock P5B E Plus + water cpu nb

http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l98/nassuz/nassuz-bench/spi-1.jpg

Misko

01-20-2007, 03:40 AM

Im I the only E6300 in here?

Of course not my friend ;), I did this with my friend

http://www.benchmark.co.yu/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=18705&d=1166094197

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=146435

:toast:

Mongoose420

01-20-2007, 04:11 AM

cpu speed bounces around a touch for some reason. Not bad for defualt memory sub timings and and zero windows tweaks =)

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/8568/445x9pipi2.th.jpg (http://img263.imageshack.us/my.php?image=445x9pipi2.jpg)

Norz

01-20-2007, 05:00 AM

....lol....Misko82:D im glad it was you who beat my score,but of course i had a better one i wanted to show off 1M-14,78....no need now... Think i posted that on hwbot.

Let me see you take down 32M-13,50sec.

I cannot improve my scores with E6300,i sold the bugger, got some E6600 action coming soon.

----cheers----

:toast:

Misko

01-21-2007, 03:38 PM

Zeus

01-25-2007, 09:43 AM

My initial result with Intel, haven't tweaked a thing.

Unfortunately the board's limit is 435MHz (Asus P5W DH deluxe) so for now i'm maxed out @ 3.9GHz.
Might hit around 12.5seconds @ 3.99GHz and some memtimings tweaking.

Gautam

01-25-2007, 12:20 PM

That's quite solid for 3.9GHz Zeus, keep on going. Unlike 965, you will notice a small improvement going from 4-4-4 to 4-4-3 btw. CAS 4 to CAS 3 is about .03 sec. If you get around to modding the board you should see quite an improvement. I had one that topped at ~430 umodded and made it to 475 benchable for 1M Pi with 2.1v vmch.

Bigger clocks and quicker times than AMD eh. :p:

Zeus

01-25-2007, 01:25 PM

Thanks. :)

2.1Vmch? how did you cool the NB?
I'm considering watercooling on the NB, and maybe the Vmch mod, 1.65V just doesn't seem to cut it.

I only have this setup for 2 days so i have to learn a lot about this board, mem and cpu, it 's quite different to an Opteron, NF4 and DDR1. :D

Atm i'm runing Orthos at 3.6GHz only 1.4375Vcore in bios, so CPU seems rather nice.
For sure i will come up with better score's at under 4GHz, just to keep this thread alive. :D ;)

Blknoel

01-25-2007, 01:46 PM

Lunae

01-26-2007, 01:33 AM

Result with E6600. Mem @ 3-3-3-8 G.Skill 6400PHU2-2GBHZ @ 2.35V
Dunno how to get it better @ sub 4ghz.

http://www.giga-design.nl/12.7.np.PNG

3oh6

01-26-2007, 03:55 PM

i finally got a 4MB conroe and had some time today to play. this is about the best i could squeeze out of my P5B-Dlx.
i could only ClockGen up to 420FSB on the 4:5 divider, if i could run 444 on the tight strap with the 4:5 i am sure i could
get a couple more hundredths off this time.

444*9 (boot at 400) 3-4-3-4 1:1 = 12.593
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v220/3oh6/xsforum/super_pi/444x9_3-4-3-4_boot400-1.png

571*7 (boot at 571) 4-4-4-4 1:1 = 12.594
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v220/3oh6/xsforum/super_pi/571x7_4-4-4-4_boot571-1.png

Norz

01-26-2007, 04:30 PM

Norz your ram can do 540 at cas 4, why did you use cas 5?

And I did 4Ghz Pi time on my E6300 as well, but its no where near full-fledged conroes' results (4MB cache), which is why I haven't posted it.

14.266s is just too much >.<

well sometimes im lazy:p: ...that run i did again with4-4-4-10 who is a golden setting for my Crucial. Think i posted that on hwbot,cant remember.

But my E6300 is sold so i cannot do it again,im sorry. But my E6400 at sub 4ghz will do 14 sec flat. Will try that now on 4-4-4-10.... Back for pic in 14sec:D :D

EDIT: Heres sub 4Ghz@E6400 14.078sec
Ofcourse i can do this with 4-3-4-8@2.4v ...test tomorrow,i drinking beer now...lol...

http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l98/nassuz/E6400/spi1m14.jpg

Zeus

01-29-2007, 01:20 PM

The best i could do:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=55213&stc=1&d=1170105216

At 3999MHz it must be pretty damn close to 12,5 sec.

Gautam

01-29-2007, 01:23 PM

i finally got a 4MB conroe and had some time today to play. this is about the best i could squeeze out of my P5B-Dlx.
i could only ClockGen up to 420FSB on the 4:5 divider, if i could run 444 on the tight strap with the 4:5 i am sure i could
get a couple more hundredths off this time.

Very nice times, fastest here so far for i965. :clap:

Zeus, 4-3-3 is interesting. What memory is that? Fatties?

Viss

01-29-2007, 01:32 PM

Very nice 3ho6. Wil have another go with 571 :D

Zeus

01-29-2007, 01:35 PM

3-3-3 was no go at this speed, that's why i went with 4-3-3.

It's Gskill 6400HZ with micron chips.

Don't know what exactly fatty's are, i'm brand new to Intel and DDR2, forgive my noobness. ;)

funkflix

01-30-2007, 04:35 AM

Fatbodies is what i have for example, old Micron D9 with bigger package and 90nm instead of 80nm from newer D9s. ;)

Now with my full amount of ram, but my OCZ need 2,6V to get through 1M with that speed and timings.. :mad:

http://666kb.com/i/alem8aimne64kc2wo.jpeg

Zeus

02-01-2007, 09:48 AM

Homing in on 4GHz.

I just can't manage to get this board to boot at 443MHz, i tried the Vmch pencilmod but it didn't work out well.

For some reson i only measure 1.3V with my DMM when i set 1.5V in bios. :confused:

Result so far looks promising:

Zeus

02-02-2007, 04:13 AM

12.5xx done @ sub 4GHz. :)

Took some tweaking to get there, i had to boot at 9x435 which is barely stable enough to boot into windows, open memset and set trd from 6 to 7.

Then it was nice and stable and could work my way up with ClockGen, 4022MHz was the best i could do with 1.585Vcore and watercooling.

That kinda makes me member of the 4GHz club right? :D

Gautam

02-02-2007, 09:58 AM

Congrats. :) Fast clocks and fast score.

Zeus

02-02-2007, 10:55 AM

Tnx Gautam.

I wonder what trd@6 would have brought though.
Oh well, you can't have it all. ;)

ZoLKoRn

02-18-2007, 02:31 AM

E6700@4.0GHz on Air 1.63V ( 500x8 ) , P5B Deluxe , G.SKILL 8000HZ 4-4-4-5

http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/pic/67004G.jpg

Bootup05

02-18-2007, 03:13 AM

Damn I hate my ram, board > ram incompatibilty, wont POST with manual timings.

So im stuck at 5-5-5-18-2T:(

Anyway my quickest time is 16.360s, il get a screeny in a min, this was at 3.65GHz (E6400) BTW, my ram craps out after that, (455FSB IIRC)

before

02-18-2007, 02:05 PM

Looking good... sub-50000 performance score :D

http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/3369/e6600spi1m12484ye8.png

My mounting was cracking while taking the screenshot... :)

Gautam

02-18-2007, 02:08 PM

You haven't officially gotten me yet, you're 3.6MHz above the cutoff. :D :sofa:

But seriously, :slobber: 49xxx at 4 GHz is jaw-dropping. :eek: Completely destroyed everyone else in this thread. :hehe:

I knew 2:3 400MHz on 965 was fast...but THAT fast?? Perhaps I need an i965 board now. ;)

Viss

02-18-2007, 02:12 PM

and with 2x512... :clap: Am waiting on ram to do 12.5 but this is incredible.

coop

02-18-2007, 02:14 PM

@ before, can you try 10x399? A very decent time though regardless. Yes, like they said,with 965 and 2-512's. 32m would be interesting.

eva2000

02-24-2007, 04:18 PM

Here's my contribution

http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/cpus/X6800/L627A872/photos/X6800_arrived_01.jpghttp://i4memory.com/reviewimages/cpus/X6800/L627A872/photos/X6800_arrived_06.JPG
http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/cpus/X6800/L627A872/photos/X6800_arrived_02.jpg

System:

Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 L627A872 B2 Step 6
Swiftech Apogee/Radiical Triple Fan Single Pass Rad/MCP655 + Kayl 100W Custom PSU
Asus 680i Striker Extreme 0402 bios
128MB Gainward FX5200 PCI card
2GB OCZ PC2-8000 Titanium Alpha VX2
4x80GB Hitachi 7K80 SATAII Raid 0 on SATA3 to SATA6 ports
Pioneer DVD Burner
600W OCZ EvoStream (http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=3262)

Super Pi 1M
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/680i_striker/results/X6800_1/ocz/titaniumalphavx2/8000/0402/10x/unlinked/2t/2_3divider/400-600-5333-2-1-2-8-2-24_1.725-2.5-1.35-1.7-1.5-1.4/superpi-1m_single_12s547ms.png

Everest Bandwidth with 42.7ns latency
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/680i_striker/results/X6800_1/ocz/titaniumalphavx2/8000/0402/10x/unlinked/2t/2_3divider/400-600-5333-2-1-2-8-2-24_1.725-2.5-1.35-1.7-1.5-1.4/everest_bandwidth.png

Super Pi 1M
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/680i_striker/results/X6800_1/ocz/titaniumalphavx2/8000/0402/10x/unlinked/2t/2_3divider/395-592-5335-3-1-6-8-3-28_1.675-2.5-1.3-1.75-1.5-1.3/superpi-1m_single_12s719ms.png

Super Pi 32M
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/680i_striker/results/X6800_1/ocz/titaniumalphavx2/8000/0402/10x/unlinked/2t/2_3divider/395-592-5335-3-1-6-8-3-28_1.675-2.5-1.3-1.75-1.5-1.3/superpi-32m_single_12m31s844ms.png

Everest Bandwidth with 43.0ns latency
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/680i_striker/results/X6800_1/ocz/titaniumalphavx2/8000/0402/10x/unlinked/2t/2_3divider/395-592-5335-3-1-6-8-3-28_1.675-2.5-1.3-1.75-1.5-1.3/everest_bandwidth.png

Gautam

02-24-2007, 04:21 PM

Nice one! :up:

Working on tabulating all this stuff for the first post...its an interesting way to show which memory configs work best, all normalized at one CPU speed.

alpha0ne

02-24-2007, 07:51 PM

Heres an old one, using 2x1GB G.Skill and an Anus P5W DH :eek:

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b29/alpha0ne/1M3.jpg

Death^Dread

02-25-2007, 10:52 AM

... using ... an Anus P5W DH :eek:

Was that intentional?
looking at your sig i'm inclinded to think it was ;)

nice score though :)

Rol-Co

03-06-2007, 07:26 PM

tried this one too.... had little bit faster but rebooted wile saving :mad:

asus commando
x6800 air Gemini II cooled
G.skill 8500Hz 2gb 2.45v bios

http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/4g1mgem.JPG

:banana:

Gautam

03-06-2007, 07:31 PM

Puts you in a very close second. :p:

Rol-Co

03-07-2007, 04:53 AM

yep
you need to work on youre time Gautam ;)

edit:
Ran this one a few times already but didn't manage to save it..... till now :banana:

http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/12531.JPG

http://octs.ripping.org/nana2.gif

Gautam

03-07-2007, 02:37 PM

There's only so much I can do with i975X bro. Find me a better time done on that chipset and I'll agree...

before

03-07-2007, 02:57 PM

When will you receive the Commando? :D

Rol-Co

03-07-2007, 02:59 PM

There's only so much I can do with i975X bro. Find me a better time done on that chipset and I'll agree...

nobody told you to use a i975 board ;)

gona try when i have my p5w back... fastest i could find overhere is is a very old one 12.750

Gautam

03-07-2007, 03:02 PM

When will you receive the Commando? :D
What Commando? :confused:

;)

ncsa

03-07-2007, 05:18 PM

A quick run on a DFI Infinity 975X/G @ 399x10

Gautam

03-07-2007, 05:25 PM

Awesome RAM frequency there! Amazing for i975X. Too bad 2x1024 can't do the same. :-/

boblemagnifique

03-07-2007, 06:00 PM

Xp LSD 3.5 , little Optimisation , 4go Geil/Cell Shock/Patriot , Strap 1066

http://boblemagnifique36.free.fr/Overclocking/CartesMeres/AbitAb9QuadGT/C2D6600/40GP.JPG

Rol-Co

03-07-2007, 08:03 PM

i think that's a little to high for the record ........ 8mhz is difference

Gautam

03-07-2007, 08:38 PM

Yes, this is true. 8MHz at those speeds are worth about .02 secs, which would make a ranking difference. It still is a great time for 500MHz 1:1.

I've been letting before sit up there with 3.6MHz too much just because I know he'd have tops regardless, but its probably about time he rebenches a notch lower as well just for the sake of propriety. :D

boblemagnifique

03-07-2007, 08:58 PM

LOL, not engraves, in any way it was a fast benchs under XP, I would test later with my new 6600 and my Quad GT volt vmod and under 2k3 with the councils of Before and Learn for the optis :D

before

03-08-2007, 12:36 AM

overcrash86

03-08-2007, 01:45 AM

http://wowgame.free.fr/Conroe%20E6600%20ES/GEIL/12.531s%204005Mhz%20667%204-4-4-12%203.06v-2.JPG

before

03-08-2007, 01:51 AM

How much volts on these modules to bench @667MHz 4-4-4-12? :o

overcrash86

03-08-2007, 01:59 AM

How much volts on these modules to bench @667MHz 4-4-4-12? :o

3.06v real, but it's an old screen ;)

before

03-08-2007, 02:02 AM

woot; that's insane! :D

eva2000

03-08-2007, 05:46 AM

3.06v real, but it's an old screen ;)
You crazy bugger! :D

overcrash86

03-08-2007, 05:48 AM

You crazy bugger! :D

this kit is always alive :D

dinos22

03-08-2007, 05:50 AM

lol crash you love your volts :D

SeLecT

03-08-2007, 05:57 AM

E6600ES @ 3978Mhz @ 1,52V
P5WDG2 WS Pro
2*1024MB Cellshock PC6400 @ 442 @ 4-4-4-8

12,828 s (no Tweaks)

http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/7038/unben3634anntjg3.jpg

overcrash86

03-08-2007, 06:01 AM

lol crash you love your volts :D

yeah, my Gskill take over 3.2v before dying

this one can get 3.1v, but no gain over ...

Rol-Co

03-08-2007, 07:25 AM

Nice run bob :toast:

@Gautam: hehe :D Wintec are about to arrive @12 oclock... D9 or not D9, that's the question? But I guess will be D9GKX... challenge will become unfair with me running 2*1024Mb! :p:

what wintec before ?? the ampx 8000 ?? have 3 sets overhere .....its gkx

overcrash86

:eek: 3v ??? wtf .... you're crazy dude
but seems to be not faster as 400x10 2:3 600 ,thats kinda weird.p5b or commando ?

dinos22

03-08-2007, 07:26 AM

his chip is a B1 stepping too don't forget

overcrash86

03-08-2007, 07:32 AM

what wintec before ?? the ampx 8000 ?? have 3 sets overhere .....its gkx

overcrash86

:eek: 3v ??? wtf .... you're crazy dude
but seems to be not faster as 400x10 2:3 600 ,thats kinda weird.p5b or commando ?

step 5 & not optimized, just testing max ;)

so my died Gskill have done 3.15v benchable :

http://wowgame.free.fr/Conroe%20E6600%20ES/Gskill%206400%20HZ/3.15v.JPG
http://wowgame.free.fr/Conroe%20E6600%20ES/Gskill%206400%20HZ/Pi%201M%20600Mhz%204-4-3-1%2013.937s-2.JPG

boblemagnifique

03-08-2007, 07:49 AM

Suxxxx 3.15v :o

3.4/3.5v mini :D

overcrash86

03-08-2007, 07:54 AM

Suxxxx 3.15v :o

3.4/3.5v mini :D

jor bob style :D
first boot 3v
second boot 3.4v
third boot burned :fight:

Gautam

03-08-2007, 08:43 AM

You guys certainly have some strong nerves there. :eek:

before

03-08-2007, 08:45 AM

what wintec before ?? the ampx 8000 ?? have 3 sets overhere .....its gkx

yep :D these RAMs are truely insane!

sang

03-08-2007, 01:14 PM

hmm...how about 444x9 with 1:1 3-2-2-6 (2x512) on i965?
Will pass before's run with 600 4-4-3-4 ?
any predictions ? :)

Zeus

03-08-2007, 01:25 PM

hmm...how about 444x9 with 1:1 3-2-2-6 (2x512) on i965?
Will pass before's run with 600 4-4-3-4 ?
any predictions ? :)

It won't, SuperPI with Conroe setup is all about memspeed, timings seem to be less important.

Please prove me wrong. ;)

Misko

03-08-2007, 01:27 PM

hmm...how about 444x9 with 1:1 3-2-2-6 (2x512) on i965?
Will pass before's run with 600 4-4-3-4 ?
any predictions ? :)

to play with 2 on 965 is very very hard, even if u make it, it would be probably slower than before's result.

Gautam

03-08-2007, 03:21 PM

hmm...how about 444x9 with 1:1 3-2-2-6 (2x512) on i965?
Will pass before's run with 600 4-4-3-4 ?
any predictions ? :)
Probably not, but couldn't hurt to try. :D

zakelwe

03-09-2007, 06:02 AM

I think a 680i running 444x9 with really tight subtimings would show these upity Intel boards a thing or two :D

3-3-2-3-1T-3-12-3-5-3-3.9

should do it fine I think.

Regards
Andy

zakelwe

03-09-2007, 06:09 AM

Marvin_The_Martian

03-09-2007, 09:46 AM

http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/9449/12938ssuperpift4.th.png (http://img48.imageshack.us/my.php?image=12938ssuperpift4.png)

My vx2's, well one stick is bad gives errors even on stock speeds and timings and since I removed a hs I can't rma it. That's why the low ram clocks. Got 2x512 geils which did 1044 5-5-5 on my ds3 but they don't like the p5w dh it seems. Dirty xp sp2, no maxmem no copy waza just diagnostics mode and real time. Will try to better myself this weekend though, but not sure what to do... either try again with the vx on low speeds cas3 or try with the geils on higher mhz but very relaxt timings ( powerchip ic's I been told ).

Gautam

03-09-2007, 09:50 AM

Also, the top 3 placings in the table on the first page are not under 4Ghz and so should be removed. They can resubmit below 4Ghz or have their own 4Ghz+ SuperPi thread. In the current climate I think rulez is rulez.

That's my opinion on the matter, it's your thread though.

Regards

Andy
4000.0MHz is fine in my book. 4003.6 isn't, so I'll give Xavier a day or so more for a rebench before removing his score. Note that his was the last score above 4000MHz that I added.

MartianInvader- that's actually pretty impressive for the low memory speed.

I never noticed a difference with diag mode, but some say it actually hurts on Intel. Can your Geils do 444 1:1 4-4-4 or similar?

Marvin_The_Martian

03-09-2007, 12:45 PM

The geil's did cas4 at those speed iirc on the ds3 but not on the p5w dh. Atleast haven't gotten them there yet. Board is stock even stock tim, but tomorrow I'm trying to get it down abit. 2k3 copy waza and maxmem should get me abit lower at the same settings then xp sp2 diagnostic mode and real time + affinity I hope. I got most of my tips from this forum lol but it's confusing sometimes because some things which people say should work don't do much for me and some things people say should not work do work.. like affinity.

Really blows one of my vx sticks is buggerd :(

staxm

03-09-2007, 07:26 PM

abit QuadGT bios beta06
e6600@1.635v
crucial ballistix PC6400@2.6v cas4-4-3-4
silverstone st56f

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/2169/screenshot007ar9.th.png (http://img135.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshot007ar9.png)

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=176026

Rol-Co

03-10-2007, 01:38 AM

boblemagnifique

03-10-2007, 03:13 AM

Strap 1066

There is problem with 2go at more 570/580mhz for the moment (i test 6x1go ...)

Marvin_The_Martian

03-10-2007, 04:08 PM

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/3043/127352qe0.th.png (http://img339.imageshack.us/my.php?image=127352qe0.png)

Can't play with you people yet, even with a more normal ram speed. I hate having these sticks and getting them stable at their rated speeds :mad:

Edit: strange my imageshack link didn't work so I had to use the attachment system for the first time in my life rofl.... the windows didn't mention any size resistriction but it does mess up the page layout here, do I need to resize it?

Rol-Co

03-14-2007, 11:40 AM

coming close Before ...... :p:

http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/4g1mspeed.JPG

but running out of options/possibility's :(

Viss

03-15-2007, 02:51 AM

Very nice. Next stop 12.4xx :D

andre X_X

03-15-2007, 11:56 AM

watch out kiwi.... :D
this only with CL5... with CL4 would probably delivers me to 12.5

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/350/1msub4gho5.jpg

Norz

03-16-2007, 06:51 AM

Got this QuadGT for 3 days now, this 1066strap is really difficult on divider, the mem also only manage 1175 at the moment, but this is my best so far, greate performance on this Abit:D

The latency over 450fsb on 4:5 (4-4-4-10) is under 40ns.... getting real high vdimm (2.425v+)

Marvin_The_Martian

03-16-2007, 07:44 AM

Hehe even with 200mhz clockspeed diffrence my 12.735 isn't that bad I recon :woot:

andre X_X

03-16-2007, 09:38 AM

finally break sub 12.6 :D
1066 strap was verrryy helpful.... i got 12.609 mostly, and only once 12.594 :D
boot at 400 CL4-4-4-4-4-8-10-8-10, change the subtimings with memset, and then clockgened to 444mhz...

result:
http://img108.imageshack.us/img108/6949/1msub4gbestivbs9.jpg

Xevipiu

03-16-2007, 02:26 PM

AW9D-MAX i975
1:1 4-2-2-1 2.1v
http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/8081/02largeuz8.jpg

4:5 4-3-2-1 2.3v
http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/3862/05largeqc4.jpg

andre X_X

03-16-2007, 07:47 PM

hahah... you beat my time by 0.001s, you might get 12.4x with the right tweak and playing with subtimings...;D

Norz

03-17-2007, 03:20 AM

nice :D and how does 4:5 work on the abit?

....like this:D
Anyone got som ideas for better=faster subtimings on my crucial 10th?

Rol-Co

03-17-2007, 04:14 AM

nice 1m
but 4:5 works still above 445 fsb on the 1066 strap ?

Norz

03-17-2007, 04:58 AM

nice 1m
but 4:5 works still above 445 fsb on the 1066 strap ?

With this bios, beta .10 it craps out on 1150mhz w thight timings and 1175mhz w relaxed timings, the 1066 strap delivers, but at a price:)
Hope for 1333 strap for higher overclock, next bios after Cebit......maybe...

EDIT: ..also need high vdimm +2.4v for this.

---cheers---

Gautam

03-17-2007, 10:19 AM

Nice work guys. Real interesting 4:5 result.

I finally got a chance to run with a Commando yesterday. First attempt netted 12.547 at only about 3990MHz without the subtimings even being touched (we're talking tRFC 42 etc. :sick:) Certainly much faster than i975X I must concede.

And then...the board started melting for no reason. First Commando DOA, second one died completely unmodded and not even being pushed at all. I see plenty of you guys are having success with it, but it seems like its quality is just too poor and its FETs aren't rated for sufficiently high current. I'm tired of it, it's just a joke. The worst part is that it was great for the hour or so it was running. I would've loved to do serious benching with it, but its no good dead. :explode2:

Going to try a Biostar next, seems like the only other choice for good 2:3 action. If it ends up having a -90C bug, I'll have to live with it.

before

03-17-2007, 10:47 AM

Sorry to hear about that :(

With the Biostar, you just need to adjust bios setting prior to run it under let's say -100C. Best is to set bios parameters @-60C and then it should be okay. ;)

Gautam

03-17-2007, 11:08 AM

Norz

03-17-2007, 11:53 AM

Ah, I see. Having trouble locating any place selling em here...but I'll see.

Btw, I got memset 3.0. It didn't seem to do anything. I tried setting some timings and it didn't change anything, and opening it a second time showed every setting blank except the last few at 15? It seemed to me that only BIOS set worked. But I didn't get a chance to run with tight subs BIOS set. :(

:confused: ....happend to mee too?!...but ill got my good run first, then after the run i checked, blank and 15-15-15-15 in the bottom of memset 3.0. Cpuz also blank, needed to reboot and did the hole thing once again, fine this time dough.....maybe a bug or something. bugs me:p:

EDIT: New PB, new pic....Hello Gautam...lol... same time.

Misko

03-17-2007, 12:11 PM

Great Norz this is I believe 4th result ever! And u still have 5mhz left and memory isn't tight, try tRFC at 20, and tras at 5 ;)

Gautam

03-17-2007, 12:16 PM

Hehe, you belong a notch above me...thats nearly 3MHz slower than my 1:1 result. So I take it you do not use Memset either?

If only I got a screenie of my 12.547 at 3990MHz... :-/

I'll get it again though, and still faster, that I can assure you of. :p:

s7e9h3n

03-17-2007, 12:34 PM

FWIW, I scored 12.565 @ 10x400 on the 680i the other night with 2x512mb fatties @ 940Mhz, 4-3-2-4, 1T...Too bad everything locked up as I was saving the screenie. My USB stuff still doesn't work correctly....Oh, well! I guess it's time to throw the board under the evap :hrhr:

Norz

03-17-2007, 12:42 PM

Great Norz this is I believe 4th result ever! And u still have 5mhz left and memory isn't tight, try tRFC at 20, and tras at 5 ;)

...oh man,now you are putting that pressure on me....lol...:p:

Im doing a format now, will try win server2003, but lately i got better times on my win xp sp2 with Sune desktop!?...why is that...lol...

Thanks folks,now im hungry for moore:D

---Cheers---

andre X_X

03-18-2007, 03:45 AM

Dekara

03-18-2007, 05:59 AM

Gautam, my 12.594 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2072851&postcount=113) was not in the table.
and also Xevipiu result, 12.593 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2073323&postcount=114) should enter top 10...

And also result of my friend staxm 12.578s (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2060961&postcount=104) was not in table.

Gautam

03-18-2007, 12:08 PM

Oops, dunno how I missed those.

Now everyone in the top 10 is sub 12.6. :p:

alpha0ne

03-18-2007, 11:24 PM

Oops, dunno how I missed those.

Now everyone in the top 10 is sub 12.6. :p:

Ohhhhh and I just want to break into sub 12.7 :dammit: :horse:

andre X_X

03-19-2007, 02:19 AM

Before is wayyy too fast with his 12.4x.... d@mn i need some nice GKX....

Big_Sam

03-19-2007, 08:47 AM

My first run:

http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/9845/superpi1m4g01xf7.gif

demiurg

03-19-2007, 08:52 AM

http://img126.imageshack.us/img126/3733/iviewcapturedate1803200sx2.png (http://imageshack.us)

That is my try

Oldscarface

03-19-2007, 02:28 PM

Here is my best score up till now

Asus Commando
Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3996 Mhz (9 x 444 Mhz, 1,53 Volt bios)
2x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC8000 @ 666 5-5-4-10 (2,47Volt bios)
Everything is air cooled (cold air)

Score : 12.531 sec

Rol-Co

03-19-2007, 02:44 PM

nice memspeed oldscarface :eek: where the H did you get those...

awesome :clap:

kiwi

03-19-2007, 02:58 PM

They might even do lower trfc and tras to go near 12.5 :)

Gautam

03-19-2007, 04:18 PM

Very impressive. :up:

andre X_X

03-19-2007, 04:29 PM

OMG, that run dont even need tweaks :D

Norz

03-20-2007, 08:10 AM

...argh!...i cannot improve my 12.562sec with this os, i have to learn who to tweak,only tweak that works for me is realtime and set affinity, and disable usb,sound bla,bla in bios.........

So i did a 32M run early this morning instead,pretty happy with that:D , why is there no 32M tread? ....2,45vdimm is correct. failed on 2,425v first time on loop 16!!

Misko

03-21-2007, 03:07 AM

Norz did u run copy waza tweak before this run?

Tempest_

03-21-2007, 08:12 AM

This is what I was able to get.
I hope you dont't mind (4,0Ghz).
Ram = Cas 4-4-4-10

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a187/artur54/640040GhzWC16500Vcore20.jpg

boblemagnifique

03-21-2007, 08:26 AM

4GP with E6600 L629B by Learn (2x512mo) :

http://ocing3.free.fr/FTP/overclocking/p5bdlx/E6600/20mars2007/12.594.png

Norz

03-21-2007, 11:43 AM

Norz did u run copy waza tweak before this run?

No my friend,usally dont do that. Just a fresh install of win2003sp1. 15 prosesses running. I would like to compare this time, it was a bit difficult, my basement is about 15`c cold, ill do all my benching down there,watercooled cpu and nb only, the wife cant stand my 12cm Deltas....lol... Im banned with my pc in the rest of my house:p:

My second run after this was 3sec slower:confused: , same setup, guess the temps are playing with me.

---cheers---

Misko

03-23-2007, 04:40 PM

The result is very very good my friend :toast: w/o waza tweak, can u try with waza tweak?

Norz

03-23-2007, 05:29 PM

The result is very very good my friend :toast: w/o waza tweak, can u try with waza tweak?

Ill try over the weekend friend:toast:
This was on winserv2003sp1 14 prosesses running:D

---cheers---

Vapor

03-24-2007, 01:59 PM

Here's Gautam's new run....:D

http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/7402/12515spipe1.jpg

Still can't catch before at all....:(

Gautam

03-24-2007, 02:18 PM

Vapor himself deserves an enormous portion of the credit for this one...came up with a lot of neat helpful tricks himself. But we're obviously still missing something here.

Anyways I suppose 3rd time's the charm for the Commando...took long enough.

before

03-24-2007, 02:57 PM

Looks very good!!! :D Your RAM is very impressive buddy! What is it?

Gautam

03-24-2007, 03:59 PM

Heh, might be good, but its not before good. :p: I guess this student hasn't matched his teacher yet. :D You and Rol-Co seem to have some tweaks going on that I'm not aware of. ;)

It's Team PC-2 5300 3-4-4-8 spec. Old but great sticks. However they seem to have a lot of trouble passing 32M at speeds/timings anywhere near this. :-/

Rol-Co

03-25-2007, 07:52 AM

very nice vapor/gautam

have u tried loosen up write to precharge and write too read ?

and try other core too ;)

Vapor

03-25-2007, 08:08 AM

We got 12.515 a few different ways, this was our fastest 19th iteration run (11.968....the others were 11.984 or 11.983 IIRC), but still couldn't get 12.000 :(

Those were practically the only two timings we didn't try loosening...wow, lol.

I have it all right here....and this is tempting me to give it another go :p:

I think I'll let the board and RAM rest until next weekend though ;)

...unless Gautam wants to give it another go when he comes by to pick up his stuff :p:

MidnightMadness

04-01-2007, 11:18 PM

12.516s - 3987MHz ;)

http://i84.imagethrust.com/t/965421/pi112516.jpg (http://i84.imagethrust.com/images/439j/view-image/pi-1--12-516.html)

12.500s - 4005MHz

http://i83.imagethrust.com/t/980773/pi1m125.jpg (http://i83.imagethrust.com/images/478V/view-image/pi-1m-12-5.html)

Mobo: Abit AB9 QuadGT
Mem: Crucial 667 10AE

Dekara

04-02-2007, 01:47 AM

@Madness

Really great spi time, your win is fully tweaked, congrats!

MidnightMadness

04-02-2007, 07:01 AM

Thanks ;) I try as I can.

staxm

04-04-2007, 11:59 AM

http://img71.imageshack.us/img71/2686/sub4ghzspi1m12562ja4.th.png (http://img71.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sub4ghzspi1m12562ja4.png)
mobo Abit QuadGT

Gautam

04-04-2007, 04:10 PM

Great times MidnightMadness and staxm! :up:

killert

04-04-2007, 05:05 PM

Im going to be laughed out of this thread :(

G H Z

04-30-2007, 12:57 AM

Took the DFI 965 board for a spin

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v31/canny/4ghz_1M_12-516.png

Gautam

04-30-2007, 06:10 AM

lol come on bro, just .001 more. :D

JMKS

04-30-2007, 07:57 AM

Some even numbers with Allendale @ 4GHz :).
Not the best possible with this frequency (maybe 50ms slower than it can be), but the zeros are nice ;).
http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/7852/14gq4.jpg

Gautam

04-30-2007, 09:10 AM

If enough people come in with 2MB cache times, I could add a second category...

That looks good, only about 1.5 secs slower than 4MB.

G H Z

04-30-2007, 04:27 PM

lol come on bro, just .001 more. :D

For as many times as I had to click 'begin calculation' to get this result I don't care about 1/100th of a second!!! :D What I really wanna figure out is 4:5 on this board.

Solarfall

05-01-2007, 12:16 AM

just noticed this thread.. mmm i think i'm going to do some superpi tweaking today :D

yotomeczek

05-01-2007, 10:05 AM

Abit QuadGT, WC (water + 8 degree)
http://images20.fotosik.pl/291/3cfa9d6b87b0745c.jpg

Gautam

05-01-2007, 03:35 PM

Nice time Yotomeczek. :up:

yotomeczek

05-02-2007, 12:06 AM

Nice time Yotomeczek. :up:

THx :D
I have problems with 16&32M I loose abot 5s in 16M - don't know why (I did 6m14,5 @ 7x500 and now I can only 6m16s ... but Madness can do even 6m12,5 :) )

Gautam

05-05-2007, 06:32 AM

At the risk of looking like a jerk, I'm afraid I'm going to have to take off before's time after all. Sorry Xavier. I tried 4003.6MHz and it is just too fast compared to 4000MHz. Not a fair fight, so I have to remove it.

The reason I'm going to look like a jerk is because I've got a new time too.

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gautamb/4000_12500.PNG

hausner

05-05-2007, 09:12 AM

nice result Gautam !

Misko

05-05-2007, 03:01 PM

Really nice one Gautam :toast:

dinos22

05-06-2007, 04:30 PM

3oh6

05-06-2007, 04:55 PM

looks like i'm on par with 3oh6 with 444MHz 3-4-3-4 timings as i've only got a 9xmulti :(

a touch quicker though :D and i know i can go down to ~ 12.55 with maxmem=500 >> maybe more with a smaller value :D
nicely done...that is a good pinch better but no memset in the screenshot :(.

i was hoping to get some time to run this again in the near future 500*8 (quadGT). see what 1000 4-4-3-4 does at 4 GHz on that board. i should get to it in the next few weeks i hope.

i would think that to be faster than 444*9 at 3-4-3-4 that we can run...yes? no? my P5B-Dlx will just not run any faster than 475FSB on the tight strap after modding and cooling with water. the quadGT did 500FSB out of the box on stock cooling.

enough rambling...nice work though, sorry for the off-topic ;)

dinos22

05-06-2007, 05:10 PM

yeah QuadGT will beat it easy..............it seems that motherboards has killer SuperPI performance :toast:

sorry my RAM timings were not all that special to be honest......i haven't really tweaked the run yet >>> i've only discovered last night at 2am that my CPU can do 32M SuperPI at 4GHz.....kinda exciting :D hahahha

andre X_X

05-12-2007, 11:41 AM

hmm... 1:1 with 9x multi and 1066 strap wasn't bad :D

http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/2025/125312lr9.jpg

Vapor

05-12-2007, 11:59 AM

Damn....I wouldn't expect 9x444 1:1 4-4-4 to be that fast at all, must be the low available memory....how do you get it that low?

andre X_X

05-12-2007, 09:28 PM

dont know why it would be that low... this is the setting/tweaks for 32m (except wazza) that i used to race with gautam in low clock challenge, but usuallly i got 4xxx on available memory (with wazza). i mean, i use the same tweaks/setting with 32m run, excetp the wazza...

this 12.531s was the best i could get with 9x multi, no matter 1:1 or 4:5 the result was the same, except 1:1 @ 1066 strap have more chance to get 12.531s. i'll try 8x500 1:1 @ 1066 later on.

Gautam

05-13-2007, 07:11 AM

Awesome time! :up:

Vapor

05-13-2007, 07:13 AM

andre X_X

05-13-2007, 09:11 AM

Lol, yeah i drink coke and pray first before hit OK.....
anyway, i run 1m on 3.6 challenge got 13.890s (beat kunnak by 0.001s) but the available memory wasnt the same.... dont know why.

luihed

05-13-2007, 07:15 PM

Excuse my n00bness but what are you guys talking about and why is it important and how do you do it?.....

w00t... Finally got all my rams working together...... But everytime I get closer to Gautam, he keeps pulling away lol.....

http://www3.telus.net/luis99/oc/4gss.JPG

eva2000

05-17-2007, 02:35 PM

my little quad core made it to equal 10th place huh :)

At default 9x multiplier we have Q6600 @9x443FSB via setFSB :cool:

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/Corsair/10000C5D/9x/667/443-554_4444+430444_1.6-AA-2.35-1.3-1.55/cpuz_validated.png

Now this I consider fast considering Kentsfield quad core B3 stepping is slower than core2 duo B2 stepping for Super Pi!

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/Corsair/10000C5D/9x/667/443-554_4444+430444_1.6-AA-2.35-1.3-1.55/superpi-1m_single_12s578ms.png

andre X_X

05-17-2007, 08:30 PM

wow... thats 4:5 looks strong on P5K... i cant boot @ CL4 with that setting on P5B... Cool

dinos22

05-17-2007, 09:06 PM

wow... thats 4:5 looks strong on P5K... i cant boot @ CL4 with that setting on P5B... Cool

yeah P35 chip works properly with 4:5 ratio as per my testing :)

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=2180078&postcount=122

Daveb2012

05-18-2007, 07:46 PM

Heres my E6700, I have only had about an hour with it, but here is what I have got so far. This is using a thermalright 120 extreme. I may be keeping my E6600 over this, I'm not sure yet, have to mess with it more to see if I can get a high enough stable clock, to justify keeping it over the E6600.

andre X_X

05-19-2007, 08:17 AM

nice result with your clock, now push it to 4000mhz

Viss

05-19-2007, 12:36 PM

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v636/loc_oc/1M4g666mhz.jpg

dinos22

05-19-2007, 09:55 PM

12.516s :)

http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/6879/4ghz1msuperpi12516smp8.png

alpha0ne

05-19-2007, 11:45 PM

Hey loc.o great ram clock, my fav # :clap: :up:

coop

05-20-2007, 03:30 PM

Very fast dino.

dinos22

05-20-2007, 04:19 PM

hey coop nice going

try running that quad GT 1:1 with supertight timings......they seem to like that :)

and what maxmem are you using

you also should run 1M for about 10 times on each timings change and record the quickest one........i've been lazy with my run.........just set my previously tight timings and ran for a few times and get 531s and a couple of 516s

my RAM is not stable at those settings so i need to get a mobo with reliable voltage regulation on RAM at feed it 2.6v and really tighten things properly and go sub 12.5 which is possible :)

coop

05-20-2007, 05:18 PM

I still need to use divider after awhile to be able to keep up. I was happy to see 600. It booted up @ 616. I've been busy over at low clock. maxmem 600.

staxm

05-21-2007, 04:20 AM

I still need to use divider after awhile to be able to keep up. I was happy to see 600. It booted up @ 616. I've been busy over at low clock. maxmem 600.

which bios on QuadGt ?

coop

05-21-2007, 03:32 PM

staxm, 13 Final

eva2000

05-26-2007, 02:31 AM

Checking out 4000Mhz single Super Pi 32M on Asus Commando :)

X6800 @4000Mhz
Asus Commando
Super Pi v1.50 32M

10x400FSB 1:1 400Mhz 4-4-4-4
Super Pi 1M = 12.609s
Super Pi 32M = 12m 51.094s

vs

10x400FSB 2:3 600Mhz 5-5-4-5
Super Pi 1M = 12.531s
Super Pi 32M = 12m 07.984s

10x400FSB 1:1 400Mhz 4-4-4-4
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Commando/results/Apogee/supertalent/T1000UB1G5/10x/533/400-400_4444_3-30-3-9-6-9_1.6875-1.4-1.65-2.25-1.6-1.225/cpuz_validated.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Commando/results/Apogee/supertalent/T1000UB1G5/10x/533/400-400_4444_3-30-3-9-6-9_1.6875-1.4-1.65-2.25-1.6-1.225/superpi-1m_single_12s609ms.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Commando/results/Apogee/supertalent/T1000UB1G5/10x/533/400-400_4444_3-30-3-9-6-9_1.6875-1.4-1.65-2.25-1.6-1.225/superpi-32m_single_12m51s094ms.png

vs

10x400FSB 2:3 600Mhz 5-5-4-5
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Commando/results/Apogee/supertalent/T1000UB1G5/10x/800/400-600_5545_3-25-3-10-6-10_1.6875-1.4-1.675-2.4-1.6-1.225/cpuz_validated.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Commando/results/Apogee/supertalent/T1000UB1G5/10x/800/400-600_5545_3-25-3-10-6-10_1.6875-1.4-1.675-2.4-1.6-1.225/superpi-1m_single_12s531ms.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Commando/results/Apogee/supertalent/T1000UB1G5/10x/800/400-600_5545_3-25-3-10-6-10_1.6875-1.4-1.675-2.4-1.6-1.225/superpi-32m_single_12m07s984ms.png

coop

05-26-2007, 10:01 AM

eva: 43+ sec., wow. Did you try other timings by chance, like 5-4-4-5? Thanks for showing both.

EDIT: nevermind, it was slower. I was so intrigued by what you did with Cas5 I ran some myself. I still think 2-2-2-5 so when I see results like yours I'm always amazed. I have my 6600 in the board now so I could not run 2/3. I did 9x444 with 4/5 and came up with this.

eva2000

06-10-2007, 11:08 AM

dam just missed out on sub 4ghz with Q6600 B3 ES hehe

@4002.6Mhz at 1.6375v bios set

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/team/6400c3/8x/5_6/500-600_4449_3-30-338_1.6375-x0.63-1.5-2.55-1.4-1.7-0.67-1.2/superpi-1m_single_12s531ms.png

@3952Mhz at 1.6375v bios set

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/team/6400c3/8x/5_6/494-592_4449_3-30-338_1.6375-x0.63-1.5-2.55-1.4-1.7-0.67-1.2/superpi-32m_single_12m08s641ms.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5K_Deluxe/results/Nautilus500/Q6600_B3/team/6400c3/8x/5_6/494-592_4449_3-30-338_1.6375-x0.63-1.5-2.55-1.4-1.7-0.67-1.2/everest_bandwidth.png

eva: 43+ sec., wow. Did you try other timings by chance, like 5-4-4-5? Thanks for showing both.

EDIT: nevermind, it was slower. I was so intrigued by what you did with Cas5 I ran some myself. I still think 2-2-2-5 so when I see results like yours I'm always amazed. I have my 6600 in the board now so I could not run 2/3. I did 9x444 with 4/5 and came up with this.

strange on P5B Deluxe same ram can do 5-4-4-4 @600Mhz on Asus Commando with 1001 bios only 5-5-4-x and I thought commando clocked ram better than P5B Deluxe ? :(

JMKS

07-02-2007, 12:23 PM

Not Top10 but it's my first try with 4MB cache on air (previous was E6700 directly on cascade ;)) - 12.593s with E6750 500x8 1:1 4-4-4-4 on Commando, modded 1333 strap (CPU was going for DI ;) but NB was aircooled all the time so no genuine 1066 strap possible, unfortunately):

http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4757/e67504ghz1mdopublikacjirv0.th.jpg (http://img510.imageshack.us/my.php?image=e67504ghz1mdopublikacjirv0.jpg)

monteboy

07-27-2007, 12:31 PM

http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/8305/12547fh5.gif

Mainboard : Gigabyte P35-DQ6 , the first P35 Board in the Top10 :)

aasmaukr

07-27-2007, 03:29 PM

Hey I'm just wondering, what OS is best for PI benching? Until now I've been using a stripped XP SP2 but someones telling me 2003 Server is better..? Could someone help me out? :p:

Gautam

07-28-2007, 12:21 PM

[
Mainboard : Gigabyte P35-DQ6 , the first P35 Board in the Top10 :)
And certainly not the last I'm sure. ;)

Finally thread updated, totally forgot.

Hey I'm just wondering, what OS is best for PI benching? Until now I've been using a stripped XP SP2 but someones telling me 2003 Server is better..? Could someone help me out? :p:

server 03 always appears much faster to me. I don't know how to "strip" XP or anything though.

Super Nade

07-28-2007, 01:17 PM

I don't know how to "strip" XP or anything though.

Make a note of what get's loaded in Safe mode and then remove all multimedia and other crap using nLite. I tried this, but since I actually needed the MM stuff a patchwork copy this and that dll didn't work..in other words, it was completely fubar'ed. :D

Gautam

07-28-2007, 06:55 PM

i've done tons of nlite, it never helps. the only purpose its useful for imho is automating installs and slipstreaming drivers, which is, don't get me wrong, a great touch.

Solarfall

08-02-2007, 06:01 AM

here is mine:

http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t307/Solarfall_photos/12.625.jpg

Gautam

08-02-2007, 06:02 AM

In this thread that counts as a good start, but you're not close to done yet. Performance Level 11?!? ;)

Solarfall

08-02-2007, 06:26 AM

In this thread that counts as a good start, but you're not close to done yet. Performance Level 11?!? ;)

im not really that familiar with memset and its settings yet can you tell me what that Performance Level actually means or does.. with my evga mobo i have no such option available.. that shot i posted was done with asus p5k deluxe mobo :shrug:

Gautam

08-02-2007, 07:01 AM

Try bringing it down to 7. ;)

Solarfall

08-02-2007, 11:14 AM

Try bringing it down to 7. ;)

so lower the better ..check.. thanks for the info mate :worship:

G H Z

08-02-2007, 11:18 AM

I doubt you'll be able to get that far, what board is this Solar?

monteboy

08-02-2007, 11:45 AM

12531 :)
http://img481.imageshack.us/img481/8611/12531sr4.th.gif (http://img481.imageshack.us/img481/8611/12531sr4.gif)

Gautam

08-02-2007, 11:47 AM

I doubt you'll be able to get that far, what board is this Solar?

NewBeetle is running 7 all the way up to 571, not to mention that the board should boot at 7 at 499MHz.

Solarfall

08-02-2007, 12:24 PM

I doubt you'll be able to get that far, what board is this Solar?

asus p5k deluxe

luihed

08-02-2007, 04:43 PM

Solar, there's a couple of things you have to enable in the bios to get the tighter PL... In the IP35 its always set at lowest level hehe... PL= 7 @ 560fsb :D ....

http://www3.telus.net/luis99/5040.JPG

Solarfall

08-03-2007, 12:55 AM

luihed hey thanks bro for screenie.. :up:

Freddie123

08-03-2007, 02:32 AM

A bit later i'll do one on my 3.5Ghz Prescott, you will feel its hyperthreading supremacy!!!!

monteboy

08-03-2007, 05:35 AM

A bit later i'll do one on my 3.5Ghz Prescott, you will feel its hyperthreading supremacy!!!!

hyperthreading supremacy ??? for an old single thread application ?

Gautam

08-03-2007, 05:42 AM

lol, he is joking.

This an old screenie I just found of a run I did with a 4 GHz S478 Prescott. :p:

http://www.ocforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=48777&stc=1&d=1141333773

Freddie123

08-03-2007, 07:18 AM

Makes me wish I had an OCable board on my prescott :P The mobo is micro atx and the only OC option is changing the FSB. Need to do all my OC's at stock voltage :P

funkflix

08-08-2007, 10:58 PM

Can someone with P5B tell me, how they can run 2:3 with a 9 x 445? Can't manage to get that combo working.. :(

The best i can get so far:

http://www.abload.de/img/4000_1mply.jpg

Gautam

08-09-2007, 07:33 AM

Can someone with P5B tell me, how they can run 2:3 with a 9 x 445?

Errr...have really really really good ram? :p:

funkflix

08-09-2007, 09:52 AM

Hmm, i found a screen from me where i have already done it.. :p: It was with my ES and Ballistix, but normally my new G.Skill clock higher! Will give it one more try soon. :)

http://www.abload.de/img/667mhz_5.5.4.6_1m_2.7vic2.jpg

Learn

08-11-2007, 10:03 AM

p5k
setfsb 20b15f
12.516s (http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/benchs/10.08.2007/1M-3999.9-12.516.png)

monteboy

08-13-2007, 05:26 AM

p5k
setfsb 20b15f
12.516s (http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/benchs/10.08.2007/1M-3999.9-12.516.png)

4 sticks = better result :)

Gautam

08-13-2007, 05:52 AM

p5k
setfsb 20b15f
12.516s (http://www.overclocking-jp.eu/public/benchs/10.08.2007/1M-3999.9-12.516.png)

Very interesting time as usual JP. :)

Learn

08-13-2007, 06:17 AM

4 sticks = better result :)

4 x 1024MB even better! :D

Very interesting time as usual JP. :)

I need a good P965, it seems better clock for clock with my tweaks.

M3kk

08-13-2007, 07:28 AM

1M - 12.531s

http://mekk.homeip.net/imagesharing/uploads/bbdde22346.png

32M - 12M 08.093s

http://mekk.homeip.net/imagesharing/uploads/b52fffedf8.png

dinos22

08-13-2007, 04:39 PM

M3kk that is a great improvement :up:

M3kk

08-14-2007, 12:11 AM

Thanks. :)

giorgos th.

08-14-2007, 12:55 AM

here is my contribution to this thread with my crappy win installation..

fireice2

08-19-2007, 09:26 AM

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g116/fireice2/E6700%20Overclocking/10x398.png

here's mine. not impressive though. :(

boblemagnifique

08-26-2007, 02:08 PM

http://boblemagnifique36.free.fr/Overclocking/Memoires/40gp1mo.jpg

Learn

08-26-2007, 02:27 PM

http://boblemagnifique36.free.fr/Overclocking/Memoires/40gp1mo.jpg

Good job bro :CTF:
:D

coop

08-27-2007, 01:02 AM

It is a fine line (or just a mhz or so) to the next level in iterations.

afireinside

08-27-2007, 01:21 AM

http://boblemagnifique36.free.fr/Overclocking/Memoires/40gp1mo.jpg

kick ass ram and score. That's some speed :shocked: Grats on #1

Gautam

08-27-2007, 04:16 AM

DDR3 is cheating. :cussing:

bob can you plz rerun at <4001MHz? Some didn't want the CPU speed to be higher.

JMKS

08-29-2007, 07:53 AM

Final numbers with Allendale @ 4GHz [CPU under DI for that FSB, 2,9VDimm etc]
E4400 444.3x9=3999MHz, RAM 2:3 = 666.5 5-4-4-4

Allendale loves memory frequency so the difference between 500x8 1:1 [1066 strap] is not that small :).

13.688s
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/4773/444x94ghz1m2mb13688sga3.th.jpg (http://img338.imageshack.us/my.php?image=444x94ghz1m2mb13688sga3.jpg)

Achill3uS

08-30-2007, 01:12 AM

12.625 (result made with only 1GB RAM, Valid (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=236231) little upper)

http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/5884/msolat4g1mnd8.jpg

coop

08-30-2007, 10:56 PM

More Cas 5 with 4:5
http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/4726/12515mm6.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

google

09-15-2007, 05:24 AM

here is mine, not as good as one of you, but I wanna to improve myself:

http://bp1.blogger.com/_hdbv8BLWrl4/RshOVRBW6kI/AAAAAAAAACg/CT_yB45nJKU/s1600/19.08.2007.JPG

and I would be happy about some comments or advices.

monteboy

09-16-2007, 02:11 PM

http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/3092/4000spiff4.gif

Florent

09-21-2007, 03:32 AM

With my news P5K-E

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/4025/1248440gpjr1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

aasmaukr

09-24-2007, 11:02 AM

:)

P5K
E6850
2x1gig 10th Anniversary sticks (4:5)
Corsair HX620W

My sticks can do 1M CL5 @ 655MHz with 2,33V, with 2,37V they do ~665, but higher voltage doesn't help. I tried upping the NB and FSB termination voltage but that didn't make any difference :(. Any tips?

Anyways I did some quick SuperPI testing on Server 2k3 and here's my result so far:

64842

Forgot to switch to mem tab in one CPU-Z :down:

Btw I also had a 12.500 run with some improved timings but it froze before I got to save the screenshot. I tried the same timings again but can't get under 12.515 :(