PDA

View Full Version : XMS2 5400UL 479MHz 4-2-2-1


Gautam
05-03-2006, 04:39 PM
Playing around with some of this stuff, doesn't look too shabby, even for a BH5 die-hard like myself. :p: Just single channel ATM (I know, I know), but a measly 2.3v. Plenty of headroom, I should think. Ran a very unremarkable pi just short of 470.

Validation link (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=91196)

hicookie
05-03-2006, 04:51 PM
insane! great ic

[cTx]Philosophy
05-03-2006, 04:56 PM
Im impressed here, nice work, wut cpu clocks like?
Id like to see this ram with conroe

Waus-mod
05-03-2006, 05:04 PM
Wow great run overthere.~ insane :D . what will it do with 3-2-2-1? i could test mine on 2.51v @ 394mhz but not higher due fsb problem. so i can compare

hicookie
05-03-2006, 05:13 PM
Wow great run overthere.~ insane :D . what will it do with 3-2-2-1? i could test mine on 2.51v @ 394mhz but not higher due fsb problem. so i can compare

u sick,mine just can do around 770 3221 2.5V:(

Gautam
05-03-2006, 05:15 PM
Thanks for the kudos. The proc is just peachy, but unfortunately the board ruins it.

On the same token, the board completely refuses to run CAS 3 at any speed :(. Don't have a P5WD2 on hand unfortunately...hopefully the AOpen will be friendlier. ;)

Waus-mod
05-03-2006, 05:27 PM
im hoping for conroe setup soon.. so i can unleash my 5400ul at full speeds.. i love corsair. all i bought in my life was corsair and all ran very hard... so yes im a fanboy :p:

proth
05-04-2006, 02:31 AM
Nice speed man...Need another stick like that one. You should try to cool it somehow. UL really turns on when cold. 1000 @ 3,2,2 would be a great thing to see

farksy
05-04-2006, 03:29 AM
Woohoo. This rams are very good ! 4-2-2-1 are one of the tighest timings i have seen for DDR2s.

Any idea what ICs they are using ?

Waus-mod
05-04-2006, 04:50 AM
no way tightest ... well yes at that speed. and ic's... we all know that :p: fat body d9 micron ic.

farksy
05-04-2006, 05:44 AM
no way tightest ... well yes at that speed. and ic's... we all know that :p: fat body d9 micron ic.
that was my intended meaning. =D.

there is bound to have 3-2-2-0 DDR2 rams lying around, it's just how high they can clock at that timings.

^don.k's^
05-04-2006, 06:11 AM
that was my intended meaning. =D.

there is bound to have 3-2-2-0 DDR2 rams lying around, it's just how high they can clock at that timings.

500 4-3-2-1 >> 370-390 3-2-2-1 so isn't 3-2-2-0 needed... At least with intel platform, will see if AMD is the same...

BTW good sticks indeed, how high they'll go @4-3-2 ??

Hazzan
05-04-2006, 06:59 AM
Playing around with some of this stuff, doesn't look too shabby, even for a BH5 die-hard like myself. :p: Just single channel ATM (I know, I know), but a measly 2.3v. Plenty of headroom, I should think. Ran a very unremarkable pi just short of 470.

Validation link (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=91196)


your 5400UL versi ?:) :)

Gautam
05-04-2006, 07:17 AM
Nice speed man...Need another stick like that one. You should try to cool it somehow. UL really turns on when cold. 1000 @ 3,2,2 would be a great thing to see
Don't worry my friend, cooling is something I'll have under control. ;)

The revision is 1.2.

Unfortunately the the other stick in the pair tops out at "only" 468. :(

4-3-2 to come shortly.

Btw, they're not tRAS bound at all. The only reason I didn't use tRAS 0 is because there's no way to set it, lowest the tweaker goes is 1. :p

Hazzan
05-04-2006, 08:08 AM
Don't worry my friend, cooling is something I'll have under control. ;)

The revision is 1.2.

Unfortunately the the other stick in the pair tops out at "only" 468. :(

4-3-2 to come shortly.

Btw, they're not tRAS bound at all. The only reason I didn't use tRAS 0 is because there's no way to set it, lowest the tweaker goes is 1. :p

Can run 500 ? with 4-3-3-4 ?

thunderstruck!
05-04-2006, 10:25 AM
:up:I love it, I keep seeing these tight latencies at amazing speeds, and see that ddr is dead :p.