TeamGroup 2x1GB Infineon Ce-6 -Report-

[gigi77]

TEAMGROUP CRONUS DDR500 3.3.2.8 Infineon Ce-6 Die


Model / Speed:PC4000 DDR500MHz
Capacity: Dual Channel Mode
CL rated: 3
Team Group part number: TXDR2048M500HC3DC-I,


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

XTREEM SERIES

http://www.teamgroup.com.tw/images/stories/keyimages/prod_cat_xtreem_key.jpg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Alpha Timings for DFI nf4 series:

Voltaggi 2.6-2.8v

CPC = Enabled
CAS Latency(CL) = 3
RAS to CAS(Trcd) = 3
Min RAS# Active time(Tras) = 8
Row Precharge Time(Trp) = 2
Row Cycle Time(Trc) = 7
Row Refresh Cycle Time(Trfc) = 13
Row to Row Delay(Trrd) = 2
Write Recovery Time(Twr) = 2
Write to Read Delay(Twtr) = 1
Read to Write Delay(Trwt) = 2
Refresh Period (Tref) = 3210
Write CAS Latency(Twcl) = 1
DRAM Bank Interleave = Enabled
Skew = AUTO
Skew Value = 0
DRAM Drive Strength = Level 7-5
DRAM Data Drive Strength = 3-1
Max Async Latency = 7ns
Read Preamble Time = 5ns
Dram time = Normal
Idle Cycle Limit =16
Dynamic Counter = Enabled
R/W Queue Bypass = 16x
Bypass Max = 7x
32 byte Granularity = Disable(4burst)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pics:

http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/917/team12cf.jpg

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/4044/team34iy.jpg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Config:

- SCHEDA MADRE : DFI Sli-Dr Bios 329
- CPU : Opteron 146@
- RAM : 2x 1024 Teamgroup Cronus pc4000 3.3.2.8 Infineon Ce-6 Die
- SCHEDA VIDEO : Point of View 7600 GT Def.(Gpu 560mhz/ Mem 700)

Sistema Operativo WinXP Pro SP2, driver ForceWare 84.21


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Work Platform :

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/3558/workplat8jp.jpg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Perfomances :

TIMINGS UTILIZZATI-PERFOMANCES

- 2-3-2-5 218Mhz

- 2.5-3-2-5 240Mhz

- 3-3-2-8 265Mhz (3d Stability around 260-265mhz)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[scwam]

Mine top out around 244 2.5/3/2/5 at 2.8v
3d stability is good up to about 258-259 but can bench aroun 262.

[gigi77]

2d Perfomances

200 2.3.2.5

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/1684/2008it.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

218 2.3.2.5

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/7587/2183xc.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

240 2.5.3.2.5

http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/403/2408vs.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

250 3.3.2.8

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/8088/ce62506zk.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

260 3.3.2.8

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/9026/ce2603yr.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

265 3.3.2.8

http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/1032/ce2651wo.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

273 3.3.2.8 Spi 1mb

http://img161.imageshack.us/img161/228/ce273max9vu.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


the max for this settings! with 3.3.3.8 and 3.4.4.8 i have stability at 275mhz 2.8v
With 3.2v i Bench at 250Mhz 2,5.3.2.5 (nice!)

[scwam]

Wow, impressive. Never though of putting more than 2.9 into them. I should try that with active cooling. I know mine won't do it though. I stick maximum is 268 and the other is 274 at 2.9v, but that's not truely stable. it's only what I can boot up at. I'm going to copy your settings and see if they fly on my board.

[gigi77]

You try 3,2v, 250 2.5.3.2.5 hehe!

[scwam]

When I get time I'm going to try to duplicate your results. I'm so freakin' busy with 2 jobs it sucks. I definately want to see if these have got more potential after seeing your results. I know I've not been able to boot up past 248 at 2.9v. I can tell you that this sticks run cool. they run no more than 48c with no cooling at that voltage. I'll report back with my results once I get some time.

I would love to see your memory bandwidth results (read and write).

Do you think 3.2 will kill these modules quickly?

What would 2.5/3/2/5 at 243 be equal to in mhz against 3/3/3/8 performance-wise?

When I click on those pics I can not get a bigger image.

[gigi77]

3d

200 2.3.2.5

http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/4012/2003d8ir.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

218 2.3.2.5

http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/4379/2183d5uu.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

240 2,5.3.2.5

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/4346/2403d9wx.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


250Mhz 3.3.2.8

http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/3281/ce62503dmk01pk.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

260 3.3.2.8

http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/5096/ce2603d6uk.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[NISCO PT]

i have 1 kit like yours
he do more or less the same
this my 24/24 settings 3d 100% stable
http://img280.imageshack.us/img280/3981/daysettings7tv.jpg

[Tutti-frutti]

Nice results, just 1 MHz above my results from 2 GBHV, on all timings (3D).
If you go 1 MHz higher, you get artifacts ?
(But 2gbhv are CE-5 yields, normally :rolleyes: )

[Cooper]

gigi77
what week are those sticks ?
It`s labeled on sticker like here

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/4774/gi7pj.th.jpg (http://img261.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gi7pj.jpg)

[Xtreem Tech]

gigi77
what week are those sticks ?
It`s labeled on sticker like here

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/4774/gi7pj.th.jpg (http://img261.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gi7pj.jpg)
It's the label which shows the week we package our reatail package and the week we ship our products to our customer. Which is not the date of CHIPS. However, since it cause many misunderstanding and confuse, we already stops the print any "week" on our label. Thanks...! :)

[Deathspawner]

Those are some awesome results. I know some people who've been having a lot of problems with their CE-6 modules lately, so it's good to see it's not THAT widespread of a problem, haha.

[Cooper]

It's the label which shows the week we package our reatail package and the week we ship our products to our customer. Which is not the date of CHIPS. However, since it cause many misunderstanding and confuse, we already stops the print any "week" on our label. Thanks...! :)

Oh..well thanks for clarifying that :)

[kk228]

Nice done, Gigi..Can u show us more?

[bachus_anonym]

Looks good, Luigi :up: Thanks for lots of benches and especially 3D :fact:

[gigi77]

Graphic Report,

http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/797/ce6pics9an.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


Thanks Bachus! :)

[Eldonko]

Good idea w/ the chart ^^, nice work on the report gigi77. :)

[Xtreem Tech]

Oh..well thanks for clarifying that :)
Hello! Cooper.
We also thank you for posting this question.
Your interest is our great pleasure. Welcome to ask us at any time without hesitation, Thank you again!