PDA

View Full Version : Slow 2.9ghz opteron


urzrkymn
03-07-2006, 11:41 AM
The overclock should make it a lot faster than it actually is imo.
What do you guys think?
What could be the problem?
Thanks

http://img382.imageshack.us/img382/4049/screen2jf.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Absolute_0
03-07-2006, 11:49 AM
maybe it doesn't like the latencies on the memory, you are running 1T right?

move this to AMD

dogsx2
03-07-2006, 11:58 AM
maybe it doesn't like the latencies on the memory, you are running 1T right?

move this to AMD

I'm surprised it's that good with those timings. Post a tweaker ss.

urzrkymn
03-07-2006, 03:25 PM
Pretty sure all the readings are acurate.
Sorry, didnt realise there was an amd section, was in a rush. Please move to amd.

http://img476.imageshack.us/img476/1121/tweaker8sf.jpg

EDIT: yes 1T

dogsx2
03-07-2006, 03:58 PM
Trc of 17 is a pi killer.

urzrkymn
03-07-2006, 05:10 PM
down to 7, making no odds?

urzrkymn
03-08-2006, 03:04 AM
...

CompGeek
03-08-2006, 05:36 AM
I dont think so, my 144 @ 2.9ghz did 29.219, and I had my RAM @ 2-3-2-5

vok
03-08-2006, 05:43 AM
May not be really comparable, but my venice @ 2600, and ram @ 217.3 Mhz 2-2-3-5 did 32.766 sec.

That is without extensive tweaking btw, hope it helps.

CompGeek
03-08-2006, 05:53 AM
Like I said in AMD, my 144 @ 2.9 only did 29.219, and that was with 2-3-2-5 timings.

toreide
03-08-2006, 06:04 AM
cas 3!

What memory is this?

GoThr3k
03-08-2006, 06:27 AM
timings are 3-4-4-8
thats bad :(
but yes you have a normal score :)

Ator
03-08-2006, 08:42 AM
Setting the Refresh Rate to 200Mhz 3.9us and the Idle Cycle Limit to 4clks cut 0.3s off my 1M time. You should also try running CAS at 2.5, and drop the Tras to 10.

urzrkymn
03-08-2006, 02:36 PM
Cheers for your help, was just expecting more :S

@toreide - memory as sig, it is running at 1:1 at 290mhz

@CompGeek - WE GET THE IDEA

Sesto Sento
03-08-2006, 02:53 PM
I think it's xtremelly slow...
This is on my day use partition with 8 months without format and with 0 tweaks...

http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/6003/pirecord25jpg7hd.jpg

Bob21
03-08-2006, 03:49 PM
It's all in the memory timings

urzrkymn
03-08-2006, 04:06 PM
Its coming...

http://img460.imageshack.us/img460/5659/screen5yr.jpg

Bob21
03-08-2006, 04:09 PM
looks much better, you're on an nf4 right?

Most people set siperpi to realtime too give a little bit better times since you are probably comparing to other peoples screens.