PDA

View Full Version : Question about overclocking my ram


Jarrod1937
02-21-2006, 07:11 PM
i now have my 1 gig (2x512 mb) dual channel pc 3200 ram overclocked from 200 mhz to 245 mhz at 2-2-2-0 timings (at 1t of course), but i can't go any higher.
so my question is, how can you tell if its your cpu or ram holding you back?
i have my amd athlon 64 3200+ overclocked from 2 ghz to 2.70 ghz at 1.40 volts but it won't go any higher than that (probably a heat issue more than the cpu limits). i have my ram at the 183 divider for the ram and am running the ram at 3.4 volts (can go to max of 3.6 volts)... if i try to raise my fsb any higher to overclock my ram just to hit the 250 mhz mark it gets unstable, but this is also overclocking the cpu to 2.75 (which i've tested in the past to be unstable). so logically i try to change my multiplyer from 10 to something lower to get my cpu to overclock a little less so i could overclock my ram more.... but if i change it at all it gets unstable (instant reboot, and no post if done in the bios).
so is this just the limits of my cpu/ram, or do you think i could get more out of my ram? i just want to hit 250 mhz... so just 5 more mhz... so hard though.
any help?
EDIT: i've also tried default timings while attempting this too.

nn_step
02-21-2006, 07:18 PM
How about you telling what sticks of ram you have or the Chips on them.. otherwise you can't help you...

Jarrod1937
02-21-2006, 07:33 PM
well they're bh5 geil ram sticks.

nn_step
02-21-2006, 07:37 PM
Actually UTT BH5 but none the same...
actually There has been some cases where Highier voltage lowers the overclock.. might I suggest that you do a check for max overclock at 3v, 3.1v, 3.2v, and all the way up to 3.6v..

Jarrod1937
02-22-2006, 11:41 AM
Actually UTT BH5 but none the same...
actually There has been some cases where Highier voltage lowers the overclock.. might I suggest that you do a check for max overclock at 3v, 3.1v, 3.2v, and all the way up to 3.6v..
cool, i'll try that when i get home. it actually overcloked pretty well at 3.1 volts but wouldn't reach 240 so i upped it to 3.4, i probably should have upped it to 3.2 first but i was quite sure it wouldn't run stable. but if i knew that some have reported lower clocks at higher volts i wouldn't have doen that. i'll check out lower voltages today.