New LG LCD 17" - 19"

[OmegaMerc]

http://www.akihabaranews.com/news-11180-LG+FLATRON+LCD+L1970HR.html

17" or 19" bringing 2ms, and a contrast ratio of 1600:1!:banana:

Anyone has pricing on these puppies?:slobber:

[nn_step]

about as much as your first born child...

[vapb400]

those monitors sound nice.

viewsonic is supposed to have 1ms by 2007 or something.

[Cooper]

And I thought 17"-19" LCDs aren`t improoved that much. Let`s hope 2ms comes w/o issues on image quality.

[eddieate]

thats all nice and dandy but i'd be more intrested in 19" moniters with higher than 1280x1024 resolutions theres not much wrong with my 4ms 19" to be honest.
/Ed

[nn_step]

Actually you as a human can not detect a difference between 1ms, 2ms or 4ms response time...

[eddieate]

Actually you as a human can not detect a difference between 1ms, 2ms or 4ms response time...

exactly, but i can detect the diffrence between 1280x1024 and 1600x1200.
/Ed

[K.I.T.T.]

exactly, but i can detect the diffrence between 1280x1024 and 1600x1200.
/Ed
agreed.

1600x1200 on a 19" TFT would look amazing in games :)

[nn_step]

agreed.

1600x1200 on a 19" TFT would look amazing in games :)
Agreed..Time for them to start improving the resolution...

[Cooper]

You can get 20" LCD with 16x12

[eddieate]

so it shouldnt be hard to make a 19" that can do it then, should it? ;)
/Ed

[Daveb2012]

I don't think it would be worth the $ im going to guess the 19" model will cost around $600. 2ms vs 8ms must be hard to distinguish even if you had the two side by side showing the same thing. none the less im always for advancements in technology.

[vok]

so it shouldnt be hard to make a 19" that can do it then, should it? ;)
/Ed

Just buy a 1600x1200 20" and tape off the edges :D ;)

[DeltZ]

contrary to belief. The eye doesn't work at 60fps. The human eye can easily see a frame which appears for 1/200th of a second..i don't know what the limit is, but 1/200th of a second is is 5ms, so i expect, the eye really can't tell the difference between 1 and 2 ms...and, even if the eye CAN technically see it, it won't notice it (if you get what i mean). No practical benefit?

I want an LCD which can't switch between native resolutions :(

or ...next PC build will just have to be leet to run at games higher than 1024 res heh.

Stuck in the stone age yes...

[eddieate]

Just buy a 1600x1200 20" and tape off the edges :D ;)

haha:) might just have to do that!

20's cost loads more than 19's.
/Ed

[bobov]

agreed.

1600x1200 on a 19" TFT would look amazing in games :)

Isn't it the text on a 1600x1200 19" LCD too small?

[biohead]

Actually you as a human can not detect a difference between 1ms, 2ms or 4ms response time...
it reduces ghosting. I can see slight ghosting on my friend's samsung 19" 4ms LCD. I really mean slight, coz it's nothing to complain compared to my brother's 25ms LCD, damn that sucks for gaming. I like my 19" CRT for that, though their LCD screens have superb quality.

oh, and this article (http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm) explains a lot on that topic.

[biohead]

Isn't it the text on a 1600x1200 19" LCD too small?
would it be different from a CRT :confused:

[OmegaMerc]

would it be different from a CRT :confused:

Considering that you have more space on an LCD 19" then on a CRT 19"....the LCD would be more legible.

[$a1Ty]

i dont know what your going on about, i can read text easy on my 17 crt at 1600

[Shadowmage]

so it shouldnt be hard to make a 19" that can do it then, should it? ;)
/Ed


Exactly. My current laptop LCD resolution is 1920x1200.... on a 15.4" LCD screen!