Super Pi 1M Performance to MHz Ratio: Post Yours!

[MaxxxRacer]

This thread is dedicated to optimizing your Super Pi 1M times per Mhz. The goal.. Get the lowest SP1M time at a given Mhz.

To standardize this, I came up with a rather simple formula so that ALL scores will be comparable. With my method, someone at 3GHz Can compare their score with someone who is at 2.8GHz or even 4Ghz. Please keep in mind that these scores are only comparable with other Athlon64 based systems. Comparing a prescott on a Time to MHz basis would be rediculous.

Here are the rules.
1. All scores submitted must have a CPU clock of atleast 2.4GHz.
2. Score must be accompanied by a Screenshot with CPUZ (main window) and A64 Tweaker open.
3. Super Pi Mod 1.4 MUST be used. The older verions and SEE2 / SEE3 versions will NOT be accepted.
4. Only 1 score, being the highest of your scores, will be added to the listing.
5. Post in the according format. Scores not posted in this format will NOT be posted. " 41.044 --- dinos22 (http://img459.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fastest1msuperpitime27641s1jl7.jpg) ------------- Opteron 144 "
5a. The format is as follows. Time (to 3 decimal places) three dashes "---" Hyperlink to SP1M time. appx 10 dashes "----------" and finally your CPU and if it is up for question, the core type (IE. FX55 SD or FX55 Claw)


Here is the Formula
Your Time in Seconds * Your Mhz (please use as many decimal places of accuracy as possible) / 2000 = Your score

Example
27.703 * 2951.7 / 2000 = 40.88547255

Lower Scores Are Better!

I will be keeping the listing as up to date as possible so that people do not need to go through the pages of posts. All scores I will have the users name hyperlinked with the screenshot of the SP1M Run with CPUZ and A64 Tweaker. Please remember that if the requirements are NOT met, that the score will NOT be posted.

P.S. I removed the numbers, in an attempt to retain my sanity during organization of the scores.

Scores - A64
-----------------------
39.535 --- funkflix (http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/4936/3953542xu.jpg)----------- Opteron 146
39.669 --- corvus_corax (http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=op146260260gsgh6vm.jpg) ------- Opteron 146
39.945 --- T_M (http://i4mark.teknetixx.com/Opteron_146/SuperPIchallenge/39_945.jpg) ---------- Opteron 146
40.331 --- s7e9h3n (http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/5103/40333pv.jpg)-------------FX55 /56
40.395 --- bachus_anonym (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=42036) --- Opteron 146
40.453 --- ^don.k's^ (http://imageshack.us/?x=my6&myref=http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=85744) ----------- 3700+ SD
40.476 --- FriGidi (http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6376/26984t1xt.jpg) ----------- Opteron 146
40.481 --- dinos22 (http://img209.imageshack.us/my.php?image=superpiefficiency404817af.jpg) ------------- Opteron 165
40.595 --- overcrash86 (http://wowgame.free.fr/3000+%20939/LBBLE%200517%20DPMW%202eme/aircool%20box%20moded/30.062s%202700Mhz-2.JPG) -------- 3000+ Venice
40.623 --- Malph (http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8887/opt2900spi1m8fg.jpg)----------Opteron148
40.820 --- eva2000 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/Opteron170/CCWBE_0546XPMW/Corsair/XMS3500C2/2x512/2_1/1114_3/10x/LDT3x/200/270-270-2225-7-14-2222_1.57-1.5-1.6-3.68_3120_ds3dds1_8F55/superpi-1m_30218.jpg) ------------- Opteron 170
40.885 --- MaxxxRacer (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=41701&stc=1&d=1135941459) ------- Opteron 146
40.897 --- farooqm (http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/8961/superpi1mbfinal7lj.jpg) ------------- Opteron 146
40.966 --- before (http://img283.imageshack.us/img283/1142/cabce0516wpmwsuperpi1m26s27pq.png) ------------ FX-55SD
41.021 --- largon (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=42045&stc=1&d=1136810713) -------------Opteron 146
41.055 --- aicjofs (http://home.comcast.net/~aicjofs/spi.jpg) ---------- Opteron 144
41.101 --- Jaan (http://www.oc.pri.ee/screens/294x9=2646MHz-tccd-31.062.PNG)----------Venice 3200+
41.115 --- Pyr0 (http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/3310/303912re.jpg) -------------- X24400
41.296 --- krampak (http://img455.imageshack.us/img455/4645/25313in.jpg) ------------- Opteron 148
41.463 --- 0verl0ad (http://img364.imageshack.us/img364/8894/superpi280630zd3tc.jpg) ---------- Opteron 144
41.522 --- Vapor (http://img454.imageshack.us/img454/9501/26157s3175m9gi.png) ------------ X24400
41.699 --- DevanG (http://photobucket.com/albums/y170/DevanG/?action=view&current=32.png) ------------- Winchester 3000+
41.913 --- GOESA (http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/6250/superpi1m2696933ne.jpg) ------------ Opteron 146
42.322 --- Budwise (http://thecowsaysmoo.org/budwise/pics/Personal/2900%20Final.jpg) ---------- Opteron 170 DC
44.991 --- grilll (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=42061&stc=1&d=1136837866) ------------ 3500+ Venice













Scores - AXP
-----------------------
1. 50.224 --- Morgoth (http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y214/atomicmorgoth2/pi39s222fsb.jpg)
2.
3.
4.

[bachus_anonym]

Score: 40.3951149

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=42036

[Morgoth]

50.22492345

Athlon XP included? if not, why not make a class for itself

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y214/atomicmorgoth2/pi39s222fsb.jpg

[MaxxxRacer]

I guess I could include it. Not much reason to though. Your score will get nocked back by even the weakest of A64's. but it would save me the trouble of having to movey our score to the back of the pack every time another score was added.. so why not.

[Morgoth]

Thanks dude, good to see that us lower class CPU users are still included!

[mrlobber]

Hmm, what about a Dothan class?

Edit: nm, just noticed a similar thread in the Intel section :slap:

[MaxxxRacer]

lol.. Yup.. Equal Opportunity here.

[K.I.T.T.]

Do i reaaaaaaally need a screenie of AMD tweaker? My best time is in my sig, but no AMD tweaker :(

And its a PITA to get this opty anywhaere above 2.9 GHz without temps going sky high :stick:

[before]

Score: 40.9667273

<img src='http://img283.imageshack.us/img283/1142/cabce0516wpmwsuperpi1m26s27pq.th.png' alt='' style='vertical-align:middle; border:0' /> (http://img283.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cabce0516wpmwsuperpi1m26s27pq.png)

[largon]

41.0217236

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=42045&stc=1&d=1136810713

[Pyr0]

[edit] - Duh

[Vapor]

here's an old one
http://img494.imageshack.us/img494/9862/27509eo.th.jpg (http://img494.imageshack.us/img494/9862/27509eo.jpg)

(28.03750x2750)/2000=38.5515625Except that's 32M :stick:

[Pyr0]

hahaha, lol i need to wake up :P

[Vapor]

Here's the only run I have with Tweaker and CPU-Z in it (at least that I could find). A mediocre 41.5229265 :(

http://img454.imageshack.us/img454/9501/26157s3175m9gi.th.png (http://img454.imageshack.us/my.php?image=26157s3175m9gi.png)

26.157*3174.9/2000 = 41.5229265

[Cranox]

Maybe add in the list extra info about the used cpu ( Venice , Opteron ,FX,Sandiego ) so u can better compare :)

[funkflix]

40,0235

http://213.202.211.105/gravedigga/0546GPAW/3000m1.jpg

[Dr_at_Home]

http://server2.ihostphotos.com/imgt/61791.jpg (http://server2.ihostphotos.com/show.php?id=61791)
This was using 2T; 36 seconds. 1T does 35, but this board seems to not like it. :eh:

36*2456.8/2000= 44.2224
35*2456.8/2000= 42.994

[Pyr0]

41.1159839
http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/3310/303912re.th.jpg (http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/3310/303912re.jpg)

[funkflix]

40,1805 with TCCD

http://213.202.211.105/gravedigga/0546GPAW/3000m1tccd.jpg

[0verl0ad]

41,4630825

http://img364.imageshack.us/img364/8894/superpi280630zd3tc.th.jpg (http://img364.imageshack.us/my.php?image=superpi280630zd3tc.jpg)

With good old Infineon 6A :cool:

It is an older run. I dont have a Pic with A64 Tweaker opened ...

[Budwise]

Lets see... 29.188 X 2900 = 84645.2 / 2000 = 42.3226

http://thecowsaysmoo.org/budwise/pics/Personal/2900%20Final.jpg

[gillll]

:)

33.956*2650/2000=44.991

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=42061&stc=1&d=1136837866

[Reinvented]

31.406 * 2750.9/2000 - 43.197

http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/996/superpi6vj.jpg

[FriGidi]

Score: 40.476

http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6376/26984t1xt.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[^don.k's^]

Score: 40,4536737

http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/8409/2776s1xr.th.jpg (http://img21.imageshack.us/my.php?image=2776s1xr.jpg)


I'm in the top3 :D

PS In the pic appears my "old" nick

EDIT: oh sh*t, isn't valid coz of the A64 Tweaker ? I hope it is... If not i'll have to do better results... :D

[corvus_corax]

Score: 26.890*3000.8/2000 = 40.345756
Opteron 146 - UTT-BH
The Vcore was set a little bit higher than necessary ;)
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/8624/op146300250gsghsp1m6mv.th.jpg (http://img10.imageshack.us/my.php?image=op146300250gsghsp1m6mv.jpg)

[MaxxxRacer]

don, looking at the score and that you have the CPUZ memory page open, I will put it up. but if you can better your score, make sure to put the a64 tweaker shot on there.

[[XC] 4X4N]

29.937*2805/2000=41.98
This is hard for us tccd guys. Funkflix, those are some great timings at that speed:toast:
http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/5901/1481m7um.th.jpg (http://img238.imageshack.us/my.php?image=1481m7um.jpg)

[dinos22]

Maxxx how did you get to that formula?!?....what does value 2000 represent?

also this will lean heavily with people that have top notch RAM........looks at my pair of G.Skill LE's that go to 280 2.5-3-3-x :(



my score: 41.044

http://img459.imageshack.us/img459/7744/fastest1msuperpitime27641s1jl7.jpg (http://img459.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fastest1msuperpitime27641s1jl7.jpg)

[MaxxxRacer]

Dinoss, 2000 is an arbitrary number, though I made it low enough so that it doesnt favor lower clocked CPU's too heavily. 3000 would end up in users with higher mhz having scores there were too high.

And yes, this test is essentially about how well you can tweak your system, and that includes RAM. Snice the CPU MHz is made equal in the test, the RAM and OS tweaking is where it comes down to. Anyone can get high mhz with a good cpu and cooling, but the real challenge is tweaking the OS and RAM to the limit..

anyway, 41 isnt bad at all. And if you look, my score is on TCCD and so is bachus' score.

[dinos22]

Maxxx..........you should probably ask people to post it in format you are using on first for easy copy and paste.......here is mine in that format

41.044 --- dinos22 (http://img459.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fastest1msuperpitime27641s1jl7.jpg) ------------- Opteron 144

[T_M]

WIll try for better later, but here's one i have sitting around from when i was testing out my BH-5

40.857 --- T_M (http://i4mark.teknetixx.com/3500C2/268.33%201M%20stable.JPG) ------------- Opteron 146

[MaxxxRacer]

Dinos, thanks for the advice. Will ad that rule.

[corvus_corax]

Hi Max!
Here is mine with the link fixed :)
40.345 --- corvus_corax (http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/8624/op146300250gsghsp1m6mv.jpg) ------- Opteron 146

[Aphex_Tom_9]

Opteron 148 @ 3413mhz, TCCD 310mhz 2.5-4-3-7
24.578x3413/2000= 41.942
methinks the ram could do with some tighter timings...

[|3ourne]

http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/7113/294ghz245mhzmem1ft.png


41.94770275 ----|3ourne (http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/7113/294ghz245mhzmem1ft.png) ---- Opteron 150 CABGE ( I have a better stepping 146 which Ill swap tomorrow and give you a score for )

[eva2000]

interesting

40.820 --- eva2000 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/Opteron170/CCWBE_0546XPMW/Corsair/XMS3500C2/2x512/2_1/1114_3/10x/LDT3x/200/270-270-2225-7-14-2222_1.57-1.5-1.6-3.68_3120_ds3dds1_8F55/superpi-1m_30218.jpg) ------------- Opteron 170

[farooqm]

For now...with my 'not so good as everyone elses' TCCD mem :(

40.897 --- farooqm (http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/8961/superpi1mbfinal7lj.jpg) ------------- Opteron 146

[Vapor]

Maxxx....while you're right I do have an X2 4400+ (in fact, that's ALL I have right now :D), my run was with an Opty 146 I had back in the day of CABNE :D

My X2 is pulling better results though (on a less tweaked, lower mem-speed run too :D), I just want to break into the low 40s before I resubmit :D

[GOESA]

Here is my opty 146 with TCCD ram - and they actually suck bigtime :(

26,969*3108,3/2000 = 41,91387135

http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/6250/superpi1m2696933ne.jpg

[Exlua]

http://www.tueren-shop.com/Lutz/Computer/Benchmark/pi.jpg

@

http://www.tueren-shop.com/Lutz/Computer/Benchmark/CPU-Z/cpu-z.jpg

37,344*2673/2000 = 49,91....

[dinos22]

it seems to me from initial results over at OCAU that lower MHz on CPU will produce BEST results indicating a slight bias in the formula i think ...............if so we should play more with 2000 value and restrict the MHz to max 300-400MHz difference.....i.e. 2500-2900 for example...........can people that ran their results past 3GHz go back and do 2.4/2.5GHz runs and see what happens

1. 40.390 --- Griff_en (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a362/Griff_en/40.jpg) ------------- Opteron 148
2. 40.820 --- eva2000 (http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/Opteron170/CCWBE_0546XPMW/Corsair/XMS3500C2/2x512/2_1/1114_3/10x/LDT3x/200/270-270-2225-7-14-2222_1.57-1.5-1.6-3.68_3120_ds3dds1_8F55/superpi-1m_30218.jpg) ------------- Opteron 170
3. 40.896 --- mikeyyy (http://imagestore.ugbox.net/image/009697a57c23058b2959327add86ad10.jpg) ------------- Opteron 144
4. 41.044 --- dinos22 (http://img459.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fastest1msuperpitime27641s1jl7.jpg) ------------- Opteron 144
5. 41.384 --- bbjayo (http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/743/bbjayosuperpi2yf.jpg) -------------- Opteron 146
6. 42.133 --- RSix (http://members.optusnet.com.au/troyjl1/spi31-203sec.jpg) ----------------- Opteron 175
7. 43.291 --- Psycho84 (http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a116/Psycho84/SuperPI1m.jpg) ------------ A64 X2 4200+

[overcrash86]

30.062 x 2700.8 = 40,5957248

http://wowgame.free.fr/3000+%20939/LBBLE%200517%20DPMW%202eme/aircool%20box%20moded/30.062s%202700Mhz-2.JPG

soon better with my opty :toast:

[dinos22]

well yeah i think the formula is NOT good

40.481 --- dinos22 (http://img209.imageshack.us/my.php?image=superpiefficiency404817af.jpg) ------------- Opteron 165

http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/983/superpiefficiency404817af.jpg (http://img209.imageshack.us/my.php?image=superpiefficiency404817af.jpg)

[Jaan]

" 41.101 (http://www.oc.pri.ee/screens/294x9=2646MHz-tccd-31.062.PNG)---Jaan----------Venice 3200+ "

not bad for tccd+ 512KB core? :)

[Fhqwhgads6680]

Hello, at work so don't have a score yet, Although I was thinking, this is a great idea, but does heavily favor 1mb cores over 512k maybe we should have 2 lists for the cache size? Great job!

[FriGidi]

Did a nice run with Opteron 146. Too bad that cpu-z didn´t work :(
http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/1148/32047t7cp.th.jpg (http://img189.imageshack.us/my.php?image=32047t7cp.jpg)

Score: 32.047 * 2500 / 2000 = 40.058

MaxxxRacer: funkflix time is wrong or then my calculator is cheating. Isn´t 26.766 * 3000.6 / 2000 = 40.157 ?

[dinos22]

here is another one from APCD..............obviously the formula is out


2404 cpu
240 memory :tongue:

40.086 --- Griff_en (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a362/Griff_en/x9_40.jpg) ------------- Opteron 148

[Fhqwhgads6680]

Why don't we just pick a lower clock speed that is easy enough to hit (like 2.4) and only allow people within 5mhz of that clock speed post their times, and just use the times themselves to compare? that'd have to be more accurate than this. Anyone else have any ideas?

[dinos22]

Why don't we just pick a lower clock speed that is easy enough to hit (like 2.4) and only allow people within 5mhz of that clock speed post their times, and just use the times themselves to compare? that'd have to be more accurate than this. Anyone else have any ideas?
yeap thats what i brought up at OCAU but different people will have their max RAM speed on various times so not everyone will be happy........

[Fhqwhgads6680]

this is true....well I think its gonna be hard to really compare results in a completely unbiased fashion, to much variation and too many variables for it to really be even. that was my only idea lol now....im stumped....

[corvus_corax]

Those results are interesting...
Another time mine at 2.6GHz
Score: 39.6695
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/5901/op146260260gsgh6vm.th.jpg (http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=op146260260gsgh6vm.jpg)

[Sunin]

Ha, 37.14064 with my Dothan 760 clocked at 2772mhz and a superpi of 26.797... And AMD's are supposed to be good? :) I know I know troll, but still shoudl open a contest like this to everyone!

[misteroadster]

I'm thinking this Ratio is real , superpi is really proportionnal to the Cpu frequency/Ram frequency.

In the past i've done some tests, and you can test by yourself :

10X100FSB / 10X200FSB was 2/1 in result of time at Pi 1M (On A64)

[MaxxxRacer]

Well what I could do is change the forumula to have the score (CPU MHZ /2) to reduce the cpu mhz bias.. but it will always be there to some degree due to the nature of the comparison.

[Vapor]

If there's an advantage to lower MHz, it's not an exclusive advantage to only a select few so I say leave what we have.

[dinos22]

ok let's kick some ass at 2.4GHz....

Maxxx....think you missed a few scores

[DevanG]

There is one more point where this formula is bias.
The difference in L2 Cache between SD and Win/Ven equivalates to ~100-150MHz extra.
So that is also an explanation for why on the first 10 positions there are one or maybe two processors with 512KB L2 Cache.

This is a quick test I did some 3 or more weeks ago with some memories I do not have now - although I have other TCCD's that are somewhat better. Unfortunately I had some problems with A64Tweaker and I used SysTool, hopefully it will pe accepted as I also have the *.bmp saved in 1600x1200 resolution.

41.6997108 --- DevanG (http://photobucket.com/albums/y170/DevanG/?action=view&current=32.png) ------------- Winchester 3000+

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y170/DevanG/32.png

LE: Computed the wrong way ... :D

[s7e9h3n]

http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/5103/40333pv.jpg
LOL....I'll let Bachus explain this one ;)

40.331925---s7e9h3n (http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/5103/40333pv.jpg)-------------FX55 /56 (Check my sig)

[Malph]

40.623---Malph (http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8887/opt2900spi1m8fg.jpg)----------Opteron148


http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8887/opt2900spi1m8fg.th.jpg (http://img216.imageshack.us/my.php?image=opt2900spi1m8fg.jpg)

[corvus_corax]

LOL....I'll let Bachus explain this one ;)

40.331925---s7e9h3n (http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/5103/40333pv.jpg)-------------FX55 /56 (Check my sig) :shock2: Wow! That is a amazing time for that frequency with those timings (156.2MHz for the mems right?). Your dimms 1 and 3 are disabled? (In accordance with tweaker shot). Any comments ? :D

[s7e9h3n]

:shock2: Wow! That is a amazing time for that frequency with those timings (156.2MHz for the mems right?). Your dimms 1 and 3 are disabled? (In accordance with tweaker shot). Any comments ? :D
Hehehe....here's a little more food for thought....;)
http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/8248/ddr3125am.jpg

[MaxxxRacer]

Stephen.. wtf did u do to ur system..

EDIT: forgot this is the famed FX56.. wierd ass chip.


Will update the scores tommorow or the next day. I find updating the list 10 times a day to be a bit much.

[s7e9h3n]

Stephen.. wtf did u do to ur system..

EDIT: forgot this is the famed FX56.. wierd ass chip.


Will update the scores tommorow or the next day. I find updating the list 10 times a day to be a bit much.
Cpu and system are working perfectly fine ;) Here's the best one yet - Sandra bandwidth...make sure you note the MAX bandwidth...LOL.....

http://img235.imageshack.us/img235/7910/ddr312sandra9ty.jpg

[krampak]

41.296 --- krampak (http://img455.imageshack.us/img455/4645/25313in.jpg) ------------- Opteron 148

[MaxxxRacer]

Stephen.. its even at 2T timmings. wtf..

ok whats the technical explanation.. or is it jsut some HUGE bug.

[Evil_Spork]

bump... only 13 scores... weak!!

[aicjofs]

41.055 --- aicjofs (http://home.comcast.net/~aicjofs/spi.jpg) ---------- Opteron 144

No perfect way to score this little game, but fun anyway.

http://home.comcast.net/~aicjofs/spi.jpg

[el rolio]

im at 41.71 right now for my score. time to optimise my ram (clearly) or just drop my cpu mhz for some 1:1 speed loving just for this list. will post SS when i get a score lower than 40 if i can.

[funkflix]

will post SS when i get a score lower than 40 if i can.

U can't! :toast:

[T_M]

U can't! :toast:

I can :)

39.945 --- T_M (http://i4mark.teknetixx.com/Opteron_146/SuperPIchallenge/39_945.jpg) ---------- Opteron 146

:rocker: **Team i4mark - www.i4memory.com** :rocker:

[funkflix]

Hmm strange. Gratz. :)

[T_M]

Not strange at all ;)
Just gotta know the tricks

[krampak]

Wanna share the tricks? :p:

[funkflix]

Sorry. ;) :toast:

39.535---funkflix (http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/4936/3953542xu.jpg)----------- Opteron 146

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/4936/3953542xu.jpg

[T_M]

Most of the tricks are in the screeny ;)

nice one funk, where'd you get the 300x8 idea - heheheh
PS - you coulda got fractionally lower if you had let CPU-Z idle for a while and capture the screeny when the CPU MHz floated to 2400.5

[dinos22]

Wanna share the tricks? :p:
yeap

make sure you run at 2.4GHz with BH5 RAM maxed out at 267 with tightest possible timings....surprised he didn't use MAL=7...guess the Opteron must have been upset

few of the registy tweaks, fast hard drives, SuperPI in root directory, run 16k a few times before going for 1M.........and run a lot of 1M runs.....

for better results than T_M's >>>>>> Win2003 Server

[T_M]

yep, still trying to get my hands on a working 2003 (been trying for weeks now...)

MAL 7 at 300HTT is just unstable
maybe if it was 290.... but not 300

[Aphex_Tom_9]

so i guess it's all about the ram frequency/timings

[misteroadster]

hummm, after some thinkings , the formula is good, but the rules aren't, to compete it must be a range of frequency :
Logically at low cpu frequency you need less bandwith than at high.

As i said previously, superpi times are propotionnals with the same ratio CPU/RAM, so to compete with 2000/200 you need 3000/300 or 4000/400.

[MaxxxRacer]

sigh.. well I guess everyone is gonna be running at exactly 2.4ghz now..

[misteroadster]

hummmm me think a range of 2.4-2.6Ghz would be better.
There is more choice in term of settings as well :)

[dinos22]

sigh.. well I guess everyone is gonna be running at exactly 2.4ghz now..
pretty much.....because the lower you go the better your results will be

run below 2.4 and see what you'll get ;)

you shouldn't complain....you've got 300MHz 2.5-3-3-6 stable TCCD.......mine are memtest stable up to 295/296 at those timings but not in windows :(

I hate my expert mobo............it will not run half multies for the life of me :rolleyes:

[T_M]

SO why not update the list when you were in the thread maxxx?

[MaxxxRacer]

It will take about 40 minutes of copy paste, copy pate, copy paste to get it done. I will do it tonight.


Dinos, its actaully only 2.5-4-3-6 stable.. Ive been trying to mess with certain settings to get it stable at 2.5-3-3-6 but its really hard as it takes 20 minutes for it to error out even at 2.5-3-3-5-7-10 at 300mhz. And If I cant boot one mhz higher than 300 or else it will reboot. Because of this I cant stest to see which settings give the least errors. I will try again later tonight. Will be messing around with drive strength and a few others.

[dinos22]

Dinos, its actaully only 2.5-4-3-6 stable.. Ive been trying to mess with certain settings to get it stable at 2.5-3-3-6 but its really hard as it takes 20 minutes for it to error out even at 2.5-3-3-5-7-10 at 300mhz. And If I cant boot one mhz higher than 300 or else it will reboot. Because of this I cant stest to see which settings give the least errors. I will try again later tonight. Will be messing around with drive strength and a few others.
ok maybe i mixed up your and Bachus's posts..........

btw what is the difference between memtest stable and windows stable speeds for you on TCCD RAM...........I think mine is at least 10MHz

on BH5 i tested in the past is a different story....basically whatever i got memtest stable was also windows SPI stable........actually even when it would error in memtest I could get it 32M stable in windows....that was a surprise i remember but hell it didn't stop me trying

p.s. sup with your sig

[chew*]

So dual cores can compete to if we use this formula right? >>>>
core 0 = 27.703 * 2951.7 / 2000 = 40.88547255
core 1 = 27.699 * 2951.7 / 2000 = 40.87956915
40.88547255 + 40.87956915 / 2 = 40.88252085

Will that be acceptable?

[MaxxxRacer]

the difference betwen memtest and windows stable is the same.. 307mhz in memtest and windows.

Chew, no need to aveage the scores. Just run one of the cores.. the better one if u can.

[chew*]

the difference betwen memtest and windows stable is the same.. 307mhz in memtest and windows.

Chew, no need to aveage the scores. Just run one of the cores.. the better one if u can.

cool core 1 it is then BTW i posted for some of your opinions on cooling an x1800xt in the watercooling thread. Need help can't make up my own mind.

[MaxxxRacer]

OK, its all updated now.

removed the numbering as it is just a pain in the ass to mess with the numbers when organizing... Im no freeking computer so sorting takes more time than my T1i-89 sorting Ebay's daily listings. (takes 24 hours wherehouse full of powerful servers)

[chew*]

33.859 x 1mhz / 2000 = 0.0169295

http://members.cox.net/wmdieselmc26/lol.bmp

After you get a laugh out of that ill explain what happened later and post a real score as im still dialing in this ati board :)

[dinos22]

33.859 x 1mhz / 2000 = 0.0169295

http://members.cox.net/wmdieselmc26/lol.bmp

After you get a laugh out of that ill explain what happened later and post a real score as im still dialing in this ati board :)
beat that Dothan bytches :D

[killingspreez]

33,641s*2403,5/2000 = 40,428

40,428---Killingspreez (http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/2973/xstest15oh.jpg)----------3700 SD

here you go:

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/2973/xstest15oh.th.jpg (http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=xstest15oh.jpg)

mfg

[T_M]

Update

39.869 --- T_M (http://i4mark.teknetixx.com/Opteron_146/SuperPIchallenge/39_869%201M%20Challenge.jpg) ---------- Opteron 146

[FireDragon]

2.7x29/2000= 39.15

245x11

opty 175

Dragon

[MaxxxRacer]

LOL Chew*


dinos, what about my sig?

[funkflix]

The link of the second placed does not work properly. :)

Thx for the list and work MaxxxRacer! :toast:

[dinos22]

LOL Chew*


dinos, what about my sig?
he's a fanboy :lol: he wouldn't know any better

also are those figures right ONLY 110W burn

[T_M]

2.7x29/2000= 39.15

245x11

opty 175

Dragon

you have read the rules right?
SUperPI mod 1.4 (i.e. 3 decimal points behind the seconds)
MHz on CPU as accurate as you can show (CPU-Z shows .1 accuracy)
Screenshot of the run including CPU-Z and A64 Tweaker.

[MaxxxRacer]

T_M, dont worry, Fire's score didnt go up for those reasons.


Pretty soon I will also stop posting scores that dont follow the posting rules. IE. the correct format. For now I am fixing them, since its only a few who dont read the rules, but its very time consuming to have to do alot of them.

Dinos, yes thats right. 110w read BEFORE the mosfets. that means the 110w is what the cpu and mosfets are drawing. So it doesnt take into account the innefeciency of the MOSFET. all of that means that the actual power draw is a few watts lower, but its not possible to take that reading.

funk, I will fix the link.

[gjwild]

Score:40.690---gjwild (http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b255/gjwild/Pi.gif) ----------148

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b255/gjwild/Pi.gif

[T_M]

Update

39.869 --- T_M (http://i4mark.teknetixx.com/Opteron_146/SuperPIchallenge/39_869%201M%20Challenge.jpg) ---------- Opteron 146

Just incase it was missed

[Hybrid]

42.2386 --- HybridHB (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v126/hybridhb/Spi.jpg) ------------- Opteron 170

[Jeager]

41.515 --- Jeager (http://jeager59.free.fr/A64/0512/2785.jpg) -------- 3000+ Venice

http://jeager59.free.fr/A64/0512/2785.jpg

[TINC]

http://images.people.overclockers.ru/52604.jpg

[NeezyDeezy]

I'm confused as to just what this score measures...

how would you even improve upon your score?

[overcrash86]

i think thats formule cant' work, just testing :

38.772 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%201995.4Mhz%20BH%20285.1Mhz%201.424v%203 8.860s-2.jpg

39.557 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%202430.7Mhz%20BH%20270.1Mhz%201.424v%203 2.547s-2.jpg

39.641 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%202520.7Mhz%20BH%20280.1Mhz%201.424v%203 1.453s-2.jpg

39.919 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%202700.6Mhz%20BH%20270.1Mhz%201.424v%202 9.562s-2.jpg

40.349 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%203006.5Mhz%20BH%20273.3Mhz%201.424v%202 6.843s-2.jpg

40.393 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%203112.9Mhz%20BH%20283.0Mhz%201.456v%202 5.953s-2.jpg

40.931 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%203276.6Mhz%20BH%20273.0Mhz%201.456v%202 4.985s-2.jpg

and to finisht, too strange score :

40.840 --- Overcrash86 ------------- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%203348.8Mhz%201.456v%2024.391s.jpg

just to say if you would have the better score, take 9x266 and optimize...

[s7e9h3n]

Nice work there overcrash....:toast:
I'll get booted tonight and throw out some results......

[overcrash86]

Nice work there overcrash....:toast:
I'll get booted tonight and throw out some results......

thx :toast:

mine are not fully optimized, but just little :D

i think ~26.7 at 3Ghz is possible, i've just more tested at 3350Mhz :p:

[shimmishim]

interesting. seems like the lowest clockspeed was the best.

[dinos22]

interesting. seems like the lowest clockspeed was the best.
just as i stated a few pages ago....formula is biased to lower clocks

[coop]

40.2201 --- http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/3816/4022017ti.jpg ------------- Opteron 148
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/3816/4022017ti.th.jpg (http://img42.imageshack.us/my.php?image=4022017ti.jpg)
I've thought of this some time ago, a ratio, and could never come up with something that was true for actual time and mhz. I should have payed better attention in school. This is good though. Maddening however.

[corvus_corax]

Score: 39.5484 -- corvus_corax (http://img12.imageshack.us/my.php?image=op1462402406of.png) -- Opteron 146
Another shot but this time on 2.4GHz. Just a few tweaks.
http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/7118/op1462402406of.png

[Flak Monkey]

43.837 --- Flak Monkey ---------- 3500+ Claw

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/3106/xs1dw.th.jpg (http://img4.imageshack.us/my.php?image=xs1dw.jpg)

[chew*]

I'm gonna have to get my gskill la's back from my bud to put ya bh-5 guys back in your place:) ddr 660 pi 1m here i come.

[Ozan Baseski]

My score : 23.766 x (3532,13/2000) = 41.97230

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/3395/23766sn1m4og.jpg

[dinos22]

My score : 23.766 x (3532,13/2800) = 29.98021485

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/3395/23766sn1m4og.jpg[/IMG]
your score is actually 41.972 :)

[s7e9h3n]

My score : 23.766 x (3532,13/2800) = 29.98021485

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/3395/23766sn1m4og.jpg
Ummm....lol.....you're dividing by the wrong number......23.766 x 3532.13/2000 = 41.9723 ;)

[T_M]

interesting. seems like the lowest clockspeed was the best.

rofl do people actually read the thread?

(just :banana::banana::banana::banana: stirring :P )

[Ozan Baseski]

Ooops sorry guys. At first I thought we are dividing by the cpu's default speed instead of an arbitrary number like 2000.:p:

[overcrash86]

just for fun, i've retested 3 run :

32.922*2400.6/2000 = 39,5162766

39.516 -- Overcrash (http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%202400.6Mhz%20BH%20266.7Mhz%201.424v%203 2.922s-2.jpg)-- Opteron 144

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%202400.6Mhz%20BH%20266.7Mhz%201.424v%203 2.922s-2.jpg

that seems as the 24GP :D

[before]

Well done Over! :D

[toto408]

Great Over! :toast:

You're now the first! :banana:

Can you make more optimisations?

[coop]

33.141 X 2403.6 / 2000 = 39.828
39.828---http://img359.imageshack.us/img359/73/39828best9dw.th.jpg (http://img359.imageshack.us/my.php?image=39828best9dw.jpg)----------148 Opteron

[Eldonko]

Nice overcrash86. :clap: I couldnt touch that time with this damn UTT-CH. Shouldnt have sold my BH-5 :(

This is with Ultra, will retry with Expert later.

33.094*2400.5/2000 = 39.721

39.721 -- Eldonko (http://members.shaw.ca/zryan/test-4.JPG)-- Opteron 148

http://members.shaw.ca/zryan/test-4.JPG

[MaxxxRacer]

overcrash, thanks for the very long tests there, but as I and dinos have already agreed upon, the formula is biased to low clockspeeds.

There is no way around this without putting memory speed and memory timmmings into the formula, which really defeats the purpose of the test..

I will update the list later tonight.

[coop]

^ That's true, and it will be hard to come up with a true ratio. Would be fun though. HOWEVER, props must be given to overcrash86 for a 32.922 @ 2400. esp with 2 - 256's. I don't know how you did it but it is a very quick time. Well done.

[Eldonko]

overcrash, thanks for the very long tests there, but as I and dinos have already agreed upon, the formula is biased to low clockspeeds.

There is no way around this without putting memory speed and memory timmmings into the formula, which really defeats the purpose of the test..

I will update the list later tonight.I thought mem timings and speed WAS the purpose of the test? :confused: It is a little different than intended but it is still fun to see who can get the highest @ 2400 :)

[Griff_en]

Sorta been posted already ...but my first post as a member of xs

40.086 --- Griff_en (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a362/Griff_en/x9_40.jpg) ------------- Opteron 148

[s7e9h3n]

Finally got my rig back up and running now with a water loop....here's the first result. Time to try some slower speeds with my 2x512mb bh5's which can do 274 with TIGHT TIGHT timings.....
http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/5329/9x26039859bs.jpg
39.857 --- s7e9h3n (http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/5329/9x26039859bs.jpg) ------------- FX55/56

[dinos22]

Here I am with my old 4000+ SD :
http://img272.echo.cx/img272/4029/spi35s9od.jpg

Gives : 2200.12x35.969/2000=39.568
I can bit this score with my Opty 148 and my old BH ... :banana:
you have to have minimum 2.4GHz for results to be valid

[before]

you have to have minimum 2.4GHz for results to be valid

Same for s7e9h3n... and for me (but I've removed my screen... :D )

[umbre_tombetoil]

you have to have minimum 2.4GHz for results to be valid

Forgot this point ... sorry .... :slapass: :slapass:
So here's my best with my old SD :
http://img155.echo.cx/my.php?image=spisd24gp7ns.jpg

39.79 --- umbre_tombetoil (http://img155.echo.cx/img155/961/spisd24gp7ns.jpg) ------------- 4000+ SD

Try tonight to bit this score with my opty ... :toast:

[before]

Well done mate! :clap: I've to improve mine...

[before]

Here is it ;) These BH5 are awesome!

39.820 -- before (http://www.beforeoverclock.com/images/CABCE0516WPMWSUPERPI1M33s[2].png) -- FX55 SD 0516WPMW

http://www.beforeoverclock.com/images/CABCE0516WPMWSUPERPI1M33s[2].png

[JasonDTM]

Edit--- Disregard this post as it has no informational value..

[overcrash86]

just to compare :

http://wowgame.free.fr/Opteron%20144/CABNE%200530%20APMW/Chilled/SuperPI%20little%20optimized/SPi%201Mo%202800.4Mhz%20BH%20280.1Mhz%201.424v%202 8.484s-2.jpg

same optimisation as my 2.4...

[toto408]

Over, can you bench at 8.5*290 or more, it could be beter with a bigger RAM freq.?

[overcrash86]

Over, can you bench at 8.5*290 or more, it could be beter with a bigger RAM freq.?

that will be same, x.5 isn't an real coef...

[Reinvented]

31.047 * 2800.7/2000 = 43.47666645

43.477 --- Reinvented (http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/6770/superpi7ez.jpg) ---------- X2 4400+ Toledo

[el rolio]

29.735 * 2800.8 / 2000 = 41.640894

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/3466/superpichallenge4gh.png

[corvus_corax]

32.937 * 2403.4 / 2000 = 39.5803929
39.580 -- corvus_corax (http://img79.imageshack.us/my.php?image=op144267240ghs5jw.gif) -- Opteron 144
http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/921/op144267240ghs5jw.th.gif (http://img79.imageshack.us/my.php?image=op144267240ghs5jw.gif)

This time in an unoptimized XP :p:

[the]

opty 175 DC system in sig
(3030.3 *28)/2k = 42.4242
ultra large pic
http://www.efegs.com/someguy/pics/various/oc/superpi/28spi4.bmp

[Flak Monkey]

43.837 --- Flak Monkey ---------- 3500+ Claw

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/3106/xs1dw.th.jpg (http://img4.imageshack.us/my.php?image=xs1dw.jpg) Why arent I on the list?

[before]

I've managed to increase my score but unfortunately not enough to beat out overcrash... :rolleyes: I'll try to do so anyway :D

39.539 -- before (http://www.beforeoverclock.com/images/CABCE0516WPMWSUPERPI1M32s.png) -- FX55 SD 0516WPMW

http://www.beforeoverclock.com/images/CABCE0516WPMWSUPERPI1M32s.png

PS: Is there any chance to see the rankings updated?

[before]

Here is it :banana:

39.501 -- before (http://www.beforeoverclock.com/images/CABCE0516WPMWSUPERPI1M32s%5b2%5d.png) -- FX55 SD 0516WPMW

http://www.beforeoverclock.com/images/CABCE0516WPMWSUPERPI1M32s%5b2%5d.png

[prosbloom225]

P4 3.0 Woot

63.4913775

[sabinus]

Please allow me to take the AMD A64 crown ... although a bit late ;)
Opteron 144 @ 2400 Mhz .
I have a 2 MB PCI card which cannot display 1280x1024 . I will try another runs to get detailed memory info.

39.5052

[funkflix]

Congratulations! :toast:

But how the hell u can beat me with an idle timer of 16? :eek: A64Tweaker would be intresting!

[sabinus]

39.411 --- SabinuS ------------- Opteron 144

Yes.. my best score:
32.843"

There is the A64 screen this time :)

[Jaan]

My best winchester 3000+ score- 40,487

http://www.oc.pri.ee/screens/winch-s-pi1m-33,313.PNG

and with Opteron 146 not so good - 40,302 http://www.oc.pri.ee/screens/1M-30sec@2686MHz.PNG

[sabinus]

Will there be any updates with the new results?

[SparkyJJO]

43.77087 --- SparkyJJO (http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g270/SparkyJJO/superpi.jpg) ---------- Athlon64 3700+ San Diego

http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g270/SparkyJJO/superpi.jpg

[dinos22]

Will there be any updates with the new results?
i think maxxx stopped it a while back as ppl are moving on but really good results there for sure................

so what's the trick you're using :p:

[sabinus]

Usual stuff: Win2003, copy-wazaa, process priority, defrag, NO ramdisk, almost NO services stopped, and a LOTS of patience ;)
...err and a personal innovation I call "pseudo-minimize™" that gives you the edge of ~0.1 sec @ 1MB.
I will post it on the SuperPI tweaks&tricks thread



i think maxxx stopped it a while back as ppl are moving on but really good results there for sure................

so what's the trick you're using :p:

[dinos22]

Usual stuff: Win2003, copy-wazaa, process priority, defrag, NO ramdisk, almost NO services stopped, and a LOTS of patience ;)
...err and a personal innovation I call "pseudo-minimize™" that gives you the edge of ~0.1 sec @ 1MB.
I will post it on the SuperPI tweaks&tricks thread
i used to have patience with 1M and would make my hardware not-so-stable on purpose and repeat it 50xtimes to get the best score heheheh....but then i thought it's all just tricks and lots of bs for a benchmark that last 20-od seconds......and concentrated on 32M instead and starting getting some kick arse times.......once you get it sweet for 32M you'll really start enjoying that.....and you need a lot of patience for 32M runs hhahah....conroes are a different story though.....much much faster........i mean i squeezed the :banana::banana::banana::banana: out of my Opteron and got it up to 3.5Ghz.....and managed 20m runs but damn people are ripping up sub-15m easy on air lol with Conroe

interested in your "pseudo-minimize™" actually :D