Rosetta Benchmark

[joshd]

hmmmm well the task manager gives me two CPU usage graphs, and i can set the affinity to CPU0 or CPU1... so i am assuming that it is on...

if it isnt, then i dont think there is any way i can actually turn it on.

[[XC] riptide]

Well I never bother to set affinity myself... so I'm not sure what way this is affecting the "Number of CPUs: 1"?!?. Like I have 3.4 northy and it'll say that I have 2 CPU's with HT on and 1 CPU with HT off! Maybe someome with more P4 rigs can jump in and sort this out! But like I said they are pretty OK benches for a 3.0gig.

EDIT: How many Rosetta instances are there in Task manager as a matter of interest??

[joshd]

only one. is there supposed to be two?

[[XC] riptide]

only one.
Well... now I ain't with my rig now, and am not familiar enough with the preferences pages for Rosey, but maybe you had selected just to use 1 CPU instead of 2!! (Windows and Rosey will see HT Proc as 2). Now if this is the case, I think NJKIDs advise on turning off HT for benches and turning on HT for running may have been carried out inadvertantly by your Rosey prefs.!! :cool: Now see if you can select from the preference pages to turn on 2 CPU's for rosey! You will get nice scores then!

PS Anybody got better advice?? Now's the time to jump in!

[joshd]

got it, it was set to only use one in the preferences. thanks!

19/06/2006 12:00:57|rosetta@home|Scheduler request succeeded
19/06/2006 12:00:57|rosetta@home|General preferences have been updated
19/06/2006 12:00:57||General prefs: from rosetta@home (last modified 2006-06-19 12:00:36)
19/06/2006 12:00:57||General prefs: using your defaults
19/06/2006 12:00:57||Number of usable CPUs has changed. Running benchmarks.
19/06/2006 12:00:57||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
19/06/2006 12:00:57|rosetta@home|Pausing task FRA_t327_CASP7_hom001_3_t327_3_1ub9A_IGNORE_THE_RE ST_162_724_2_0 (removed from memory)
19/06/2006 12:00:59||Running CPU benchmarks
19/06/2006 12:01:08||Running CPU benchmarks
19/06/2006 12:02:07||Benchmark results:
19/06/2006 12:02:07|| Number of CPUs: 2
19/06/2006 12:02:07|| 2610 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
19/06/2006 12:02:07|| 5709 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
19/06/2006 12:02:07||Finished CPU benchmarks


from what people have been saying, i take it that the bench goes down, but the actual crunching goes up?


still only one rosetta process though...

EDIT: two now, it DLed another task.

sorry for the crazy amount of posts i seem to be posting in the rosetta setion... lol.

[[XC] riptide]

Damn... I was afraid that it would rebench when you change Proc settings! i wonder is there away around that! Pity that damn dell doens't let you enable or disable HT! Is there any hacked off Bios that you can flash into that thing? Overall you'll get more points and more done with the HT on (and benched with it) but there is the opurtunity for the credits. ;)

[joshd]

no, no hacked BIOSs as far as i know.

is it better to have a higher bench is it? i mean, umm... not just knowing you have a good bench-wise?

[[XC] riptide]

no, no hacked BIOSs as far as i know.

is it better to have a higher bench is it? i mean, umm... not just knowing you have a good bench-wise?
Of course its better to have a higher bench... but you are asking me with a HT proc and the answer is a little longer. Your 2nd bench is lower then the first granted ... but it is not like 50%. Its 60%! Now instead of only one work unit been worked on at any given time, you now have 2 works units! Get my drift. Each one will get less credits BUT, comparitive data over time will always show that all things been equal, using HT on with associated benches will give you better scores.

[joshd]

i see! so it will take longer to complete the WUs, but i am doing two at the same time, so in the long run, it is better.

have a banana for your helpful-ness. :D :banana:

[[XC] riptide]

i see! so it will take longer to complete the WUs, but i am doing two at the same time, so in the long run, it is better.

have a banana for your helpful-ness. :D :banana:
Hmmm ... well.... you can set how long you want work units to work for. See .. the thing is you could, in reality... keep a workunit and do a VAST amount of work on it, and I reckon even beyond the constraints of BOINC. When you get a WU you are obliged to carry out the folding to get the first stage completed. Now for guys that like their own preferred lenght of time, you can set it to take 1 hour 2 hours.. etc etc in the preferences. However if the first stage of the folding takes longer than your preferences it will keep going until it is completed it first stage of folding. (I forget the correct terminology for 'stage'.) You can also I think set them going for 24 hours and that protein gets folded and folded and there are alot of predictions made on that WU.
IN short, you can set the lenght of time to work on it, but remember your '1st stage obligations' have to be met. (UNless somebody changed the rules)

[WesM63]

Laptop in Sig:

6/22/2006 6:47:45 PM||Benchmark results:
6/22/2006 6:47:45 PM|| Number of CPUs: 1
6/22/2006 6:47:45 PM|| 3070 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/22/2006 6:47:45 PM|| 10799 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

[mat128]

Hmmm ... well.... you can set how long you want work units to work for. See .. the thing is you could, in reality... keep a workunit and do a VAST amount of work on it, and I reckon even beyond the constraints of BOINC. When you get a WU you are obliged to carry out the folding to get the first stage completed. Now for guys that like their own preferred lenght of time, you can set it to take 1 hour 2 hours.. etc etc in the preferences. However if the first stage of the folding takes longer than your preferences it will keep going until it is completed it first stage of folding. (I forget the correct terminology for 'stage'.) You can also I think set them going for 24 hours and that protein gets folded and folded and there are alot of predictions made on that WU.
IN short, you can set the lenght of time to work on it, but remember your '1st stage obligations' have to be met. (UNless somebody changed the rules)

So is it better to have long WUs?

[[XC] riptide]

So is it better to have long WUs?
Well, some people think its better to have them more than just 2 hours. You see, there is initialization period with every work unit.. lasts a couple of minutes. So if your WU's are short this initialization happens more than if your WU's are long. During the initialization you looze a little of time!

[Danger30Q]

Acer 8204 laptop w/ T2500 Yonah w/ SSE2 optimizations
(soon to put in my Merom 7400 - surprisingly the newest European Acer bios supports Meroms)

2944 floating
11394 integer

I just joined the XS Rosetta team and I should have a Conroe 6700 Stepping 5 and a Merom 7400 @ 2.6 up and running 24/7 within the next 1 week. It's great to see all the enthusiasm for these crunching causes!

[heater918]

Acer 8204 laptop w/ T2500 Yonah w/ SSE2 optimizations
(soon to put in my Merom 7400 - surprisingly the newest European Acer bios supports Meroms)

2944 floating
11394 integer

I just joined the XS Rosetta team and I should have a Conroe 6700 Stepping 5 and Conroe 6400 up and running 24/7 within the next 1 week. It's great to see all the enthusiasm for these crunching causes!

:welcome: To the Team.
All i can say about your Conroes :cool: :woot: be sure to update us on the benchmarks when you get them.

[Absolute_0]

3800+ at the new settings

Measured floating point speed 5449.36 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 17873.63 million ops/sec

[Danger30Q]

Intel Merom 7400 @ 2.8ghz (24/7 stable)

2 CPUs
Measured floating point speed = 4982.18 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed = 22994.21 million ops/sec

I have really struggled to get this chip stable at 2.9 which is what it's capable of but the board is holding it back. This box will be up 24/7 until the Conroes are released.

[Danger30Q]

Is the Floating point score completly dependent on the CPU speed and nothing to do with what processor you have? It seems that a Opty 170, FX57, or X2 all running at the exact same speed have about the same Floating point score but have different Integer scores. Can someone tell me if I'm correct in this thinking? I haven't looked at too many Rosetta benches.

[mtzki]

X2 4400+ @ 2.6GHz
CPUs: 2
4466 floating point MIPS
14583 integer MIPS

P4 550 @ stock 3.4GHz
CPUs: 2
3079 floating point MIPS
6284 integer MIPS

XP-M 2800+ @ stock 2.13GHz
CPUs: 1
2680 floating point MIPS
8791 integer MIPS

All more or less 24/7 Rosetta atm. Adding a Dothan soon and an E6700 later.

[[XC] DragonOrta]

Thought I'd go ahead and update with my 64-bit linux Conroe benched at 3.38ghz.

Measured floating point speed 8193.98 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 31016.07 million ops/sec

[njkid32]

Thought I'd go ahead and update with my 64-bit linux Conroe benched at 3.38ghz.

Measured floating point speed 8193.98 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 31016.07 million ops/sec

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: HOLLY HELL!!!! Man thats a great bench for that speed. Damn I need to goto linux!!!

http://img240.imageshack.us/img240/5528/newconroebench4ke.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

It was done at 3939MHz 438fsb. I used the 667 upclock on the mem and loosened timings to 4-3-3-8 at 2.2v.. I forget but the mem speed was in the upper 500's..

[[XC] moddolicous]

I told you njkid!
Dragonotra: Those are some crazy benches. Is it an e6600?

[[XC] DragonOrta]

Yeah, it's a step 4 E6600, so this is about as far as I can go with my water right now. I use about 1.56v to get it benchable there. Once retail becomes available, I might try to sell this a get one of them, or just build another cruncher with a retail.

[mcflurry4321]

Ahem...so maybe this is a dumb question...but where are you guys getting Conroes???

[njkid32]

Ahem...so maybe this is a dumb question...but where are you guys getting Conroes???

Santa:) He lives in Virginia and Jim Carey was in his movie:rofl:

For awhile before Intel stepped in and got upset there were lots of them in the For Sale section (you will need 100 posts to see). But now until the release of retail Conroe its gonna be a little hard to get them. So there were a few lucky ones that got some ES Conroes....

BTW :welcome: to Rosetta and thanks for helping out. You will notice that we kid alot here (me mostly) but when it comes to the important things you will see how serious we are as a team:) If you need anything please feel free to pm me or any of the guys here cuz everyone is more than willing to help out..

[WesM63]

I'm not kidding when I say my conroe will be here July 12th ;)

I can't wait to see what this puppy will do!

[mcflurry4321]

Santa:) He lives in Virginia and Jim Carey was in his movie:rofl:

For awhile before Intel stepped in and got upset there were lots of them in the For Sale section (you will need 100 posts to see). But now until the release of retail Conroe its gonna be a little hard to get them. So there were a few lucky ones that got some ES Conroes....

BTW :welcome: to Rosetta and thanks for helping out. You will notice that we kid alot here (me mostly) but when it comes to the important things you will see how serious we are as a team:) If you need anything please feel free to pm me or any of the guys here cuz everyone is more than willing to help out..

Thanks a lot!!! I won't hesitate to ask any questions. I've been browsing the forums and everyone seems cool! Hope I can help out!

[mcflurry4321]

7/6/2006 7:05:38 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
7/6/2006 7:06:37 PM||Benchmark results:
7/6/2006 7:06:37 PM|| Number of CPUs: 1
7/6/2006 7:06:37 PM|| 4680 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
7/6/2006 7:06:37 PM|| 15258 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
7/6/2006 7:06:37 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks


On an A64 3400+ @ 2750

[ex2cib]

just noticed by NJ's and DO's benches,


their numbers are just about identical, slight edge in NJ's favor, but, basically even, and DO is 600MHz SLOWER

not bad @ all

[njkid32]

DO I am going to mail you a raptor so you can install linux:rofl:

Yeah clock for clock there is no comparo with Linux (especially 64bit) to Windows. Just think if DO benched at the same speed I did. :eek:

[ex2cib]

DO I am going to mail you a raptor so you can install linux:rofl:

Yeah clock for clock there is no comparo with Linux (especially 64bit) to Windows.


thats nice of you sending DO a new hard drive to run his rig on ;) :lol:

[[XC] DragonOrta]

I was able to bench at 3.4ghz in Fedora Core 5, so I booted into XP and benched at 3.4ghz, just to see what a difference it really made.

Measured floating point speed 6127.14 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 28317.65 million ops/sec

and the 64-bit 3.4ghz bench

Measured floating point speed 8285.44 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 31175.42 million ops/sec

[[XC] DragonOrta]

DO I am going to mail you a raptor so you can install linux:rofl:

Yeah clock for clock there is no comparo with Linux (especially 64bit) to Windows. Just think if DO benched at the same speed I did. :eek:
Funny you should say that. I've got an idle Raptor sitting on the lampstand next to me. The only problem is that it takes some work to get a linux install working on a computer with any hardware that's different from the original computer.

But Fedora Core 5 and Ubuntu are both pretty easy to install. And if you get in a bind, you might be able to give Ser a call. He has FC5 on some of his crunchers.

EDIT: Are you still in AZ? I keep thinking that you are in Vegas.

[[cTx]Philosophy]

165 @ 2.9 Ram @ 242 2.5-3-2-5 ... Seems low to me doesnt it?
7/7/2006 2:07:09 AM||Benchmark results:
7/7/2006 2:07:09 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
7/7/2006 2:07:09 AM|| 4881 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
7/7/2006 2:07:09 AM|| 15977 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
7/7/2006 2:07:09 AM||Finished CPU benchmarks

[njkid32]

I found some driver issues in my Windows install and fixed them tonight... Here are my new benchies at 3987MHz 1.55v mem using 667 divider so it was in the high 500's at 4-4-4-8 2.2v... Still on air:)

http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/58/conroebench24tx.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Martijn]

I found some driver issues in my Windows install and fixed them tonight... Here are my new benchies at 3987MHz 1.55v mem using 667 divider so it was in the high 500's at 4-4-4-8 2.2v... Still on air:)



Exactly what air cooling is it?

BTW, shouldn't you go to bed, LOL, it's at least 2am in the USA :p:

[njkid32]

I am using a TT Big Typhoon with the stock fan on it. I will put a better fan on soon but I am going to run it on phase tomorrow I think:)

[Martijn]

I am using a TT Big Typhoon with the stock fan on it. I will put a better fan on soon but I am going to run it on phase tomorrow I think:)

Only a Big Typhoon? OMG, those conroes will do fine on my Zalman 9500 :slobber:

[Danger30Q]

Conroe 6700 ES @ 3.75ghz
Just installed Fedora Core 5 Linux-64 and it makes quite the difference:

BEFORE Linux-64:
Measured floating point speed 6627.41 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 30633.12 million ops/sec

WITH Linux-64
Measured floating point speed 9078.58 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 33338.27 million ops/sec

http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=270601

Over 9000 floating point is insane!

[Movieman]

Conroe 6700 ES @ 3.75ghz
Just installed Fedora Core 5 Linux-64 and it makes quite the difference:

BEFORE Linux-64:
Measured floating point speed 6627.41 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 30633.12 million ops/sec

WITH Linux-64
Measured floating point speed 9078.58 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 33338.27 million ops/sec

http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=270601

Over 9000 floating point is insane!
HOLY CRAP!:eek: Hey, post this in the main Rosetta section..You have bragging rights with this pal!:toast:

[[XC] DragonOrta]

And if you look at my post at the top of this page, you will now see what I was so excited about back then. Awesome Numbers there, Danger30Q. :up:

[njkid32]

Ok, I have been up all night with this:mad: but the results were well worth it:)

At 3876MHz or so I got--

Measured floating point speed 9417.6 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 33839.27 million ops/sec

Not to shabby:) But, I am still working on a better oc its a pita cuz I have to do it all through bios not in Linux:(

[ex2cib]

Ok, I have been up all night with this:mad: but the results were well worth it:)

At 3876MHz or so I got--

Measured floating point speed 9417.6 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 33839.27 million ops/sec

Not to shabby:) But, I am still working on a better oc its a pita cuz I have to do it all through bios not in Linux:(

see if you can break 10,000 on floating point:toast:

[njkid32]

Ooops wrong bench:)

Measured floating point speed 9423.08 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 35511.16 million ops/sec

IDK if I can break it cuz I think heat is an issue right now.

[[XC] gomeler]

Put that sucker under phase! Don't let heat be your wall.

[njkid32]

I know I am just being lazy:)

Oh I need to thank Fr3ak for helping me out with Linux:woot:

[[XC] moddolicous]

What distro are you guys using?? I heard that gentoo is the fastest distro as you can customize it for your comp.

[[XC] DragonOrta]

I'm using Fedora Core 5 for now, just because Gentoo can be a b|tch to install

[uOpt]

What distro are you guys using?? I heard that gentoo is the fastest distro as you can customize it for your comp.

I hate Fedora by now. When I need a Linux as opposed to FreeBSD I use Debian. I am actively checking out Ubuntu. Didn't have time to mess with Suse but want to.

[brot]

well, gentoo really is a *insertbadwordhere* when you install it the first time. You have to built everything from scratch, deciding what you want. So you do only have what you need, no support in the programs for nonsense things.
Who needs a program, which got the gnome-gui routines in it, when you use kde. Also, who needs programs compatible with any 64-bit-cpu, when it could use especially the routines for your cpus.
Thats what gentoo is about. Choises.

If you wanna try out gentoo, i would be really happy to help.
But, back to topic: these scores really rock. i mean really really. :)

[[XC] serlv]

My fastest cruncher, before I get a Conroe.


6252 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
18463 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

...in 64-bit FC5

[Brock Landers]

Here's the scores from the ugly un-box.

Measured floating point speed 1473.48 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 2221.75 million ops/sec

I decided to get off my lazy bum and do win2k. She's now benching at 2570/10919. I'm really hoping for 500 or so a day from her.

Would there be any benefit to really stripping windows out?

Oh yeah, it's a Barton at ~2.1 with 512MB of RAM.

[njkid32]

I think this bench speaks for itself....3.5ghz at 1.45v (heat is an issue on air)

http://img56.imageshack.us/img56/2119/kentsfield35ghz9jt.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[Brock Landers]

Shelfpc2:
Floating point: 2631
Int: 11396

AXP@~2.1 512 MB DDR

It's going to share an Ethernet cable with the shelfpc above it. Oh well, big dumps are good I guess.

[[XC] serlv]

Shelfpc2:
Floating point: 2631
Int: 11396

AXP@~2.1 512 MB DDR

It's going to share an Ethernet cable with the shelfpc above it. Oh well, big dumps are good I guess.

What motherboard and cooling are you using with that procssor?

[Brock Landers]

A really crappy MSI K7N2-V and stock Barton HSF. The chip is a DL3TC 1800+. The BIOS doesn't facilitate any vcore or multi adjustment. C'est la vie. I'll take what I can get I guess, it's really better than nothing. I know with vcore that this chip would do more.

[[XC]melymel]

This is my 805 @ 3.6ghz undervolted to 1.24v and running on ubuntu 64bit linux, I haven't really tried to increase the clocks or volts yet so be prepared for more but i think this is more than reasonable for an extremely budget rig :D.

Mon 17 Jul 2006 13:57:38 BST||Benchmark results:
Mon 17 Jul 2006 13:57:38 BST|| Number of CPUs: 2
Mon 17 Jul 2006 13:57:38 BST|| 5301 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
Mon 17 Jul 2006 13:57:38 BST|| 16736 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

:toast:

[Danger30Q]

Acer 8204 laptop with T2500 @ 2.0ghz:

2944 floating
11394 integer

with Merom 7400 at 2.16ghz:

3828 floating
17275 integer

(old benchmark) with Merom 7400 at 2.8ghz in my desktop PC:

4982.18 floating
22994.21 integer

----------------
All have the SSE2 optimizations. I would appreciate someone with a Yonah T2500 overclocked on the Aopen board to give their benchmarks.

[njkid32]

Danger30Q, I would talk to Hassan I think he has a few Yonah's running Rosetta right now....

[Raiden Zero]

my new celeron cruncher:

4.73GHz

CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Celeron(R) D CPU 3.20GHz
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Home Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 1023.04 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Measured floating point speed 5277.37 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 18509.62 million ops/sec

[WesM63]

Nice celly Raiden!

Here is my 'ho at stock speeds:

4527.02 Floating
20479.61 Integer

[Raiden Zero]

celeron@ 487Xmhz

CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Celeron(R) D CPU 3.20GHz
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Home Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 1023.04 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Measured floating point speed 5428.93 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 19003.47 million ops/sec


raiden

[mcflurry4321]

celeron@ 487Xmhz

CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Celeron(R) D CPU 3.20GHz
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Home Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 1023.04 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Measured floating point speed 5428.93 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 19003.47 million ops/sec


raiden

Wow. Do all of those Celerons OC like that? What cooling are you using?

[Raiden Zero]

Wow. Do all of those Celerons OC like that? What cooling are you using?

Dunno if they all oc like that since there should be some differences in oc between B1 and C1 step. ... but i dont think that mine is something special.

Cooling is Thermaltake SonicTower+2*120mm fans.
i bet i can bench up to 5ghz or even more.
just need to get my a/c unit and lap the ihs.
(roestta 100% load ->62°C ^^)

raiden

[meshmesh]

CPU: AMD X2 4400+ @ 2.60
Ram: 2 x 1MB BH5 (2.5-3-2-6) @ 237Mhz
Chipset: NF4
Optimizations: SSE2
OS: Win XP SP2
# of Cpu's: 2
Measured floating point speed 4494 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 14785 million ops/sec

[mcflurry4321]

(roestta 100% load ->62°C ^^)


Holy cow!

[Raiden Zero]

Holy cow!

ye, a bit too high :(

btw: 4.8GHz 1.47Vc Prime2004 priority10->69°C lmao

[stummerwinter]

I really love the 1.06-BIOS for my AOpen...


CPU: T7400 @ 3,12 GHz
RAM: 2 x 512 MB Syncmax @ 333 MHz 4-4-4-12
5.5.0

23.07.2006 10:16:59||Running CPU benchmarks
23.07.2006 10:17:58||Benchmark results:
23.07.2006 10:17:58|| Number of CPUs: 2
23.07.2006 10:17:58|| 5597 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
23.07.2006 10:17:58|| 25707 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
23.07.2006 10:17:58||Finished CPU benchmarks

[Raiden Zero]

I really love the 1.06-BIOS for my AOpen...


CPU: T7400 @ 3,12 GHz
RAM: 2 x 512 MB Syncmax @ 333 MHz 4-4-4-12
5.5.0

23.07.2006 10:16:59||Running CPU benchmarks
23.07.2006 10:17:58||Benchmark results:
23.07.2006 10:17:58|| Number of CPUs: 2
23.07.2006 10:17:58|| 5597 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
23.07.2006 10:17:58|| 25707 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
23.07.2006 10:17:58||Finished CPU benchmarks

Hey, i can nearly beat ur floating point MIPS per CPU with my Celeron 352 :D

CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Celeron(R) D CPU 3.20GHz
Number of CPUs 1
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Home Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 1023.05 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Measured floating point speed 5529.52 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 19386.57 million ops/sec

Running 4.95GHz, Thermaltake SonicTower, 71°C Load :stick:

[kiwi]

Linux + core2 duo ownage :)

E6300 @ 7x486 = 3.4Ghz

8.2K/31K (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=50021&stc=1&d=1155136652)

[Fr3ak]

Do you have win XP installed on that rig? Maybe we can bench with the same multiplier and mem timings to see if there is any benefit from the bigger cache. I doubt there is a noticable difference, but you never know.

And running something like 400mhz fsb or below would be nice. I only have pc667 ram that runs with 800 5 6 6 15 right now and I cant change ram timings above 400mhz with my asus :/ And I only have 512mb ram right now, so maybe we better wait until I get my gskill 1gb. Will install Linux on Friday, but I dont think I can run 48x fsb ;)

Now that I think about it, if you are using the Gigabyte,comparing it to the asus might be worth nothing as it has different internal timings.

[kiwi]

Sure just tell me what fsb, ram timings to run and we will see :) But preferably 1GB or more because of bank interleaving. 512MB performance will always be a bit worse even at the same settings

[Paladin]

E6400@3440 (8x430) 1.40V

Win2Kpro
6173 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
28638 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Will do WinXPpro, Win2K3, and some flavor of 64-bit Linux when time permits.

[Absolute_0]

Conroe at about 3.8 GHz

Measured floating point speed 6803.8 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 31748.82 million ops/sec

[kiwi]

Another allendale, e6400 @ 3.85Ghz
Linux
Score:


9.4K/35.4K (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=50306&stc=1&d=1155933454)

[Paladin]

Will do WinXPpro, Win2K3, and some flavor of 64-bit Linux when time permits.

To keep it homogeneous I'm benching the E6400 @ 3.2ghz

Win2K - 5742/26663
WinXP - 5745/26464
Win2K3 - 5742/26462
WinXP64 - 5008/26051

(Did XP64 many times; that was the highest score it could get even with lowing the ram timings.)
Only have to do a Linux 64-bit to finish off my BOINC tests (latest Gentoo and Ubuntu hang during install).

[[cTx]Philosophy]

Ive been siggd :P

[Carpe^Diem]

21-08-2007 18:54:08||Benchmark results:
21-08-2007 18:54:08|| Number of CPUs: 4
21-08-2007 18:54:08|| 3926 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
21-08-2007 18:54:08|| 8763 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU