ATI Catalyst 5.11b vs XG Warcat 5.11XT on X1800XL

[spajdr]

Ok guys, since im addicted to overclocking and benching :stick:
and since i though it could be good to try XG Warcraft 5.11XT since i heard some good stuff about it i though i could give it a try.

All tests was done with AA6x AF16x HQ

So here we go

3D Mark 2003 with GPU/MEM 500/1000 and ATI Catalyst 5.11b
http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/5486/5005003dmark032jl.jpg

3D Mark 2003 with GPU/MEM 600/1200 and ATI Catalyst 5.11b
http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/52/6006003dmark036ey.jpg

3D Mark 2003 with GPU/MEM 500/1000 and XG Warcat 5.11XT
http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/3079/5005003dmark03xt8md.jpg

3D Mark 2003 with GPU/MEM 600/1200 and XG Warcat 5.11XT
http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/529/6006003dmark03xt4ac.jpg

so far its looking good ..

Next we got 3D Mark 2005 which sadly didnt show much difference

3D Mark 2005 with GPU/MEM 500/1000 and ATI Catalyst 5.11b
http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/7906/5005003dmark050in.jpg

3D Mark 2005 with GPU/MEM 600/1200 and ATI Catalyst 5.11b
http://img492.imageshack.us/img492/9787/6006003dmark055om.jpg

3D Mark 2005 with GPU/MEM 500/1000 and XG Warcat 5.11XT
http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/9701/5005003dmark05xt6ww.jpg

3D Mark 2005 with GPU/MEM 600/1200 and XG Warcat 5.11XT
http://img492.imageshack.us/img492/6083/6006003dmark05xt3qg.jpg

And last for now is OpenGL benchie Aquamark 3.0

500/1000 ATI Catalyst 5.11b
http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/1738/500500final8ms.jpg

500/1000 XG Warcat 5.11XT
http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/9900/500500finalxt4hv.jpg

600/1200 ATI Catalyst 5.11b
http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/9462/600600final2qm.jpg

600/1200 XG Warcat 5.11XT
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2766/600600finalxt6ne.jpg

500/1000 ATI Catalyst 5.11b in DETAILS
http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/4792/500500detail5ao.jpg

500/1000 XG Warcat 5.11XT in DETAILS
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/4103/500500detailxt0rq.jpg

600/1200 ATI Catalyst 5.11b in DETAILS
http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/3249/600600detail1gr.jpg

600/1200 XG Warcat 5.11XT in DETAILS
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/3095/600600detailxt0eh.jpg

Thats all folks! for now :toast:

http://www.tweaksrus.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&Itemid=1&gid=158&orderby=dmdate_published&ascdesc=DESC
here you can get Warcats :-)

[robin]

what about games?

[spajdr]

Dont have much games now, and im tired :-)
I hope someone will try some games, for example Quake IV or FEAR, if there is some difference :-)

[deathman20]

Cool.. Might try these out.

[WarAnakin]

Thx for your testing and your time spajdr.
I hope you like the drivers .

[eva2000]

yeah looks like these will help me crack 11k in 3dmark05 for X1800XT :)

[ahmad]

Damn! I am gonna try these. Hopefully I can beat my record of 9400 650/1500 :) . I downloaded the 5.11b but haven't had a chance to play with em. Now I'll play with these instead.

Great job on the testing, and thanks.

PS. Processor? I get around 92k in aquamark with my 2.7ghz venice.

[ahmad]

This is what I get now.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=40592&stc=1 (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=40591&stc=1)

My previous record was 9373 but that was with ATITool beta9. It might be ATITool 10 thats doing this. Or it could be the memory timings I messed with. In either case, its close enough.

[cantankerous]

margin of error? It is only 4 points difference.

[Magnj]

these are not ORB legal I presume