Kunaak
01-13-2003, 12:12 PM
2nd.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5599290
1st.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5595489
they are obviously fakes, so I am wondering why they are still allowed to be posted there at futuremark, it ruins the credibility of the who purpose of benchmarking and overclocking, if you can just hack the program, or make it run as a wire frame....
it's just disappointing to see futuremark leaving it there, like it's somehow suppose to be legit.
then on the opposite end of the spectrum, they continuously delete peoples NF2 scores cause they pass 220 on the FSB.
I don't know, the last few days have just been very disappointing to see them scores there. it just ruins the credability of the whole thing...
why bother getting thousand dollars in computers, overclocking and learning tons of stuff...
when some guy with a GF2 can just download a hacked version of 3Dmark that runs wire frames?
:confused:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5599290
1st.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=5595489
they are obviously fakes, so I am wondering why they are still allowed to be posted there at futuremark, it ruins the credibility of the who purpose of benchmarking and overclocking, if you can just hack the program, or make it run as a wire frame....
it's just disappointing to see futuremark leaving it there, like it's somehow suppose to be legit.
then on the opposite end of the spectrum, they continuously delete peoples NF2 scores cause they pass 220 on the FSB.
I don't know, the last few days have just been very disappointing to see them scores there. it just ruins the credability of the whole thing...
why bother getting thousand dollars in computers, overclocking and learning tons of stuff...
when some guy with a GF2 can just download a hacked version of 3Dmark that runs wire frames?
:confused: