Holy Crap!! 68355mhz @ 1.439 Opteron!!!

[fullup3]

This error occured a few times during running occt for some reason. I tried to capture several screenies, but this is the only one that came out.

wouldn't it be nice!! ;) ;)

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/4013/110720051918302rp.png

[003]

Yes it would. Thats pretty cool.

[Supertim0r]

maybe in a few years...

[xenolith]

Nice pic, but all it proves is your system produced an error in CPUZ while stressed, lol.

[fullup3]

Sure, but I was really trying to push the chip with low volts, and I just thought the pic was a cooler than average cpu error!

Peace

[xenolith]

Definately cooler than average. Maybe you can save that pic to show your grand kids when they might be able reach that speed. :p:

[l3ored]

what would happen if you tried to validate that?

[dinos22]

nice and low vcore...................i reckon you could push it past 80K with some more volts :eek: :lol:

[Daved+]

nice and low vcore...................i reckon you could push it past 80K with some more volts :eek: :lol:
:rofl:

[dinos22]

:rofl:
:lol:..........funniest thing is when our kids start digging out these threads and look at us crazy idiots drooling over a mere 80K CPU :rofl:

[mnewxcv]

nice and low vcore...................i reckon you could push it past 80K with some more volts :eek: :lol:


:clap: :clap: :clap:

[fullup3]

Yea, they will run 200k, with 100 cores, each with 1 terabyte of level 1 cache, and It will only require .1 v to run on air.

[longsiew]

I don't think our kid's generation could hit 60K in cpu, too. So, right here right now, we are more advance then the future technology. hahahahahh

[PkG.1337]

i c this is a screenshot of a picture.

[Supertim0r]

give me your cpu and i'll show you a 80ghz SS :D

[AgentVX]

Damn, you beat me by a few GHz :slapass:
I probably need better cooling :p:

[join nbk]

idots, learn


that means your cpu is unstable, ive seen it happen, its usully due to a faulty core or mobo it missreports, ive seen this when i went with a few guys i know to their computer pc place, i used to work part time, just did it for the extra parts type of thing and ebvcuase i thought it was fun to build them adn get paid to o/c em,

so, thare, all is proven

[fareastgq]

idots, learn


that means your cpu is unstable, ive seen it happen, its usully due to a faulty core or mobo it missreports, ive seen this when i went with a few guys i know to their computer pc place, i used to work part time, just did it for the extra parts type of thing and ebvcuase i thought it was fun to build them adn get paid to o/c em,

so, thare, all is proven

Uh, I think he knows it's unstable, your missing the point of his thread. Anyway, that's pretty cool, now you can say when your grandkid brags that they run a 60k oc in 30 yrs, you can say
" Bahhh, back in my day, We didn't have all this fancy Dylithium crystal crap and nano-biocomputers, I was alrdy overclocking 60k on plain old silicon, , always thinking your the first to do this and that....you young bucks don't know jack squat"

Then they'll call u an old fart and you'll chase them around the house with your cybernetic legs because you blew yours off in the war in Iraq.

[Kalway]

*dying of laughter from this thread*

I want cybernetic legs. :(

[largon]

Most likely this glitch is not caused by a hardware failure nor instability, but a bug or limitation in CPU-Z / detection engine.
It's a read failure similar to the "Double CPU-Z divider bug" where during the launch of a second instance of CPU-Z mem freq in Memory-tab is forced to show the actual HTT-value without a divider. Reason to this read failure might be: software bugs, slight incompatibility, etc. And hardware failure, but it's very, very unlikely because everything else was perfectly stable.

I spotted this exact bug few times when I had my old DFI nF2 and AXP-M 2600+:
Something was interfering with CPU-Z detecting right specs. I remember several times when CPU-Z displayed cpu speed to be several hundred GHz's. iirc record was over 400GHz, on an AXP-M :). Note that every time CPU clock was shown incorrectly, system was in full load (priming, sPi).
Sometimes even memory size (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=39620&stc=1) and SPD (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=39618&stc=1) were read incorrectly.

idots, learn - -It took me to read only the first word of this post to form a certain (be sure it's not positive) impression about Registered User join nbk (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/member.php?userid=22146).

Secondly: You won't get far in these forums if you start by insulting people. I assume this "idots" you typed was supposed to be "idiots"?
If not, forgive me my ignorance.

Thirdly: Your experience does not prove anything. It's just an experience.

[cupra]

nice and low vcore...................i reckon you could push it past 80K with some more volts :eek: :lol:

right :D

[5days]

Doesnt look like a glitch to me. Looks like a photochop.

[i found nemo]

:rolleyes: yes that is right, a photo chop with a well respected member confirmin he's seen it too right? :rolleyes:

[5days]

:rolleyes: yes that is right, a photo chop with a well respected member confirmin he's seen it too right? :rolleyes:
My bad. The text on OCCT is different though, plus it was a SS of photo viewer and not the actually picture itself.

[DStealth]

I have seen this Bug too - OCCT+CPU-z just for a second the sensor ,where cpu-z reads clocks ,go wrong nothing special or unstable there:)

[i found nemo]

i've had the occt screen go bonkers on me before, never cpu-z though, a reboot fixes this problem for me btw sorry for being so snappy on my last remark it just caught me off guard

[LoKi2k]

btw. nice ram do you have, if they run 1:1 ;)

[LORD]

Fwark an ell :slobber:
Ima gonna see if I can beat that with one of my Opterons... :D

heh. heh Good Bug :toast:

[mnewxcv]

well if the vcore was real low, it might have been a little unstable causing this. that would make perfect sense.

[ionicle]

68,000MHz :D wow! is that cpu for sale? ;)