View Full Version : 32m Low Clock Challenge
dinos22
11-22-2007, 05:37 AM
you REALLY need to read what this thread is about :p:
dinos22
11-22-2007, 05:38 AM
soooooooo misko what is that tweak you were talking about on email the other day :)
Ehh.. why do i REALLY need to do that?
people posts their 4.8ghz results?
Dont get what you mean? what have i done wrong?
hipro5
11-22-2007, 05:57 AM
I think that this thread got de-railed.......From 3.6GHz we climbed at 4.8GHz+...... :D :p:
Dont get what you mean? what have i done wrong?
the point of this thread isn't to post your 32M SPi time, it is to try and get the lowest frequency for a certain time block, 9.59.xxx, 10.59.xxx, 11.59.xxx, etc...
with your time smack dab in the middle of the 11.59.xxx time block, you can lower your frequency quite a bit in order to keep your time at 11.59.xxx without creeping into the 12min range. or get your time down to 10min 59.xxx at the lowest frequency possible with tweaks and whatnot.
I think that this thread got de-railed.......From 3.6GHz we climbed at 4.8GHz+...... :D :p:
hey, i did my best to bring that 9:59.xxx time block down as best i could :D
Ahh now i get it :)
thanks! :D
Misko
11-22-2007, 03:28 PM
soooooooo misko what is that tweak you were talking about on email the other day :)
We are working on tweak, but for now just can't write it until find out in detail what is the cause of acceleration :confused:
dinos22
11-22-2007, 03:34 PM
We are working on tweak, but for now just can't write it until find out in detail what is the cause of acceleration :confused:
:up: :up: :up: :up:
you can make a "workshop" and i'm sure there will be plenty here happy to test and contribute their thoughts
dinos22
11-22-2007, 03:37 PM
the point of this thread isn't to post your 32M SPi time, it is to try and get the lowest frequency for a certain time block, 9.59.xxx, 10.59.xxx, 11.59.xxx, etc...
with your time smack dab in the middle of the 11.59.xxx time block, you can lower your frequency quite a bit in order to keep your time at 11.59.xxx without creeping into the 12min range. or get your time down to 10min 59.xxx at the lowest frequency possible with tweaks and whatnot.
hey, i did my best to bring that 9:59.xxx time block down as best i could :D
Ahh now i get it :)
thanks! :D
:up: :up: :up: :up: :up: :up:
oh man this is hard :) been trying all night to beat nr 1 on the 11.59 hehe..
but its a no go :D even with ddr3, gutam must have tweaked HARD..
:) we'll se, ill post my results soon.
cheers!
dinos22
11-22-2007, 04:22 PM
oh man this is hard :) been trying all night to beat nr 1 on the 11.59 hehe..
but its a no go :D even with ddr3, gutam must have tweaked HARD..
:) we'll se, ill post my results soon.
cheers!
the thread hasn't been updated
11.59 with DDR3 is waaaay lower than what's up there as gautam's run and the other one ;)
check out the last few pages with me and Jody benching a little heh
Now i see, i have a lot of tweaking to doo heheh...
well well...ill be back :)
what is the best OS? im starting to doubt the one that im using, windows 2003 server...
hmm?
For 32M, server 2003 is the one.
dinos22
11-23-2007, 03:57 AM
Now i see, i have a lot of tweaking to doo heheh...
well well...ill be back :)
what is the best OS? im starting to doubt the one that im using, windows 2003 server...
hmm?
xp pro or 2003 will do the same for 32m if anything xp was a touch quick fully tweaked
1m is where 2003 was better from testing in past
but i still stick to xp :rolleyes:
Misko
11-23-2007, 06:36 AM
:up: :up: :up: :up:
you can make a "workshop" and i'm sure there will be plenty here happy to test and contribute their thoughts
I promise soon (few days) I'll write ;)
massman
11-27-2007, 12:51 AM
Someone should really update the startpost :D
Someone should really update the startpost :D
i am working on that...i already have done all the updates to Coops last edit and am just trying to get a mod to give me the full BBCode of the first post so we can get a new thread started and updates done :up:
massman
11-27-2007, 01:03 AM
Can't you just post the updates in a post and report to the mods that the first post should be updated?
If you start a new thread, you'll lose the charm of a thread that has been going on for 50+ pages :p
getting a mod to update the post even once a week doesn't sound feasible. i completely agree, i would love this thread to stay alive but the limitations of VBulletin won't allow someone but a mod to edit the first thread.
hey Eva, any magic that you know of deep within VBulletin that would allow myself or someone else willing to do the updates to 'acquire' ownership of a thread?
CapFTP
12-07-2007, 04:21 AM
9.xx
http://news.tecnocomputer.it/stuff/File/Capftp/E6700/9.54.453@5100.JPG
and also 12.xx
http://news.tecnocomputer.it/stuff/File/Capftp/Contest3600/pi32@3600_515x7-618-544_12m58s312.JPG
Zucker2k
12-07-2007, 01:44 PM
This gets me on the board, right? First x38 DDRII?
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6721/32m4023xz0.jpg (http://img220.imageshack.us/my.php?image=32m4023xz0.jpg)
32M 4023MHz: 11M 59.625
445*9 4:5 ratio. RAM @ 558MHz 4-4-4
hey mate...we have moved the 32M Challenge to:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=2585711#post2585711
as Coop isn't around to update it anymore so i took over the reigns. i will add your score though so no need to repost in that thread. BTW, welcome to the 11min group :up:
could we please have a mod lock this thread perhaps?
DJSUB
01-12-2008, 10:50 PM
Time Zone: 12.xx
Proc Speed: 3599.99 MHz (Based on CPUZ Validation)
Actual Time: 12.59.890s
Multiplier: 6 x 400
Ram Type: DDR2
Ram Speed: 1200 mhz
Ram Timings: 4-4-4-4
Divider: 2:3
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Chipset Used: P35
CPUZ Validation : http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=296675
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/2107/spi32m36ghzq660012m5989mo1.png
this run is dedicated to my AMA ;)
you know who you are :D
The True Spirit of Pinoy PowaH! ;)
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.