PDA

View Full Version : G.Skill 2x512MB PC4400FC (TCCD) OCing Report!


bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 01:33 AM
Sup X'ers!

Few days ago I received, what I should call, a *NEW* batch/revision of G.Skill F1-4400DSU2-1GBFC (http://www.gskill.com/f1-4400dsu2fc.htm) to play with. Among a plethora of different speed grades, this 2x512MB was placed on the bottom of G.Skill Extreme Series, meaning it's the cheapest choice from that line. The specifications are telling us that this kit is rated at 2.5-4-4-8 (PC4400) @ 2.7~2.9v.
All of the FC reviews I found on the Net mentioned that ICs used to build those modules were Samsung TCC5 0522. But apparently, G.Skill was switching ICs on this kit from TCCD to TCC5 and very recently back to TCCD again. I was informed, that the latest batch of those kits (including mine) had definetely TCCD ICs fitted onto them. Due to the fact that all G.Skill modules shipped after June 2005 are covered with heatspreaders, confirming that was not as obvious. But I manged to take a glimpse at the ICs thanks to a little gap that can be found between ICs in the middle of the module and a heatspreader. That confirmed what I was told - the kit I had was build with Samsung TCCD 0519 ICs.

Now that we have that out of the way, let's give my old Canon 2MP some 15 seconds of fame :lol: Kit's photos are next... ;)

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/GskillPC4400FC_a_8x6.jpg

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/GskillPC4400FC_b_8x6.jpg

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/GskillPC4400FC_c_8x6.jpg

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/GskillPC4400FC_d_8x6.jpg

bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 01:34 AM
Before we start, some preparations were needed :D Equipped with few of those ;),

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/fosters_8x6.jpg

I set everything up,

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/setup_8x6.jpg

and was ready to GO!

bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 01:35 AM
This kit's default spec is 275Mhz 7-4-4-2.5-1T but I decided to fire it up at 275Mhz 6-3-3-2.5-1T @ 2.5v :)

All looked damn fine as SPi32M run @ 2.5v (2.54v with a DMM) so next step was SP2004.

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/275x11_3025Mhz_SP2004_96mins_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/275x11_3025Mhz_SP2004_96mins_16x12.png)

Great news is this RAM was very stable at 275MHz 6-3-3-2.5-1T with barely above 2.50v :) Bad news is, that after over an hour of playing in BIOS I could not get that kit stable at much over that and keeping TRCD=3 :(

So, next step was, loosening TRCD to 4 and go for a ride :lol:
From this moment prepare for SuperPi 32M GALORE!!!


285Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/285x11_3135Mhz_32M_634_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/285x11_3135Mhz_32M_634_16x12.png)


290Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/290x11_3189Mhz_32M_634_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/290x11_3189Mhz_32M_634_16x12.png)


297Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.8v <---- voltage was set a lot higher than neccesary

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/297x11_3268Mhz_32M_634_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/297x11_3268Mhz_32M_634_16x12.png)


303Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.8v <---- voltage was set a lot higher than neccesary

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/303x11_3334Mhz_32M_634_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/303x11_3334Mhz_32M_634_16x12.png)

bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 01:36 AM
This is the point where I decided to drop the multiplier on my SD 3700+ as I was approaching it's maximum benchable speed. That means, this kit forced me to play with x10 multi :lol:

303Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/303x10_3031Mhz_32M_634_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/303x10_3031Mhz_32M_634_16x12.png)


306Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/306x10_3060Mhz_32M_634_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/306x10_3060Mhz_32M_634_16x12.png)


308Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/308x10_3080Mhz_32M_634_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/308x10_3080Mhz_32M_634_16x12.png)


310Mhz :D 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v <---- voltage was set a bit higher than neccesary

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_32M_634_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_32M_634_16x12.png)

bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 01:36 AM
Unfortunately my time was running out and I decided to call it a night and stop at this point to run something else for a change ;)


Memtest For Windows @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_M4W_501_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_M4W_501_16x12.png)


Quick 30mins of SP2004 LargeFFT @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_SP2004_30min_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_SP2004_30min_16x12.png)


SysTool Pi 32Million @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_SysTool_part2_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_SysTool_part2_16x12.png)


Hexus Pifast 10M @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.7v

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_Pifast_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_Pifast_16x12.png)

UFFFFFF!!!! :lol:

bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 01:37 AM
Conclusion

Basically, I was very impressed that G.Skill PC4400FC, which is rated at lowly 275Mhz 7-4-4-2.5-1T, performs that well. I'm pretty sure that during the next few days I might be able to push them a little further and maybe work on getting this kit to work @ TRCD=3 at higher that DDR550 speed.
Considering that PC4400FC is the cheapest (about $180) of all G.Skill Extreme Series memory products, it managed to deliver quite nice and stable results.

Thanks for willing to read and watch this sort of long quasi-review :D

bachus_anonym

--------------
This kit was sent to me by G.Skill USA representative. I was 100% assured that it was neither hand-picked nor pre-tested before shipping it to me. I'm not associated in any way, shape or form with G.Skill. I was simply given this kit for evaluation and desided to present my tests regardless of performance. The results I obtained may or may not be on par with all other G.Skill PC4400FC kits available for purchase.

Onepagebook
10-15-2005, 01:40 AM
http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/setup_8x6.jpg

and was ready to GO!


hey hey...pay me the copyright...:D :slap: :D

Vapor
10-15-2005, 01:43 AM
That is quite impressive for the price....very thorough review at stable settings!

What about 2.5-3-3-x performance? :D

bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 01:45 AM
Kevin,

Hahaha :lol: I remember that I've seen that somewhere before but did not know you had it set up like that too :) You forgot to register in in the U.S. Patent Office :lol: :p:

What about 2.5-3-3-x performance? :D
Well, TRCD=3 so far is not looking too good with this particular kit I got :( I could not get it to play nice with me beyound that 275Mhz. It's pretty odd that it is so stubborn but I think and hope that there's something more in it :)

Onepagebook
10-15-2005, 01:52 AM
Kevin,

Hahaha :lol: I remember that I've that somewhere before but did not know you had it set up like that too :) You forgot to register in in the U.S. Patent Office :lol: :p:

See I know you 're gonna say this, I always use that:D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=1085977#post1085977

http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/0531rpmwfx57/ttbigt.jpg

s7e9h3n
10-15-2005, 02:39 AM
See I know you 're gonna say this, I always use that:D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=1085977#post1085977

http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/0531rpmwfx57/ttbigt.jpg
Hey Kev - take a look @ his 12v rail - see? I told you so :p:

@ Bachus - wonderful review on those sticks....man you've run more 32m's in this thread than I have in my lifetime :up:

Vapor
10-15-2005, 02:48 AM
Well, TRCD=3 so far is not looking too good with this particular kit I got :( I could not get it to play nice with me beyound that 275Mhz. It's pretty odd that it is so stubborn but I think and hope that there's something more in it :)Alright, with TRCD=4 performance so good it looks like it'll still be a GREAT buy if the sticks all perform close to yours.

Onepagebook
10-15-2005, 03:08 AM
Hey Kev - take a look @ his 12v rail - see? I told you so :p:

@ Bachus - wonderful review on those sticks....man you've run more 32m's in this thread than I have in my lifetime :up:
Now, I am running 316.1x10 pi 32m...haha. looks good so far. :fact:

s7e9h3n
10-15-2005, 03:13 AM
Now, I am running 316.1x10 pi 32m...haha. looks good so far. :fact:
Time for you to get some sleep Kev - wrong thread man :p: lol

Vapor
10-15-2005, 03:13 AM
Heh....Stephen, what does the 12V rail have to do with anything?

s7e9h3n
10-15-2005, 03:25 AM
Heh....Stephen, what does the 12V rail have to do with anything?
It all depends on who you ask ;) OPB says that it should never be run @ >~12.35 Volts (and he's probably right if Oskar Wu gave him that advice). I say a high 12V rail just gives a little "cushion" for stability. I've never run into issues with a high 12v rail - I always ran my 12v on my Zippy @ 12.81 and this PCP&C 510 now @ 12.73. I figure I'm still within 10% of spec so I'm OK :p: OPB always tells me I need to lower my 12v rail, but I always respond with - "Well, I've seen a spi32m run by Bachus Anonym with his 12v rail @ 12.93" :D

Zeus
10-15-2005, 03:51 AM
Nice RAM for a nice price.

What version of windows server is that you are using?
Is that the 64bit version?
I'm downloading the 32 bit trial version right now.

Your 32M at 310x10 is 3 seconds faster than mine with the same settings, could that be due to windows server OS?

Vapor
10-15-2005, 04:13 AM
Could be various things but rest assured that 2k3 is faster...

eva2000
10-15-2005, 05:29 AM
Bachus nicely done with 32M results :D

ZeroX
10-15-2005, 06:27 AM
Nice results :toast:

quent
10-15-2005, 03:14 PM
Hello, I made a test for www.overclocking-masters.com ( french )

link (http://overclocking-masters.com/newsocm.php?newsid=60)

Results :

Memtest @ 315Mhz 2.5-4-3-5 1T

http://overclocking-masters.com/UserFiles/Image/quent/memtest-315-1T.jpg


Superpi 1M @ 320Mhz 2.5-4-3-5 1T

http://overclocking-masters.com/UserFiles/Image/quent/2.5-4-3-5-1T.gif

Sandra @ 322Mhz 2.5-4-3-5 1T

Link (http://overclocking-masters.com/view_image.php?img=/UserFiles/Image/quent/sandra-322-9-1T.PNG)

More information on the review post (http://overclocking-masters.com/newsocm.php?newsid=60)


Thanks to Alice from g.skill :clap:

Quent.

kakaroto
10-15-2005, 03:14 PM
Very nice work there. 310MHz 2.5-4-3-X is damn fast voor TCC5 memory! :cool:

quent
10-15-2005, 03:16 PM
I tested TCCD chips ;)

bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 03:26 PM
Bachus nicely done with 32M results :DThanks Goerge :toast: It means a lot from such a great memory OCer/tweaker/reviewer like yourself :)
Very nice work there. 310MHz 2.5-4-3-X is damn fast voor TCC5 memory! :cool:Thank you!

Also, it's actually TCCD 0519 ;) I needed to confirm it myself, so I used "this technique" :lol:.

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/glimpse_8x6.jpg

Unfortunately, I could not find a way to take a good close up of markings alone (to hard to hold a camera and memory module at the same time for a good pic) so you have to believe me :p: Apparently, those new modules (#0509, 0510) are made of TCCD again...

I'm pretty sure they can go at least 5Mhz further, 32M stable ;) I will try later, though...

eva2000
10-15-2005, 06:57 PM
how well do they do on air cooled cpu ? i'm sure the sub zero cooling on cpu helps clock TCCD bit higher

bachus_anonym
10-15-2005, 07:08 PM
how well do they do on air cooled cpu ? i'm sure the sub zero cooling on cpu helps clock TCCD bit higher
If I haven't had such a great mounting job done to my cooler I would have torn it apart and do some air OCs :lol: But I can assure you that it will definetely go higher since I can fairly easy Prime LargeFFT @ 310Mhz for more than hour today. I can run only 1M @ 315Mhz 7-3-4-2.5-1T 2.75v but that's about all for now. I'm not gonna switch to 2T as results are just embarassing :D
I hate DOS memtest from all my heart and I just wanted to double-check today why :) So, I can do #5 and #8 for about 60 minutes at 300Mhz 7-3-3-2.5-1T 2.75v but in Windows this is so unstable like there's no tommorow :lol: But I'm on a mission now to get "TRCD=3 clocks" up a bit ;)

EDIT: I just re-read your question. Oops :D Actually, I would not be so sure about that, you know George. I don't personally believe in that. especially, since AMD's 90nm, when the colder you go, the worse sometimes it can be. I experienced that with a Winchester and I'm somewhat seeing that now, with San Diego 3700+. E.g, once I see -22C in BIOS, chances are (and it happens) that I cannot even boot to Windows @ 310+HTT. On air, 330HTT is never a problem. So, it's the other way around.

quent
10-16-2005, 02:01 AM
how well do they do on air cooled cpu ? i'm sure the sub zero cooling on cpu helps clock TCCD bit higher


On air cooling :

http://overclocking-masters.com/UserFiles/Image/quent/2.5-4-3-5-1T.gif

Zeus
10-16-2005, 02:16 AM
Quent, is that 32M stable as well?
If so, this RAM is as good or even better than my 1GBLE. :eek:

eva, what makes you think phasechange cooled CPU's make TCCD clock higher?
Like BA says, the mc is taking a hit under subzero so actually it's the other way around, isn't it?

Good to see TCCD is still alive and kicking. :banana:

quent
10-16-2005, 05:23 AM
Quent, is that 32M stable as well?
If so, this RAM is as good or even better than my 1GBLE. :eek:

eva, what makes you think phasechange cooled CPU's make TCCD clock higher?
Like BA says, the mc is taking a hit under subzero so actually it's the other way around, isn't it?

Good to see TCCD is still alive and kicking. :banana:

Yes SuperPi 32M OK @ 320, but in 2.5-4-3-8 1T

Very good tccd, sure :clap:

bachus_anonym
10-16-2005, 08:19 AM
Yes SuperPi 32M OK @ 320, but in 2.5-4-3-8 1TDo you have a screenshot for that, please? Maybe @ 310 and then 320Mhz, so we can compare ;) I'm asking because 1M was the only SPi calculation you run throughout whole your review. Also, why show 1M if it's good for 32M? Just checking, it's my nature... :D

In the meantime, last night I run some more SP2004...


120mins of SP2004 LargeFFT @ 310Mhz 6-3-4-2.5-1T @ 2.75v

http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_SP2004_122mins_8x6.jpg (http://www.clockmehigh.com/ddr/GSkillPC4400FC/310x10_3100Mhz_SP2004_122mins_16x12.png)

I'll try If 315Mhz, 32M stable is doable with those sticks... They look like definite "yes" but I'll check later :)

quent
10-16-2005, 09:37 AM
I haven't got a screenshot, sorry.

SuperPi 1M OK @ 320Mhz 2.5-4-3-5 1T Dualchannel 3v
SupePi 32M OK @ 320Mhz 2.5-4-3-8 1T Dualchannel 3.2v

:banana: