View Full Version : An interleave experiment
Theo404
10-10-2005, 07:31 PM
Trying to get used to my new san diegos memory controller (a lot better than my venice for some reason), and I had a play with bank interleave because of suggestions from the DFI TCCD timming guide that san diegos may run more stable with bank interleave disabled. I cant comment on its effect on stability (YET, more to come) but this is a small test to show its impact on performance:
San Diego 3700 @ 2.754 1.504V
Gskill TCCD 4400 LE (440) @ 306mhz 2.5-4-3-7
Interleave Disabled:
sPi 1M:
1st run - 30.719
2nd run - 30.391
3rd run - 30.437
Sandra Memory Bandwidth:
1st run - 7598, 7509
2nd run - 7606, 7531
Interleave Enabled
sPi 1M:
1st run - 30.125
2nd run - 30.125
3rd run - 29.859
Sandra Memory Bandwidth:
1st run - 7661, 7573
2nd run - 7662, 7572
I was very suprised to drop into a lower second on the sPi runs just through enabling interleave, so rest assured, until I have data regarding its stability benifits with a san diego core I will be running it enabled.
Next I will try to evaluate its effect on stablility (in the same brief way) so stay tunned if your interested.
Onepagebook
10-10-2005, 08:05 PM
if you run on 32m, you will be shocked.:)
Stuperman
10-10-2005, 08:11 PM
is that node, bank or both?
eva2000
10-10-2005, 08:19 PM
yeah bank interleave is a big boost!
Lane-k
10-10-2005, 11:13 PM
I have see same thing... It's better having it enabled... Now.. I have heard too it can help stabilise with 2x 1Go of DDR...
For something totally different... I can have some G-Skill DDR...Some shop in UK delivery now to Switzerland...( for cheap difference)
Actually i have the OCZ 4800 Plat and have some trouble... I have finally see that: if the core of S-D is not totally stable at 300, it's better use 4400 DDR and OC them at the max they can... But i have see too only good result with the G-Skill PC4800 ( 1T version). WHat do you think about. The G- Skill 4800 will be good, or i try the 4400.?
Edit: looking at the site of G - SKill, i fall one thing for the DDR, settings tested on DFI ( Full bios DDR setting http://www.gskill.com/f1-4800dsu2ffsetup.html) + the F1 - 4800 DSU2-1GBFF is tested too for the 550Mhz (2.5-3-3-7 1T) The speed i search according to my CPU is near 276x11 at 300x10... What are you thinking.. a good idea to go with this one??
Vapor
10-10-2005, 11:57 PM
You should see how much bank interleave helps when you double the DIMMs :banana:
with 2T for both 2xDS and 4xDS, of course
MonkSP
10-11-2005, 07:51 AM
Yet I was expecting a larger diference. I guess its quite similar with spi 1mb
MonkSP
10-11-2005, 08:12 AM
Yes, but since seems you are limited to 200 fsb with 1t in those 4 slots (considering oscar wold release that bios) and now you have 2Gb kits, I am not 100% sure of that boost.
Vapor
10-11-2005, 08:19 AM
if you "COULD" lmfao 4x512 or 4x1024 at 1t and then do a compare via same cpu/fsb you would see another boost as you did from disabled to enabled as more banks=more bank interleavingYou could run 2T for both 2x and 4x to simply see the difference....or you could run 1T at like 190MHz ;)
Or you could get Oskar to post that BIOS that allows up to 203MHz (which I'm seriously considering for my 24/7 3GB setup).
largon
10-11-2005, 10:00 AM
I've seen 2x1GB set provide more bandwidth than 2x512MB sets? Why?
Or am I imagining things?
Lane-k
10-12-2005, 03:16 AM
Normal... If you have 2Go of physical memory... You will have more bandwith..
The bad thing, you need good DDR at 2Go, can be OC same as 1Go and with agressive timings.
largon
10-12-2005, 03:33 AM
Normal... If you have 2Go of physical memory... You will have more bandwith..
The bad thing, you need good DDR at 2Go, can be OC same as 1Go and with agressive timings.1: Normal? Yes. I know it's normal, but why?
2: Using 2x 512Mb sticks at a specific speed and timings won't get any higher b/w than 2x 256Mb at same speed and timings. I don't see why 2x 1Gb would be an exception.
3: What is a "Go"? Never seen that one before.
Edit: Hmm. Go seems to be Gb in french...
I think he means 1T and 2T.
MonkSP
10-12-2005, 03:37 AM
I think that GO is that program that test stability like spi
largon
10-12-2005, 03:40 AM
I think he means 1T and 2T.
But 1T isn't a problem with 2x 1Gb.
2x 1Gb is comparable to 2x 512Mb if we talk about Command rate.
Vapor
10-12-2005, 03:46 AM
IIRC, Tony couldn't even explain WHY, only that it happened.
Lane-k
10-13-2005, 06:17 AM
I think that GO is that program that test stability like spi
No Go is Gb . sometimes i make the misstake..
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.