G.Skill Fun :)

[jmke]

# PC3200GH 1GB (2x)
# PC3200ZX 1GB (2x)
# PC4400FC 1GB
# PC4400LE 1GB (2x)
# PC4800FF 1GB
# PC4800FR 1GB (2x)
# PC4800LA 512MB

Tested timings:

# CL2.0-2-2-5 1T
# CL2.0-3-3-6 1T
# CL2.5-3-3-6 1T
# CL2.5-4-4-8 1T
# CL2.5-4-4-8 2T

http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=350

[alexio]

Nice review ;)

[jmke]

Elmer? ;)

[alexio]

Nope, just another Dutch guy :)

My name is Alexander and i'm usually called Alex.

[enzoR]

the GH didnt clock as high as what others here have gotten which is between 265-275 :fact:

I wonder if they did a burn-in??

otherwise a very nice review :clap: :toast:

[windwithme]

nice tests :p:

[Aleman]

Now THATs a review :).

[high5]

but the testing procedure itself is very poor imho.

That’s why we’ve chosen to do the following tests to verify a stable maximum overclock:

Memtest 86+ 1.60 10 passes test 5
SuperPi 2M
Sandra 2005 memory bandwidth
Pifast calculation
test #5 10 passes? pi 2m? you gotta be kidding me?!?

[jmke]

yes; running each setting for 24 hours will push back the review too.. well let's say, June next year..

[sai]

God damnit that makes me test my 4400LE with high voltage again 2-3-3-6 253Mhz :eek: :eek: :eek:

[high5]

yes; running each setting for 24 hours will push back the review too.. well let's say, June next year..
nobody mentioned 24hrs, but this is silly.

if you're doing something, do it right.

[OV3RCLOCK3R]

cool review:)

[targ]

i agree with high5, SPI32M would be a better indication of stable speed.

otherwise a good review. shows some more good results from GSkills.

targ

[x3ro]

Yep.. 2m is too short to give a good overview on if its stable or not.. Just do 32m like targ(hi m8) said.. And also plz try to include 3dm2001 lobby high and low detail test.. They will show differences too... Besides that its a nice review..

Regards, x3ro aka Shagrath

[LivingL@rGe81]

Good review, would of liked better stability tests