FX55BN San Diego overclocked...

[Dumo]

Heres..
Heres 55BN with 1.65V :D and no opti..
http://img275.echo.cx/img275/7812/cpumark55sandiego8dr.jpg
And compared to 55 130nm...
http://img264.echo.cx/img264/8775/cpumarkmushkin21fh.jpg
http://img279.echo.cx/img279/4959/fx55s19wb.jpg
Lobby low...
http://img224.echo.cx/img224/9839/screenshot0554du.jpg
Pure speed :D
http://img283.echo.cx/img283/5688/screenshot0545an.jpg

[Dumo]

Will try with tccd...

[krille]

Dude, why is one 940 and one 939? And I see no "San Diego", just "Claw Hammer" and "Sledge Hammer". It even says 130nm in CPU-Z. You don't mean "BN" as in "San Diego", do you? Cause if you do... : slapass :

Edit: Jesus, I'm confused - big time. Why does both this one and OPB's say S940 and "Sledge Hammer" when BN is supposed to be E4 "San Diego" and 939, right? Smelly...

Edit 2: Ahhh... CPU-Z being slow as always. Sorry, for ever doubting you.. hehe

[robberbaron]

Nice, the TCCD should net you some nice speed. I hope this thing outdoes the Clawhammer!

[robberbaron]

Dude, why is one 940 and one 939? And I see no "San Diego", just "Claw Hammer" and "Sledge Hammer". It even says 130nm in CPU-Z. You don't mean "BN" as in "San Diego", do you? Cause if you do... :slapass:

Hahahhaa, this chip just came out. Dont doubt Centvalny. CPU-Z is the one in error.


Ugh, Newegg is really slow right now. Go ahead and search on newegg when its working for 2.6ghz and San Diego. You'll see that the FX55 San Diego has been out.

[Dumo]

cbid..

[ozzimark]

very nice dumo, very nice.

just out of curiosity, how does the clawhammer do in sPI at the same speeds? :toast:

[Dumo]

very nice dumo, very nice.

just out of curiosity, how does the clawhammer do in sPI at the same speeds? :toast:claw wont run @ that speed...with single phase and no opti...

[cupra]

that is very nice results dumo, well done (:

[ozzimark]

claw wont run @ that speed.
:(

maybe 3.1 or 3.2ghz then? :buddies:

[cpulloverclock]

24.5 at 3420?

I get 25.0 at 3250 unpatched

[charlie]

24.5 at 3420?

I get 25.0 at 3250 unpatched

No, you can't compare. He's running WinXP with all eye-candy on. Probably NO optimizations for superPi performance... he's just showing relative stability with the 1M run.

C

[tombman]

Is this a standard vapochill ls or has it been modded?

What temps did you get on full load with the clawhammer fx and the san diego fx?

[wedfighter]

Congratz bro Dumo :slobber:
coba kemaren ikut lomba oc di Indo, menang deh lo..
(if only u join the CPU race last week in Indo, i believed u'll take the trophy) :lol:
btw, how come u got such high temp w/ Smartguardian? :rolleyes:

[[_Silence_]]

how come u got such high temp w/ Smartguardian? :rolleyes:

Its a Smart Guardian Bug with sub zero temps. If u go below 0 it start count @ 256ºC (like 256ºc is 0ºc and 255ºc is -1ºc, and so on....)

[wedfighter]

ic now..thx to _silence_

[GazC]

No, you can't compare. He's running WinXP with all eye-candy on. Probably NO optimizations for superPi performance... he's just showing relative stability with the 1M run.

C

Thats true enough, because my initial impression was that the lobby score seems low for the speed too.

[QuikSilver]

Nice OC, one question though. Why did you cover up the batch numbers on chips?

[Dumo]

Heres comparo to fx claw...all candies on and no opti. See the difference on vcore...
http://img216.echo.cx/img216/7725/1sd8qd.jpg
http://img216.echo.cx/img216/5645/1claw2ls.jpg
http://img216.echo.cx/img216/5313/1sd52of.jpg
http://img216.echo.cx/img216/4221/1claw24ke.jpg

[EmineM]

what cooling are you using btw?

[Dumo]

vapo ls..

[MaxxxRacer]

those are some very nice clocks man. especially for a vapo ls. usually ive seen a round 3.1 -3.2 with a vapo ls. looks like the new FX's are an improvement. though more cpu samples are needed to reallly be able to confidently make that statement.

[Cornelious0_0]

those are some very nice clocks man. especially for a vapo ls. usually ive seen a round 3.1 -3.2 with a vapo ls. looks like the new FX's are an improvement. though more cpu samples are needed to reallly be able to confidently make that statement.

This is true, but it at least gives us something to look forward to.

If I can ever convince myself to drop the cash on one, I wanna pickup a VapoLS for my current A64 rig...just cus after I mod/modded the Vapo case it'd look fricken pimp underneath my modded PC61. :cool:

Congrats Cent, saw your results on [H] previously, just wanted to throw you another congrats. :)

[SIOUX]

those are some very nice clocks man. especially for a vapo ls. usually ive seen a round 3.1 -3.2 with a vapo ls. looks like the new FX's are an improvement. though more cpu samples are needed to reallly be able to confidently make that statement.


I think quit a lot of people reach 3300mhz on LS with a Clawhammer. We hit 3350mhz with Vapo LS on a Claw??? :)

[Dynasty]

What is the max. stable of your fx55 San Diego ?

[DazzXP]

Hmm they must be using a new stepping for the FX55 before the FX57 by looks of it.

[mcbarnet007]

it is nice to see clock for clock 90nm is much faster

[gocchin]

Good work Dumo... looking forward to some complete 3D01 runs with that chip! (^_^)

[Cornelious0_0]

Good work Dumo... looking forward to some complete 3D01 runs with that chip! (^_^)

No kidding.....considering how close you were last time you submitted on the Top10 last time Cent, I'm crossin' my fingers for ya with this chip...hope it'll help ya push to 40k. :banana:

[Onepagebook]

Hello buddy, now you know what I am talking about.
Same phase change..but 0516 WPMW :D

http://img97.echo.cx/img97/1749/fx55sd35gcpuzv9fq.jpg

http://img97.echo.cx/img97/1112/fx55bn357hb.jpg

[ben805]

dumo and opb.....can you please do me a favor and see how high you can run superpi 32m with? i'm guessing 3.3G?

these new FX is looking mighty good!!!

[|-jokker-|]

OPB that chip in awsome , it´s really good one :)
Let´s se some 3d ??

[[XC] moddolicous]

great chips OPB and Dumo, really nice clocks. I wanna see some 3d runs with them.

[Dumo]

OPB, nice one :toast: ..Its that BN box?

[Onepagebook]

OPB, nice one :toast: ..Its that BN box?
yes
0516wpmw...

[Dumo]

yes
0516wpmw...Gotta get one ;) How bout other test? Heres mine with pretty low sandra mem...compared to FX 130nm
http://img90.echo.cx/img90/5255/screenshot0201qq.jpg
http://img90.echo.cx/img90/4261/screenshot0231li.jpg

55 130nm..
http://img134.echo.cx/img134/7955/94k8tr0uu.jpg

[Dumo]

55 BN sandra cpu...
[img]http://img149.echo.cx/img149/1429/screenshot0091uk.jpg

[Dumo]

@325....the max so far...
http://img123.echo.cx/img123/2220/superpi325sd1bu.jpg

[Onepagebook]

Be careful...1.84v :D

[bob(nz)]

Man, i cant wait for these to be released at the bottom of the world :toast:

[G H Z]

Be careful...1.84v :D

That's not a 90nm core;)

Hey OPB where did you get yours !!

[Vincentvega18]

It is 90nm its just a cpu-z bug saying 130nm, also notice it says socket 940?

[s7e9h3n]

@325....the max so far...
http://img123.echo.cx/img123/2220/superpi325sd1bu.jpg
Wow Dumo, 1.84! :eek: I've just started to get my FX goin and trying to find stable settings, but it seems that these cpu's love Vcore. 1.71V:
http://img207.echo.cx/img207/848/325validated5su.jpg

[HARDCORECLOCKER]

:D Hey Dumo - I almost get eye-cancer, go for CPU-Z 1.29. Will recognise Your CPU & socket........

:toast:

[Codeine]

Thats a huge error man. I dont understand why cpu-z is not communicating with your system correctly. Whats with your cpu temp?

[s7e9h3n]

Thats a huge error man. I dont understand why cpu-z is not communicating with your system correctly. Whats with your cpu temp?
On the DFI Smart Guardian 255=0 and 254 = -1C, 253 = -2C, etc......

[Unrealcpu]

Dumo and opb where did you buy your chips?

[Dumo]

Dumo and opb where did you buy your chips?NE...and now also on Mwave.com (http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec.hmx?scriteria=BA21524)

[misteroadster]

My 3700+ roxx :rolleyes:
http://www.overclocking-masters.com/chat/uploaddir/455.JPG

[Dynasty]

very nice 3700 San Diego :toast:

[misteroadster]

that was some tests with PGEO cascade, more to come soon ;)