View Full Version : [Spec Comparison] Xbox 360 Vs. PS3
Jester FPS
05-27-2005, 10:47 AM
Source: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/617/617951p1.html
Mods: Please delete if it's already been posted
Members: Please don't flame if it's already been posted :p: :nono:
saaya
05-27-2005, 11:08 AM
hasnt been posted yet, thx :)
just go to the front page and hit ctrl+f and check if news about this have already been posted, only takes a minute :D
thx a lot for sharing those news, really interesting stuff! :toast:
KoolDrew
05-27-2005, 11:25 AM
Thus, enclosed is a Microsoft-made comparitive analysis
The analysis was made by Microsoft so I would take it with a grain of salt. I still am getting an X360 regardless.
DudeMiester
05-27-2005, 03:23 PM
That analysis is TOTAL BULL:banana::banana::banana::banana:. Please take this digusting bit of PR spincrap off the XtremeSystems news. It's degrading to this site's reputation.
More info on the issue:
http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23193
saaya
05-27-2005, 03:38 PM
if ms posts bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: wouldnt we save their reputation by not posting about it ;)
DudeMiester
05-27-2005, 03:51 PM
Well the thing is these are Microsoft employees posting this in their personal blogs, so it isn't even an offical MS marketing thing. It's just zealous employees.
brandinb
05-28-2005, 07:00 PM
haha the ps3 has twice the bandwidth of the xbox 360 because the gpu and cpus dont share bandwidth its rambus for the cpus and ddr for the gpu. that gives teh ps3 much more bandwidth! xbox has shared memory for gpu and cpu and we all know how fast that is. its that little 10mb embedded dram that they claim the 264mb/s of bandwidth but its only 10 mb so they cannot claim system bandwith off that i belive its more of a frame buffer or cache?
brandinb
05-28-2005, 07:09 PM
they also claim no cache for the spe processors but they have 256k of sram hmmm...
also the main cpu has 512k cache well they must miss something ehh...
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.