Why so low bandwidth in Sandra ???

[TEDY]

Any help appreciated :)

http://freeweb.siol.net/tadej27/sandra.jpg

[cAsio]

u need more mhz to last full your 250mhz mem clock,

by a 3200+ 200x10 , the cpu cant get full data transfer because it have to low mhz. für the 200mhz fsb so u have 4,7gb

with 200x11 u have more by same fsb :P look at the percent in sandra

[pancake]

seems about right

[Tony]

Run unbuffered sandra, buffered is dependant on CPU clock speed and fsb.

[TEDY]

how do you do that bigtoe ? :)

[cAsio]

say your bandwith effiency :rehab:

[muzz]

how do you do that bigtoe ? :)

In Memory bench there is an options selection area ( Pencil and paper-lower left edge on the sandra I have).
You have to uncheck some things, so it looks like this:

[TEDY]

say your bandwith effiency :rehab:

82-83%

[cAsio]

:slap: u need more mhz :P to use ur fsb speed effeiciency , so u can get 95% or max 98%.


but u got a 3000+ u can only get more mhz by more fsb :D 3500+ is best for overclocking :D

[TEDY]

now
proc 300*9 with 5/6 divider for ram running 250

much better results 7228/7171 and better effiiciency 92%

[DarkManX_BG]

now
proc 300*9 with 5/6 divider for ram running 250

much better results 7228/7171 and better effiiciency 92%
RAM is actually running at 245MHz. Read this thread (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=41595&highlight=real+memory+speed) for more info...

[TEDY]

after some A64 tweaks and 305*9 and ram running 250

i get 7481/7395 :D

[DarkManX_BG]

Good job :thumbsup: