View Full Version : tccd 510 poor results(56k ok)
impu|se
03-25-2005, 03:51 PM
My cpu is stable up to ~282 fsb and I cant seem to get this tccd passed 270. Mem is tccd week 510. Is it the mem controller holding me back or timings. Ived tried up to 3 volts, and loosened some timings, no help. This is on a 3700+ dtr dfi ut250. I had high hopes for this late week tccd, but cant even go passed 275 stable. I know im jsut being picky but id really like to run this mem at least what my cpu can do. thx
http://home.comcast.net/~impulse/2.9.png
http://home.comcast.net/~impulse/3.1.png
georgesod
03-25-2005, 03:57 PM
What memory?
RaptorRaider
03-25-2005, 03:58 PM
It doesn't look that bad for single channel.
If you want to be sure test them seperately and see how far you can get them alone.
impu|se
03-25-2005, 04:25 PM
What memory?
kingston hyperx 3200 ul
Ill test them by themselves and see how they do
georgesod
03-25-2005, 04:35 PM
From what i saw, kingston's tccd turned out to be crap
HKPolice
03-26-2005, 08:34 AM
Probably still using the JEDEC PCB.... that's the bottleneck.
impu|se
03-26-2005, 08:58 AM
thx sorta hehe, I was able to run the two sticks individually at 280 with the same timings, and about 283-5 with more lax settings. I was excited when I took the heatspreader off to see week 510. I hadnt heard anything about them and last batches i heard of were 0438 and they did well. God just doesnt want me to do 300x10 i guess ;)
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.