PDA

View Full Version : OPB Broke self Bandwidth record again


Onepagebook
02-10-2005, 12:38 PM
Not with previous fsb, but more about 100mb/s:

9576mb/s:

http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/records/opb9576mbs.jpg

took it from digicam:

http://www.ocxtreme.org/onepagebook/records/opb9576mbsdc.jpg

conrad.maranan
02-10-2005, 12:38 PM
Good job, Kevin! Now let's see 10,000MB/s. :D

bachus_anonym
02-10-2005, 12:45 PM
Almost there, OPB! just little bit more and you get 10K....

I can tell you that with a little tweak on Server2003 (actually, that tweak is right in front of your eyes, when Sandra results are ;) ) you could get 9700MB/s at same mem speed :) and efficiency could go up by aboyt 2%....

Onepagebook
02-10-2005, 12:46 PM
yup, buddy
If I got 3 stage cascade running 345x11,
I will...I might need to drive my Nissan altima all the way from columbus ohioo to Vegas.;)

conrad.maranan
02-10-2005, 12:49 PM
I will...I might need to drive my Nissan altima all the way from columbus ohioo to Vegas.;)
I'll drive my 530i and meet you there. We can pull off some mafia-type raid and take everything from chilly1's garage. I'm sure he's got some top-secret 6-stage cascades ;)

bachus_anonym - What's the tweak in Server 2003, in case I ever get a hold of a copy?

NiCKE^
02-10-2005, 12:52 PM
Great results man!

Onepagebook
02-10-2005, 12:54 PM
ya, that's what I wondering..
Actually win2k is not bad though(this bw was runnig under win 2k):D

BTW** oh ya..chilly 1 is just recoverd from his arm surgeory, so we might have chance hehe..:D

blander
02-10-2005, 12:59 PM
:up:
nice bandwidth

zA.Gosu
02-10-2005, 01:06 PM
Nice OPB, what kinda volts needed? Is that TCCD?

wfarid
02-10-2005, 01:13 PM
yea what ram did u use?

jjcom
02-10-2005, 01:16 PM
I'm going to guess its Gskill TCCD RAM. You know...that one kind lol i forgot the name :eek:

jjcom

J-Mag
02-10-2005, 01:16 PM
344mhz WOW! :slobber:

Whats the max you can pull in 1gb Dual chan?

Could it be anything, but TCCD? (well I guess, with OPB you never know...)

jayjaya29
02-10-2005, 01:18 PM
Holy crap, nice results. Will be awesome if you break 10,000.

THunDA
02-10-2005, 01:22 PM
Now thats some bandwidth.. :)

enok
02-10-2005, 01:26 PM
OMFG! :o

wfarid
02-10-2005, 01:31 PM
i was asking what PARTICULAR brand of gskill ram opb was using LA, LE?

conrad.maranan
02-10-2005, 01:35 PM
Download the 180 day trial.
But what's the tweak? Don't tell me that the 180-day trial version is the actual tweak. :confused:

Zeus
02-10-2005, 01:40 PM
But what's the tweak? Don't tell me that the 180-day trial version is the actual tweak. :confused:

LOL, the tweak is that the time limit pushes you to the edge. :D

Onepagebook
02-10-2005, 01:40 PM
i was asking what PARTICULAR brand of gskill ram opb was using LA, LE?


LA, 2x256 :D

bachus_anonym
02-10-2005, 01:52 PM
bachus_anonym - What's the tweak in Server 2003, in case I ever get a hold of a copy?
Let's see if it helps OPB get higher bandwidth... But It helped me gain about 150MB/s....

The tweak is to enable Lock pages in memory option in Group Policy Editor ( gpedit.msc ).
It would be great if someone else besides myself can see if it helps...
I see no reason why it wouldn't.
One thing, though... Sandra 2005 Lite seems to not use it even though option Use large memory pages
is on YES in Memory Bandwidth benchmark options.
Sandra 2004 works fine, though...

Good luck :thumbsup:

zeebs
02-10-2005, 01:54 PM
:D Nice bandwith bench OPB, care to share some of that :rolleyes:

Mag Master 21
02-10-2005, 02:13 PM
I just "aquired" server2003 enterprise edition.. Hoping to do some benching on it pretty soon..

actionB52
02-10-2005, 02:17 PM
omg, i'm only 6000mb/s behind!!!! :slobber:

great job

btw, will there be g.skill ram with the new bh-5 chippies? :confused:

Onepagebook
02-10-2005, 08:40 PM
Let's see if it helps OPB get higher bandwidth... But It helped me gain about 150MB/s....

The tweak is to enable Lock pages in memory option in Group Policy Editor ( gpedit.msc ).
It would be great if someone else besides myself can see if it helps...
I see no reason why it wouldn't.
One thing, though... Sandra 2005 Lite seems to not use it even though option Use large memory pages
is on YES in Memory Bandwidth benchmark options.
Sandra 2004 works fine, though...


Good luck :thumbsup:


too bad, win2k doesn't like it... :(

cpulloverclock
02-10-2005, 10:22 PM
I dont know if u'll get a little boost with that

read bypass at 16x
bypass max at 7x
refresh rate at 200 3.9µs
row refresh cycle time at 12-14

DamienKC
02-10-2005, 10:25 PM
Hahahaha, and my best bandwidth is like 4,000...of course this is with 512mb, but even then i'd be far behind...

STEvil
02-11-2005, 01:33 AM
bachus - any realworld performance gains? Wonder if there is a way to enable it on WinXP.. maybe this tweak will offset 1T vs. 2T enough to make 2T more useable? :D

DemonEyez
02-11-2005, 02:42 AM
I tried to enable it under Windows XP Pro. The setting is available and has been set just like the example, but Sandra still refuses to Use large Memory Pages.
I'm running Sandra 2005 Pro

Entity_Razer
02-11-2005, 04:38 AM
is that 9GB effectivly or 9GB in dual channel mode?

I'm guessing single channel but just to be sure .....

Nice benches dude!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :stick: :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:

cpulloverclock
02-11-2005, 04:52 AM
tried Lock pages in memory enabled and +10/+20 but Sandra writes OFF.... :rolleyes:

Saliman
02-11-2005, 05:39 AM
just... WOW

Punisher!
02-11-2005, 07:22 AM
onepagebook I am using Windows XP and I have much more than your efficiency... if you had mine you would go over 10K.

http://m4tribes.m4d.it/puni/sandra1.jpg

(200 fsb on nforce2 | 2-2-2-5)

What about tweaking the o.s.?

Chr0n1c
02-11-2005, 08:44 AM
:slobber:

Nice work man. :toast:

quicksilverXP
02-11-2005, 09:02 AM
Punisher, that's because you have such low latencies, as you increase latencies bandwidth efficiency lowers... so there's nothing you can do to change that unless there's some miraculous ram out there that can run at 344 at 2-2-2-5.

aCidbAbY
02-11-2005, 09:40 AM
amazing indeed:up:

Onepagebook
02-11-2005, 10:16 AM
Punisher, that's because you have such low latencies, as you increase latencies bandwidth efficiency lowers... so there's nothing you can do to change that unless there's some miraculous ram out there that can run at 344 at 2-2-2-5.


also the hight multipler;)

aCidbAbY
02-11-2005, 11:10 AM
so OPB how much is the gskill LA 512x2 going for?

Onepagebook
02-11-2005, 12:19 PM
so OPB how much is the gskill LA 512x2 going for?
I have never had chance to play 2x512 LA yet.
personally, I don't think 1G LA is better than 1G LE :)

Cornelious0_0
02-11-2005, 02:11 PM
VERY nice bro.....saw this on the XS front page and kinda knew what I was in for......I'm in awe. :slobber:

It's stuff like this that keeps me pressing forward to start benching again.

perry_78
02-11-2005, 02:24 PM
I have never had chance to play 2x512 LA yet.
personally, I don't think 1G LA is better than 1G LE :)

We'll see :) Once i figure out what the hell all those options in A64 tweaker and th DFI BIOS are I'll try to go over 300 2,5-4-3-7 with my LA 1G :) BTW what are the records for 1G LE and 1G LA from what you (OPB + this delightful society) know?

My Idle Timer is 256, doesnt really compare to yours (at 16) does it? :D '

Where can you acquire the 0.5 A64 tweaker and Sandra 2005 Pro (I'm guessing you have to pay). 2004 was free wasn't it?

Bachus, if you get 8K+ at 300*9 2,5-4-3-7, looks like I'll have a shot at that with my LA 1G :)

Onepagebook
02-11-2005, 02:30 PM
We'll see :) Once i figure out what the hell all those options in A64 tweaker and th DFI BIOS are I'll try to go over 300 2,5-4-3-7 with my LA 1G :) BTW what are the records for 1G LE and 1G LA from what you (OPB + this delightful society) know?

My Idle Timer is 256, doesnt really compare to yours (at 16) does it? :D '

Where can you acquire the 0.5 A64 tweaker and Sandra 2005 Pro (I'm guessing you have to pay). 2004 was free wasn't it?

Bachus, if you get 8K+ at 300*9 2,5-4-3-7, looks like I'll have a shot at that with my LA 1G :)


I think A64tweaker is from one of our XS Master--Codered. He is also a nice guy though. pm him get a copy
sandra 2005 lite is free though. :D


OPB

Bloody_Sorcerer
02-11-2005, 07:48 PM
OPB, thats ungodly. What ICs/voltage? *drools*
only... 6500 to go!

Onepagebook
02-11-2005, 08:33 PM
OPB, thats ungodly. What ICs/voltage? *drools*
only... 6500 to go!


It's Samsung TCCD 0440 chip, 2.9v
Gskill Model # 512 LA kit(2x256) :)

Punisher!
02-12-2005, 01:49 AM
Punisher, that's because you have such low latencies, as you increase latencies bandwidth efficiency lowers... so there's nothing you can do to change that unless there's some miraculous ram out there that can run at 344 at 2-2-2-5.

Actually from 2-2-2-5 to 2,5-3-3-6 I lose just 2 percentage points:
http://m4tribes.m4d.it/puni/sandra3.jpg
(200 fsb nforce2 | 2,5-3-3-6)

OPB just try your efficiency @ 200 bus 2-2-2-5, if it is lower than mine I will suggest st to tweak the o. s..

bachus_anonym
02-12-2005, 01:53 AM
@Punisher

that efficiency (97-98% / 92-93%) is just not gonna happen on A64 S939....

Punisher!
02-12-2005, 01:55 AM
@Punisher

that efficiency (97-98% / 92-93%) is just not gonna happen on A64 S939....

Yeah, actually I had imagined it.

bachus_anonym
02-12-2005, 02:00 AM
@Punisher

that efficiency (97-98% / 92-93%) is just not gonna happen on A64 S939....
actually, I will take that back....

it is possible but you would need to work with high multiplier, like x12 maybe, and high CPU clocks... as bandwidth efficiency is also dependant on CPU frequency.

I would assume that 250x12 with FX and BH-5 would give you probably 96% / 93% or something like that.

SteveOCZ
02-12-2005, 03:18 AM
Thats one smokin fast system. Where is the super PI or prime?

Bla$nA
02-12-2005, 06:30 AM
i wasnt online yesterday so i´ve just read it..
really nice OPB.. ;)

B5I8
02-12-2005, 05:55 PM
Punisher, you're comparing apples and oranges. You can't compare a Socket A Nforce2 mobo to a Socket 939 Nforce4 board.