is that possible?fx-55@2915MHz got 25s 1mpi?!

[EnergyStaR]

http://bbs.qicaihong.com/bbs/UploadFile/200511921413315431.jpg

fx55 + hyper48
a8n-sli deluxe
g.skill la 512m*2
asus 68u pci-e sli
maxtor 8m 160g*4 raid 0+1
silverstone ZEUS ST52F

somebody in china got this pi score, i dont think its possbile.

what do u think of it?

[cpulloverclock]

http://bbs.qicaihong.com/bbs/UploadFile/200511921413315431.jpg

fx55 + hyper48
a8n-sli deluxe
g.skill la 512m*2
asus 68u pci-e sli
maxtor 8m 160g*4 raid 0+1
silverstone ZEUS ST52F

somebody in china got this pi score, i dont think its possbile.

what do u think of it?I dunno, I think I can get 26s with a 3000+and unpatched superpi at 3040-3050MHz

The best optimizations are required for that

at 2.7GHz I got 29s
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/29.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/29....gif

[EnergyStaR]

I dunno, I think I can get 26s with a 3000+and unpatched superpi at 3040-3050MHz

The best optimizations are required for that

at 2.7GHz I got 29s
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/29.gif
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/29....gif
he didnt give it any special optimizations

[FUGGER]

With the CPUZ cut off it is impossible to tell the speed of the machine. I see a low vcore for that speed. He must be going for max pi with the stock FSB of 200, a clever trick to get the most default performance from DDR400 standard.

[EnergyStaR]

he said he ran it under safe mode

[blinky]

also its a different version of superpi, so its possible the calculation coding could have been messed with