*** The XS SLI 3DMark 05 and 03 Top 10 List *** [Archive]

View Full Version : *** The XS SLI 3DMark 05 and 03 Top 10 List ***

Pages : [1] 2 3

dwwalker14335

01-28-2005, 01:13 PM

Here is the XS unofficial 3DMark05 and 3DMark03 SLI top ten list.

The official Futuremark Hall of Fame (http://www.futuremark.com/community/halloffame/)

A bit of news, Wednesday, April 20

The Forceware 66.93 drivers have been re-reviewed and discussed with NVIDIA based on the drivers' application detection mechanism with SLI configurations and application profiles for 3DMark. It has been mutually decided that their approval will be canceled. Forceware 71.89 drivers are recommended for all 3DMark testing on SLI configurations

6800 CLASS

SLI 3DMark05 Results - 6800 Series Class

1. 14,472 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=816910) Lardarse (Shamino), ASUS 6800 Ultra @ 627/1386, FX-55 @ 3.44 GHz
2. 14,436 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=820275) Sampsa & Kamu, ASUS Extreme 6800 Ultra @ 621/1350, FX-55 @ 3.45 GHz
3. 13,881 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=796689) oppainter, MSI 6800 GT @ 583/1287, FX-55 @ 3.53 GHz
4. 13,167 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=727110) Team Finland, 6800 Ultra @ 661/1425, FX-55 @ 3.26 GHz
5. 12,989 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=862761) EQuito, eVGA 6800 Ultra @ 510/1282, A64 3700+ @ 3.30 GHz
6. 12,834 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=741239) mdzcpa, ASUS 6800 Ultra @ 519/1228, FX-55 @ 3.28 GHz
7. 12,516 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=741458) FROG, ASUS 6800 Ultra Extreme @ 504/1242, FX-55 @ 3.29 GHz
8. 12,020 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=728286) gundamit, BFG 6800 GT @ 475/1228, A64 3000+ @ 3.11 GHz
9. 11,950 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=718051) Skyline, evga 6800 Ultra @ 468/1242, FX-55 @ 2.94 GHz
10. 11,854 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=620825) //mAr, 6800 GT @ 472/1228, A64 3500+ @ 2.7 GHz

SLI 3DMark03 Results - 6800 Series Class

1. 31,407 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3937992) Lardarse (Shimano), ASUS 6800 Ultra @ 638/1404, FX-55 @ 3.44 GHz
2. 30,158 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3871335) Sampsa & Kamu, XFX 6800 Ultra @ 641/1370, FX-55 @ 3.16 GHz
3. 28,573 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3910654) oppainter, MSI 6800 GT @ 548/1253, FX-55 @ 3.5 GHz
4. 27,723 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3980689) EQuito, eVGA 6800 Ultra @ 513/1276, A64 3700+ @ 3.27 GHz
5. 27,598 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3865712) mdzcpa, 6800 Ultra @ 520/1215, FX-55 @ 3.28GHz
6. 26,799 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3901300) Apocalipsis, Gainward 6800 GT @ 548/1296, FX-55 @ 3.24 GHz
7. 26,430 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3848794) FROG, ASUS 6800 Ultra Extreme @ 495/1256, FX-55 @ 3.25 GHz
8. 25,652 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3987465) Kinc, 2x Leadtek 6800 Ultra, 475/1323, FX-55 @ 3.41 GHz
9. 25,507 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3654674) dwwalker14335, evga 6800 Ultra @ 496/1260, A64 3200+ @ 2.7 GHz
10. 25,247 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3842539) Skyline, evga 6800 Ultra @ 470/1242, FX-55 @ 2.95 GHz

6600 GT CLASS

SLI 3DMark05 Results - 6600 Series Class

1. 8,630 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=873708) JasonHK, CHAINTECH 6600 GT @ 630/1336, 4000+ @ 3.13 GHz
2. 8,605 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3892134) Brandybuck, ASUS Extreme 6600 GT @ 637/1316, A64 3000+ @ 2.91 GHz
3. 8,583 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=701685) H2OGun, ASUS 6600 GT @ 637/1336, FX-55 @ 2.90GHz
4. 7,766 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=796452) Leon, 6600 GT @ 585/1282, A64 3500+ @ 2.60 GHz
5. 7,730 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=860110) thenloi, MSI 6600 GT @ 579/1179, A64 3000+ @ 2.70 GHz
6. 7,578 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=583773) splmann, ASUS 6600 GT @ 621/1209, A64 3000+ @ 2.72 GHz
7. 7,429 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=616668) iMAX, Leadtek 6600 GT Extreme @ 576/1215, A64 300+ @ 2.74 GHz
8. 7,354 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=704712) SPQQKY, evga 6600 GT @ 558/1174, A64 3200+ 2.70 GHz
9. 7,069 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=789244) Join']['eaM, xfx 6600 GT @ ???/1164, A64 3500+ @ 2.42 GHz
10. 7,061 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=582553) micketh, 6600 GT @ 558/1125, A64 3500+ @ 2.51 GHz

SLI 3DMark03 Results - 6600 Series Class

1. 18,402 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3990790) JasonHK, CHAINTECH 6600 GT @ 624/1337, A64 4000+ @ 3.17 GHz
2. 18,339 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3989132) Micutzu, Gigabyte 6600 GT @ 630/1337, FX-55 @ 3.03 GHz
3. 18,332 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3885912) Brandybuck, ASUS Extreme 6600 GT @ 630/1316, A64 3000+ @ 3.03 GHz
4. 17,877 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3795762) H2OGun, ASUS 6600 GT @ 621/1323, FX-55 @ 2.90 GHz
5. 17,000 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3786193) splmann, ASUS 6600 GT @ 501/1210, A64 3000+ @ 2.72 Ghz
6. 16,522 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3918532) Leon, 6600 GT @ 585/1256, A64 3500+ @ 2.60 Ghz
7. 16,411 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3829392) SPQQKY, evga 6600 GT @ 501/1002, A64 3200+ @ 2.71 GHz
8. 16,030 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3737879) iMAX, Leadtek 6600 GT Extreme @ 552/1205, AMD 3000+ @ 2.74 GHz
9. 15,835 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3654814) hag6br, evga 6600 GT @ 559/1125, A64 3500+ @ 2.65 GHz
10. 15,720 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3909479) Join']['eaM, xfx 6600 GT @ ???/1170, A64 3500+ @ 2.35 GHz

Give a legit link, and I will update the list.

Some guidelines:
1. Post the link to your result
2. What brand, type and clocks of your video cards
3. Your processor and clock rate
4. Your cooling method (optional)

If it is all in your sig, then no need to post the details.

Let's see those scores!

I will update the list every evening. More often when I get a chance.

happyhero

01-28-2005, 01:22 PM

05 score
8756 3500+ @ 2409 MHZ 2 x XFX 6800GT 351/1002 on air.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=524490
need new PSU before i can start overclocking.

lostark374

01-28-2005, 01:37 PM

sorry i should of posted more info on mine they are evga ultras it reads the clocks wrong they are 446 x 1140 stock cooling and its a 3500+ newcastle 11 x 240 1.55v home built 404a phase

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v247/lostark374/IMG_0136.jpg

dwwalker14335

01-28-2005, 01:57 PM

Scores and info updated!

GRAFiZ

01-28-2005, 02:00 PM

Great thread my friend... I appreciate it. I'm going to shoot for a higher number soon.

By the way, my nick is GRAFiZ, not GFRAFiZ. Hate to complain though. ;)

Thanks!

dwwalker14335

01-28-2005, 02:01 PM

Sorry, typo and fixed! Glad to help.

lostark374

01-28-2005, 02:45 PM

ultra's not gt's
sorry but i paid a fortune for them

dwwalker14335

01-28-2005, 02:53 PM

ultra's not gt's
sorry but i paid a fortune for them

Actually, I should have known just by looking at the clocking. Edited. Hmmm. Going to have to keep a copy of the list on my desktop. Easier to edit. Less chance of mistakes than the little editing screen.

mdzcpa

01-28-2005, 03:22 PM

This score is a bit old, and I've done better, but its a start. I'll have more tonight.

2003 score: 23, 627 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3637663

GRAFiZ

01-28-2005, 04:15 PM

Finally... I broke 10K. It's odd, it seems like 3dMark2005 has no problem running up to 9.5K or so, but getting it past 10K is hard.

Anyhow:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=528556

Score: 10041

2 x BFG 6800 GT OC @ 390/1033, A64 3500+ @ 2.47 GHz 2.5/3/3/5/11 4XHTT

Sorry to keep changing my scores, I'm still trying to figure out how these A64 machines work. Hope I can still improve.

Thanks again! :toast:

gocchin

01-28-2005, 04:45 PM

3dmark03 23853 fx-55 @ 2962mhz 2 x evga 6800 Ultra 473/1215 on air

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3610850

matt9669

01-28-2005, 04:50 PM

If I can just get my DFI SLI-DR :stick:

GRAFiZ

01-28-2005, 04:52 PM

Great score everyone... just ran 3dmark2003...

Link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3641258

Score: 21335

2 x BFG 6800 GT OC @ 390/1033, A64 3500+ @ 2.47 GHz 2.5/3/3/5/11 4XHTT

It's fun running with such a pack as you all, however you're FX-55's are certainly showing my machine a thing or two!

Well, I hope to improve these scores.

Thanks!

reject

01-28-2005, 10:02 PM

lostark374
you cpu is at 2640? you need phase for that?

lostark374

01-28-2005, 10:13 PM

yeah this cpu is crap 2400 on air 2812 on phase but not stable ....it will do better then 2640 but ive had no time to fool around with it

i picked up a week 47 3000+ winne but its crap too i sold my fx55 and im waiting to pick up another one

dwwalker14335

01-28-2005, 10:15 PM

Nice scores, guys! List updated.

The MSI K8N Diamond is in and running. Time to do some benches :)

Quick take:

The MSI K8N-SLI PCI-E slots are really tight, especially compared to the ASUS A8N-SLI. I can't imagine two stock HSF Ultra's breating in here. The top card would not get very much air flow.

The northbridge fan is a lot quieter on the MSI. The ASUS sounds like you have a 15,000 RPM SCSI drive running in your system.

The MSI would not boot dual channel without flashing to the 1.1 beta BIOS first (dated 1/14/05).

EDIT: As I thought, the MSI was able to get me past 11K (11049) in 05 and 24K in 03!

Run 290 FSB, 1T, 9X multi
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=529750

Run at 285 FSB, 1T, 9X multi
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3642303

mdzcpa

01-29-2005, 07:09 AM

Okay...new updates:

05: 11,367 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=530782
03: 24,258 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3643501

Still pushing upward.....

althes

01-29-2005, 09:38 AM

you boys are tearing it up.

drcrawn

01-29-2005, 11:09 AM

SLI - SMELL ALL EYE

Lardarse still holds the top SLI spot IMO, even if it isnt up there anymore.

But you guys have some nice scores and I *might* be a tad jealous, maybe.

Only problem is this list is gonna change faster than Britney Spear's husband.

dwwalker14335

01-29-2005, 10:37 PM

I agree, Shimano is the king. I wish they had preserved the previous results. I really wanted to analyze those results.

I have to say, this MSI board is impressive. I am running a 9x multi and 2.7 GHz, so 300 FSB on the memory, 1T, 2.5-4-3-10. All I can say is, wow! :D

Bumped the video clocks to 490/1260 (according to Coolbits).

New scores:

05 - 11,526 491/1255

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=533658

03 - 25,253 486/1256

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3646771

dwwalker14335

01-29-2005, 10:48 PM

Scores updated!

GRAFiZ

01-29-2005, 11:55 PM

dwwalker14335, your scores are incredible!!!

What kind of cooling you using?

Also, I just got a new score, not much higher, but I gained a few. I hope I have room to improve.

Link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=533773

New score: 10169

2 x BFG 6800 GT OC @ 390/1100, A64 3500+ @ 2.5 GHz XP-90

Thanks again!!! I love this thread!!! :toast:

dwwalker14335

01-30-2005, 12:48 AM

GRAFiz, your score has been updated!

Thanks for the kudos. Lists always seem to spark a little friendly competition. And, it's nice to see what others are doing to get their scores up every little bit. I found my best trick is to take your memory as high as possible. FSB is key. CPU makes less of a difference on 05 than any other bench. So, I get my RAM to 300 FSB, the mem transfers over 8000 Mb/s, then run the benches. Seems to work well. So, if you have an FX-55, for instance, it is better to run at 300x9 than 270x10 or 245x11 which are all basically equal the same CPU clock. But, pretty much everyone here at XS knows that ;)

As for my system, I am use Innovatek watercooling. Nothing fancy, but it is effective.

Looks like I lucked out on the video cards. They are clocking very well. And, the MSI Diamond is turning out to be a very good board. I bought it as an interim until the DFI arrived to market, but the MSI might be a keeper.

H2OGun

01-31-2005, 07:54 AM

dwwalker14335, your cards are very nice clockers. Just started OCing my brand new Inno3D 2 x 6800 Ultras and here are my best runs so far.

3DMark 2003 - 23245 @456/1154 MHz (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3652232)

3DMark 2005 - 10890 @459/1181 MHz (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=538597)

EDIT: Added some of the requested infos:
CPU: FX-55 @10x290
Board: DFI nF4 SLI-D
Cooling: CPU and GPUs are all watercooled.

Kanavit

01-31-2005, 07:57 AM

God, those are some sick scores. I'm jealous.

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 09:10 AM

H2OGun

01-31-2005, 09:19 AM

Nice numbers, H2OGun, your scores have been added. Are you the one who made those cool (literally) SLI water blocks with the opposing barbs? I recall, without looking through the forums, that it was you. If so, those blocks look very nicely made.

And, I see you have the DFI. I think that will be THE PCI-E based board for O/C efforts for some time to come.

Thanks. I own the blocks, yes, but am not the original maker of the blocks.

How is the MSI board getting along with you? I've tried it before. With more voltages, it will be as good as DFI. :toast:

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 09:34 AM

I saw pictures of the blocks, and they look a lot like the DangerDen NV68's. Those opposing barbs will come in handy on tight SLI setups like the DFI and MSI. Most blocks are too thick and the barbs are in the way.

The MSI is working quite well, in spite of the artificial 90 nm 1.450 VID limit on the CPU. It seems to run a max of 1.55V into the CPU. But, in spite of that, it is more stable at 2.7 GHz than the Neo 2 with more voltage. I have been able to run the 2 x 512 MB PQI Turbo DDR at just over 300 FSB, 1T and a 9X multi. So, so far, it is looking very good.

As for the voltage limitations, it seems all the manufacturers are limiting the VCore on 90 nm CPU's. I think this has to do more with pressure from AMD than anything else. Putting all that voltage into the Winnie cores can lead to more RMA's. And, AMD does have pull with the motherboard manufacturers.

eva2000

01-31-2005, 11:15 AM

Okay here's my scores with A8N-SLI Deluxe bought off oc-rookie who did the vdimm cap mod + vdd chipset mods (set at 1.675v). CPU cooled by MCW6002 with MCP650 + MCP600 in series + Thermochill 120.3

3500+ 90nm @11x247 = 2722mhz
A8N-SLI Deluxe 1004.01 bios
2x XFX 6800GT PCI-E stock heatsink @400/1175
2x512MB OCZ PC3700EB Singles @247mhz 3-2-2-8 1T
580W Topower 6P686 35A/12V

3dmark2003 @400/1175 = 22,244 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3652886)

3500+ 90nm @11x233 = 2564mhz
A8N-SLI Deluxe 1003.05 bios
2x XFX 6800GT PCI-E stock heatsink @405/1150
2x512MB OCZ PC3700EB Singles @233mhz 3-2-2-8 1T
580W Topower 6P686 35A/12V

3dmark2003 @405/1150 = 22,135 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3633162)

3dmark05 @405/1125 = 10,219 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=521438)

Full pics
- http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/web/
- http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/web2/

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 12:55 PM

eva2000, results posted.

I was wondering when you would show up! Nice to see you here.

I still have to see about a volt mod for the MSI Diamond board. It looked like an easy mod on the ASUS, but I have yet to see what is required on the MSI.

eva2000

01-31-2005, 12:59 PM

thanks.. it's just too hot and humid here so night/morning benchies in cool 28C room temps is only time LOL

Jamo

01-31-2005, 01:01 PM

may i suggest you also do a table for 6600gt's? i'm sure theres a few 6600gt sli owners feeling left out :)

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 01:16 PM

may i suggest you also do a table for 6600gt's? i'm sure theres a few 6600gt sli owners feeling left out :)

What? You mean not everyone has 6800 GT or Ultra SLI systems? Ignorant me. Sure, I can do that. I will create a subclass. That way everyone can play ;)

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 01:21 PM

thanks.. it's just too hot and humid here so night/morning benchies in cool 28C room temps is only time LOL

Hmm, a nice cool 28C. I guess there is a plus to winters after all :)

Here, it is 28F.

Hombre

01-31-2005, 01:35 PM

Very nice score, walker.
You have beaten four FX55's and one of them is even phasechanged! :eek:

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 01:47 PM

I am not sure what the others FSB rate is. Mine is at 300, and that seemed to really help 05 versus CPU clock. And, 05 is all about the GPU clocks and memory transfer rates. 03 is more balanced, but it is still a GPU dependent score, and 2.7 GHz on the CPU helps a little. In AM3, however, I can only get around 93K, since that bench is the most CPU dependent of the benches. So, I am still looking to get an FX-55 to replace my Winnie 3200.

xs64

01-31-2005, 01:49 PM

My first SLI Gainward GS GLH 6600GT test :D ( with stock coolers )

A64 3200+ @ 2.56Ghz with Hyper6
Vid @ 500/1148
3DMark03 = 14967
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3653293

A64 3200+ @ 2.56Ghz
Vid @ 540/1154
3DMark05 = 6234
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=539481

mdzcpa

01-31-2005, 02:13 PM

Very nice score, walker.
You have beaten four FX55's and one of them is even phasechanged! :eek:

I am not sure what the others FSB rate is. Mine is at 300, and that seemed to really help 05 versus CPU clock. And, 05 is all about the GPU clocks and memory transfer rates. 03 is more balanced, but it is still a GPU dependent score

Yep, this Asus has me ham strung pretty bad. Since you cannot run anything above 240 HTT on this board at 1T, I've just kept my HTT and memory low with the tightest timings I can run (CAS 2 2-5-2 1T).

That said, I'm not done yet with this combo. I haven't used A64 Tweaker nor got around to pressing my card clocks any higher. I have some improved cooling and GPU vcore coming along soon:)

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 02:20 PM

I had the ASUS board as well. Could not get it stable at 250 FSB, 1:1 with the RAM at 1T (250x10). With the MSI, 300 x 9 is stable. So, this board is the ace in hole for now. I have to work on the core volt mod for the Ultra cards. Still at 1.4V. I will up it to around 1.7V, and it should get well over the 500/1300 mark. With a single AGP card, I was able to get around 6650 at 515/1320. I will mod these cards similarily and hope for the best. A stock XT PE core clock would be nice :D

xs64, your scores have been added!

mdzcpa

01-31-2005, 06:55 PM

Another update:

05 : 11,643 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=540391
03: 25,288 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3654117

This is about all I'm gonna get with stock voltage and basic water cooling on the GPU. I'll look for more speed there still. I also still need to tweak the ram and OS.

Onward....

OPPAINTER

01-31-2005, 06:57 PM

Great scores Mike :toast:

OPP

gocchin

01-31-2005, 07:03 PM

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 07:08 PM

happyhero

01-31-2005, 10:43 PM

Entry for the 6600GT 3dmark03 class

6911 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=498735) Happyhero, leadtek 6600 GT Extreme @ 561 MHz / 1181 MHz, AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2409 MHz

dwwalker14335

01-31-2005, 10:59 PM

Entering the results now.

New update, myself. I was pushed by mdzcpa :stick:

He made me do it ! :D

3DMark03 - 25,507

Used a 302 FSB, 496/1260

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3654674

3DMark05 - 11,671

Used a 302 FSB, 501/1260

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=540815

Also posted new FM Approved results of 11,162 in 05 and 24,890 in 03.

And, if you are wondering why they clock so well, I bought four cards, picked the best two, and sold the other two.

I am liking this MSI board:

http://img168.exs.cx/img168/3816/300fsb1fr.jpg

http://img168.exs.cx/img168/2305/300fsbcpu1pq.jpg

http://img168.exs.cx/img168/891/300fsblat0bf.jpg

nutcase

02-01-2005, 01:05 AM

here is my best 3dmark03 score right now

A8N SLI Dlx
3500+ @ 2600 Mhz
2x Evga 6600Gts @ 556/1113 in SLI

Both Cpu and Gpu's air cooled..

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3654814

happyhero

02-01-2005, 03:50 AM

03 test.

20254 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3651449) happyhero, XFX 6800 GT @ 402 MHz / 1123 MHz, AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2211 MHz

eva2000

02-01-2005, 04:28 AM

mdzcpa

02-01-2005, 04:33 AM

Entering the results now.

New update, myself. I was pushed by mdzcpa :stick:

He made me do it ! :D

Good stuff there!

Okay, looks like I'm gonna be making a few more passes tonight as well :D

dwwalker14335

02-01-2005, 05:47 AM

Good stuff there!

Okay, looks like I'm gonna be making a few more passes tonight as well :D

Thanks. Maybe I will last a whole 24 hours on top of the list ;)

I am tapped out. Those scores are it. Unless, of course, I resort to hardware mods, but I want to make sure these cards don't flake out. So, I will keep them as is for a bit to ensure they are broken in and not broken.

Keep the better scores coming, guys!

drcrawn

02-01-2005, 12:01 PM

move over expensive rig coming through LOL

3500+ 90nm @11x246 = 2705mhz at 1.6v
A8N-SLI Deluxe 1004.01 bios
2x eVGA 6800U PCI-E stock @455/1185
2x512MB OCZ PC3700EB Singles @246mhz 3-2-2-8 9-13-2222 1T
120GB WD 1200JB
580W Topower 6P686 35A/12V

3dmark05 = 10,803 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=541313)
3dmark2003 = 23,628 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3655166)

strange i set it at 455/1185 but ORB says 453/1188 :confused:

NV overclocking isnt scientific b/c you can set mhz by mhz, which isnt accurate at all. ATI overclocking tools "show" you precisely what clocks you are setting, NV doesnt.
The other way this happens (happens to me at max clocks) is when I set my core to 515 or 516, it will only run at 513. I've confirmed this with rivatuner monitoring and ORB scores. So even if I push a little higher than 513, it wont actually drive that higher frequency.
Not sure which one is happening for you, probably that setting 455 is actually closer to 453, can you try 456 and see what the orb tells you, or riva monitoring? Hope that helped.

pinto

02-01-2005, 12:12 PM

mdzcpa

02-01-2005, 02:39 PM

I am tapped out. Those scores are it. Unless, of course, I resort to hardware mods, but I want to make sure these cards don't flake out. So, I will keep them as is for a bit to ensure they are broken in and not broken.

LOL...I'm in the same boat too! In fact, I'm not really a serious benchmark person...I prefer quality gaming machines that are "true" PCs and are self contained. My days of the sprawling parts all over my workbench are gone. But, not only that, I just cannot afford to bork either of these cards going for super mondo ORB scores:)

To be honest, I'm not sure I have anything left in the reserve to come by you either. Like you, I'll be staying away from hard mods to the card (or doing anything that dimishes the well rounded capability of a gaming rig). But I'll be trying a few more tweaks here and there all in the name of good fun:D

GRAFiZ

02-01-2005, 02:52 PM

Yup... I dont know how much more I can squeeze out of my current setup either, frankly, I'm just glad to even be on the same page as you FX/Ultra users. :)

Pedro Rocha

02-01-2005, 03:17 PM

Some updates with new drivers, 2 6800GT still with stock cooler

Pedro Rocha, XFX 6800 GT @ 428/1134, FX-55 @ 3.15 Ghz

3DMark05 - 11131 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=540157

3DMark03 - 23115 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3650939

Not bad for unmoded GT's with the worst and most noisy stock coolers I ever onwn :)

Pic:
http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/11131_3Dmark05.jpg

:toast:

happyhero

02-01-2005, 03:36 PM

3DMark03 - 21052 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3657296

CPU @ stock speeds.

CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2206 MHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Series GPU
402 MHz / 1094 MHz
OS: Microsoft Windows XP
Res: 1024x768@32 bit

nutcase

02-01-2005, 04:37 PM

Hi i have a problem i purchase two 6800U PNY they are apparently work in sli mode, recognise, the case in the forceware ismarked but no task balance and no performance increase! somebody have an idea? :confused:

If that is with an Asus A8N-SLI, I found a bug in some of the Beta Bios's for it.. Mine did the same thing till I updated to the 1003 Final, then the Cards worked like a charm.

The 1004-001 Bios is better though as it really lets you overclock
:p:

also, make sure to use a Later Driver version. People have been having troubles with the 66.73 Drivers not enabling SLI. I use the 71.24 drivers and they are working well. and make sure to enable SLI in the drivers :D

dwwalker14335

02-01-2005, 06:04 PM

Also, when you flash the BIOS, use the /CD switch after the awd flash program and before the filename to completely flash the BIOS. Otherwise, a little piece of the old remains behind.

dwwalker14335

02-01-2005, 06:09 PM

happyhero

02-01-2005, 06:24 PM

All scores updated, guys!

Looks like we have three above 11K in 3Dmark05, alone. And, that's not easy. Just take a peak at the ORB. There are only 5 people with scores in that territory, and we have three of them here. :toast:

Nice numbers!you did the wrong cpu speed.
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2206 MHz

3DMark03 - 21052 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3657296

dwwalker14335

02-01-2005, 07:26 PM

you did the wrong cpu speed.
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 2206 MHz

3DMark03 - 21052 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3657296

Sorry, took a peak at your sig when I edited the results. Saw the @2400. Also, it looks like the link on your 05 result is broken.

mdzcpa

02-01-2005, 07:28 PM

dwwalker14335

02-01-2005, 07:41 PM

Okay, another update:

05: 11,783 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=543707
03: 25,451 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3657768

That's about it for while.

Too bad I missed out on those DFI SLI boards at ZZF :(

Nooooo...now I have to make some more runs. Man, that is a great number to post! I will try, but I think that 05 may stand in the lead. :slobber:

eva2000

02-02-2005, 07:21 AM

wohoo today was 32C but had a late night thunderstorm and pouring down rain and cooler room temps dropped from 31C to 27C. Helped my memory oc on my cards a bit :)

3dmark2003
2x eVGA 6800U PCI-E stock @455/1200 = 23,722 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3659235)

3dmark05
2x eVGA 6800U PCI-E stock @455/1210 = 10,894 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=545089)

unfortunately, tomorrow will be 34C heh (at least it's not some of our rural areas which hit 43C today :eek: )

perkam

02-02-2005, 08:24 AM

Good God !!! SLi seems like pure pwnage compared to all other cards I've seen.

Hmmmm...what can you expect in 03 and 05 with max oc on both cards on air but with STOCK cpus ? Anyone tried it ?

Perkam

eva2000

02-02-2005, 08:29 AM

Well i clocked my cpu to 9x250 = 2250mhz with 6800U at stock 425/1100 and got 21,727

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3659060

perkam

02-02-2005, 08:35 AM

20k in 03 stock ??!!!!

Ok this thread is officially mind-bendlingly xtreme, not that it needed my confirmation.

Though my question was stock cpu + Max Air on 6800Us = ?

Amazing stuff Eva, I guess we all should fear those with SLi or else they might unleash their BACKUP SCORES :devil:

Perkam

matt9669

02-02-2005, 11:31 AM

Anyone having problems with Winnies on phase change on these NF4 boards? Trying to decide what to get for my SLI-DR - dunno if I can afford the FX-55 . . .

//mAr

02-02-2005, 02:31 PM

05: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=542953
03: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3657005
all watercooled ;)

dwwalker14335

02-03-2005, 02:12 AM

All results updated!

Nice results, //mAr.

Tried a change on my system.

Ran at 275x10,1T, 2.5-3-3-8, 4X HT, 501/1275 - 11715 Seems the 4X HT made a littel difference. I was running before at 205 or so FSB and 3x HT.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=547729

Not good enough to surpase mdzcpa, but still a little higher.

And, check out this G.Skill on the nForce4. Not to shabby.

http://img227.exs.cx/img227/3549/310fsb3pb.jpg

eva2000

02-03-2005, 04:40 AM

catchin gocchin's score with 20+ behind on my core :)

3dmark2003
2x eVGA 6800U PCI-E stock @455/1210 = 23,820 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3662298)

http://fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/results/3500_90nm/OCZ/PC3700EB/2x512/LDT3x/8x/339-247-3228-9-13-2222-1T-1.6-3-1.67/3dmark/3dmark2003_455-1210_23820_tn.jpg

3dmark05
2x eVGA 6800U PCI-E stock @455/1210 = 10,897 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=547904)

http://fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/results/3500_90nm/OCZ/PC3700EB/2x512/LDT3x/8x/339-247-3228-9-13-2222-1T-1.6-3-1.67/3dmark/3dmark05_455-1210_10897_tn.jpg

nutcase

02-03-2005, 06:27 AM

Thought I would update my scores:

A64 3500+ @ 2650 Mhz
2x Evga 6600Gt's @ 558/1125 Mhz
All AIr cooled..

3Do5 score (7027):

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=543700

3D03 Score (15,835):

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3658306

dnavarro

02-03-2005, 08:14 AM

Here are my scores (should be top ten on both):
2003:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3657980 = 23772
2005:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=540883 = 10716

My cooling is 100% aircooled (GPU's are 6800 U's SLI) and Vapo LS (FX55 @ 11x275 = 3.03Ghz) on CPU.

GPU clocks are currently around 440/1250 (eVGA) but I am working on more at the moment :)

Thx,

D

abstrakt

02-03-2005, 08:24 AM

First test with Mach II and stock graphics cooling, totally untweaked.

FX-55 @ 3065
6800GT @ 409/1096

See latest post.

abstrakt

02-03-2005, 09:02 AM

Last one for today

See latest post.

Changed clocks to 416/1063. Case ambient is 50C, won't turn heating off because I am ill :(

eva2000

02-03-2005, 09:14 AM

ouch 50C case temps!

hope you get better soon.. but hope i get further ahead before you catch up lol

abstrakt

02-03-2005, 09:21 AM

When I feel more up to it I will tweak OS, get fans on memory, and open the door to get ambient down :)

Might try my UTT aswell.

happyhero

02-03-2005, 01:15 PM

3Dmark05
10083 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=547923) happyhero, XFX 6800 GT @ 425 MHz / 1170 MHz, A64 3500+ @ 2.47GHz
3Dmark03
22231 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3662416) happyhero, XFX 6800 GT @ 425 MHz / 1170 MHz, A64 3500+ @ 2.47GHz

thelostrican

02-03-2005, 04:06 PM

eva2000:how much better if any are the ultras compared to the gt's in terms of ocing
i got 4 cards in here, the wife says i can only keep 2 :banana: so which way the ultras or the gt's...

abstrakt

02-03-2005, 05:47 PM

Damnit, wanted 11000 before tonight. Going to need to raise the volts on the 6800's to 1.4v tomorrow, will defintley do better then.

See latest post.

Edit: lol, did one last run, 11103 :)

See latest post.

mdzcpa

02-03-2005, 05:55 PM

Does anyone know if Nibitor works on the PCI-E 6800 Ultras yet? Last time I checked, Nibitor 1.9 still didn't work yet.

happyhero

02-03-2005, 06:14 PM

Does anyone know if Nibitor works on the PCI-E 6800 Ultras yet? Last time I checked, Nibitor 1.9 still didn't work yet.1.9b works fine.

mdzcpa

02-03-2005, 06:22 PM

Are you sure?

Check out this recent thread at mvktech:
http://www.mvktech.net/component/option,com_simpleboard/Itemid,34/func,view/id,5354/catid,21/limit,10/limitstart,10/

It seems that although the BIOS is editable, it isn't producing the right results (the card is not running at 1.5v even though it is set in the bios).

I experienced the same trouble as HeavyH20 did on that thread...the BIOS was editable, but voltage did not change. Do you know more about this situation?

eva2000

02-03-2005, 07:38 PM

eva2000:how much better if any are the ultras compared to the gt's in terms of ocing
i got 4 cards in here, the wife says i can only keep 2 :banana: so which way the ultras or the gt's...
Ultras mate, they're 40-55mhz off the core faster than GTs out of the box stock...

abstrakt

02-03-2005, 07:50 PM

Ok I SWEAR this is the last one for tonight/this morning. 11151, just wanted to get past Pedro :)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=550364

For tomorrow, tweaked win2k and 20C case ambient I think :) I think the memory will go quite far at low temps as it gets through half a 3DM05 bench at 1400MHz :eek:

happyhero

02-03-2005, 11:18 PM

3DMark03 - 22231 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3662416

abstrakt

02-04-2005, 05:31 AM

Is the list no longer being updated? :(

dnavarro

02-04-2005, 01:35 PM

I noticed the same thing. Looks like it hasn't been updated with the last few days of posts......

D

dwwalker14335

02-04-2005, 01:51 PM

Does anyone know if Nibitor works on the PCI-E 6800 Ultras yet? Last time I checked, Nibitor 1.9 still didn't work yet.

They are working in a new release. Once 1.9c arrives, it will work.

dwwalker14335

02-04-2005, 01:52 PM

Is the list no longer being updated? :(

All scores updated!

Was out last night (Thursday). So, I missed an evening update. But, the list has been fully updated as of now, before the all important weekend browsing!

The last update was Thursday 4:15 AM. I usually try to visit the list 2 to 3 times per day.

And, BTW, nice numbers for a couple of GT's! And, stock cooling, no less. Get an 03 run in too, when you get a chance.

Pedro Rocha

02-04-2005, 02:02 PM

Amazing, the MSI Diamond SLI runs 3Dmark05 with the bus set @ 350 MHZ (HTTx3) :slobber:

And that with only 1.6v on Vcore, the maximum vcore with current bios b113, I cant imagine what this MB can do with more voltage.

Unfortunately my FX55 needs voltage to escalate :(

Here is a pic and update scores :

http://pedrorocha.planetaclix.pt/11147_350HTT_3Dmark05.jpg

MSI Diamond SLI
FX55 @ 3100
2 XFX 6800GT 427/1140 Stock Cooler

3D Mark 2005 - 11147 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=546753

3D Mark 2003 - 23666 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3661066

:)

dwwalker14335

02-04-2005, 02:08 PM

The voltage item may be what converts everyone to the DFI board. If it were not for the voltage limitations, this board may very well have been the best nForce 4 board available. I guess we will have to find a volt mod.

BTW, nice run. abstrakt has got you by a nose hair, however ;)

thelostrican

02-04-2005, 06:56 PM

Ultras mate, they're 40-55mhz off the core faster than GTs out of the box stock...
ultras it is then, there are some very nice scores here... :toast:

dwwalker14335

02-04-2005, 10:26 PM

Just for information purposes, here are my scores running the tests with my 3200 and the Ultra cards at stock clocks.

3DMark05

9,202
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=553952

3DMark03

21,233
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3669368

And with FX-53 stock clocks

3DMark05

10,052
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=553988

3DMark03

22,118
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3669186

eva2000

02-04-2005, 11:41 PM

you sure about that FX-53 3d2k3 same 22,118 score as 3200+ ?

dwwalker14335

02-04-2005, 11:48 PM

Work in progress. You got me while I was updating the links. Those were both FX-53 clock runs in the post you saw.

The point of the post was to show that the CPU clocks seem to make more of a difference in 05 than 03, which would be contrary to what I would have thought, since 05 is supposedly a pure video test.

eva2000

02-05-2005, 12:00 AM

yeah that's what i found cpu seems to make a difference in 05 in SLI mode

dwwalker14335

02-05-2005, 12:03 AM

Which tells me that the SLI mode is a driver load on the CPU. So, as the driver evolves, they may make substantial gains in performance.

//mAr

02-05-2005, 09:28 AM

my cards are 6800gt ...
again some 03 ;)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3662511
24k+!!!
cpu is fx53 :)
ram adata DDR600

eva2000

02-05-2005, 09:52 AM

very nice //mAr

i noticed you used 71.80 drivers, they work for you ? i tried them and alot of artifacting and missing textures when 3dmarking = higher fps, but had to go back to 71.24

perkam

02-05-2005, 10:36 AM

OK, so there are a lot of fortunate members here on XS with SLI setups. However, there is not a single person with SLI on the entire front page of ORB for both 05 and 03 who has AN XS TAG !!!!!!!!

I understand some ppl here are from different teams for those without teams willing to join the XS 3dmark Team once the captain is chosen, It would be nice to see somone with an XS tag SOMEWHERE on the front page for 05 and 03 sli marks.

EDIT: Does that sound a little demanding....cause it wasnt meant to be. Anyhoo, just a priority that I wanted to make members aware of. Nothing else.

Perkam

abstrakt

02-05-2005, 10:45 AM

Mines been tagged in 6th place for days... I've dropped down now though.

dwwalker14335

02-05-2005, 10:59 AM

We need some more 66.93 WHQL FM Approved 03 runs made by some of the guys willing to do the **xtremesystems.org** tag. We could dominate the list !

abstrakt

02-05-2005, 11:25 AM

Couldn't get SLI to work with 66.93, 71.80 gives me 10C lower temps then 71.25 aswell, so I will bench on that when I can mod BIOS to 1.5v :/

eva2000

02-05-2005, 11:27 AM

yeah i couldn't bench SLI with 66.93 either would give me non-SLI single PCI-E scores evenw ith SLI enabled!

dwwalker14335

02-05-2005, 11:43 AM

Really? I was able to with the ASUS and the MSI in both 03 and 05. Have you tried with the Ultra cards yet, eva2000?

eva2000

02-05-2005, 11:47 AM

tried 66.93 with both 6800GT/6800U PCI-E and no go for SLI mode :(

71.24 still are best drivers for me

dwwalker14335

02-05-2005, 11:48 AM

Did you install 71.24 than manually update the driver to 66.93 (do not use install program). That way, the fixed dll's stay.

eva2000

02-05-2005, 12:02 PM

nah i have a basic ghost image OS that i make after i first time install winxp pro sp2 which has never had any drivers installed...

then when i change drivers i revert to this basic ghost image to install drivers for first time :)

then i ghost image each driver state, so i can switch between fresh first time drivers for 66.93, 71.24, 71.80 etc

abstrakt

02-05-2005, 12:15 PM

Is Win2000 not good for 3DM05? Don't see anyone using it.

perkam

02-05-2005, 12:21 PM

Mines been tagged in 6th place for days... I've dropped down now though.

Hard to imagine dropping down from 6th place with an fx-55 at 3 ghz and sli huh ??

I imagine it puts a lot of things in perspective.

Perkam

dwwalker14335

02-05-2005, 12:26 PM

Thought the 3D team was concentrated on 01. But, I tagged my results as requested.

My second place on the hall of fame is tagged (like that will last). Have to use the 66.93 driver, however. And, it seems people are having problems with that driver. I also have the number 2 spot on approved FM driver 05. Again, for the moment.

abstrakt

02-05-2005, 01:52 PM

Hard to imagine dropping down from 6th place with an fx-55 at 3 ghz and sli huh ??

I imagine it puts a lot of things in perspective.

Perkam

Not really, never been on a front page before. All I did was open the back door, thats as xtreme as I get. Only reason I'm on the front page is because it seems the true benchers have boycotted SLI.

//mAr

02-05-2005, 02:15 PM

very nice //mAr

i noticed you used 71.80 drivers, they work for you ? i tried them and alot of artifacting and missing textures when 3dmarking = higher fps, but had to go back to 71.24
71.80 workin fine for me...
450/1200 is all day stable for me...
go for tweaking and you'll have a higher score too...

i won't use an xs.org tag! techpowerup.com 1man 3dteam =)

dnavarro

02-05-2005, 02:54 PM

I had problems with 66.93 also :( I am in the top ten in both 03 and 05 (at least as of Thursday) but running driver 71.80....and I AM tagged XTREMESYS so maybe you were searching "official drivers" .

Damn I hope NVIDIA releases an "official" driver soon. The 66.93's suck for the OC.

D

EDIT: looks like I am number 7 in 2003 but got bumped off the top 10 in 2005

perkam

02-05-2005, 04:30 PM

Only reason I'm on the front page is because it seems the true benchers have boycotted SLI.

You're so right abstrakt, though I'm surprised Macci/Stilt/Opp havent jumped on to the bandwagon.

Perkam

eva2000

02-05-2005, 04:33 PM

You're so right abstrakt, though I'm surprised Macci/Stilt/Opp havent jumped on to the bandwagon.

Perkam
probably limited by extreme cooling options more than anything hehe - although i have heard of at least 2-4 projects by these guys for dual video card cascaded phase change systems in the works.. they're coming just not right now lol

perkam

02-05-2005, 04:48 PM

although i have heard of at least 2-4 projects by these guys for dual video card cascaded phase change systems in the works..

Wow, eva2000 can u confirm that ??

Perkam

eva2000

02-05-2005, 04:56 PM

i read it somewhere i know xtremeresource folks have Baker doing something heh

SIK_L_CELL

02-06-2005, 01:04 AM

Here is my 03.

3DMark 03 - 24441 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3673542)

eva2000

02-06-2005, 01:56 AM

woah cpu @ 3300mhz :cool:

dwwalker14335

02-06-2005, 08:33 AM

Hey, SIK, nice score. Result posted!

nutcase

02-06-2005, 09:45 AM

LikwidKool

02-06-2005, 11:21 AM

damn, i gotta get my stuff in soon. might be my only chance for first page.

once the big guns show up. it's over jonny.

dwwalker14335

02-06-2005, 12:45 PM

damn, i gotta get my stuff in soon. might be my only chance for first page.

once the big guns show up. it's over jonny.

Yes, once they show up, 12k will be the entry fee to be on the list. Especially if they phase cool the GPU's. I think we will see some 13K scores. Shimano was around 12,900 or so on the crappy 66.93 drivers. So, he would have been in the 13K+ range had been able to use the newer drivers.

SIK_L_CELL

02-06-2005, 12:48 PM

Hey, SIK, nice score. Result posted!

Thank you sir!

SIK_L_CELL

02-06-2005, 09:48 PM

Heres my first crack at 05!

3DMark 05 - 11175 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=561325)

happyhero

02-06-2005, 10:24 PM

yeah i couldn't bench SLI with 66.93 either would give me non-SLI single PCI-E scores evenw ith SLI enabled!
install 66.93 this way!!.
just UNinstall the 71.24 driver through control panel, reboot and install 66.93 right ontop of the dirty drivers(do not use driver cleaner). it seems to help with approval(FM) and you still get a decent score.

eva2000

02-07-2005, 03:11 AM

install 66.93 this way!!.
just UNinstall the 71.24 driver through control panel, reboot and install 66.93 right ontop of the dirty drivers(do not use driver cleaner). it seems to help with approval(FM) and you still get a decent score.
tried that way as well was a no go for me :(

SIK_L_CELL, nice crack at the list hehe

dwwalker14335

02-07-2005, 08:41 AM

SIK, nice work on the initial 05 score. Very good for air cooled cards! I think watercooled, GPU core Volt mod and 3.3 GHz on the FX-55 will yield 12K on 05.

I did the 66.93 install very similar. I manually updated the driver (you will have to do it for both cards) to the 66.93, and it worked fine.

And, it now looks like the first phase changed GPU and CPU combo with the DFI has arrived on the ORB. I think they are using GT's, so they should be limited to around 550 or so on the GPU core.

abstrakt

02-07-2005, 07:25 PM

Oh damnit SIK you beat me, I didn't want to bench this week now I have to :)

eva2000

02-08-2005, 05:52 PM

i'm waiting for my DFI NF4 SLI-D before i do any more damage to this list... if i can find a winnie that does 3ghz on water that would be nice hehe

mdzcpa

02-08-2005, 05:54 PM

i'm waiting for my DFI NF4 SLI-D before i do any more damage to this list... if i can find a winnie that does 3ghz on water that would be nice hehe

Ditto. My Asus SLI is maxxed out.

I just wish DFI could have put these boards out in better volumes. The waiting around is nasty.

dwwalker14335

02-11-2005, 11:20 AM

Looks like a few phase change systems are in the works for the GPU's, and , it appears that more than a few are converting to the DFI SLI board. I think it will be interesting to see any improvements over the likes of MSI and ASUS.

eva2000

02-11-2005, 05:02 PM

well my DFI NF4 SLI-D should arrive next week :D

dnavarro

02-11-2005, 07:42 PM

eva2000

02-11-2005, 07:46 PM

nicely done dnavarro :)

what settings and vdimm used for 315mhz 1T mem speed ?

dwwalker14335

02-11-2005, 08:30 PM

Hey guys small update to my list:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=577602 05 = 10735 marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3694655 03 = 24101 marks

both should be in the top ten :D

This is with my DFI Ultra D (No more Gigabyte lol).

D

All posted!

Nice clocking on the processor. How are you liking the DFI? I have heard rumblings about how difficult it is to get running, initially. What is your quick take on the DFI?

And, eva2000 will be climbing ina bout a week, I suppose. Now that the DFI is on the way!

Hmm, and it sounds like abstrakt may have hit the ceiling on his score. SIK has him beat by a measely 24 points.

dnavarro

02-12-2005, 12:07 PM

Thx for the congrats guys. The DFI is purely the best board I have ever played with. I am using the exact same memory/cpu and the exact same voltages as I did on my Gigabyte SLI! It almost seems wrong that my memory is clocking so high :)

As far as setup, it was a breeze for me once I booted only with one dimm (in channel 4) and immediately flashed to bios 2/01 (I am using 2/09 now). Bios 1/25 (the shipping bios) will not boot for most in Dual Channel! After that it has been a dream setup :banana:

I still have higher I can go on the video clocks. I am still testing everything for stability. These were just dry runs. Thank God for my PCP&C PSU LOL. Here's a pick of my setup with memory timings. And if you guys don't have the DFI yet...pick it up :toast:

(sorry for the big pic....)
D

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/dnavarro77@sbcglobal.net/detail_hires?.dir=deb5&.dnm=8d15.jpg

Micketh

02-13-2005, 05:45 AM

05 6600GT score 7079 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=582553, took ages to get it to pass the cpu tests without locking up, i hate this motherboard :( my neo2 was much better for ocin.

mdzcpa

02-13-2005, 09:05 AM

WOO WOO!

My modded DFI Ultra is up and running SLI like a champ now :banana: This board scrrreeeaaammmss!

I'm back on the horse looking for more! Updated 3D scores coming tonight!!

nutcase

02-13-2005, 09:56 AM

got a quick question.. has anybody played around with SLI under win2003 yet?

Got a copy just itching to be installed but not sure if it would be worth it with an SLI system..

mdzcpa

02-13-2005, 01:45 PM

Well now, I wouldn't think a simple mobo swap would be so effective, but this DFI mobo is one mean mutha.

New personal bests all around:

3D05: 12,070 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=583951

3D03: 25,744 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3701354

Just gettin warmed up too. This board is allowing for some of my all time best CPU and mem clocks :banana:

eva2000

02-13-2005, 03:46 PM

can't wait to get my DFI board won't get it till Wed/Thu this week a earliest though :(

dwwalker14335

02-13-2005, 06:28 PM

mdzcpa, nice scores! You now own the list! I think we will see more improved results for anyone who acquires the DFI board. People wondered how I kept up with phase changed FX-55's, but it was that most were hamstrung by the ASUS board or low voltage on the MSI. I had a little more clock on the GPU to compensate, but since the DFI showed up, my score will probably slowly slide off the list ;) That is, unless I join the DFI/FX-55/Phase cooled group.

12K on 05 is a very nice score, indeed! eva2000 will be back for blood once he has his board on hand.

What are the mem transfer rates on that board with SiSandra? 9000+?

eva2000

02-13-2005, 09:07 PM

asking me about sandra on A8N-SLI ?

mine on A8N-SLI Deluxe

2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 BH-5 @ 250mhz 2-2-2-6 1T

http://fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/results/3500_90nm/kingston/KHX3200K2/3_17/LDT3x/11x/250-250-2226-8-12-2212-1T-1.6-3.6rail-1.67/mem-buff1.jpg

or

2x 512MB OCZ PC3700EB @ 252mhz 3-2-2-8 1T
http://fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/results/3500_90nm/OCZ/PC3700EB/2x512/LDT3x/252-252-3228-8-14-2222-1T-1.6-3.6psurail_156/mem-buff.jpg

dwwalker14335

02-13-2005, 09:14 PM

eva2000

And, I bet the DFI will do better. With the MSI, I was able to get over 8000 with a Winnie. 9000 is pretty much the norm with an OC'd FX-55 on a good board. It will be interesting to see how much the DFI helps you out on your score.

mdzcpa

Wondering what your SiSandra is, as well. With the FX-55, and some good memory, 9K should be attainable.

And, since Shamino's score is on an older build, and no longer published (he was was at 12,457), that latest effort (12,070) puts you in the number 1 spot on 3Dmark05! :toast:

Jamo

02-16-2005, 04:00 AM

05 6600GT score 7079 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=582553, took ages to get it to pass the cpu tests without locking up, i hate this motherboard :( my neo2 was much better for ocin.

my mate mick's told me you've missed him, so i just thought i'd make sure you'd seen his score, his system specs are same as mine exept he has a 3500+ newcastle and some TCCD, clocks are in link

cheers
:toast:

dwwalker14335

02-16-2005, 10:13 AM

Micketh score is added! And, a very nice 6600 GT SLI score at 7K plus!

I missed it on the image jump after the post just before his score. :confused:

Also, the link refers to a 7061 score result? I have that result posted so far, but it looks like his best is really 7079.

Micketh

02-16-2005, 02:02 PM

cheers, if this board would clock like my neo id try and get 8k but it dosent so ill have to sit here and sulk haha.

LikwidKool

02-16-2005, 02:03 PM

some 6660GT SLI scores in my siggy. Will be moving on to 6800gt's in a day or so though.

dwwalker14335

02-16-2005, 03:15 PM

LikwidKool, your scores have been updated to the list!

It will be interesting to see how the 6800 GT's stack up.

mdzcpa

02-17-2005, 04:06 AM

I added a little cushion on the 05 score:

12,153 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=593372

eva2000

02-18-2005, 07:43 AM

well setup my DFI NF4 SLI-D with 217 bios with one of my new 3200+ 90nm 0445 VPMW cpus

2x eVGA 6800Ultra PCI-E @453/1215
DFI NF4 SLI-D 217 bios
2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 BH-5 2-2-2-6
cpu:ram divider = 9/10

3dmark2003
3200+ @ 302HTT/271mhz mem = 2719mhz
= 23,921 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3716887)

3dmark05
3200+ @ 300HTT/270mhz mem = 2700mhz
= 10,976 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=598105)

3dmark2001
3200+ @ 271HTT/271mhz mem = 2710mhz
= 31,477 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8435392)

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3200_0445_VPMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/17_3/LDT3x/9x/300-270-2226-8-14-2212-1T-1.63-3.6-1.6_16x_7x/3dmark/3dmark2003_454-1215_23921_tn.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3200_0445_VPMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/17_3/LDT3x/9x/302-271-2226-8-14-2212-1T-1.63-3.6-1.6_16x_7x/3dmark/3dmark05_453_1215_10976_tn.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3200_0445_VPMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/17_3/LDT3x/271-271-2226-8-14-2212-1T-1.632-3.6-1.6_16x_7x/3dmark/3dmark2001_455-1215_31477_tn.jpg

//mAr

02-19-2005, 02:45 AM

11,4k with 6800gt sli 453/1215
fx53 270*10 @ 2,5-3-3-5-7-16-1T
msi diamond
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=600676
maybe 2x6800 ultra -> 12k ? ;)

3dmark03 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3720252
450/1200
fx53
msi diamond

dwwalker14335

02-19-2005, 12:51 PM

Those are some nice clocks on the GT cards,//mar. And, a big improvement on the 05 score.

All scores updated!

eva2000

02-20-2005, 03:31 AM

correction i changed cpus from 3500+ @ 2.7ghz to 3200+ @ 2.7ghz :)

3 nice cpus i have

got 3500+ that does 2.755ghz
got 3200+ that does 2.717ghz
got 3200+ that does 2.700ghz

all at 1.6-1.63v

Skyline

02-22-2005, 02:10 AM

Got my Sli rig up and running.

2003 24204 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3730837)

2005 11096 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=610304)

Detail of setup in sig

dwwalker14335

02-22-2005, 07:11 AM

correction i changed cpus from 3500+ @ 2.7ghz to 3200+ @ 2.7ghz :)

3 nice cpus i have

got 3500+ that does 2.755ghz
got 3200+ that does 2.717ghz
got 3200+ that does 2.700ghz

all at 1.6-1.63v

Yes, I always forget you have so many items. I did not even look at the CPU!

dwwalker14335

02-22-2005, 07:19 AM

Got my Sli rig up and running.

2003 24204 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3730837)

2005 11096 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=610304)

Detail of setup in sig

Nice results for air cooled GPU's and a watercooled FX-55!

iMAX

02-22-2005, 10:11 AM

Leadtek 6600GT Extreme 550/1200 w/ stock cooling
DFI LP NF4 SLI-DR
3000+@460*6 w/ Dangeden TDX :p:

3D03 : 15807 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3732057)

3D05 : 7144 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=612286)

edit : update

Pesmerga

02-22-2005, 11:54 AM

AMD Athlon64 FX55 @ 200X14 , 2800Mhz
DFI LanParty UT SLI-D
GSkill TCCD 256MB X2 (2-2-2-5)
Galaxy GeForce 6800GT X2 , SLI (425/1190)

3DMark05 = 10783 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=610023)

dwwalker14335

02-22-2005, 08:37 PM

iMAX, results posted. Moves you into the first spot on the 6600 SLI list!

Pesmerga, 05 result posted. We are almost at 11K just to get on the list! Nice work.

eva2000

02-22-2005, 09:00 PM

Yes, I always forget you have so many items. I did not even look at the CPU!
hehe i'm changing back to 3500+ on DFI NF4 and putting 3200+ in MSI K8N Neo2 for some air testing before i dust off my mach2 :D

dwwalker14335

02-22-2005, 09:43 PM

hehe i'm changing back to 3500+ on DFI NF4 and putting 3200+ in MSI K8N Neo2 for some air testing before i dust off my mach2 :D

Phase cooling the CPU should open up your score quite a bit.

Let's see what the guy from down under can do in the middle of summer!

eva2000

02-22-2005, 09:57 PM

well i know 3500+ doesn't like sub zero temps but the 2x 3200+ might

H2OGun

02-22-2005, 10:17 PM

Asus 6600GT TOP @574/1197 w/ stock cooling
MSI K8N Diamond
FX-55 @285x10

3D03: 16417 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3737021)

3D05: 7258 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=615889)

EDIT: Updated scores.

iMAX

02-23-2005, 12:11 AM

iMAX, results posted. Moves you into the first spot on the 6600 SLI list!

Thank 4 all :p: . Your work is great :toast:

A64 300+ @ 2.74 GHz

i no have A64 300+ :D

dwwalker14335

02-23-2005, 08:05 AM

Thank 4 all :p: . Your work is great :toast:

i no have A64 300+ :D

I guess that would have been on killer overclock :eek:

You now have an A64 3000+.

splmann

02-23-2005, 08:44 AM

Got my Sli rig up and running.

I wait for my G.Skill Memorys .

Athlon 64 3000+ @ 2700 GHz (9x300)
DFI LanParty NF4 SLI-DR
For Test 1 Gig A-Data PC4800 3-5-5-10 300@3,1V
My Memory at the moment Kingston HyperX KHX-3700
3-4-3-9 260@3,1V
2x Asus 6600GT SLI @570/1140
Tagan 480

3dMark 2003 15980 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3711831)

3d Mark 2005 6700 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=583773)

dwwalker14335

02-23-2005, 08:32 PM

splmann, results posted.

Nice 03 run!

All scores updated!

And, it looks like H2Ogun moves into the no 1 XS spot for 6600 SLI!

Looks like #6 on the ORB for 05 and 03. Nice work!

H2OGun

02-23-2005, 08:49 PM

Dave, will you be kind enough to update the list please? Post #167 above. I've just updated my score for 6600GT SLI. Thanks.

dwwalker14335

02-23-2005, 09:02 PM

Dave, will you be kind enough to update the list please? Post #167 above. I've just updated my score for 6600GT SLI. Thanks.

Looks like you caught me in the middle of my update! Score posted!

H2OGun

02-23-2005, 09:09 PM

Looks like you caught me in the middle of my update! Score posted!

Thanks Dave. Have to downgrade to 6600GT class series since 6800Us are gone. You have an amazing pair of 6800Us. They clock very well. I've tried like 8 6800Us and none can go beyond 470/1190.

dwwalker14335

02-23-2005, 09:27 PM

I got lucky, I guess. I went through 4 cards and picked the two that were the closest match on core temp and memory auto detect. The similar core temps usually indicate similar reponse to overclocking and voltage tolerance. I actually picked the two middle cards. There was one card that idled at 41 C, two at 43C and one at 47C. They all pretty much auto detected to around 1180 on the memory with the stock HSF. Sometimes its all about luck ;)

H2OGun

02-23-2005, 09:43 PM

Wow, most of 6800Us I've tried were auto-detected at 44X/115X. The 6600GTs are different stories though. Both were auto detected at 60X/1240. Normal 6600GT is 500/1100.

dwwalker14335

02-23-2005, 10:22 PM

Now, imagine a 16 pipe card at those clocks! And, those on the way very soon ;)

iMAX

02-24-2005, 05:06 AM

@dwwalker14335 : Pls update my result. THX a lot :p:

Leadtek 6600GT-Extreme@576/1215, A64 3000+@304*9
3D05 : 7429 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=616668)

Leadtek 6600GT-Extreme@552/1205, A64 3000+@304*9
3D03 : 16030 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3737879)

H2OGun

02-24-2005, 08:11 AM

Imax, nice scores m8. I had to give my 6600GTs quite a bit of exercise to overtake yours.

Asus 6600GT TOP @588/1238 w/ stock cooling
MSI K8N Diamond
FX-55 @285x10

Updated 3D05: 7558 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=617092)

Updated 3D03: 16963 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3738414)

iMAX

02-24-2005, 09:19 AM

H2OGun, your scores is very very nice :toast: .

Maybe I need water cooling, Leadtek 6600GT is very hot, fl 83C :(

dwwalker14335

02-24-2005, 12:01 PM

All scores updated.

Very nice scores, H2OGun. On the Futuremark ORB, that's #3 overall on 05 and #2 overall on 03 for 6600 GT !

H2OGun

02-24-2005, 06:32 PM

Thanks. I didn't realize that and was happy for a while thinking #1 was within reach - until I found out who were ahead of me. There is no way I can pass Shamino with his crazy clocking 6600GTs. OMG, he is still with 66.93 drivers. He can pull away easily just by switching to newer drivers. :slobber:

dwwalker14335

02-24-2005, 06:55 PM

Well, you still did very well considering you are up against the big guns and phase cooled systems.

SIK_L_CELL

02-24-2005, 11:55 PM

Both Futuremark approved runs.

3DMark 05 - 11201 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=619054)

3DMark 03 - 24781 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3740630)

dwwalker14335

02-25-2005, 08:43 AM

Hey, SIK. I thought you had moved away from SLI? Looks like you have some more clocking on the GPU's!

Sweet runs. That puts you in number 2 spot on the ORB for WHQL FM Approved for 05, and now you are number 4 on the ORB Hall of Fame (for 03). Nice!

SIK_L_CELL

02-25-2005, 08:54 AM

These are cards I am modding for someone. Thanks. :banana:

SIK_L_CELL

02-25-2005, 02:13 PM

eva2000

02-25-2005, 02:16 PM

easy you're using 66.93 drivers try 71.24 (my favs)

SIK_L_CELL

02-25-2005, 02:18 PM

easy you're using 66.93 drivers try 71.24 (my favs)

I meant on the ORB with FM approved drivers, I get insane scores with the 71's. Thanks man.

dwwalker14335

02-25-2005, 02:31 PM

HeavyH2O - I cant see how at the same card clocks and 600mhz more on the Cpu, I cant take you. Gettin closer though. I just cant get the hang of these Nvidias.

3DMark 03 - 24840 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3741365)

Well, 10 MHz on the core (496) and, I ran it at 302 FSB. Also, the 1.3 LOD adjustment via coolbits (maximum performance) and you missed one item. That onboard audio is a resource hog. You may have left 400-500 points on the table by keeping that on.

//mAr

02-25-2005, 02:49 PM

http://mar.h0sted.org/11k85.jpg (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=620825)
2x6800gt, msi diamond, TWINMOS, fx53 twister... all watercooled.

SIK_L_CELL

02-25-2005, 04:24 PM

Well, 10 MHz on the core (496) and, I ran it at 302 FSB. Also, the 1.3 LOD adjustment via coolbits (maximum performance) and you missed one item. That onboard audio is a resource hog. You may have left 400-500 points on the table by keeping that on.

Thank you Sir!

dwwalker14335

02-25-2005, 07:13 PM

http://mar.h0sted.org/11k85.jpg (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=620825)
2x6800gt, msi diamond, TWINMOS, fx53 twister... all watercooled.

Wow, those new drivers really make a difference! Too bad I am stuck here with no video cards at the moment to try them out.

Nice run!

mdzcpa

02-25-2005, 10:03 PM

charlie

02-26-2005, 01:48 AM

I grabbed a #10 overall in '05 with a 11,208.... still haven't tweaked o/s or downloaded rivatuner, though.... and at 455/1135.
Will pull out all the stops and see what she's got tommorrow!

C

dwwalker14335

02-26-2005, 08:30 AM

Here are my final WHQL runs:

3D 05: 11,843 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=622172)
3D 03: 25,976 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3743771)

Both are good for #2 in both 03 and 05 Default. Not enough to catch 1st though. But close:)

Going to the 75.90s for non WHQL now!

Wow, some very nice results, indeed! :slobber:

Looks like Team CPU City bumped up to first with 27,076 on 03 FM Approved WHQL.

I want to see what those new drivers can do. I would think you would gain around 300-400 points. But, we will know soon ;)

And, SIK, these are the results to gun for. Same mobo and card, similar clocks. He easily eclipsed my results.

L@TrO

02-27-2005, 01:28 PM

Here are my dual msi 6800TD(non ultra) scores:
->3Dmark 2005 : 10024 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=628217)
->3dmark 2003 : 20280 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3742346)

specs:
a64 3000+winny CCBID egpw
dfi nforce4 sli
2*512mb gskill La
2*msi 6800Td

dwwalker14335

02-27-2005, 02:07 PM

Nice results for the regular 6800 cards.

charlie

02-27-2005, 07:42 PM

11,393
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=625033

24,156
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3749912

dwwalker14335

02-27-2005, 08:11 PM

charlie, results posted!

What is your processor? I see you have the Winnie listed, but which one?

charlie

02-27-2005, 10:40 PM

charlie, results posted!

What is your processor? I see you have the Winnie listed, but which one?

It's a sweetheart 3000+ that runs up to 310 3D stable (2790mHz) at 24C ambient....

dwwalker14335

02-28-2005, 02:06 PM

Some of those Winnie cores are very nice. Mine has been stable to around 2.75 GHz using 305 FSB on the RAM. Not bad for a 3200+. Looks like all the Winnies have similar potential. Some go a little higher, most go a little lower.

BTW, charlie, some very nice scores this side of an FX-55!

oomen

02-28-2005, 02:25 PM

2003 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3717697
2005 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=598660

dwwalker14335

02-28-2005, 08:06 PM

2003 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3717697
2005 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=598660

I am assuming an A64 3200+ ?? I will change the list if I was wrong.

Results posted!

dwwalker14335

03-11-2005, 11:07 AM

Wow, no updates on any SLI system scores?

Seems all the interest is still on the x850 XT PE's with the super clocks. ;)

mdzcpa

03-11-2005, 11:58 AM

Actually I'm in the process of getting my chiller working again to put some better cooling on my Ultras. I have not retired from this SLI thing just yet:D

neoman

03-11-2005, 12:13 PM

Looking otherguys SLI setups with 6800 and Vapochill gets me like omg :P where the hell are u guys taking this money ?

Vapo + 2 x 6800 Ultra costs 2299 Euros :O
I know that in U.S.A prices of PC hardware are very low comparing with europe countries
but this low ? Can u guys in USA can buy like every month a new video and still get food to eat ? ;P

isp

03-11-2005, 12:31 PM

I'm told as you get older you'll have more descretionary income... eg, spending copious ammounts of cabbage on gear...atleast I hope that's how it works

dwwalker14335

03-11-2005, 08:07 PM

Actually I'm in the process of getting my chiller working again to put some better cooling on my Ultras. I have not retired from this SLI thing just yet:D

Good to hear!

I wonder what the average age of the dual Ultra SLI owner is, these days :D

nutcase

03-11-2005, 08:12 PM

I will start benching again when I get 1 new Video card.. killed one of my cards :eek:

as for age, I am probably on the older side :D

eva2000

03-11-2005, 08:40 PM

Wow, no updates on any SLI system scores?

Seems all the interest is still on the x850 XT PE's with the super clocks. ;)
nah fiddling with different ram on DFI NF4 right now and testing a new cpu on MSI K8N Neo2 how's 3500+ newcastle @ 2866mhz at 1.65v http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=755092#post755092

I'll be back (SLI) :D

dnavarro

03-12-2005, 12:48 AM

Hey guys, I have a newly updated 2005 score. Using WHQL 71.84:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=667211 = 10978

I think that might put me back on the list :)

I like this new NVIDIA Driver...for benching at least :banana:

D

wfarid

03-12-2005, 02:21 PM

wow awesome jobs guys, keep it up... and i can't stop drooling... lol

dwwalker14335

03-12-2005, 04:10 PM

Jasonhk

03-13-2005, 03:49 AM

Hi Please Update:

Slot me into my 1st Place 3DMark03 and 3DMark05 for 6600GT SLI'ed :banana4:

7776 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=671252 JasonHK, CHAINTECH 6600 GT @ 609/1248, 3200+ @ 2.64 GHz
17,252 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3795246 JasonHK, CHAINTECH 6600 GT @ 609/1248, 3200+ @ 2.64 GHz

Confirm scores here:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=55967

Thanks,

H2OGun

03-13-2005, 05:07 AM

Updated scores
6600GT SLI @612/1305 MHz
FX-55 @2900MHz

3D05 - 8243 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=671777)

3D03 - 17701 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3795722)

dwwalker14335

03-13-2005, 11:22 AM

Nice scores, Jasonhk, but it looks like H20Gun posted the #1 scores right after you!

Results Posted!

Jasonhk

03-13-2005, 11:56 AM

Jasonhk

03-13-2005, 11:59 AM

What are those reserve scores? H2OGUN? Please just publish them...is you have them...

C_X

03-13-2005, 02:14 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=670390

with sli 6800gt xfx and zalman vf700cu

dwwalker14335

03-13-2005, 08:44 PM

Yea he did

But i've improved :)

Chaintech 6600GT SLI @ 609/1300Mhz :bigsmile:

3DMark05: 8090 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=672457)
Soz, didn't take a screen shot of the 8090, only got a 8086 one...
http://jasonhk.za.net/records/8086.JPG

3DMark03: 17608 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3796543)

http://jasonhk.za.net/records/17608.JPG

Only 93 points away from 1st :clap: And my nature beats his, so my Graphics is stronger, just my cpu @ 2.64Ghz and his @ 2.9Ghz.

Put me 2nd place for both, :bigsmile: , Almost 1st in 03...shees, this 3200+ is doing well :clap:

Aquamark3: 91325 (http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=1629108029)

Puts me 3rd if you look at each user, as some users posted 2 or 3 times,

On 03, I have noticed that nature seems stronger on the A64 versus the FX-55, clock for clock. A little slower on the first test, however. The extra half meg of cache helps and hurts, it appears. But, even if a little slower clock for clock, the FX-55 ultimately has the edge with a little more horsepower. It really makes a difference in AM3. You could probably break 100K on that set up with an FX.

Very nice runs, JasonHK, this side of the FX.

And, C_X, nice scores for the GT. I wonder how much better the Ultras will run!

H2OGun

03-13-2005, 10:13 PM

What are those reserve scores? H2OGUN? Please just publish them...is you have them...

Well, believe it or not, I do have them and will publish them when needed... :D

Somone mentioned before in another thread that it's not wise to show all your cards beforehand :cool:

C_X

03-14-2005, 05:41 AM

On 03, I have noticed that nature seems stronger on the A64 versus the FX-55, clock for clock. A little slower on the first test, however. The extra half meg of cache helps and hurts, it appears. But, even if a little slower clock for clock, the FX-55 ultimately has the edge with a little more horsepower. It really makes a difference in AM3. You could probably break 100K on that set up with an FX.

Very nice runs, JasonHK, this side of the FX.

And, C_X, nice scores for the GT. I wonder how much better the Ultras will run!

Thanks but i think i can do a little better than that. I hope i can get to the 11K with a better cpu. (mine is a cbbid 3500+ max = 2400) and my 3d cards are still running on stock voltages.

Arnar

03-14-2005, 01:51 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3800695

24189

FX-55 @ 260x12, RAM with 9/10 divider so it is 234mhz 2-2-2-6
CPU cooled with Vapochill LS

2x BFG 6800 Ultra cooled with asetek waterchill, except Im using H20 block which he is selling here and the card was clocked at 466mhz/1210mhz

The driver wont allow me to go higher!

I think I should be getting a higher score, any ideas?

dwwalker14335

03-14-2005, 09:45 PM

Result posted!

As for the clocking, get the card as close to 25C as possible under load. That is where the peak clocks occur.

eva2000

03-14-2005, 11:17 PM

Result posted!

As for the clocking, get the card as close to 25C as possible under load. That is where the peak clocks occur.
maybe with winter coming to OZ can get ambient room temps under 26C lol but card sigh

SPQQKY

03-15-2005, 03:00 AM

6600GT SLI
14,940 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3798386)

6301 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=672153)

Arnar

03-15-2005, 04:36 AM

Result posted!

As for the clocking, get the card as close to 25C as possible under load. That is where the peak clocks occur.

So 450/1200 @ 25°c is faster than 450/1200 @ 50°c?

I'll just get some icecubes to cool the rad ;)

C_X

03-15-2005, 09:40 AM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=678845

i think this is a nice score for a rookie

dwwalker14335

03-15-2005, 12:21 PM

So 450/1200 @ 25°c is faster than 450/1200 @ 50°c?

I'll just get some icecubes to cool the rad ;)

Actually, at 42C load, my cards clock at around 470/1260. Then, with load at 25C, I can hit around 500/1280 or so. The ambient temp of the chilled water is about 12C.

Arnar

03-15-2005, 03:20 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=679556

11357

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3803755

24952 3DMarks

charlie

03-15-2005, 03:22 PM

Arnar,
GREAT scores....

You smoked me in '03... that 500mHz CPU lead over me and that GT1 just kills my 24.1k......

I've still got you in '05, probably from WinXP/Rivatuner tweaks....

Arnar

03-15-2005, 03:40 PM

I dont have any tweaks, just overclock core and mem with Rivatuner

Maybe you could teach me some? ;)

Thanks for the compliment, coming from you.. its great ;)

charlie

03-15-2005, 04:12 PM

Arnar,
Well... just a few of the obvious ones...set bench to "realtime" and set LOD BIAS to "3". That alone will let you take out my '05 score :D
And polish up your XP a bit... set theme to "classic" and "best performance", remove wallpaper and set to 16b color....

C

Torin

03-15-2005, 04:15 PM

charlie, the SLI link for 05 in your sig needs 1 less set of "http://".

mdzcpa

03-15-2005, 04:26 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=679556

11357

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3803755

24952 3DMarks

Nice scores!

C_X

03-15-2005, 05:56 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=680204

3d mark 2005: 10786

so, i'm at my max here, everything on air no volt mods etc...

and my cpu wont go any farther.

charlie

03-15-2005, 06:15 PM

charlie, the SLI link for 05 in your sig needs 1 less set of "http://".

thanks torin... fixed.

eva2000

03-15-2005, 07:03 PM

11,393
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=625033

24,156
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3749912

interesting 3d2k3 your card clocks and cpu are about the same 23,921 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3716887

i don't use LOD tweaks so is that the difference right there ?

charlie

03-15-2005, 07:10 PM

interesting 3d2k3 your card clocks and cpu are about the same 23,921 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3716887

i don't use LOD tweaks so is that the difference right there ?

yeah, probably. I used LOD3 and something else in Rivatuner, just can't remember what... I'm not much into Nvidia drivers and tweaks...

C

charlie

03-15-2005, 07:12 PM

EVA2000,
THat's weird... you KILL my GT1... hmmm maybe the tight timings???
Strange.... I need to try some UTT!

dwwalker14335

03-15-2005, 07:14 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=679556

11357

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3803755

24952 3DMarks

Nice scores!

Results posted.

Arnar, you destroy my GT1 results. I wish I had an FX, right now. FX does a better job on the first test than the plain A64 (CPU intensive test). But, on latter tests, higher video clocks make up a bit of ground, since they are more video intensive. I think the higher clock and bigger cache of the FX definitely helps the first test.

EVA2000, what was your FSB on 03? I could look at the result, but the FSB on that is usually inaccurate. I ran most of mine around 302-305 FSB with 2.5-3-4-9 timings. I wonder if tighter timings are better than higher bandwidth on some tests. Your GT1 is better than mine. I guess it could also be that I push my cards a little past prime, since the other three tests more than make up for the loss on the first test.

dwwalker14335

03-15-2005, 07:19 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=680204

3d mark 2005: 10786

so, i'm at my max here, everything on air no volt mods etc...

and my cpu wont go any farther.

Great score. Anything approaching 11K is a very respectable score. And, that's with GT's and your CPU at 2.4 GHz. Not bad at all!

eva2000

03-15-2005, 10:21 PM

EVA2000,
THat's weird... you KILL my GT1... hmmm maybe the tight timings???
Strange.... I need to try some UTT!

yeah probably ram timings

EVA2000, what was your FSB on 03? I could look at the result, but the FSB on that is usually inaccurate. I ran most of mine around 302-305 FSB with 2.5-3-4-9 timings. I wonder if tighter timings are better than higher bandwidth on some tests. Your GT1 is better than mine. I guess it could also be that I push my cards a little past prime, since the other three tests more than make up for the loss on the first test.
all my settings/fsb are in compare url descriptions ;) you folks should do the same just save base description in txt file and copy and past after submission :D

23,921
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3716887

3200+ 90nm @9x300 = 2701mhz - 2x eVGA 6800U stock @454/1215 - 2x256MB Kingston KHX3200K2/512 BH-5@270mhz 2-2-2-6 8-14-2212 1T - DFI NF4 SLI-D 217 bios - 580W Topower 686P6 35A/12V (eva2000)

C_X

03-16-2005, 11:16 AM

Great score. Anything approaching 11K is a very respectable score. And, that's with GT's and your CPU at 2.4 GHz. Not bad at all!

Thank u, but i orderd a fx55 and i hope i finaly can get to the 11K

C_X

03-18-2005, 06:34 AM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=687427

finaly i have the 11K and i am finaly at the top 10 here, what an honor :D

dwwalker14335

03-18-2005, 12:34 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=687427

finaly i have the 11K and i am finaly at the top 10 here, what an honor :D

Nice work!

And, with that score, we now officially have 11K as the entry point to the top 10 list.

charlie

03-18-2005, 01:39 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=687427

finaly i have the 11K and i am finaly at the top 10 here, what an honor :D

don't forget your XtremeSystems.Org 3Dteam TAG!!!!!

C

C_X

03-18-2005, 02:19 PM

tag added

is it good like that?

charlie

03-18-2005, 06:24 PM

tag added

is it good like that?

Looks beautiful... nice big score, too.

C