Want a CPUZ Screenshot Verified?? Post it here...

[Kunaak]

ok, I want to start this post to help weed out fake, or questionable overclocking scores.
this is a small way we can do this.

if you see a Questionable OC, then just post it here.
But the CPUZ Checksum Numbers must be clear and visible.
there is no way around this, and can be assumed that a cheater will try to hide the numbers on purpose or say "I didn't know about the numbers"

so, 2 things.
Must be a screen shot, don't just list the numbers, wanna be able to clearly see the numbers myself, to help either me, or any other mod willing to do some checking, or so more scrupulous members can try to weed out photo-doctord screen shots.

I will check this post ever few days, or as often as possible.
so be patient.
checking a screen shot should only take a minute or two to post the results.

so, if you see a screenshot that you think is "iffy", and want it checked, post it here, and I, or another mod will do our best to check it.
just please, don't bombard me with 50 screenshots to check at once :D

here is a example of the numbers I need to see, and what a checked and verified screen shot will look like.

PS to everyone.

I don't want to have to post a confirmation shot of every posted screen shot, as thats just wasting space, and alot of my time.
if it's really important to have a confirmation shot, please let me know.
otherwise I won't be posting one for every shot I come across.

By the way, this isn't a Item you can download, and isn't freely available, and no I can't send you a copy, or let you download it from me or anything else, so don't PM me asking me where to get it, or whine to me that it "sucks", that I won't give you a copy.
I've had one Person PM me already, about about 10 people in the last month all asking me for it... the answer is always no.
not cause I am trying to be mean, thats just the rules.
The Author didn't make this a public item for many reasons.
to keep someone from writing a fake program, to keep CPUZ as reliable as possible, and things like that...

[bh2k]

For suicide shots sometimes the number can be read a bit off in this example of my 3.0C @ 4.1 on water cooling

http://www.brainwashstudios.com/steve/41ghz.jpg

[Kunaak]

yes, CPUZ can be off by 1-2 mhz in some cases.
CPUZ updates itself in real time, so if you press print screen, as its changing the code, then the numbers can be alittle off and make the MHZ off by a tiny margin, but this is fine.
anything more then 3-4 mhz to me is kinda odd, cause I never seen it happen yet, and I been checking these for the last few months.
a 1-2 mhz offset isn't unusual, but anymore then that is.
10 mhz or more off, and to me somethings wrong.

your screenshot here, is well within the margin of error, so it passes I say ;)

[bias_hjorth]

This is an awesome service. :toast:

Could you please check the following shot:
http://www.oc-central.dk/tobias/3150.gif

[Kunaak]

Spot on Perfect.

3150 on the dot.
nice OC ;)

PS to everyone.

I don't want to have to post a confirmation shot of every posted screen shot, as thats just wasting space, and alot of my time.
if it's really important to have a confirmation shot, please let me know.
otherwise I won't be posting one for every shot I come across.

[LoudHoward]

He can't because its missing the numbers at the bottom :(

Pretty interesting about the numbers, good to know you can at least identify the cheaters.

[bias_hjorth]

Thank you kunaak :D ;)


loudhoward: I am sorry but I dont follow you?

[trans am]

Can't you just take a legitimate screenie from someone else? or another forum and post it as yours? I'm guessing that's what most cheaters would do. My guess is cheaters wouldn't even take the time or have the knowledge to use photoshop, when they could simply post someone else's screenie.

[$0m#0n#]

Check this 1 pls

[Mrki]

Mine pls too... THX :D

http://mitglied.lycos.de/siedl/10x300_OCZ_CPU-Z.jpg

[Kanati]

I don't think everyone needs to be checked, the purpose here I think is to weed out questionable results that are used for world record attempts or extreme benching. People wanting their 3 gig A64's and 4 gig P4's checked probably are legit anyway. Its the 4+ gig A64's and 6+ gig P4's that might be called into question.

[Kunaak]

egal, yours checks out perfectly- 3950.

Mrki, yours checks out perfectly too, 3000 mhz on the dot.

[Fried_Spam]

My guess is that if you are willing to post your own screenie then you are most likely not cheating. Like Kanati stated, this should be used for those times when some jacka.. states that he has his A64 running 3.2ghz on stock voltage and air cooling or other really far-fetched crap.

[black rose]

How is the number relavent to the clockspeed?

[Kanati]

How is the number relavent to the clockspeed?

Thats the secret. :rolleyes:

[pr0di9y]

http://www.lowyat.net/uploads/pr0di9y/K8N/260x10SuperPI.jpg

Mind checking this Kunaak?

Thanks a Million.

Cheers

[Kunaak]

passes perfectly, 2600 mhz on the dot.

what is that little CPU clock program?

[pr0di9y]

Got it from CPUID, I use it every time I overclock my processor. It seems that the CPU-Z at times loads a tad slower. I guess not enough cooling for the proc... This bench was with DIY water cooling setup with the reservoir clough up with blocks of ice... This 3500+ of mine aren't responding to anymore voltages. Looking forward for some phase changing cooling on it :)

[Jupiler]

Kunaak,
I'll give you a hand, if needed.

[Kunaak]

Jupiler,

sure, if you see a person wanting thier shot checked, go ahead ;)
I can always use alittle help.

[ReKcAh]

Hey guys,this is with my older 3.0c MO chip,tell me if its true or false :p:


http://www.overclocking-madness.com/images/307FSB.jpg

[Kunaak]

true ;)

4608 P4 is what I got from the checker.

[ReKcAh]

Dude that was the fastest reply i ever had :D Thanks its is true :)

[berkut]

http://www.teampuss.com/berkut/415ghz.jpg

[Kunaak]

Intel Pentium 4 4156 is what I get.

Nice OC there :D

[berkut]

If the cpu wasnt so stubborn (about the fsb) there would be much more.

Cooled by a CO2 cascade @ -75C

[Kunaak]

Both pass on the dot. :D

[Kunaak]

yeah I kinda figured you'd want the screen shots for OC's like that, haha...

[aonic]

Kunaak, do you know where I can get the whitepaper on the numbers? I want to make a php script to check them :p
Sorry, if they are secret :D

[Crankster]

They are, for obviouse resons.

[Kunaak]

Kunaak, do you know where I can get the whitepaper on the numbers? I want to make a php script to check them :p
Sorry, if they are secret :D

can't give you any numbers, white papers, or anything else concerning the CPUZ checker.

it's not meant to be available to people other then a few people the Author lets use it, for many reasons...

mainly to keep someone from writing a fake Checksum program.
as far as I know, only a few of us mods from XS have it. then the author of CPUZ himself.
but don't bug him for it, cause thats a dead end too.

[mdzcpa]

Here's a screeny of a FX 55 I've been hassled about on other forums. I'd like a little back up here please.

[Kunaak]

AMD 64 FX 3315.

right on the dot. :)

[cpulloverclock]

sticky?

[Gokou]

er why are people checking if their OWN overclocks are true or false?

pointless++?

[cpulloverclock]

a 2500+ at 3653MHz please
with a 2 stage


longhorn??
http://www.pcinpact.com/images/bd/news/13068.jpg

[Jupiler]

a 2500+ at 3653MHz please
with a 2 stage

longhorn??


Both numbers give an Athlon XP at 2165 and 2164 Mhz respectively. Strange.

[cpulloverclock]

a fake?
please, u can post a screen of cpu-z frequency checker??

for a proof

thx

[bias_hjorth]

longhorn??


Its def. not longhorn. Looks like a milk styled skin to stylexp :)

[cpulloverclock]

in a few minutes I'll have CFC by franck himself :)

[Jupiler]

Here :


http://users.skynet.be/MetalHead/checksum.jpg

[Mag Master 21]

Wow.. Our first cheat..

[cpulloverclock]

Here :


http://users.skynet.be/MetalHead/checksum.jpgthx :)

[RocKer]

Can you verify this pifast (http://users.pandora.be/RocKer/A64%203200%200426UPMW/Pifast/Pifast-2530mhz.JPG) and SuperPI (http://users.pandora.be/RocKer/A64%203200%200426UPMW/SuperPi/SuperPI-2500mhz.JPG) score please,so when its verify't ok,then i can say that my score is legit:).

He,it's not a worldclass score,but it's my score and the best i did,yet;),asoon that my dfi nf3 back is from rma we will try again and do better :banana: .

[Jupiler]

Both are OK.

Can you verify this pifast (http://users.pandora.be/RocKer/A64%203200%200426UPMW/Pifast/Pifast-2530mhz.JPG) and SuperPI (http://users.pandora.be/RocKer/A64%203200%200426UPMW/SuperPi/SuperPI-2500mhz.JPG) score please,so when its verify't ok,then i can say that my score is legit:).

He,it's not a worldclass score,but it's my score and the best i did,yet;),asoon that my dfi nf3 back is from rma we will try again and do better :banana: .

[bachus_anonym]

Kunaak or Jupiler,

can you guys take a look and verify this screenie from SuperPi Challenge on my native forum? here it is:

thanx a lot,

[Jupiler]

No problem.
CPU checksum is not valid, unknown cpu.

[bachus_anonym]

Thanx a lot Jupiler.... can you please put that CPU Freq Checker on top of the screenie.... i want this guy to get busted.... he's one position above me in the SuperPi Challenge.... plizzzzzz ???

[Jupiler]

Here you go :

[bachus_anonym]

thanx a zillion, man :thumbsup:

[bachus_anonym]

Jupiler, one more please... not sure about that, it might be genuine.... thanx!

[berkut]

ladnie to tak nie wierzyc kolegom ? ;>

[bachus_anonym]

ladnie to tak nie wierzyc kolegom ? ;>

czolem Berkut.... it's for a good cause ;) one cheater is busted already and there's more work to be done :)

[Jupiler]

Doesn't match either.

[bachus_anonym]

OMFG.... one thing please.... before i do so much noise on my other forum, can you verify my screenie from this Challenge, please

EDIT: and the one that my buddy submitted - partner in crime :)

thanx a lot, Jupiler for your time and kindness :toast:

[Firefoxx]

Long time ago

http://www.de.tomshardware.com/cpu/20031230/images/5255mhz.gif

Is it possible? No CPUz ID?

[OPPAINTER]

Could you check this one for me?
I'm not to sure about this guy ;)

OPP

[Crankster]

OPP, isn't that FUGGERS? :D

[OPPAINTER]

OPP, isn't that FUGGERS? :D
Well if it comes up as a cheat we'll say no:D

OPP

[G H Z]

a 2500+ at 3653MHz please
with a 2 stage

longhorn??


That looks like a Mac/Linux OS. Is the checker valid across any platform?

[CTKP]

That looks like a Mac/Linux OS. Is the checker valid across any platform?
Its just a mac skin for XP, it doesnt change any system files(well other than the skins) so cpu-z should not be changed in any way. And you cant run OSX on anything than MAC hardware ;)

[bachus_anonym]

OPP, isn't that FUGGERS? :D

yes, it is FUGGER's.... trust nobody, eh OPP :D

[Karnivore]

Could you check this one for me?
I'm not to sure about this guy ;)

OPP


LOL
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19625

[OPPAINTER]

OPP, isn't that FUGGERS? :D
Yes, now I can say it was FUGGERS:D
:toast:

OPP

[bias_hjorth]

sticky no?

[bachus_anonym]

Karnivore, please can u check my latest screenies, plizzzz.... matter of life or death.... :D

EDIT: i vote for STICKY, too...

[Karnivore]

Karnivore, please can u check my latest screenies, plizzzz.... matter of life or death.... :D

EDIT: i vote for STICKY, too...

The Yoto Screenie appears to not be showing the Checksum, but here is yours.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19626

[bachus_anonym]

thanx a lot....
damn it, i missed that one about Yotomeczek... :(
anyway, great thread and thank you very much for your help, Karnivore....

[agenda2005]

Can you please help me check this guy too?

[mdzcpa]

er why are people checking if their OWN overclocks are true or false?

pointless++?

Nope, not pointless at all for me. If anyone questions my overclock I just point them to this thread.

[Jupiler]

This one looks OK.

Can you please help me check this guy too?

[cpulloverclock]

:slobber:

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30Ghz.JPG

[cold_ice]

I'd be very pleased if you can check this two:
http://img55.exs.cx/img55/1853/5222.png

http://img92.exs.cx/img92/2983/5101.jpg

thx

[quintus]

:slobber:

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/30Ghz.JPG

:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :owned:

At first i waz thinking is real! but there were to many numbers there...
:banana4: :banana4: wil that be next year? :rotf: :owned:

[Karnivore]

Cold_Ice


http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19645&stc=1

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19646&stc=1

[cold_ice]

thx

[meke]

may you want to check the decreased multiplier.

I am curious because the cpuZ is switching from x14 to x18 on the fly like Fugger told us before.

this shot was taken on a x14 moment.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v217/meke_oocay/asusp5p800/fsb257defVcore.jpg

[cpulloverclock]

may you want to check the decreased multiplier.

I am curious because the cpuZ is switching from x14 to x18 on the fly like Fugger told us before.

this shot was taken on a x14 moment.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v217/meke_oocay/asusp5p800/fsb257defVcore.jpg
not a fake

I tested

[meke]

thx

[cpulloverclock]

Kunaak> I got CFC by Franck

[Kunaak]

Note to People who keep Messaging me, asking me for the CPUZ Checker.

stop messaging me.
I can't give it to you.
its not mine to give.
no reason you have can allow me to give it to you.
it's just not mine to give.

so please, stop PM'ing me for it...

I got 4 today alone.
I am getting tired of telling the same story over and over, when it's already in my first post... :(

[petervandamned]

Respect the author wishes i think :)

http://www.tweakers.net/ext/f/45570/full.jpg
could you do my score plz :) thnkz
842106231

[Jupiler]

Your's ok too, Peter.
Nice oc, BTW.

[petervandamned]

thnkz :)

[confuzzedintel]

i got one. can you check it please.

[Karnivore]

i got one. can you check it please.

here you go.

[Det0x]

Can u check my newcastle on air plz ?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v231/Fosco/Det0x_pc.jpg

[Kunaak]

both verified

[perkam]

I am getting tired of telling the same story over and over, when it's already in my first post...

I guess the CPU Verify Ability is both a gift and a curse huh Kunaak ;)

Perkam

[Kunaak]

not not really.
haven't recieved a single PM about it since I posted it for the second time that I can't give it to you, no matter what the situation is...

[Tek]

Kunaak, could please confirm the CL1.5 0 0 0 7 0 timings on these RAM. Thanks, for your time and this service :)

[cpulloverclock]

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/2410.JPG

[Tek]

Uhm, the RAM timings are what matter, as I wrote. I have no need to confirm my 2.4ghz A64 can run 2.41ghz or haven't you acquired the RAM part of the checksum reader? ;)

[cpulloverclock]

Uhm, the RAM timings are what matter, as I wrote. I have no need to confirm my 2.4ghz A64 can run 2.41ghz or haven't you acquired the RAM part of the checksum reader? ;)
no :(

[cpulloverclock]

I'd like to know what this CPU's real clock is.
Its prolly a fake one anyway, 4 GHz Athlon XP :slobber:
checked and 4104MHz is ok

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/Informatique/4104.JPG

[Firefoxx]

I believe it's just a cpuz bug showing this massive FSB and this Vcore can't be real...

[Karnivore]

I believe it's just a cpuz bug showing this massive FSB and this Vcore can't be real...

Agreed, CPUZCheck does not confirm the clocks of the processor, itt only confirms the numbers displayed by CPUZ match the checksum. You can still manipulate CPUZ to not read properly, and the 4ghz AXP is about as fake as I think I've seen..

[Umek]

I'd like to know what this CPU's real clock is.
Its prolly a fake one anyway, 4 GHz Athlon XP :slobber:

Jajajajajaaj a palomino 0.18m
:D :banana4:

[Tek]

Yeah, that is true about CPU-Z. I have seen my 3700+ show 1.5ghz HTT clock, making the final clock 18ghz :D

It usually happens under heavy load, like running M32 and SiS at the same time.

If I had been quick with a capture, I am sure the CPU-Z checksum would have "confirmed" the 18ghz :)

[Pejsen]

Anyway to check if the memory speed is for real?

I need to tjek some dude claming he's running @ ras-2-cas = 0 :S

[Tek]

Anyway to check if the memory speed is for real?

I need to tjek some dude claming he's running @ ras-2-cas = 0 :S

Probably "dudedess" if it is my girlfriend on tweak.dk (Heidi aka Sadako Yamamura), you are refering to. I posted the CL1.5 0 0 0 7 0 133mhz screenshot with the checksum, so I can confirm if they are truely running at these timings :)

AMD Tweaker says they do run at these speeds. If the reserved values aren't effective, then wth are the timings then?

I hope we clear this once and for all. Don't let her get to you, if she is the "dude" you're refering to :)

[iljs]

2.4 on water : |

[Kunaak]

There is a way to fake screenshots, and have it look verified.

as soon as the next version of CPUZ is out, I won't validate any version of CPUZ lower then 1.26 or 1.25.1 Beta, without Mips shots to accompany it.

there was a cheated post here about a week ago, and it since looks like the person who found the cheat didn't keep his word and went around blabbing about it, cause there are obviouse fakes popping up, looking like verified OC's.

they want me or other people to verify thier fake CPUZ shots.
When the cheat is fixed...

I personally won't validate any version of CPUZ lower then 1.26 anymore.

[bias_hjorth]

Sounds good. Very good actually. When is 1.26 going to be released?

[Kunaak]

I really don't know when 1.26 will be out.
I been bugging the guy too much lately, at the moment, I think it would be better to leave him alone to do his thing, then constantly bug him about the details.
he's heard enough from me about the CPU-Z exploit.

I don't think it will be too long though, we are still using 1.25.1 beta, and I haven't had a problem with it yet. so soon I hope.

[eshbach]

does this check out or is it fake?

http://img120.exs.cx/img120/2746/32g.png

[aCidbAbY]

fake^^^^^

[cpulloverclock]

the checker gives 3263MHz but a fake is a possibility

[CodeRed]

AMD Tweaker says they do run at these speeds. If the reserved values aren't effective, then wth are the timings then?


Tras = 5 is the minimum the mem controller will do. You can set it lower but it doesnt have any effect despite what some people may think ;)

[alz85]

http://img118.exs.cx/img118/5662/nieuwesuperpiresultz.jpg

Are the numbers on the RAM screen enough to check the CPU speed ?

[Umek]

http://img118.exs.cx/img118/5662/nieuwesuperpiresultz.jpg

Are the numbers on the RAM screen enough to check the CPU speed ?

Fake :p:

Now i :toast:

http://img110.exs.cx/img110/4553/264x10.jpg

[Karnivore]

http://img118.exs.cx/img118/5662/nieuwesuperpiresultz.jpg

Are the numbers on the RAM screen enough to check the CPU speed ?

me thinks a bit of photchopping going on there.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=20118

[charlie]

.....and not even "GOOD" photo-chopping, at that!

[Dani]

Check this out, my new CPU :stick:

http://koti.mbnet.fi/dani69/DFI%20nForce3%20250GB/A64%203200+%20130nm@3265MHz%20fake.gif

yes, it's fake, when I use Prime95 it's just jumps over 3GHz :D

[Kunaak]

theres no way I can verify a screen shot, with CPUZ anymore.
theres a few very huge cheats on the net at the moment, that could easily post screenies like these.

only things I found that aren't vulnerable to cheating programs, from alot of my testing, is
Hexus Pifast,
3dmark2001se,
CPUMark2
Clockgen,
and Windows>Properties.

Programs that are extremely Susceptable to cheating with the recent programs I have been notified about are...

sisoft sandra.
3dmark2003 and 2005.
PCmark2004.
Aquamark 3.
Super Pi.
CPUZ.
WCPUID.
Crystal CPUID.

I am not able to verify CPUZ shots, and call them accurate until various things change.
all I can say is that each one of these shots do appear valid, atleast to CPUZ.

but without, clockgen shots, 3dmark2001se, hexus pi fast or CPUMark2 (not CPUMark99)

theres no way I can verify these OC's.
not calling them fakes, just saying...
a recent cheat program, just made everything very "questionable" lately

I am on the case, Emailed Futuremark and suggest how they can fix these problems with thier new patch. thier reply was "we will look into it" and nothing else.
no reply from the people of Sisoft sandra.
Aquamark forums seem to be offline for me... can't email them.
still searching for ways to verify Overclocks, that the cheat program, can't fake.

at the moment...
only Hexus Pifast,
3dmark2001se,
CPUMark2
Clockgen,
and Windows>Properties.

can be atleast highly reliable at this point.
CPUZ should not be considerd solid proof of a OC-even when verified

I can produce mips shots to match any ghz, from 1mhz to 100 ghz.
I can mimic any bandwidth you can imagine.
I can fake a 3dmark shot of anything from 2dmark2003 and 2005 well past 100,000 points... and it all looks valid.

it is a very recent problem, that I have been working like hell to kill.
I have emailed every program maker, every person I thought would care to know, even microsoft, asking them to find a way to fix this.
but the plain fact is... a cheater has the advantage if they want to do it.

I have found a few programs are still reliable, and not susceptable to cheating programs that are popping up.
I am also working with the guys from CPUZ trying to find a way to make CPUZ ahead of the pack in the cheat busting department.
even the very latest 1.25.2a beta, is vulnerable to this new cheat.

but Clockgen, so far, isn't.
so there may be something about Clockgen, that CPUZ can't do at the moment, that can be adapted or something...
the ideas are still floating around.

[kristos]

http://img118.exs.cx/img118/5662/nieuwesuperpiresultz.jpg

Are the numbers on the RAM screen enough to check the CPU speed ?
kunaak or anyone...
can you check this screenie still?
I'm 99% sure he doesn't know about the cheats, he just photoshopped it (rather poorly :p)
http://img89.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img89&image=superpi33sec1.jpg

this is from the same guy as from the picture in the quote

This screenie should be his legit score

the thing is, I know it's v1.24, but the checksum from the memory tab is different from the checksum from the cpu tab.

Now I stupidly already pointed a finger at him but the checksum verification was done based on the memory tab. the checksum on the cpu tab is blocked by the seccond cpu-z.

but the checksum seems about right.. 25** mhz

[Kunaak]

both CPUZ shots pass the check.

but if you want it completly verified, I suggest you ask for a hexus Pi-fast score.
a 3dmark2001se link (2003 and 2005 wont do) and a CPUMark2 Benchmark.
or Clockgen shot.

more then one, of these perferably.
little to nothing can be used to verify a OC at the moment.
especially super pi shots :(

[kristos]

oki thx

I'll ask for clockgen and hexus pifast or so..
(what about the plain pifast?)

so the memory tab can also be used to verify cpu speed? it's not used to verify the mem settings?

[Kunaak]

no, it doesn't verify the cas latency unfortunatly.

[mtb856]

You think my overclock is verifiable? ;)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v168/mtb856/Computer%20Mods/CPU-Z.jpg

[DudeMiester]

I don't see the big deal with these cheat programs. You know the people who have respect and whom you can trust. Everyone else might as well have never overclocked in the first place. That's how you really tell who's ligit, who has respect of the community.

[Kunaak]

cheating is alot more of a risk then you may guess.

take the orb for instance.
alot of people put a ton of work into getting into the top of various catagories, like top ti4200, to $300 videocard, top of the ORB, top of the low end cards...

if some of these programs become more common, any kid on any forum who wants to look cool, can fake any number of screen shots, and be top dog in thier little circle without ever earning or learning a thing, other then how to use a few programs.
every benchmarkers would face the issue of being tempted to cheat, even just alittle.
any person pissed off that they can;t get top OC's from thier hardware could easily just make one.
the orb would be flooded with fake scores, from any catagory you can think of.
the ORB would be useless.

cheating poses a very real risk, if you actually like overclocking, and the challenges around it. ignoring cheating, is just ignoring the inevitable.
doing something about it now, is better then doing alot about it later.

[Zanr Zij]

not cheat, can u check 4 me, thanks...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v509/ZanrZij/A64/CPU/CPUZHighest.jpg

[Andrewv]

My Intel P4 2.8c @ 3.45GHz Air cooling (intel box).

[Zanr Zij]

N verify 4 my PIV 2.8E@3.9GHz, DFI LanParty 865PE.... Thanks once ag'n...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v509/ZanrZij/PIV/Press2.jpg

[ReKcAh]

Heres one more for me guys
Thanks for your work :toast:

http://www.overclocking-madness.com/images/HighMHZ.jpg

[macg]

pls verify :)

http://img90.exs.cx/img90/5471/k1o1.th.jpg (http://img90.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img90&image=k1o1.jpg)

http://img90.exs.cx/img90/6506/w0vsuperpi.th.jpg (http://img90.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img90&image=w0vsuperpi.jpg)

[Jupiler]

Zanr Zij :

both your screenshots seem OK.

Andrewv :

screenshot seems OK too.

ReKcAh :

same for you.

[Jupiler]

macg :

both screenshots seem OK.

[Kunaak]

CPUZ 1.26 is out.

I personally will not be checking older version of CPUZ lower then 1.26, unless theres some additional proof of the OC, if the OC being asked for verification is alittle hard to believe, IE- 3.5 ghz AMD Xp's, 3.9 ghz A64's things like that.

below is a shot to show that while older versions of CPUZ can be cheated on, this new version, is the best CPUZ there is, and best cheat free CPU reading program I know of at the moment.

I am on my laptop at the moment, a 750 mhz P3.
obviously the speed showing in CPUZ 1.24 is a fake.
but I cannot fake a 1.26 shot at the moment.
so I am moving CPUZ back to the good list, as long as it's version 1.26 and up.

[Karnivore]

Kunaak, has put alot of work into trying to end the fakes, Big thanks to you!

and I'll echo his policy, I also won't verify anything other then the latest release of CPUZ currently this is 1.26.

Thanks for your efforts Kunaak :toast:

[Andrewv]

You can check this too, thanks

[Tek]

Great news about CPU-Z, already downloaded it :D

First pic to be confirmed is just my usual 3ghz - 12 x 250mhz - 4xHTT
Second pic is a new screenshot of CL1.5 0 0 0 7 0 133mhz T1 RAM. I hope CPU-Z 1.26 can confirm these RAM are running at CL1.5 with Cas to Ras of 0 etc...

Nothing good about these timings, as speed is killing them, but I want to confirm them anyways for fun :D

I booted with them at 12 x 200mhz - 133mhz divider CL1.5 0 0 0 T1 - rest on auto and set rest of timings with AMD tweaker. So can the numbers be confirmed, even though CPU-Z doesn't show them, Kunaak?

Thanks for the service :)

[Kunaak]

no cas latency cannot be confirmed with CPUZ at the moment.

frank is working on it, and a few other things.

[turez]

Can you check this please?

[Karnivore]

Can you check this please?

here you are.



http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=20783&stc=1

[thomas66]

found on the most reliable hardware page on the world :D THG
acually i think the voltage is a bit fishy maybe even more not correct...


http://www.de.tomshardware.com/firstlook/20041208/abit-fatal1ty-04.html

[Riverna]

True or fake?

http://people.freenet.de/funkflix/spi32m.jpg

[Jupiler]

Riverna :

Looks OK.
Is it yours?

[Riverna]

Riverna :

Looks OK.
Is it yours?

Ok Thanks ,
No its not from me.

[funkflix]

@Riverna ... U just stultify urself m8! :rolleyes:

@Jupiler

That was my screenshot.

[MarilynMX]

Hey I just got a pair of OCZ 3200 EL Plat rev2. Tested single stick max speed at 285MHz 2.5-3-4-11, dual channel max'd at 280MHz 2.5-3-4-8 with no additional volts. I'm new to RAM oc so can you guys tell me if my speed/timings are OK?

[Jupiler]

@Riverna ... U just stultify urself m8! :rolleyes:

@Jupiler

That was my screenshot.

Nice cpu you got there. :toast:



BTW :
next time, it would be better to use CPU-Z 1.26 to have the screenshot verified.

[funkflix]

Thx! :toast:

Ok i will use 1.26 now! I know there is something out there to fake the numbers
of the older version, right?

[Jupiler]

That's correct.
But I wasn't referring to you only. ;)
It's a general question.

[burnout]

http://home.arcor.de/twinmos.support/WB_UTT.JPG

hopefully this is true :D

[Jupiler]

burnout :

cpuchecksum is OK.

[burnout]

thanks, best news today :D

[Jupiler]

No problem. Also replied your PM at HWL.

[Gav]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v326/gav69/1.jpg
I thought it was weird look at vcore aswel seems low for the mhz,Could you please check.

[Kunaak]

looks legit, but can't call it legit unless he's using version 1.26 of CPUZ.
that version is easy to cheat on.

[Gav]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v326/gav69/trythis.jpg

[Kunaak]

looks good to me, it passed.

[Gav]

looks good to me, it passed.
:banana: time to flash to 1.36 and get +18.3% vcore
Thanks.

[Dumo]

Heres mine
http://www.omg-hax.net/upload/everest3392-1.JPG

[kristos]

check this one plz, I think it's patched :

http://home.scarlet.be/~bralou/superpi.JPG

this should be his correct score :

http://home.scarlet.be/~bralou/superpi2.JPG

[Jupiler]

Dumo and Kristos :

both your screenshots look OK. But as Kunaak said before, it would be better to use version 1.26.

[kristos]

hmm odd, I wonder where he got those 2 seconds from when he's running at the exact same clockspeeds...

[aristidis]

And mine too...

[Zanr Zij]

Heres mine
http://www.omg-hax.net/upload/everest3392-1.JPG

What... ? very amazing that u can run with haft-multi show on Core Center ? Which way ? Thanks

[Boogotop]

from a guy in a french o/c forum

http://nvforce.chez.tiscali.fr//untitled2.JPG

[Jupiler]

And mine too...

Yours looks ok too.
Nice oc, BTW.

[Jupiler]

from a guy in a french o/c forum



Looks ok.

[Boogotop]

the guy who made the screenshot say to me it was under win64 and he set 10*255 in the bios and cpuz report it as 5*510......this guy are not know to be a cheater but if you can verify that

thx

[Jupiler]

It might be a little bug when using CPU-Z under WinXP 64-bit.
Perhaps you can ask the guy if this happens at each setting. If so, can you post some other screenshots?
If the problem persisits, he can also report this "bug" to the author of CPU-Z.

[DarkForce]

Just to prove to myself and a few others!

http://img25.exs.cx/img25/9544/XP-M25002714GHz.jpg

Just hope you can see the numbers you need. :shrug:

[Kenetixx]

First post in here after lurking for a bit, Nice forum Ive picked up heas in here :) ANyway can you check mine for me alot dont beleive
http://users.tpg.com.au/adslp5px/Pics/cpu2600.jpg

[Jupiler]

DarkForce and Kentixx :

Both your checksums seem ok.
But can you take a screenie with CPU-Z version 1.26? Just to be sure.


And welcome to Xtreme to both of you. :welcome:

[Cloud125]

verify this plz
http://torny.altervista.org/DSC002451.JPG :)

[Jupiler]

verify this plz
http://torny.altervista.org/DSC002451.JPG :)

Looks OK too.
Nice oc, BTW.
And Welcome to Xtreme. :welcome:

[Cloud125]

Looks OK too.
Nice oc, BTW.
And Welcome to Xtreme. :welcome:
thx :)
Peltier with Winchester rulezz :banana:
ah can u post me a screen of cpuz near my screen plz :)

[dimasdw]

this my cpuz screenshot,please analyse this :)

http://photos2.flickr.com/2367707_ac605b5b27_o.jpg

and this my best OC result

http://photos2.flickr.com/1381176_7396b32a28_o.jpg

[burnout]

http://photos2.flickr.com/1381176_7396b32a28_o.jpg
hard to verify a cpu-z screen without a visible checksum ;)

and you should upgrade to cpu-z 1.26, because 1.24 can be fooled

[dimasdw]

hard to verify a cpu-z screen without a visible checksum ;)

and you should upgrade to cpu-z 1.26, because 1.24 can be fooled

eh..what is checksum (sory for my bad english)
anyway this my cpuz screnshot with cpu-z 1.26

http://photos2.flickr.com/2368293_69a2ce1982_o.jpg

[I²K]

http://www.xtremecooling.net/image/3150.jpg

:stick:

[Bennah]

http://img62.exs.cx/img62/6138/own3dpc8ar.th.jpg (http://img62.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img62&image=own3dpc8ar.jpg)

could you check that for us... ;)

[CTKP]

Beat me to it Ben.... :D

[MouseSeries]

Fake?

http://img139.exs.cx/img139/737/m11223zr.jpg

[funkflix]

That is Tom Holck's Screen, isn't it? :rotf:

[Bennah]

Beat me to it Ben.... :D

:p:

and if that is Tom Holck's shot then im sure its not a fake :D

[Jupiler]

eh..what is checksum (sory for my bad english)
anyway this my cpuz screnshot with cpu-z 1.26



Your checksum is ok.

[Jupiler]

I²k and Bennah :

Both your checksums look ok (old version of cpu-z is used so no 100% guarantee)

Mouseseries :

Tom's checksum looks ok too.

[MouseSeries]

Download CPU-Z Check why???

Plzz Link..

Thankss!!!

Mickey Mouse. :toast:

[funkflix]

Download CPU-Z Check why???

Plzz Link..

Thankss!!!

Mickey Mouse. :toast:

This Tool is just for a few selected and faithful ppl in the Oc-World, so u can't
have or download that somewhere! :)

[Bennah]

I²k and Bennah :

Both your checksums look ok (old version of cpu-z is used so no 100% guarantee)

Mouseseries :

Tom's checksum looks ok too.

hm, the overclock looks very suspect... could of got the cpu-z id from another 3ghz athlon screenie... i think its fake :rolleyes:

[JWB]

The superpi of 27seconds is definately wrong/fake in that pic Bennah. SAE's barton at 3..3Ghz i think got 30 sec for the world record at 26*fsb

[I²K]

hm, the overclock looks very suspect... could of got the cpu-z id from another 3ghz athlon screenie... i think its fake :rolleyes:

It's mine so i know that it isn't a fake :D

http://www.xtremecooling.net/image/3ghz.jpg

Same CPU, higher FSB.

http://www.xtremecooling.net/image/2900.jpg


1M stable :D

[GazC]

Download CPU-Z Check why???

Plzz Link..

Thankss!!!

Mickey Mouse. :toast:

You want to me careful calling yourself Mickey Mouse, you might get banned!

;)

[funkflix]

@Bennah

Yeah, this Screen is 100% a Fake! I think i know this guy named "Unknown", he
posted here an 7 GHz result with an P4 an that was an Fake too! :)

[Bennah]

Its a deferent guy I think but a yet again a faker!

[racoontje]

If this program works with all CPU-Z checksums (ie checksum generated by 1.24 = checksum generated by 1.26 = checksum generated by [version]), how come 1.24 is so much easier to fool?

[Crmk]

Hello.

I'm new here.
I hope this screen is true :D ;)

http://www.crmk.de/2755mhz.jpg

[Bennah]

Hi welcome to xtremesystems :toast:

[Jupiler]

Hello.

I'm new here.
I hope this screen is true :D ;)



Checksum is ok.

And welcome to the sickness/madness. :welcome:

[Crmk]

Thanks for check!
And thanks for this nice greetings :)

[tomasir]

Please verify this screen. I can hardly believe in it - but just wonna be sure.

http://forum.pcmaniak.pl/download.php?id=4019

[funkflix]

Thats an Screenshot from FUGGER! Where u got that from?

Look here : http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=582207#post582207

[tomasir]

Thank you very much! I don't recently read all the foreign forums therefore I was asking for verification. Now I'm convinced that this person (on my forum) is a cheater. I will delete all his posts.

[odb]

could someone check this out for me, i suspect bs, on stock cooling he says

[Karnivore]

could someone check this out for me, i suspect bs, on stock cooling he says



http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=21449&stc=1

[IvanAndreevich]

Wow nice thread we got here! Thanks to all the mods for spending time on this. Just for fun please check:

http://img137.exs.cx/img137/7955/2790screen6zl.th.jpg (http://img137.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img137&image=2790screen6zl.jpg)

odb
Meh.. BS in this case, but 3.4 GHz is not unreal for a D1 chip.

[Kunaak]

Ivan, I'd check your shot for you, if I could see it.

the attached file, is the size of a match book.
can't see a thing.

[comment]

Nice touch Kunaak :up:

Here's mine:

[IvanAndreevich]

Kunaak
Clickie on the thumbnail :) It's a big photo.

[deevo]

here's mine...

http://www.geocities.com/gepz48/Super-PI.JPG

[Karnivore]

Wow nice thread we got here! Thanks to all the mods for spending time on this. Just for fun please check:

http://img137.exs.cx/img137/7955/2790screen6zl.th.jpg (http://img137.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img137&image=2790screen6zl.jpg)

odb
Meh.. BS in this case, but 3.4 GHz is not unreal for a D1 chip.



http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=21493&stc=1

[Karnivore]

Comment, yours the checksum is ok, Deevo, same for yours.

[deevo]

Comment, yours the checksum is ok, Deevo, same for yours.


checksum? how 2 activate the checksum from cpuz?

[Karnivore]

checksum? how 2 activate the checksum from cpuz?


You don't, its just there




http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=21502&stc=1

[sr4470]

Not a brilliant OC, but i thought i may as well put it here:

[Kunaak]

sr4470

passes ;)

[dippyskoodlez]

http://www.x3lda.com/lmsdfts/2900baby.JPG

Always wondered what those numbers were for :D

[deevo]

You don't, its just there




http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=21502&stc=1

karnivore... mine's ok, rite? :D :D

[Jupiler]

karnivore... mine's ok, rite? :D :D

Yes it is.

[Karnivore]

Comment, yours the checksum is ok, Deevo, same for yours.


karnivore... mine's ok, rite? :D :D

Yes fine as I posted, easy to miss though :)

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=646415#post646415

[-=Monty=-]

http://img27.exs.cx/img27/6620/69ghz4hl.jpg

Is that real?

[funkflix]

No! :rolleyes:

[-=Monty=-]

No! :rolleyes:

I would still like it checked.

[funkflix]

Np, but i already know the result of it! ;)

[Jupiler]

I would still like it checked.

It has been said before, use cpu-z version 1.26 only.

[Karnivore]

http://img27.exs.cx/img27/6620/69ghz4hl.jpg

Is that real?


If you read back through this thread you will see that the staff here has already made statements regarding verifying suspicious screenshots that use anything but the latest CPUZ. The older CPUZ, as well as most other OC tools are quite easy to manipulate to make them read just about anything you want them to.

Unless this fellow is a known reputeable OverClocker, and has provided Pictures, benchmarks at slower stable speeds approaching those, and other supporting evidence you can be pretty safe in assuming fake. We've recently had a number of high 6, and 7+ ghz fakes.

Another thing to consider is it seems only the latest LGA775 chips are even coming close to that.

Again, sorry but unless this fellow has a sterling rep and/or a bunch of supporting evidence, its not going to fly... And the staff here won't verify it.

[Karnivore]

Oh, yeah btw, 432 fsb on a 865 or 875 board?? Come on.... :stick:

EDIT: Monty, I see your watermark on this??? You claiming this as legit, and yours? :rolleyes:

[Frost_Bite]

Please Check:

http://virtual-octane.net/FX55/untitled.bmp

Thanks

[dippyskoodlez]

Please Check:

http://virtual-octane.net/FX55/untitled.bmp

Thanks


That one looks fine to me... I do 2800mhz at less Vcore. :) :toast:

[-=Monty=-]

EDIT: Monty, I see your watermark on this??? You claiming this as legit, and yours? :rolleyes:

Forget it, i'll shut up now.
That is what my CPU-z said. I don't know why, but that is what it told me.

[Jupiler]

Forget it, i'll shut up now.
That is what my CPU-z said. I don't know why, but that is what it told me.

Can you try it again, with version 1.26?

[Karnivore]

Forget it, i'll shut up now.
That is what my CPU-z said. I don't know why, but that is what it told me.

hmmm :confused: :confused: so almost 7ghz, and nadda clue how you got it :eek:

[IvanAndreevich]

http://img139.exs.cx/img139/5531/rolfcpuz7bw.gif

What about this one ;)

[Karnivore]

http://img139.exs.cx/img139/5531/rolfcpuz7bw.gif

What about this one ;)


Well this is what it comes up with..

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=21559&stc=1

[IvanAndreevich]

Karnivore
I can't see your image - seems to be down? :D

[Karnivore]

Karnivore
I can't see your image - seems to be down? :D

Odd, showed up for me, but seems vb didn't attach it correctly, lol, sorry, fixed now it seems..

[IvanAndreevich]

Karnivore
Sheesh.. so the checksum doesn't allow to check the memory ratio. That screenshot is BUGGED. Do you think it's possible to run 302 MHZ 1:1 @ 5-2-2-2.5??

It was some random thing that happened on my system. In reality, the memory divider is not /9 but rather /14

[Cyrus The Virus]

Please Check because they don't beleave me

http://users.pandora.be/CyrusTheVirus/Super%20Pi%201M%2033Sec.JPG

[Jupiler]

Please Check because they don't beleave me

http://users.pandora.be/CyrusTheVirus/Super%20Pi%201M%2033Sec.JPG

Your checksum's ok.
Don't worry about that 1 person not believing you.

0447 UPCW if I'm correct?

[Cyrus The Virus]

Your checksum's ok.
Don't worry about that 1 person not believing you.

0447 UPCW if I'm correct?

Thanks

You're correct

ADA3200DIK4BI
CBBHD 0447UPCW
1158317L0072

[Karnivore]

Karnivore
Sheesh.. so the checksum doesn't allow to check the memory ratio. That screenshot is BUGGED. Do you think it's possible to run 302 MHZ 1:1 @ 5-2-2-2.5??

It was some random thing that happened on my system. In reality, the memory divider is not /9 but rather /14

Nope, AFAIK, the only thing the checksum verifies is CPUID, and clock speeds. Its being worked on though, future versions Checksum may give us more info..

And yeah I noticed the timing, lol..

[detonator]

please can you cheak this tnx:)
barton at 3.350mzr...
http://invasione.altervista.org/3352AMD.jpg

[RocKer]

Can you check this sandra membench (http://users.pandora.be/RocKer/A64%200430%20RPMW/Sandra%20Bench/Memorybench-2475mhz.JPG) ,thanks guy's.

[Jupiler]

please can you cheak this tnx:)
barton at 3.350mzr...
http://invasione.altervista.org/3352AMD.jpg

It looks ok.
He's using version 1.24, so no 100% guarantee.

[Crmk]

:slobber:

[detonator]

tnx:)

[sin0822]

is this fake, and is this fake?
http://img138.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img138&image=haahahaha9dg.jpg

http://img138.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img138&image=hghgh3qu.jpg

I think cpuz messed up, thses are my oces, i think my entire hd is messed up.

[Karnivore]

is this fake, and is this fake?
http://img138.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img138&image=haahahaha9dg.jpg

http://img138.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img138&image=hghgh3qu.jpg

I think cpuz messed up, thses are my oces, i think my entire hd is messed up.

welcome to Xtreme!


Why even Ask? isn't it obvious?? :rolleyes:

[petervandamned]

Could i plz have a check again
Now maxed 4000+ not bench stable, but just finding the borders

http://www.tweakers.net/ext/f/47840/full.jpg

[sin0822]

welcome to Xtreme!


Why even Ask? isn't it obvious?? :rolleyes:

lol, thanks for the warm welcome, ima regular over at extrmeoverclocking, its just you guys have more resources like this thread. I dont know whats wrong with my cpuz it wont show things sometimes except mhz. then when it does it does this crap. I thought it was cool that i got 29ghz lol. My highest is only 4.2ghz, and my proc sucks with my mobo. Im getting a new proc tommaorw hopfully 3.0 m0 or 3.2 e0.

[eakova]

Hi! my first post after long time reading..
can you pls check this 7Ghz o/c from an italian? thanks ;)

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/salvoperfectoverclock/index.htm
cpuid:3704490121

[bias_hjorth]

HAHAHA I say its real. Without any question or doubts. :hehe:


"Liquida con comprassore a FREON "

:lol: :rotf:

Or look at the hoses obviously comming from the top of the case.. And then look at "his" rad pic.. I bet he´s pumping loads of freon though those.

His ultimate proff is this highend video.. Hurry up and download it here cause people are streaming like crazy: http://xoomer.virgilio.it/salvoperfectoverclock/Filmato.WMV

[bias_hjorth]

Hi! my first post after long time reading..
can you pls check this 7Ghz o/c from an italian? thanks ;)

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/salvoperfectoverclock/index.htm
cpuid:3704490121


Btw. Welcome to xtreme :toast: - It sure maked me laugh.

[eakova]

i believe video doesn't proof of anything... why the temprature is hidden?
i'm still suspicious..

[eakova]

happy to make you laugh :D