Want a CPUZ Screenshot Verified?? Post it here...

[bias_hjorth]

Hehe you didnt notice the irony in my first reply? I´ll say it was so strong you could almost smell it :p:
But you suspicion is absolutely correct.. His overclock is 100% fake and is actually the baddest attemp in faking an overclocking I´ve yet seen.

[bias_hjorth]

You may also notice this:

at least this should say a big fakie all over it even without knowing anything to the cpu :)

[Karnivore]

Hi! my first post after long time reading..
can you pls check this 7Ghz o/c from an italian? thanks ;)

http://xoomer.virgilio.it/salvoperfectoverclock/index.htm
cpuid:3704490121

Wow, at least some of them attempt to make it believeable, Worse attempt at a fake ever, but then again Maybe that Rad is just show and the TT HSF is some new super Secret Cooling project... :wierd:

[bias_hjorth]

So you didnt catch the stunning video eh ? :D

[eakova]

sorry about my english :)
i wasn't sure about the irony there..
thanks anyway ;)

[bias_hjorth]

sorry about my english :)
i wasn't sure about the irony there..
thanks anyway ;)


hehe no problem :D And dont neeed to say you´re sorry cause you are def. understandable :)

[Kunaak]

bias_hjorth

that 7130 mhz shot, thats a 3.449 ghz shot.
total fake.
not even a good one.
amazing what kinda dumb stuff people will do to get thier 15 minutes of fame huh?

[Karnivore]

You may also notice this:

at least this should say a big fakie all over it even without knowing anything to the cpu :)


Not that we needed this to decide but I'll add it for kicks..





http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=21851&stc=1

[bias_hjorth]

bias_hjorth

that 7130 mhz shot, thats a 3.449 ghz shot.
total fake.
not even a good one.
amazing what kinda dumb stuff people will do to get thier 15 minutes of fame huh?


I must admit I do find it hilarious - This is so badly done it deserves attention.. :D :banana4:


*edit:

I am all out of tears with this one:

"Thermaltake Cooling CPU at 6500rpm con supplementare dissipatore originale intel modificato con fori interni di presa d'aria con attacco per LN2Cooling ad Refrigerazione Liquida con comprassore a FREON "

Babelfishy translation:
"Thermaltake Cooling CPU at 6500rpm with additional dissipator originates them intel modified with inner holes of taken d'aria with attack for LN2Cooling to Liquid Refrigeration with comprassore to FREON"

If half of this is true I better mail him cause I want to know his crazy secrets :p:

[bias_hjorth]

lol, thanks for the warm welcome, ima regular over at extrmeoverclocking, its just you guys have more resources like this thread. I dont know whats wrong with my cpuz it wont show things sometimes except mhz. then when it does it does this crap. I thought it was cool that i got 29ghz lol. My highest is only 4.2ghz, and my proc sucks with my mobo. Im getting a new proc tommaorw hopfully 3.0 m0 or 3.2 e0.



Judging from the file name alone I´ll say its hard to take serious and what else could you expect?

But a warm welcome to xtreme anyway :toast:

[raptorx]

Hi, been reading a long time but saw this so thought i'd pop mine in too - every little bit helps :)

http://www.raptorx.net/neo2pbench.jpg

[robocopy]

Can you check this please?

[Kunaak]

raptorx, turez.

both shots pass and are verified. ;)

[sr4470]

Damn this OCZ, wont go above DDR500 1:1, not even with 2.85v, guess this RAM does have hynix chips then

[RocKer]

Can you check this sandra membench (http://users.pandora.be/RocKer/A64%200430%20RPMW/Sandra%20Bench/Memorybench-2475mhz.JPG) ,thanks guy's.
Can you check it please.

[deevo]

how come everybody had a CPUZ Frequency Checker on their CPUZ?
how to get it or activate the frequency checker on CPUZ?

[funkflix]

how come everybody had a CPUZ Frequency Checker on their CPUZ?


Everybody? Just a few Admins/Mods of xs.org have the "Checker"! :)

[Karnivore]

Can you check it please.

We have no way to verify it. Thats why its nice for folks to post other benchmarks that help support the claims.

[All4AMD]

www.all4amd.netfirms.com

3dmark05 and shot of cpu speed and FSB with timings on ram

[RocKer]

We have no way to verify it. Thats why its nice for folks to post other benchmarks that help support the claims.
And why is that,i dont understand it,four other people you do the check,but not for me :confused: :confused: ,i know its the 1.24 but others have used it and there's is checked.

You can read the cpuz # on both,so whats the problem??

You wonder why i wont to know,becaus its from my old a64 3200+ and its the only 275 htt cpuz i have,and becaus the motherf**** dont want to go there anymore with my bh5 :( ,thats why i wont it to be checked,thats all :) .

[Karnivore]

And why is that,i dont understand it,four other people you do the check,but not for me :confused: :confused: ,i know its the 1.24 but others have used it and there's is checked.

You can read the cpuz # on both,so whats the problem??

You wonder why i wont to know,becaus its from my old a64 3200+ and its the only 275 htt cpuz i have,and becaus the motherf**** dont want to go there anymore with my bh5 :( ,thats why i wont it to be checked,thats all :) .

Rocker Probably because your link asked for Sandra to be confirmed, I didn't open the screenshot to look. The CPUZ checksum is verified.

[pythagoras]

Could you check this one for me please:

http://artificial.bounceme.net/images/4ghz.PNG

Regards

John.

[robocopy]

Can you check this please?

http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfolders/upload3/set.JPG

[G H Z]

Guys, if it's your own OC what's the point? It's alot of extra work for these guys. This is for verifying questionable screenies, which if yours, of course are not.

[pythagoras]

That screen shot isnt mine! I would like it verified as I think its suspect.

Regards

John.

[Jupiler]

It's no problem. ;)
Everyone's allowed to have his (or somebody else's) cpu-z screenshot checked.


turez and john :
both your checksums are ok.

[pythagoras]

Thanks Jupiler, is it possible to have a cpu temp below the mobo temp when this is supposed to be an air cooled run?

Regards

John.

[charlie]

Thanks Jupiler, is it possible to have a cpu temp below the mobo temp when this is supposed to be an air cooled run?

Regards

John.

Many motherboards have such BAD temp reading (think neo2) that I wouldn't trust the numbers!

C

[Jupiler]

Thanks Jupiler, is it possible to have a cpu temp below the mobo temp when this is supposed to be an air cooled run?

Regards

John.

It's an ASUS board. :D
I had the same thing with my 2.8c.
Using watercooling, the cpu temps were sometimes lower than the board/system temps.
But never checked when using aircooling.

[dippyskoodlez]

It's an ASUS board. :D
I had the same thing with my 2.8c.
Using watercooling, the cpu temps were sometimes lower than the board/system temps.
But never checked when using aircooling.


I have had a lower CPU temp then my case.

My tornado was ducted by a 90mm fan right above it, outside of the case. case got warm, but my CPU was constantly getting fresh air.

Along with the fact that mobo sensors suck. lol :D

[pythagoras]

Thanks guys, thought about ducted air but this is just using the standard Intel heatsink, so it sounds like pos mobo temp monitoring.

Regards

John.

[pythagoras]

Sorry to be such a pain. Could someone please tell me what information was in this screen before the photochop?

http://80.42.183.150/turbo.jpg

Regards

John.

[Jupiler]

Sure John, np.
Althon MP @ 1539Mhz

[dippyskoodlez]

Sorry to be such a pain. Could someone please tell me what information was in this screen before the photochop?

Regards

John.

lol! 4ghz athlon MP pally! one heck of a CPU if it existed. lol. :slobber:

[pythagoras]

That screen shot was made by someone who admitted it was a fake, I posted it to show that we could tell an original from a fake.

So please dont think the originator of the last screen shot was trying to fool anyone :(

Regards

John.

[Honda250sx1986]

I am XTREME!!!!!!! :banana4:
http://home.comcast.net/~kenny920/images/cpuzss1.gif

[derbis]

http://img58.exs.cx/img58/116/cpuz5xh.jpg

Please verify it :)

Its taken from an ebay offer.
The CPU should run at these speed with a triple radi @ 45C° (taken from ebay)

[Jupiler]

Please verify it :)

Its taken from an ebay offer.
The CPU should run at these speed with a triple radi @ 45C° (taken from ebay)


Fake.
Unknown cpu.

got a link to that auction?

[Kanbeki]

Not too active around here, just wanted to see if it says mine is valid or not since the number is constantly jumpin and causes me to worry

[Jupiler]

Kanbeki :

yours looks ok, but can you take a screenshot with version 1.26?

[burnout]

jupiler: http://www.google.com

[Jupiler]

Ah, thanks.
Gonna ask him to post a screenie with version 1.26. :D

[Jupiler]

Hehe,
mail send.
Anxious to see if he's gonna reply and answer my question.

[Crmk]

say me if its real ok?

[Kanbeki]

Since then I've changed my VS but its the same northy

[Jupiler]

Since then I've changed my VS but its the same northy


Checksum's OK.

[cpulloverclock]

by Memesama



M/B：MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
CPU： ADAFX55 0438TPMW
CPU Cooling：Maxx LN2
Chipset Cooling：ノーマル
Memory：PC3200 CL2.5 256MB×2 BH-5 0311
VGA：Canopus PWR128P(PCI)
HDD：IBM DTLA 15G
Power suplｌｙ：ZippyHP2-6460P
OS：Windows Server 2003
Vddr:3.52(実測)＝Vio3.70V(実測)
Vcore:1.915V(CPUZ読み)
HT:×3

http://blue.ap.teacup.com/memesama3939/img/1104929824.jpg
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/memesama3939/img/1104929799.jpg
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/memesama3939/img/1104929533.jpg

[Riverna]

hello,

is this screenshot a fake or is it real?
A Guy from the ocinside forum has took the shot. And all shot´s have the resemble number.

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/8886fakeornot.JPG

[Crankster]

fakes all of them if they have the same checksum!

[Riverna]

fakes all of them if they have the same checksum!


ok thanks :) i thought so :toast:
how many mhz has he got according to the screen?

[dippyskoodlez]

fakes all of them if they have the same checksum!

1 of them could be real... :P

[Riverna]

The first screenshot is real and the other are fakes... thought

[Crmk]

i think the screenshot on the left side is real.
the others are fakes

[Jupiler]

cpulloverclock :

checksum's OK.
Very impressive oc.


Riverna :

fake.
cpu runs at 1927Mhz.
Was ein...... kannst du selbst mal ausfüllen. :D

[Riverna]

cpulloverclock :

checksum's OK.
Very impressive oc.


Riverna :

fake.
cpu runs at 1927Mhz.
Was ein...... kannst du selbst mal ausfüllen. :D

Danke dir :)

[Crmk]

Das ist ja mehr als verkümmelt *g*
3 GHz ... ich hätte DIREKT ein Sempron gekauft würde es stimmen :cool:

[sr4470]

Back with a better oc, all i need now is a decent psu and to figure out why connecting my LAN makes it reboot :confused:

[Riverna]

Das ist ja mehr als verkümmelt *g*
3 GHz ... ich hätte DIREKT ein Sempron gekauft würde es stimmen :cool:


Are there today just stupid people in the forum? The guy from ocinside with 3ghz and a other guy said he would have 13,6k with a x800se on 520/560 with 8 pipelines. After 1 hour and a lot of postings and links to the futurmark database the idiot said that the run was with 640*480 :rolleyes:

Sorry will kein Ärger bekommen deswegen schreib ich es lieber in Englisch :)

[funkflix]

I think peoples lost there respect for other peoples. If u look at the 3 last pages,
there are so much faked results! Even people used Tom Holck's/Oppainter's
screens to pose in other forums... thats so cheap .. Can't understand that kind of peoples. :mad:

[Jupiler]

That's why it might be a good idea to put your name in the screenshot, so that some lamers can't say it's their oc.

[funkflix]

Thats an good idea m8, but i'm always pray for the good attributes of the ppls.
But i think it's time to denote our screenshots! :-\

Edit: Anyone knows an good program to do this? MSPaint sucks, bcs. it's always
an white backround behind, when u write something. :)

[dippyskoodlez]

Thats an good idea m8, but i'm always pray for the good attributes of the ppls.
But i think it's time to denote our screenshots! :-\

Edit: Anyone knows an good program to do this? MSPaint sucks, bcs. it's always
an white backround behind, when u write something. :)


Photoshop, ofcourse. lol :p:

Hmm... maybe the GIMP? its free(unlike photoshop. im gifted with a copy from school). :toast:

[funkflix]

Photoshop, ofcourse. lol :p:

Hmm... maybe the GIMP? its free(unlike photoshop. im gifted with a copy from school). :toast:

K, thx. i will try Gimp. :)

[SuperDude]

Please and thanks

[Kunaak]

Please and thanks

verified and checked, passed perfectly.

[kiwi]

NC 3200+ @ 2700Mhz
:D

[Jupiler]

NC 3200+ @ 2700Mhz
:D

Looks OK.
Please use CPU-Z version 1.26 and post a screenie.Thx.

[Crmk]

NC 3200+ @ 2700Mhz
:D


Thats so ... sorry ... funny.

Over 1,8 V for 2,7 GHz ??
I have 2,7 Ghz with 1,5 V ... that is 0,3 V less

[Jupiler]

Thats so ... sorry ... funny.

Over 1,8 V for 2,7 GHz ??
I have 2,7 Ghz with 1,5 V ... that is 0,3 V less

Don't know what's so funny about that.
Not every cpu will overclock the same, with the same voltages. Some will need more juice than others. It's all a matter of luck, don't foget that. ;)

[Crmk]

okay thats right but ... he need a vcore mod to take this clock ;)
it's not funny thats right, sorry.

[funkflix]

okay thats right but ... he need a vcore mod to take this clock ;)
it's not funny thats right, sorry.

He need no Vcore Mod! Thats an Newcastle and with some Mobos u can give
+ 1,85V without Mods! :)

[Riverna]

He need no Vcore Mod! Thats an Newcastle and with some Mobos u can give
+ 1,85V without mods! :)


my old newcastle runs with 1.9V on 2666Mhz :stick: I love the Winchester and the low Voltage :toast:

[funkflix]

Sure, i like the lower voltages of the winchesters too, but i said, that it is no problem to give an Newcastle above 1,8V without any Mods on ur motherboard! U should know that anyway! ;)

[Tek]

Can anyone varify this one. 14 x 200mhz - stock voltage. 3DMark01 stabile for now.

Thanks :)

[Karnivore]

Tek, both checksums match the displayed clock speed.

[Riverna]

Is the screen ok?

http://www.forumdeluxx.de/gallery/data/500/888628sek.JPG

[Karnivore]

Riverna, your match dispayed speed as well.

[kiwi]

He need no Vcore Mod! Thats an Newcastle and with some Mobos u can give
+ 1,85V without Mods! :)

Correct! DFI NF3 allows much more voltage without mods!
:D Just my temps are high (around 60C under no load)



Looks OK.
Please use CPU-Z version 1.26 and post a screenie.Thx.


I will post 1.26 Cpuz later today.

[ImmortalNoob]

Can someone verify this screenshot
http://www.overclockers.at/attachment.php?s=&attachmentid=71749&fullpage=1

[Jupiler]

Can someone verify this screenshot


Checksum seems ok.

[kiwi]

cpuz 1.26. Are these OK?

[The Doctor]

http://www.tweakzone.nl/f/g/28670sZTvis2A.jpg

[Jupiler]

kiwi & The Doctor :

both your checksums passed.

[calum]

can some one check my air cooled pentium

http://calum.ath.cx/images/4ghz.PNG

[Riverna]

Riverna, your match dispayed speed as well.

Sorry, I not understand u. What is dispayed? :confused:

[Staphy]

Can someone check this for me : -

http://up1.fastuploads.info/284fsb.jpg

[Jupiler]

Can someone check this for me : -



Can't check it because you used an old cpu-z version, which doesn't have the checksum number on the bottom left.
Use version 1.26 and repost, please.

[Brandybuck]

can someone check this

http://img20.exs.cx/img20/4980/3ghz8jl.jpg

[Joe_Beasley]

Well, Might as well check me as well...lol.


http://home.comcast.net/~orangeparktech/cpuz2.JPG

[Kunaak]

Joe...

it passes just fine.

[skate2snow]

http://www.lesfurieux.net/hfr/for_3200mhz.jpg

Urgent verification!

[pythagoras]

That checks out skate2snow.

Regards

John.

[Jupiler]

skate2snow :

looks ok, but older version is used.
No 100% guarantee that's is for real.
Can you ask the poster to use 1.26 and report back?

[zabomb4163]

http://www.computerbase.de/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=19723

6.3ghz p4/

[deevo]

please check this one for me.. thank's.



http://www.geocities.com/gepz48/PI.jpg

[Jupiler]

zabomb4163 & deevo :

both checksums pass.

[Crankster]

Just a quick thing...
Why do you need to check your own score?
Sure if someone is really badgering you or something like that but most of these OCs are very mild/near stock.

[skate2snow]

Crankster, for me, it is not my own, my 3500+ is not a winchester....

[Kunaak]

skate2snow.

the 3200 mhz shot cannot be considerd cheat free.
it's using a version thats easily manipulated.

if you want more solid verification, please do the shot, with CPUZ 1.26 or higher.

[trodas]

This thread is EXTREMLY funny! :p:
As soon, as any CPU-Z version get compromised, there always jump out some ppls, that want their result from the old, cheatable CPU-Z, verified - no matter that the "gods" says :lol:

Unbeliable. :stick:
(why cheat, when you KNOW this is cheating and you possibly can be only ashamed of yourself...? Makes no sense to me...)

Anyway, mine are there:

http://ax2.old-cans.com/cpuz.gif

Too poor result? Well, Im far from serious overclocker... At least I did not need to cheat :lol:
Verify, pls?


PS. this is still a little cheating, because I was unable to do hexusPIfast in more that 242x11 ( http://ax2.old-cans.com/cpuz242x11.gif ) - 225x12 always reseted during te cumputing :mad: Even I used two 120mm fans bloving air on the mobo parts and heatsinks and all voltages maxed up...(the great AXP-M 2600+ cpu need only 1.850Vcore for 2700Mhz, so it possibly can go much higher, if the mobo can make it...) 225x12.5 - 2813Mhz is posting, and DOS working, but getting into windows is another story...


PS. I would recommend to stop verifiing for real and even delete these posts, that did not used the latest CPU-Z - after reading the whole thread, there is at least 10 ppls, who posted with old version, and of course, never come back with 1.26 - with make the situation quite clear, IMHO :(

[Zejtan]

anyone that can verify this ?
i know i didnt cheat on it in any way, but if something isn't correct, i would like to know, thnx,

ZejtaN

http://ruff.se/files/etc/pub/upload/2892-verification-pic.GIF

[ziR.diGi]

http://v094600.dd2434.kasserver.com/ecl/oc_results/34xx.gif

not the best clocking but its still passive-watercooled :) so its noiseless :D

[masterchorch]

plz verifie that:

http://www.ocbase.de/content/images/6.206%20Ghz.jpg

and

http://www.ocbase.de/content/images/570-0018.jpg


on second screen the first number just can be a 4 or a 1, so plz try both.

[burnout]

@masterchorch: no one can verify screen 2, the number can't be seen completely... as far a i know, it's a DFI 875 P-T and why does x19 work? i though this still isn't supported...

but IMHO 27 ist slow for 5.3

[masterchorch]

@burn:

open u're eyes, i wrote about the number!!!

there is only the first one missing, but u can se that it have to be a 1 or a 4 couse of the part of the number u see - its a line, and in cpu-z only the 4 or the 1 have a full line of the right side, so....

[Jupiler]

trodas, Zejtan, ziR.DiGi and masterchorch :

all checksums pass.

masterchorch :

first number is a 1.

[masterchorch]

kk & thx ;)

[Zejtan]

thnx Jupiler,
now lets try watter or something nice =),

[mike11973]

http://img86.exs.cx/img86/3583/cpuzshot6ha.jpg

[ziR.diGi]

thanks for the verify ! :)

[Kunaak]

mike11973

yours is good

[Umek]

xtreme underclocking :D xD

http://img109.exs.cx/img109/4770/Dibujo36.jpg

11hours prime stable

bye!

[Kunaak]

Umek,

Yes, your underclocking passes too, haha... nice voltages there ;)

[ziR.diGi]

here we go again..
little update. owned the 3,5ghz :P
http://v094600.dd2434.kasserver.com/ecl/oc_results/3516.gif

..and that with my first p4 ever ! iam so happy :D and the board+cpu has still more power. but now iam doing prime test for some hours. atm it seems to be very stable !

[Jupiler]

ziR.diGi :

checksum's OK.

[TM30]

could you please check this one:

http://www3.mtb-news.de/fotos/data/500/22832850.gif

[enzoR]

red x

[Karnivore]

could you please check this one:


Looks ok, but that purple sure is hard on the eyes..





http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=23096&stc=1

[Crmk]

That's Skynet ... it's ever so ;)

[mike11973]

http://img175.exs.cx/img175/9375/newcpuzsettings9eb.jpg

[alexio]

I'm not sure about this one.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v342/AlexKok33/3466mhz.jpg

[BeSaiD]

I want to verify this one :P

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v504/setyotomo/mampus38fd-resize.jpg

Thanks a lot!

[Tyrou]

Hi, could you please check this one :

http://img161.exs.cx/img161/7250/29113lo.png

Thx

[Jupiler]

Hi, could you please check this one :

http://img161.exs.cx/img161/7250/29113lo.png

Thx


Checksum's OK.

[Jupiler]

I want to verify this one :P

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v504/setyotomo/mampus38fd-resize.jpg

Thanks a lot!

It passes, but the program can't check the memory frequency, if that's what you wanted to know. (315Mhz, 2-2-2-5, 1T) ;)

[[XC] moddolicous]

I want to verify this one :P

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v504/setyotomo/mampus38fd-resize.jpg

Thanks a lot!
What ram are you using that can reach 315mhz 2-2-2-5. I want to see a Sandra mem benchmark

[BeSaiD]

What ram are you using that can reach 315mhz 2-2-2-5. I want to see a Sandra mem benchmark


I want to see sandra, too :P

They are some twinmos with winbond UTT @3.2v :eek: :slobber: :worship:

Edit: Thank you Jupiler for verifying that screen :D

[Riverna]

True or fake? What a ugly color :(

http://www3.mtb-news.de/fotos/data/500/22832850.gif

[DrecksAzubi]

True or fake? What a ugly color :(

http://www.picupload.net/myimage/d36d6a94f5ec3b2b092ad8c5f.jpg

Easy Tune is crap^^

[funkflix]

I hope this colors are a fake! Ahhh .. i forgot it's SKYNET, he need those colors.
But do not even know why ... freaky.

Btw., i don't think it's an fake. ;)

[shimmishim]

can you check this one?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v257/alvinleephd/3400screen.jpg

[CTKP]

The 3400+ 939 newcastles are real, but must be purchased in conjunction with a mobo.

[Jupiler]

http://img175.exs.cx/img175/9375/newcpuzsettings9eb.jpg


Sorry for the delay.
Checksum passes.

[Jupiler]

I'm not sure about this one.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v342/AlexKok33/3466mhz.jpg


Looks OK but no 100% proof, as an older version has been used.

[shimmishim]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v257/alvinleephd/3400screen.jpg

check please.

i'm curious cuz it's a dh7-cg stepping rather than a D0 stepping

[Karnivore]

check please.

i'm curious cuz it's a dh7-cg stepping rather than a D0 stepping






http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=23427&stc=1

here you go.

[shimmishim]

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=23427&stc=1

here you go.

thanks!

too bad the checksum can't tell the difference between 754 and 939...

it's just strange cuz i've never heard of a CG 939 ... oh well...

[B I]

How this looks.....Im learnin alot from u guys

thanx

[tictac]

Can someone verified this :)

http://www.tictac.katrourke.com/pic/setyotomo.jpg

[overcrash86]

can you check this ?

http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/64-M%203400+/2993Mhz.jpg

[Jupiler]

B I & overcrash86 :

checksum's OK.


tictac :

the checksum from the CPU-Z screenie at the left of the screen is not valid (checksum # has only 9 digits, should be 10). The other is OK.
Something's wrong with the first one.

[tictac]

ok thanks :)

[B I]

thanx

[overcrash86]

B I & overcrash86 :

checksum's OK.


tictac :

the checksum from the CPU-Z screenie at the left of the screen is not valid (checksum # has only 9 digits, should be 10). The other is OK.
Something's wrong with the first one.


thanks ;)

[nutcase]

can you verify this one.. something does not add up...

sorry, but he cut part of it off and barely readable for the checksum

[dippyskoodlez]

can you verify this one.. something does not add up...

sorry, but he cut part of it off and barely readable for the checksum

hmm... looks like....

3132337881?

:toast:

um.... 458x21 = 9618mhz....

CPU-z not read multi correct? the 14x multi of 2.8ghz works for the 6.4ghz, but 458fsb? :slobber: I wish.

[cpuz]

3132337881 is not valid anyway.
The P4B 2.8GHz uses 21x133, that explains the multiplier. It is the only true information in this screenshot ;-)

[nutcase]

3132337881 is not valid anyway.
The P4B 2.8GHz uses 21x133, that explains the multiplier. It is the only true information in this screenshot ;-)

well, that is good enough.. Now time to go slam on him
:toast:

I should have added it up but was too lazy.. :rolleyes:

[DB72]

http://xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=23754&stc=1 first time trying this..

'hopes this works'


thx

[THunDA]

When someone gets a change can you check this one out.. :)

Thanks alot..

[trans am]

is this real? suppose to be a 754 newcastle on water cooling. it looks questionable.

[Jupiler]

is this real? suppose to be a 754 newcastle on water cooling. it looks questionable.

Very questionable.
CPU runs at 2700, not 2960, like he claims to.

[Jupiler]

When someone gets a change can you check this one out.. :)

Thanks alot..

checksum's OK.

[THunDA]

Thanks.. :)

[Kunaak]

DB72- yours passes perfect for 2500 mhz.

hag6br- thats a fake, comes up as unknown CPU, 0 mhz.
fake.

[DB72]

thanks Kunaak

woohooooo

got me some nu memory runs great :banana:

[trans am]

Very questionable.
CPU runs at 2700, not 2960, like he claims to.

Holy crap! I knew it! Thanks man! This guy is going to get reamed!

[godsa]

Please check..thanks :)

[majkel84]

Please verify my friend's screen:
http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/tytan150/CPU-Z/cpuz1.26%20@%204.0.JPG

http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/tytan150/CPU-Z/cpuz1.26%20@%204.0.JPG

[missme]

check this sum

[L0$t Pr0PhEt]

check this sum

LOL, you must be kidding me, I think his superpi score is a bit low :p

[overcrash86]

check this sum


:owned: :wierd:

lol all faked :rotf:

[missme]

LOL, you must be kidding me, I think his superpi score is a bit low :p
so i do realy want to know whether the cpu-z 12.6 can be faked

[missme]

:owned: :wierd:

lol all faked :rotf:

i know it must be fake,but the checksum maybe right,that is I worry about...

[racoontje]

Regarding the "LOL, obviously fake" posts, we don't care if it's actually fake or not (we don't need a checksum verifier to show that), we just want to see if it's possible to fake 1.26, which was previously thought impossible :)

[Kunaak]

nothings impossible, unfortunatly, we got idiots out there that think "ok so CPUZ 1.26 can't be cheated on, so I think I'll figure out how to cheat on it", we do all this hard work to make overclocking more honest and theres always someone out there trying to make it easier for cheaters.

this is why I have a list of things out there to help verify OC's.
like clockgen, 3dmark2001se, CPUmark2 and other things.
CPUZ alone, is just a single tool, in no way meant to imply a OC is 100% cheat free.

CPUZ so far, is the most cheat free program I know of.
Crystal CPUID, Central Brain Identifier, WCPUID... these programs offer NO Anti Cheating Measures. Only the maker of CPUZ so far has worked with us to try and stop cheaters and cheating.

[godsa]

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=700725&postcount=411

So your all saying that thats a fake?

Either quote me or say...Godsa thats a fake..or Godsa that checks out :toast:

[jhj]

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=700725&postcount=411

So your all saying that thats a fake?

Either quote me or say...Godsa thats a fake..or Godsa that checks out :toast:

The checksum is ok, seems not faked.

[bias_hjorth]

How would you know?

[majkel84]

You've forgot about mine!


Kunaak- could you PLEASE verify mine ?? :cool:

[Jupiler]

You've forgot about mine!


Kunaak- could you PLEASE verify mine ?? :cool:

Something's wrong with that checksum.
Checksum reads AMD cpu and "No valid" frequency.
Weird.

[Kunaak]

theres alot of things wrong with that screen shot.

in the processor name, it should read P4 EE, but it just says P4

in the code name it says northwood, it should say gallatin.

in the second processor name, it says 3200 mhz, it should say 3.2 ghz...

the available multipliers are from 16-0, it should say 8-16 or 12-16.

anyways, thats one of the easiest case of faking I ever seen...
tell your friend to try harder next time.

[majkel84]

theres alot of things wrong with that screen shot.

in the processor name, it should read P4 EE, but it just says P4

in the code name it says northwood, it should say gallatin.

in the second processor name, it says 3200 mhz, it should say 3.2 ghz...

the available multipliers are from 16-0, it should say 8-16 or 12-16.

anyways, thats one of the easiest case of faking I ever seen...
tell your friend to try harder next time.

True, we've also noticed that and it seems quite strange to us and that's why I post it here to verify.
The screen's owner said that it's the early version of P4 EE so CPUz didn't recognize it as Gallatin but Northwood :stick: Freak !
jupiler, kunaak- Thanks for advice. :)

[godsa]

jhj thanks for the feedback..nice for you to chime in and lend a hand ;)


Quote:
Originally Posted by godsa
jhj thanks for the feedback..nice for you to chime in and lend a hand


Again (and I'm not gonna repeat it) :
there is no 100% certainty that a screenshot, taken with older versions than 1.26 are cheat-free.
Therefore, we ask to post screenshots with version 1.26 used. Has been asked several times and weeks before. Maybe you should read Kunaak's posts again.

Apparently, you believe a guy who registered today and made 1 single post?
Wow ..didn't even think to check if it is 1.26 or not..just figured it was...My mistake.

Sure Y not believe a guy with one post..Lol..the guy that trans am caught lieing >>AsianInvasion Rating: 1377 | Rated by 92 Visitors <<< :banana4: :banana: :toast: :D ;)

[Jupiler]

jhj thanks for the feedback..nice for you to chime in and lend a hand ;)


Again (and I'm not gonna repeat it) :
there is no 100% certainty that a screenshot, taken with older versions than 1.26 are cheat-free.
Therefore, we ask to post screenshots with version 1.26 used. Has been asked several times and weeks before. Maybe you should read Kunaak's posts again.


Apparently, you believe a guy who registered today and made 1 single post? :stick:

[cpuz]

Hi,
it seems someone succeeded in cracking the checksum in 1.26. Thanks to Kunaak and Pik-Ard for pointing me on that.
I'm really wondering about the aim of doing this, the checksum is just a way to validate an overclock with cpuz. In addition, we have nice people here who spend lot of time to validate checksums, and cracking the checksum is a way to make their efforts void.
The checkum method used in cpuz was, so far, not very sophisticated. From next version it will be, and will change every version if necessary. Checksum check program will be sent to concerned people.
Best regards,
Franck

[L0$t Pr0PhEt]

Hi,
it seems someone succeeded in cracking the checksum in 1.26. Thanks to Kunaak and Pik-Ard for pointing me on that.
I'm really wondering about the aim of doing this, the checksum is just a way to validate an overclock with cpuz. In addition, we have nice people here who spend lot of time to validate checksums, and cracking the checksum is a way to make their efforts void.
The checkum method used in cpuz was, so far, not very sophisticated. From next version it will be, and will change every version if necessary. Checksum check program will be sent to concerned people.
Best regards,
Franck

Thanks for making such a fine program :toast:

[MaSell]

Can you check that screen? I think it is impossible, 4.6GHz at northwood, AC cooling. Look at that:

http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/tytan150/2.6%20@%204.6.JPG

THX :toast:

[Rippthrough]

Hi,
it seems someone succeeded in cracking the checksum in 1.26. Thanks to Kunaak and Pik-Ard for pointing me on that.
I'm really wondering about the aim of doing this, the checksum is just a way to validate an overclock with cpuz. In addition, we have nice people here who spend lot of time to validate checksums, and cracking the checksum is a way to make their efforts void.
The checkum method used in cpuz was, so far, not very sophisticated. From next version it will be, and will change every version if necessary. Checksum check program will be sent to concerned people.
Best regards,
Franck


Keep up the good work :toast:

[Jupiler]

Can you check that screen? I think it is impossible, 4.6GHz at northwood, AC cooling. Look at that:

http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/tytan150/2.6%20@%204.6.JPG

THX :toast:


100% fake.
Shows P4 at 2925Mhz

[pudds]

Can you verify this:

http://www.pc-helper.net/screen.JPG

On air using xp-120 + delta

[Kunaak]

it passes...

[SuperDude]

thanks

[Jupiler]

thanks

Checksum's OK.

[cpuz]

Just for information, the new validation system is quite done, it is very different from the current one, online-based, and much more secured.
I'm making my possible to release this version as soon as possible.

[godsa]

Just for information, the new validation system is quite done, it is very different from the current one, online-based, and much more secured.
I'm making my possible to release this version as soon as possible.
Still available only to selective people are is it web based so anyone can check sums now.

Born and raised Hazlet, NJ... :toast:

[shidokanjohn]

Can you verify this pls?
http://www.thelab.gr/attachment.php?s=&postid=171050

[Kunaak]

everything passes perfectly.

[shidokanjohn]

Thanks Kunaak....
Someone told me that i am good at photoshop...

[The Byter]

can u plz verify me ?

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=24430

[BB mods's]

Check my latest plz. http://www.snt-systems.com/tommy/ocd.jpg

[cpuz]

Still available only to selective people are is it web based so anyone can check sums now.

Born and raised Hazlet, NJ... :toast:

No, anyone will be able to check an overclock.
I've been in NJ for 4 months only, I like the place very well.

[Karnivore]

Thanks to Franck's great efforts this thread is no longer needed!

Download the latest CPUZ and verify your own Screenshots!

http://xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=52972