[ATI/A64 Club] 30K 600/600 Lowest Cpu freq.

[misteroadster]

I think it's a good challenge , i've seen macci doing some good 30K with his Winnie :banana:
Everybody is welcome and can compete with an (lucky) air setup.

The Rules are :

- Minimum 30000Pts at 3dmark 2001 at default settings.

- 520/560 or 600/600.

600/600 is for those lucky guys with X800 Watercooled or just lucky with their aircooled X800 .

520/560 is for the unlucky or prudent guys .

You can do Both contests if you wants :banana4:
-Register yours scores on the ORB is Required and post the link

http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/520560.GIF

http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/600600.GIF

Here is mine Temporary 520/560 run :
Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939
FX53@278X8 2/2/2/3 (Bios F3)
ATI X800Vivo@XT 520/560 (Bios 526/573)
2X256 mo Kingston KHX 3200 sgle sided vddr=vio=3,91v
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/30K520.JPG
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8245830

[DCR]

I like those x800 clocks...I wonder how high I can get my PE on water...

[misteroadster]

yes , those clock aren't too hard to have.
The japanese got their 24GP, why don't we have our own 30K-GP :D ?

[FrozenGPU]

Woah! (Neo) Memory does matter! :D

[DCR]

Is that RivaTuner? When I tried to use it with the 8.07 betas, it says there is no driver found to tweak.

[misteroadster]

humm , i use the 20RC15 Rivatuner with Cat 4.10.

[blinky]

i like contest ideas like this, but i think we need to have an all air cooled conitnually running contest, i think 37K is possible on air ;)

[misteroadster]

limiting the frequencies , is a good solution i think , place to optimizing !!
No enormous HSF , no finland air :D , no mods or a little , just optimisations , Massive FSB , and tight timings.
And no stress to burn your babies :banana4:

Do you think 600/600 is too much ? 580/580 is better maybe ?

[Formann]

limiting the frequencies , is a good solution i think , place to optimizing !!
No enormous HSF , no finland air :D , no mods or a little , just optimisations , Massive FSB , and tight timings.
And no stress to burn your babies :banana4:

Do you think 600/600 is too much ? 580/580 is better maybe ?


Great idea :)

But the VC clockck shoud be 576/596 :D :p:
580/580 sounds great. Still need to vmod my XT PE tho. I actually hope it catches on fire. Paying 500$ for an XT PE, and all it does is 576/596.. and thats on water. Its my 4th x800, and i really feel i diserve a good one now.


Let the tweaking begin :D

[CodeRed]

[QUOTE=misteroadster
And no stress to burn your babies :banana4:

[/QUOTE]

3.84V Vdimm aint stress?

I like the idea of this contest as it allows a lot of people to play. So what's th preset CPU limit? 2.0, 2.2, 2.4GHz ?????

[misteroadster]

no cpu limit , lower is better.
3,84 is just fine for my BH5 powaaah :D
Codered do you think 600/600 is too much or is good ?

[GomerPyle]

Arh my VIVO wont do more than around 560 / 580 :( :)

misteroadster great idea, will give it a try in the weekend.

How much vgpu to get to 600 on AIR misteroadster?

[misteroadster]

1,65v stock cooler. Window opened :D

[Formann]

Hmm.. the x800 is very powerfull in 01 compared to the rest of the system. I cant se it beeing a bottleneck if it were to run at stock XT PE speed.

Even the ones with poorly OCing VIVOs can enter. That way a lot more people can enter the contest.

Just a thought :)

[Fosco]

Her is mine "old" 30k all air setup.

Epox-8KDA3J @ 263x9
A64 3200+ Clawhammer @ 2367MHz
OCZ 3500 EB @ 263MHz-3-2-2-5 ,
C3D x800xt pe @ 567 \ 598. All Air

30037marks (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8071854)

[misteroadster]

really good for a 754 ;) , congratz :toast:

[Fosco]

really good for a 754 ;) , congratz :toast:

Thanks :)

[CodeRed]

no cpu limit , lower is better.
3,84 is just fine for my BH5 powaaah :D
Codered do you think 600/600 is too much or is good ?

600/600 is fine by me, but a few are on stock air, no volt mods, and have warranty on their cards ;) 600/600 is probably a bit too high for these "stock" cards. 520/560 is also another nice number to choose, everyone should be able to do that :cool:

EDIT: If 520/560 forces u to use the 9x multi then that gives me a fighting chance :p:

[misteroadster]

Ok for 520/560 dude , it's the new rule :D
but i can't edit the title :/
i have to create a new thread probably.

[misteroadster]

600/600 is fine by me, but a few are on stock air, no volt mods, and have warranty on their cards ;) 600/600 is probably a bit too high for these "stock" cards. 520/560 is also another nice number to choose, everyone should be able to do that :cool:

EDIT: If 520/560 forces u to use the 9x multi then that gives me a fighting chance :p:
yes , it's probably real , but it's maybe wrong :D
But the most important thing is a lot of people can compete ;)
May be i should create many category 754 1mo/512 /939 1mo/512
We'll see what the competition can do , which os is the best , wich memory, the differences between socket and process 0,09 or 0,13 :toast:
And here we'll know who's the real OPTIMASTER :banana:
I hope my FX53 won't die with 3,85vio in the ass for long hours :rolleyes:

[=STE=BloodAngel]

Hehe, here's my old 30K record with a stock X800XT PE.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8049314

Not really a challenger, since you guys are using way lower cpu speeds.

[misteroadster]

you're the #1 754/512 of the thread , you're not a challenger for the moment :toast:
30400 is a little more , try to reduce cpu frequency :D

[=STE=BloodAngel]

you're the #1 754/512 of the thread , you're not a challenger for the moment :toast:

It's a 1Mb Clawhammmer :toast:

[misteroadster]

arf ok you're the challenger !!! :D
30K with 2700mhz and 1Mo L2 is not very good :(
you can do better with your actual 512ko ;) .

[macci]

I'll see what I can do once I lower the multi and up the FSB w/ Winny :D
Great challenge :toast:
So XT at stock clocks (520/560) right or 600/600? Hell I'll do both hehe :D

[=STE=BloodAngel]

arf ok you're the challenger !!! :D
30K with 2700mhz and 1Mo L2 is not very good :(
you can do better with your actual 512ko ;) .

Well actually, NC's are total crap in 2001Se in my opinion :p:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8167236

[misteroadster]

yes, i think both are interesting ;) thx macci :toast:

[misteroadster]

Well actually, NC's are total crap in 2001Se in my opinion :p:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8167236
I'm not totally agree with you , i think there's a 200Mhz lack ok , but not so much.
here's an old run with NC 939 0,13 :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8066437
if have it today i could have 1000-1300 pts more , so 34K probably.

[=STE=BloodAngel]

Yes they perform a lot better on S939 (DC makes up for the lack of cache). But just compare my 1Mb and 512kb scores. The 1Mb scores almost 3K more, while the NC is clocked 200Mhz higher and it has more memory bandwith.

As you can see I used exactly the same Catalyst drivers 2 :)

[misteroadster]

time will tell us. ;)

[=STE=BloodAngel]

I'll be back when I get my new stuff together :cool:

Will hopefully arrive friday:
Asus A8V Deluxe S939 Rev2
AMD 64 3200+ 90nm Winchester

Already in my hands :banana: :
1024MB G.Skill PC4400
Club3D X800Pro Vivo @ XT PE, Air cooled 560/1200Mhz
Tagan 480W Psu

[misteroadster]

héhé, i hope you will be be happy with your winnie :banana:

[Godmyster]

Here is mine :) 3400@2520@1.6v XT@607/614 Mem = Default all stock cooled and no Mods i think its pretty good im able to do 2530 but dont have a PS also very stable :)

http://imagens.foruns.org/godmyster/XT.JPG http://imagens.foruns.org/godmyster/CPU.JPG

[misteroadster]

:confused:
Where is the score ?
The rules are 600/600 or 520/560. :stick: :D

My (temporary) best 520/560 run
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8237254

[misteroadster]

Any challenger's ? :)

[spaceman]

Any challenger's ? :)
I can get just over 30k with 2500 MHz., give me a little time. ;) Edited out the WRONG compare. :rolleyes:

[misteroadster]

I can get just over 30k with 2500 MHz., give me a little time. ;) Edited out the WRONG compare. :rolleyes:
You're welcome ;)
:toast:

[spaceman]

Here's the one I thought I had, I'm pretty sure I can improve it. Stock 520/560, BTW. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8236821

[misteroadster]

can you give me the specs required : Cpu, Ram, FSB, Mobo, drivers.....

[Godmyster]

I got the score here.. http://imagens.foruns.org/godmyster/30.3k.JPG dont have a link because i dont have net in the other system :\

[misteroadster]

what was your settings ? and Cpu, ram ..........?
If it's not a 520/560 or 600/600 run i can't accept this , sorry . :(

[Godmyster]

It was with 600/600 on the card and 2520mhz on the CPU.. ram was default. :)

[misteroadster]

Here is mine :) 3400@2520@1.6v XT@607/614 Mem = Default all stock cooled and no Mods i think its pretty good im able to do 2530 but dont have a PS also very stable :)

http://imagens.foruns.org/godmyster/XT.JPG http://imagens.foruns.org/godmyster/CPU.JPG
:confused:
I can't accept your result , a link is required.

[Godmyster]

That was the Max that i could do on my card without artefacts i thought the thread was about that.. but i dont have a link because i dont have net in the other system :( and im using 56k atm and my modem doesnt work in w2k.. oh we..

[misteroadster]

Gomdmyster , this thread is made for compare the results of differents setup at same GPU frequency.
If you can't give me a link (i 'll include them in the table) your score is interestless :/
There's not so much rules , but i have to be strict.

[pkrew]

Here's one stock card. 8 x 279.76 acpi tweaked. Nice round number too.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8238968

[misteroadster]

wow , congratz dude ;) , great performance !!!!! :toast:
Good Job, Perfect run. :slobber:
i tried a 280 run with 560/520 too but i could only get 29K6 , i'll retry later with W2K :toast:
your car low is very impressive :eek:

[pkrew]

Thanks, you should be able to beat it with win2k. The only tweak I used was the acpi, so there's room for a better score

[misteroadster]

Very happy to see you there :)
Very interesting compare already. :toast:
Phil can you tell me your timings please for the table ? ,and catalysts are 4.10 official ? ;)

[pkrew]

I was using the beta 8.07 drivers. The timings were 2225715. Good luck with win2k

[misteroadster]

I was using the beta 8.07 drivers. The timings were 2225715. Good luck with win2k
okay , thx Phil , but 8.07 is used for 4.10B and 4.11B; for W2K my image cd dont want to be burned i've killed 3CD already :mad:.
I hope a good 600/600 run from you :toast:

[spaceman]

can you give me the specs required : Cpu, Ram, FSB, Mobo, drivers.....
Doh, sorry guy. CPU is a de-lidded desktop 3200+ (.13), 1M L2 cache, RAM is 1x512 BH-5 @ 1t-2-2-2-5, FSB is 10x250, mobo is DFI LP 250 GB, and Cat 4.9s on Win2k. My RAM was running at 264 stable today, but the chip won't give me decent horsepower. 9x264=2376 MHz., not enough for 30k. Half multis = no boot, or I'd try 9.5. :( I'll put the beta Cats back on tomorrow, and give it another whirl. :) BTW, my VIVO @ XT PE won't do 600/600, on air, so all my entries are for the 520/560 class. :)

[misteroadster]

i found a winnie/Gskill/XP competitor :D :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8237697

[misteroadster]

I was using the beta 8.07 drivers. The timings were 2225715. Good luck with win2k

I've installed 2K+DX 8.1 it's better for sure , about 300 pts more.
Very hard to beat you , i'm fighting :toast:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241057

[CodeRed]

I've installed 2K+DX 8.1 it's better for sure , about 300 pts more.
Very hard to beat you , i'm fighting :toast:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241057

Try playing with your GPU memory timings ;)

Its amazing how tight you can run with lots of volts and only 560 MHz :D

[misteroadster]

yes, i tried that yesterday , i think i'm forced to do that now :D
But now it's time to sleep , i'm dead here it's 5:30 AM :rolleyes:

[pkrew]

I've installed 2K+DX 8.1 it's better for sure , about 300 pts more.
Very hard to beat you , i'm fighting :toast:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241057

You'll get there my friend. :toast:

[spaceman]

I've installed 2K+DX 8.1 it's better for sure , about 300 pts more.
Very hard to beat you , i'm fighting :toast:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241057
I see ya moved up on your FSB, from 3MHz. to 23 MHz., lol. :D

[Frank E. BoNeS]

Here's one...Claw@261x9, stock card.....

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241952

...Might be able to go just a tad lower on the CPU. I'll also try a 600/600 run later.

[misteroadster]

You'll get there my friend. :toast:
Arfff , it's so cruel !!!!!!!!! :D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8242029
i will retry later !!!! :toast:

[misteroadster]

Here's one...Claw@261x9, stock card.....

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241952

...Might be able to go just a tad lower on the CPU. I'll also try a 600/600 run later.
THx , waiting for yours timings and settings ;)

[Frank E. BoNeS]

THx , waiting for yours timings and settings ;)


Timings were 2,2,2,5,7,12...2x256 of BH-5, DX8.1, win2k and the beta 8.07's. Did I miss anything? :D

[spaceman]

Arfff , it's so cruel !!!!!!!!! :D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8242029
i will retry later !!!! :toast:
LOL, that's harsh. :p: Seems you got the right settings, just need that one magic run. :cool:

[misteroadster]

Timings were 2,2,2,5,7,12...2x256 of BH-5, DX8.1, win2k and the beta 8.07's. Did I miss anything? :D
no, it's perfect.
BTW: good job :toast:

[Formann]

Not quite the result I was hoping for, but here it is.

A64 3500+ NewCastle @ 2570Mhz - 257*10 2-2-2-5 - Stock XT PE.

30013 3dmarks (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8242960)

Still have a lot to learn about tweaking.

[misteroadster]

Not so bad !! ;) push your ram to 280 Mhz with 9x coeff and some tweaks can do the job :banana:

[Formann]

Not so bad !! ;) push your ram to 280 Mhz with 9x coeff and some tweaks can do the job :banana:

One of the BH5 sticks can do 280, but not the other one. Its clocks about 10Mhz lower. For 267Mhz i need 3.7v (fluctuating from 3.57-3.7) I dont think i can reach 280 even with 3.9vdimm on booster. Im not gonna kill another A64. Im tired of watching my lovedones die.

Still, if i feel up to it, i might give it another try. If I just could find some new and/or better tweaks i could have 30k @ 2500-2530Mhz or so.

[misteroadster]

i was benching at 3,94vddr for this :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8243100 :banana:
Héhé :)

[Formann]

i was benching at 3,94vddr for this :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8243100 :banana:
Héhé :)

Okay.. you got me convinced. I mean, whats one more dead A64? :D

BUT, first i need to figure out some more tweaks. I dont think 280*9 alone is gonna cut it.

[misteroadster]

humm, i think 280x9 would be enough with a good LC, but only you can tell us ;)
259X9+2K3=279X8+W2k(400Pts)
2337 =2238+40mhz
2337 =2278
20Mhz FSB = about 60mhz cpu = 600 pts
you are at 2570 and 280x9 give you 2510mhz , really just ok, but probably doable :toast:

[misteroadster]

waiting for competitorz ...........

[spaceman]

Mkay, here's an entry for the 600/600 category. (finally volt-modded the vgpu to 1.8v, after mounting a PAL 8150. ;) ) Delidded desktop 3200+ Claw (1mb L2, .13), 1 512MB stick of BH-5 @ 1t-5-2-2-2, CPU @ 9x260= 2340 MHz., Cat 4.11s & DX9c on 2kPro, on DFI 250 GB. Oh yeah, might need this. ;) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8245514

[misteroadster]

thanks spaceman ;)

[misteroadster]

:banana: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8245830
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/30K520.JPG

New 600/600 record :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8246048 :banana4:

Edit: Tras and Trc wrong on the screen. :D

[misteroadster]

600/600 is fine by me, but a few are on stock air, no volt mods, and have warranty on their cards ;) 600/600 is probably a bit too high for these "stock" cards. 520/560 is also another nice number to choose, everyone should be able to do that :cool:

EDIT: If 520/560 forces u to use the 9x multi then that gives me a fighting chance :p:
you were wrong dude , 520/560 is a great contest , really hard , 600/600 is easier in fact :p:

[pkrew]

Congradulations my friend, great job :toast:

[CodeRed]

you were wrong dude , 520/560 is a great contest , really hard , 600/600 is easier in fact :p:


Looks like you guys are having a lot of fun with this contest. Just wish I had a vid card so I could join in.

Maybe in a few weeks I'll have a play in the 512kb cache class ;)

[misteroadster]

Pkrew : Thanks :toast:
BTW: you gave me a lot of work :)
Codered : yes i'd a lot of fun , and i ve learned a lot, but i hope it's just beginning , i'm waiting for your results ;)

[spaceman]

you were wrong dude , 520/560 is a great contest , really hard , 600/600 is easier in fact :p: Yeah, 600/600 is WAY easier. I still can't get my FSB to cooperate, on a 520/560 run. I've had 29,6xx, but that's the closest I can get under 2500 MHz. I'm lapping my mobile 3000+, so I might still have a shot. ;)

[=STE=BloodAngel]

I hope to recieve my Winchester and Msi today, and I'll do a quick 2001Se run for you guys @520/560. If the Winchester clocks over 2.5Ghz 30k is guaranteed :banana:

[misteroadster]

i've tried a run witn an 4000+ waterchilled and mine settings , X800Vivo@XT stock cooled, settled to 604/624.
Waiting for a good FX55 :rolleyes:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8247863

[misteroadster]

no contesters ?

[=STE=BloodAngel]

Can't hit anything higher than 28K :mad: , with my Winchester @2.5Ghz. And my G.Skill running @DDR500. X800XT PE @520/560.
Any tips :p: ?

[spaceman]

Just gotta find the best RAM timings you can, then max out the FSB. :)

[=STE=BloodAngel]

Can't hit anything higher than 28K :mad: , with my Winchester @2.5Ghz. And my G.Skill running @DDR500. X800XT PE @520/560.
Any tips :p: ?

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8272556

And what was that Acpi tweak again :stick:
Also I'm using Catalyst 4.11 if I'm right.

http://members.home.nl/paul.nijpels/Winchester2.JPG

[spaceman]

SMART mode on your HDD is killin' ya. I didn't think anyone still used that. ;)

[G H Z]

New 520/560 record :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8246048 :banana4:


292fps Nature @ 520/560 let alone 600/600?

I'm @ 291fps with 645/624 :confused:

*Edit Oh I see that that is 600/600 compare;) Still what's wrong with my card?

[misteroadster]

oh, yes , i ve done a mistake , i have edited :) , it was 600/600 of course.

[G H Z]

:)

Still @ 600/600 your Nature beats my 291fps @ 642/624 by 1fps. I don't understand this, are you playing with memory timings on the card?

[misteroadster]

yes , nature is memory dependant , and the timings helps.

[=STE=BloodAngel]

Here you go, http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8275692

:banana4: 29.5k :banana4:

Now I just have to figure out that tweak everyone is talking about to get past 30k :toast:

Specs and everything in compare description.

Do I get my name in that table on the first post now :stick:
Maybe you can add the 3DMark scores in that table too, kinda hard to see what you need to beat someone.

[cuddles]

If anyone wants to remote desktop into my PC and tweak my GPU memory you can go for it ;)

[misteroadster]

Here you go, http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8275692

:banana4: 29.5k :banana4:

Now I just have to figure out that tweak everyone is talking about to get past 30k :toast:

Specs and everything in compare description.

Do I get my name in that table on the first post now :stick:
Maybe you can add the 3DMark scores in that table too, kinda hard to see what you need to beat someone.
Congrats , you are near of the but :) , is it a 520/560 run ? , and the score is not so important because to be perfect it has to be +/-30100.

[G H Z]

If anyone wants to remote desktop into my PC and tweak my GPU memory you can go for it ;)

I can "tweak" more than that for you;)

[cuddles]

Please do :D *carries on the conversation in a PM*

[=STE=BloodAngel]

Congrats , you are near of the but :) , is it a 520/560 run ? , and the score is not so important because to be perfect it has to be +/-30100.

Yes, its run @520/560.

Can someone please push me in the right direction with that Macci tweak, can't find the thread anymore :(

[HermS]

Stock speeds on GPU

Compare (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8276386)
Screenie (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/graham.phillips200/30043.png)

This is with Clawhammer @ 249 x 10 on XP SP2 / DX9.0c with Cat 4.12 Beta My ram 2 x 512Mb BH6 and tops out at 255 so this is about as close as I can get. :cool:

[Arnar]

I wont get my FX55 back until 1-2 weeks :|

But them I'll post some great results :)

I have alot of BH-5 to play with ;)

[misteroadster]

Héhé , thanks all ;) , table updated.

[v142]

just passed 30k :D
30006 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8277485)

settings:
3500+ winchester 278x9,5
Corsair CMX4400C25 2,5-3-3-8-1CR "weak dram" 2x512MB
msi K8N neo2 plat. bios 1.51
Powercolor x800xt pe stock 520/560 (omega drivers)

[ahfung]

Here's my result:

A64 3200+ oc to 2395MHz (299x8)
Lanparty NF3
Geil UltraX 256MB oc to 299MHz 2.5-3-3-10 1T
X800XT-PE default speed
Windows 2000 SP4
DX9
Cat 4.12beta

Where can I find DX9 remover? It gonna help I know.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8278107

http://www.anti-x.org/bbs/attachments/forumid_13/3TUv_3dm01low30k.jpg

[ahfung]

This time with DX8.1, 520/560 game, X800 at default speed and mem timing.

http://anti-x.org/bbs/attachments/forumid_13/ObpK_3dm01low30k2.jpg

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8278180

[misteroadster]

good job :toast:

[ahfung]

Now this is 600/600 game, again with default bios no mem tweaks.

2.3GHz, 2nd place i'm in :banana: http://anti-x.org/bbs/attachments/forumid_13/Tyvb_3dm01high30k.jpg

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8278236

[misteroadster]

Updated ;)

[HermS]

Upgraded my cooling, Tweaked and optimised a little and managed to take 20Mhz off, shame my card wont do 600/600 for love nor money.

Screenie (http://homepage.ntlworld.com/graham.phillips200/30051.png)

Compare (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8278690)

[spaceman]

Curse you, ahfung, ya beat me by 40 MHz. :soap: :p: ;) Just kidding, good job. :toast:

[ahfung]

Curse you, ahfung, ya beat me by 40 MHz. :soap: :p: ;) Just kidding, good job. :toast:

LOL. Now you have plenty time to beat me as I'm returning the Geil to my friend. Oh well, the truth is reinstalling DX8 plus all the tweaks is PITA.

[macci]

Dothan running on i875 platform might do quite well in this challenge.
Take a look at The Stilt's run at 2400MHz => 32.3k (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8566966) :hehe:

Must set up my own Dothan 2001 rig this evening :D

[Mathias-K]

Great idea! Lets get Dothans in it :)

[macci]

The possibility to use i875 mobo has really given an awesome boost for Dothan 3DMark2001 speed. For instance w/ i855 mobo, 639/639 card clocks and 2.7GHz Dothan speed Drago low would give only a bit over 500FPS - now The Stilt scored over 600FPS on Drago low w/ 2.4GHz and 600/600 card. Over 100FPS faster w/ lower CPU&Card speed ;)

[macci]

Did my first Dothan 1.6G+P4C800 run w/ X800XTPE at stock clocks. CPU at 12x200 1:1 2-2-2-5. Score = 32120 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8567481) :D
And this is w/ windowsXP and zero tweaks, just installed it.
FX55 @2.6GHz (13x200) w/ 1GB of RAM, same video card and full Win2000 tweaks got basically an identical score (32185).

So it looks like Dothan is equal to FX55 even w/ 200MHz lower clockspeed ;)

[macci]

Dothan 2.4G vs. FX 2.6GHz

http://www.akiba-pc.com/CT-479/fx_vs_dothan.gif

Ok, I'll try the lowest 30k speed now :D

[macci]

Ok, here is the lowest CPU MHZ for 30k I could get w/ Dothan so far:

2053MHz (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8567531)

only 9x228 and 600/600. Lower than 9x didn't seem to work w/ the adapter for some reason. 30k at sub 2GHz ain't far thou.

edit: Full screenshot => PIC (http://www.akiba-pc.com/CT-479/30k_2053.gif)

[Moonman]

Nice thread.
Will join the tweaking battle in a few days.

[twilius_basic]

Dothan 2.4G vs. FX 2.6GHz

http://www.akiba-pc.com/CT-479/fx_vs_dothan.gif

Ok, I'll try the lowest 30k speed now :D

:eek: :woot:

Can we see someone cascade a Dothan through 2001? Please Macci? :D We ain't seen a 2K1 run from you in ages.

[Mathias-K]

Ok, here is the lowest CPU MHZ for 30k I could get w/ Dothan so far:

I knew it would come, and it just owns so much! :D

.. another interesting parts of it is, that you once clocked all the way up to 4500MHz to reach 30K.. ;)

[Moonman]

Here is mine result:
http://www.shrani.si/pics/3006311828_thumb.jpg (http://www.shrani.si/pics/3006311828.jpg)

orb (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8578884)

[Moonman]

Result for 600/600 catogory.

http://www.shrani.si/pics/3008811832_thumb.jpg (http://www.shrani.si/pics/3008811832.jpg)

orb ( http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8578946)

Hardware:
A643000+ winchester
2x256 BH-5
Neo2 PE
X800pro vivo modded to x800xt pe :banana: