PDA

View Full Version : D0 or C0 3.2E?



Malk
11-06-2004, 09:26 PM
I am maybe selling my 3.2E D0 but has the opportunity to choose between a new C0 or D0 when getting a new CPU, which should i choose for overclocking?

jjcom
11-06-2004, 09:41 PM
I believe that D0 is newer, so I would go for that one. Your current D0 seems to be doing pretty good. The believe that C0 was a earlier rev. I think it ran hotter with less of an overclock potentical.

Malk
11-06-2004, 09:52 PM
That was also my beleif at the time i purchased this one i have now, but i have read some places about some C0´s that are doing pretty good as well.

i have had My current D0 at 4.16 Ghz 1.6 Vcore :)

jjcom
11-06-2004, 09:55 PM
probly just a later C0, as far as I knew the D0 was the latest addtion to the Prescott. but i could be wrong, being that its mid-night here, lol. I post once late....and I thought "XS" was something else, then couldn't figure out why that guy was chewing me out, so I was little mad...o'well.

Malk
11-06-2004, 10:00 PM
You have to explain what you mean by that? :)

Here its early in the morning :)

Petr
11-07-2004, 12:45 PM
The best is revision E0 (Model 4, Stepping 1) - lowest heat generated, highest frequencies possible. D0 and C0 are now outdated.

comment
11-07-2004, 02:42 PM
The best is revision E0 (Model 4, Stepping 1) - lowest heat generated, highest frequencies possible. D0 and C0 are now outdated.Hi's out for a s478 CPU not a LGA775. Considering what you told me earlier this evening he should grab a D0 stepping (loadline B) - right?

Victorshen
11-07-2004, 02:50 PM
Hi's out for a s478 CPU not a LGA775. Considering what you told me earlier this evening he should grab a D0 stepping (loadline B) - right?
:rolleyes:
but it seems that there is also s478 version E0 prescott

Click Here to check (http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/list.asp?ProcFam=483&PkgType=ALL&SysBusSpd=ALL&CorSpd=ALL)

They r

SL7KD 3.40 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PP 3.40 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PN 3.20 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PM 3 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PL 2.80 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA

:toast:

comment
11-07-2004, 03:18 PM
:rolleyes:
but it seems that there is also s478 version E0 prescott

Click Here to check (http://processorfinder.intel.com/scripts/list.asp?ProcFam=483&PkgType=ALL&SysBusSpd=ALL&CorSpd=ALL)

They r

SL7KD 3.40 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PP 3.40 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PN 3.20 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PM 3 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PL 2.80 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA

:toast:I know but the 3.2 E0 (SL7PN) supports loadline A not loadline B.

Victorshen
11-07-2004, 03:33 PM
I know but the 3.2 E0 (SL7PN) supports loadline A not loadline B.
just do search over this forum, so you mean its not capable to use Lock free techs on these chips?

well, i think it wont be a big problem for me at least, take 3.2G for example, id be very happy to have it running @ 300*16 :D

uclajd
11-07-2004, 08:50 PM
SL7KD 3.40 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
SL7PP 3.40 GHz 800 MHz 90 nm E0 1 MB 478 pin PPGA
So what is the difference between SL7KD and SL7PP? :confused:

And does anyone know the Product Order Codes for the 3.2 E0? Some sites (Newegg, MWave) use the Product Order Codes instead of the OEM Order Codes. :shrug:

IamAnoobieCheez
11-07-2004, 09:00 PM
I want an E0 :(