View Full Version : Something I Just Picked Up, (Again!)
hallowen
08-13-2004, 04:43 PM
I REALLY Have to Quit Buying These Things.........:p:
http://hallowen.freehosting.net/3.4EEOES1a.jpg
On STOCK INTEL HSF:
http://hallowen.freehosting.net/capture_018eo1.jpg
FUGGER
08-13-2004, 05:03 PM
Those E0 's are sweet.
4.2Ghz on low voltage and stock HSF...
BTW that is a very nice pi time
hallowen
08-13-2004, 05:08 PM
Thanks FUGGER,
Looks like Eventually I'll HAVE to put it under the Cascade,
The Temptation is TOO MUCH to Bear!:banana:
Karnivore
08-13-2004, 05:37 PM
Originally posted by hallowen
Thanks FUGGER,
Looks like Eventually I'll HAVE to put it under the Cascade,
The Temptation is TOO MUCH to Bear!:banana:
Nice processor, PM me when your done playing ;)
Intense
08-13-2004, 06:02 PM
Where are you getting these?!
tylerhskate
08-13-2004, 06:08 PM
Close out MSN messenger EWW and qttask(quicktime) yuck, that ate up my memory when i first installed xp. Oh yeah that oc is friggin amazing nice job dudet
hallowen
08-13-2004, 06:24 PM
Intense
You must have Contacts( And not divulge anything about your dealings with Them!) + $$$!:cool:
tylerhskate
Yeah, I know I should have turned off the eye candy and closed programs, but I forgot due to the Excitement!:hehe:
hallowen
08-13-2004, 07:33 PM
Still Playin'................And Still On Stock Air.;)
http://hallowen.freehosting.net/capture_011eo1.jpg
freecableguy
08-13-2004, 07:38 PM
Strangely everytime I get an ES I usually end up using the highest or second highest multiplier...almost seems like a waste....except it's a sexy ES....hehe. :D
hallowen
08-13-2004, 08:08 PM
freecableguy
I Know What You Mean,
But There's Just Something Addictive About These ES's.:banana4:
cold_ice
08-14-2004, 02:55 AM
Damn nice CPU, you have there :eek:
I want to see cascade results!
Iridium192_217
08-14-2004, 07:04 AM
Nice chip you got there:)
When you are going to put it in the cascade?
hallowen
08-14-2004, 08:54 AM
Iridium192_217
Going to use a Chilled Water Setup First Just to Experiment a little, and also because I'm Already Testing my A8V/FX-53 under the Cascade with my New X800XTPE!:D
Hard to Build another Cascade ATM Due to Work Schedule, So It'll Have to do on Cold Fluids for right Now. :toast:
hallowen
08-14-2004, 10:39 AM
Using DD Block and 20C Chilled Water......
http://hallowen.freehosting.net/capture_015cw1.jpg
tylerhskate
08-14-2004, 11:10 AM
Mem only at 176? whoa...
hallowen
08-14-2004, 11:45 AM
Yeah, Not enough Volts for the Memory Past 260 1:1, Just testing CPU Range.:p:
saaya
08-14-2004, 01:00 PM
i wouldnt call 1.55v "low vcore" for a prescott, but nice oc!
hallowen
08-14-2004, 01:33 PM
Thanks saaya
Well, compared to the 1.75 Vcore :eek: I had on My 3.2E ES, I Think It's Kinda Low! :D
a very nice find there dude. :)
althes
08-14-2004, 05:11 PM
i want to see the benches on that sucker
freecableguy
08-14-2004, 05:54 PM
I just got my 3.4EE ES at 4Ghz down to 1.5V....now THAT'S a low Vcore!
Kanavit
08-15-2004, 06:55 AM
so Hallowen, what do u prefer A64 FX-53 or P4 EE?? you are one of the few who are fortune enough to have used both platforms.
saaya
08-15-2004, 08:24 AM
Originally posted by hallowen
Well, compared to the 1.75 Vcore :eek: I had on My 3.2E ES, I Think It's Kinda Low! :D
:P
masterofpuppets
08-15-2004, 08:33 AM
Originally posted by freecableguy
I just got my 3.4EE ES at 4Ghz down to 1.5V....now THAT'S a low Vcore!
My EE sucks up more voltage than a, um dunno. But without that droop mod, I would never have got it over 4GhZ.
hallowen
08-15-2004, 08:37 AM
I am having a hard time trying to choose between AMD and INTEL!:p:
The 3.2EE's I've tried have worked Good under Single Stage DD(4000MHz-4400MHz), The 3.2E ES was Great under my Cascade(5008MHz), The New 3.4E EO ES looks Promising on Stock HSF Air!(4303MHz) :eek:
The FX-53 is Very Good(3202MHz) under my Cascade ATM, but I'm Waiting For a better MoBo to come out for S939 since the A8V has It's Problems.:(
Just using both types to experiment with, can't really compare until I build another Cascade for the INTEL Chips and run them side by side! :toast:
masterofpuppets
08-15-2004, 08:49 AM
Go INTEL! Get a lga775 3.4ee and a 865 lga mobo, put it under the cascade and watch your fx53 suck.
skate2snow
08-15-2004, 09:22 AM
Can I know why an LGA 3.4EE?:rolleyes:
tylerhskate
08-15-2004, 09:44 AM
is there any noticeable speed diff between the two since their both like lightning or do you just have to bench to test?
hallowen
08-15-2004, 09:56 AM
You really have to run benches to measure the differences between them, and they should be tested with the same type of cooling (Air/Water/Phase Change/etc..).
Also, trying to keep up with all the "New Stuff"(MoBo's/Ram/CPU's/etc..) every few months is getting to be Expensive $$$$$$!:lol:
freecableguy
08-15-2004, 11:43 AM
I know what you mean, it's almost time to have another "Help-me-by-buying-my-extra-hardware-before-the-wife-sees-the-VISA-bill sales" :D
saaya
08-15-2004, 01:32 PM
the lga ees are probably a newer stepping, so thats why he suggested to pick those?
and what stepping is your fx? you should try a new chip, charlies fx53 is stable at 3.2ghz or even higher with only dry ice and tom got his fx53 to 3.5ghz and 3.4ghz+ is 100% stable for him with his cascade.
you should try a new fx, will be some time till we see 90nm fx chips it seems, maybe 4 months or even more.
but those new prescotts sound promising as well.
Kanavit
08-15-2004, 02:49 PM
LGA looks really promising to me. new socket design which should last for many years. much longer than any of AMD's sockets since it still uses pins. the Pinless cpu will have so much advantage in the future when Dual cores come out and higher frequencies clockspeeds. Plus DDR2, and PCIe.
We all know sooner or later AMD will adopt this technology, so all of their technology is once again outdated.
masterofpuppets
08-15-2004, 03:11 PM
Kanavit: the non overclocking, self confessed intel fanboy ;)
I still to this day wonder why kanavit frequents an overclockers forum when he runs...stock...
hallowen
08-16-2004, 06:09 AM
Well, I Decided to Sell My AMD Rig and Concentrate on the EO under The Cascade.
I Think It's going to be Interesting...........Don't You Think?
:banana3:
$0m#0n#
08-16-2004, 06:27 AM
I wish I had a CPU like U, I must sell my 3.4C and buy 3.2E, the prescott r realy sweet and I think its gonna be more fun with the 3.4E than FX.
enzoR
08-16-2004, 06:48 AM
holy crap.. and i though prescotts sucked!
lol, nothing sucks under a -100C cascade ;)
Originally posted by egal
I wish I had a CPU like U, I must sell my 3.4C and buy 3.2E, the prescott r realy sweet and I think its gonna be more fun with the 3.4E than FX.
LOL ive got his old 3.2e es you should of said somthing id of traded you....
btw: hallowen nice chip as usual :D
peace perc,
saaya
08-19-2004, 07:26 PM
Originally posted by bh2k
lol, nothing sucks under a -100C cascade ;)
:D
nice hellowen, so its going good under ps? come on post some results already :D
Originally posted by Kanavit
LGA looks really promising to me. new socket design which should last for many years. much longer than any of AMD's sockets since it still uses pins. the Pinless cpu will have so much advantage in the future when Dual cores come out and higher frequencies clockspeeds. Plus DDR2, and PCIe.
We all know sooner or later AMD will adopt this technology, so all of their technology is once again outdated. you think socket 775 will stay for a few years?
socket a was introduced in june 2000 and the last new socket a chipset that was released was the nf2u400-ST and the kt880 just a few months ago, and the sempron socket a was released just now.
that makes the socket a plattform 4 years old!
intel:
socket 370
socket 370 tualatin
socket 423
socket 478
socket 478 prescott
intel didnt even plan dual core desktop chips before 2008 when they released the prescott, so what makes you think socket 775 was designed for dual core chips? im not saying it cant handle dual core chips, but it was def not designed to support them, while socket 939 and 940 were designed to work with dual core chips from the start. looking at intels history they always switched to a new plattform instead of trying to get a new technology working on an already exisiting plattform, so even if dual core chips can run on 775 i highly doubt intel will release dual core 775 chips.
btw, dual core cpus will come at LOWER frequencies than single core chips on the market at that time.
and other than intel amd will NOT switch to a new socket for new technolgies like pcie, and i doubt amd will do ddr2 anytime soon, and even if they do they will very probably stay with socket 939 and 940.
you are really looking through your intel glasses, you need to be more objective.
its a fact that intel never designed a plattform to last, they never claimed they would, thats not their strategy. their stategy is to build the best possible plattform possible for every new generation of cpus while amds startegy is to build one plattform with many upgrade possibilities so that it lives long and people dont need to upgrade.
intel is aiming at good performence and doesnt care that much about the costs, while amd mostly focuses on cost and accepts performence losses if it means a longer plattform life.
their startegies are not better or worse than another, they are just different market approaches.
oh, and pcie is nothing intel developed and amd will adopt, pcie was developed by all big players in the industry, mostly by ati and nvidia. and ddr2 development was supported by intel but they didnt develop it either.
its true that intel is supporting new technolgies, but thats because it fits their marketing strategy to throw a new plattform on the market all the time.
hallowen
08-19-2004, 07:54 PM
saaya
I Haven't done any more testing/benching on this Chip lately since I had to order another ASUS MoBo, 'cause my old P4C800D Died on me (Probably from Too many Mods/Changes/Abuse/Etc...), So I bought a P4C800E (Refurb) to continue Testing.
This EO is the Latest Prescott Stepping that reportedly has a "throttling" feature to allow lower Chip temps, although it Could hurt Performance.
As you can see, It works pretty good on just HSF Air, But after I do the Mods on this replacement MoBo, Then the REAL Testing will begin when it's under the Cascade!:toast:
skate2snow
08-20-2004, 02:04 AM
Originally posted by saaya
the lga ees are probably a newer stepping, so thats why he suggested to pick those?
and what stepping is your fx? you should try a new chip, charlies fx53 is stable at 3.2ghz or even higher with only dry ice and tom got his fx53 to 3.5ghz and 3.4ghz+ is 100% stable for him with his cascade.
you should try a new fx, will be some time till we see 90nm fx chips it seems, maybe 4 months or even more.
but those new prescotts sound promising as well. Right now there is no benefits w/ the LGA775, and no new stepping AFAIK. MOP looked to say that LGA whould rock, but right now the only speed difference w/ LGA you will have is that you have 775 contacts, and not 478, and the distance you have by those contacts is too short to have a speed difference, and most of the pins are of no benefits right now.
And hollowen, take your time, important things first;)
And freecableguy, I love your last post, it makes me remind when my mom was suprise of 1000$ hardware purshase because I was asking to my dad and not my mom:D.
hallowen
08-22-2004, 08:57 AM
Alright Ppl,
First tests under Cascade With Stock X800XTPE (520/560)............:D
http://hallowen.freehosting.net/capture_00334eo.jpg
http://hallowen.freehosting.net/capture_001a34eo.jpg
http://hallowen.freehosting.net/capture_00134eo.jpg
http://hallowen.freehosting.net/capture_00234eoam.jpg
freecableguy
08-22-2004, 10:36 AM
Holy chit! Nice OC.
hallowen
08-22-2004, 10:51 AM
Thanks freecableguy,
I Always Knew these ES's were Sweet OC'ers!:p:
cold_ice
08-22-2004, 12:08 PM
Very impressive!
I must get one of these :D
But your SuperPI score seems a bit low to me, you should easily get 27 secs with 4,9ghz. And please don't kill this chip like your 3.2es, oh pardon forgot that it's still working ;-)
hallowen
08-22-2004, 12:13 PM
cold_ice
Yes, SuperPi should be better, I'll have to work on it!;)
Not Bad for the First Shot Though, Still Lots more tests to Run.:toast:
cold_ice
08-22-2004, 12:49 PM
You should try Win 2003 Server
good luck
hallowen
08-22-2004, 06:10 PM
cold_ice
Are you using Win 2003 Server? Is it any better than Win XP Prof?
I'll Try it If I can find it at a decent Price. ;)
In the Meantime, Gonna Test Different Multipliers(14 - 16) on the Chip Tommorow and try more Vcore Also!:eek:
And YES, I do remember what almost happened to my 3.2E ES. :p:
Karnivore
08-22-2004, 06:57 PM
Server 2003 can shave quite a bit off SuperPI times, you can download a FREE Evaluation HERE (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/trial/evalkit.mspx) and HERE (http://www.msfn.org/win2k3/) is workstation setup guide.
AudiMan
08-22-2004, 07:24 PM
WOW!! I want a 5 GHz CPU!!
I wonder how it it'll be before I can run 5GHz with a Vapo LS.
Congrats!
hallowen
08-22-2004, 07:41 PM
Karnivore
Thanks for the Download Info!:toast:
I'll try to Install it Soon and see how much of a difference there is from XP. :cool:
AudiMan
Thanks, and :welcome: to the Forums!
u buy a hell of a lot of these ES's :toast:
hallowen
08-23-2004, 04:07 AM
a5h
Yeah, I Know, Just Can't Help Myself!
It's getting to be an Addiction!:lol:
cold_ice
08-23-2004, 08:23 AM
Yes I'm using WIN2003 for SuperPI, it's a bit faster than WinXP as already said
freecableguy
08-23-2004, 08:40 AM
What would possibly make Win2k3 faster than WinXP for SPI? I thought this was test of HARDWARE!?
-=TriX=-
08-23-2004, 10:16 AM
As far as I know, WS2003 has a tweaked kernel compared to XP/2k which makes it just slightly faster in SuperPi than XP/2k; ! second is the performance difference people commonly claim.
Karnivore
08-23-2004, 03:45 PM
Originally posted by freecableguy
What would possibly make Win2k3 faster than WinXP for SPI? I thought this was test of HARDWARE!?
Hardware test or not, its still software, and still needs to run through the OS.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.