Jupiler
10-20-2002, 01:47 PM
Well, got the Gigabyte 9700 2 weeks ago but wasn't impressed with the oc. Only 375-380 core and 332 mem. Really disappointed.
So I sold it yesterday and got me the Hercules 9700. Much better choice, I should have bought this one from the beginning. :)
Anyway, after a fresh install of WinXP, oc'ing the card and 3Dmark was next. (of course)
This sucker oc's very good, I can bench at 396/354, with only some small artifacts in Nature. Core craps out at 400 Mhz. Still not bad.
IT7 with a 2.4B at 3159 Mhz, PC3200 C2 at 234, 2-7-2-3, Enhanced OFF. Card was oc'ed at 385/349, to be sure it wouldn't carsh. Ran prefect without a single artifact.
Score : 18228.
Not to bad I think, but I'm limited by the cpu and multiplier. Cpu does 3420 but lower multiplier isn't helping me. Maybe a 2.8 next month?
18228 (http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4824783)
So I sold it yesterday and got me the Hercules 9700. Much better choice, I should have bought this one from the beginning. :)
Anyway, after a fresh install of WinXP, oc'ing the card and 3Dmark was next. (of course)
This sucker oc's very good, I can bench at 396/354, with only some small artifacts in Nature. Core craps out at 400 Mhz. Still not bad.
IT7 with a 2.4B at 3159 Mhz, PC3200 C2 at 234, 2-7-2-3, Enhanced OFF. Card was oc'ed at 385/349, to be sure it wouldn't carsh. Ran prefect without a single artifact.
Score : 18228.
Not to bad I think, but I'm limited by the cpu and multiplier. Cpu does 3420 but lower multiplier isn't helping me. Maybe a 2.8 next month?
18228 (http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4824783)