Pifast Benchmark

[Caprid]

Nice Job Jeff :cool:

Speaking of nice jobs, thanks to you and learn, I should have one running 226-229 soon. Keep getting errors. Have to find it's "Happy Place"

Cheers!! :toast:

[Pedro Rocha]

Some Granite Bay numbers :)

http://pprocha1.no.sapo.pt/PIFastGB3933.jpg

[AKRedneck]

Sorry about the big size, here's some of everything...

[KAIN]

Just to say it will be back online soon, had some technical difficulites with my hosting which have slowed updating.

[Tom Holck]

Ok,

We look forward to se the new list

:toast: :toast:

[hundasport]

Here's mine:
60.56
7.00
4.36
2.91
75.02

Pretty cool campared to those I've seen with faster mhz than mine (100-200 mhz more), most were lower fsb...though i believe I beat one that had more than 200fsb with higher clock speed.

9.5x200.45@1904.31 (wcpuid), vcore@1.675, vdimm@1.5v, cpu temp@46c, case temp@35c, cas 2.0

update!
60.22
7.00
4.36
2.91
74.69
It's the best I can do at 1904mhz from a 1800XP. too lazy to oc to 2050mhz, which is my max

[Caprid]

8RDA+ 12X227 2724mhz


http://caprid.homestead.com/files/pi54.80.jpg


:cool:

[DeBastaard]

Originally posted by Caprid
8RDA+ 12X227 2724mhz


http://caprid.homestead.com/files/pi54.80.jpg


:cool:

That's nice man 8)
I just did it again and my best is 95.xx :mad:

[sysfailur]

54.80! COT DAMN CAPRID! Very nice! Very very nice! :)

OPPAINTER needs to rip out his 3ghz chip and run some pifast.... as a matter of fact I'll go post that in his thread right now!

[Caprid]

Originally posted by sysfailur
OPPAINTER needs to rip out his 3ghz chip and run some pifast.... as a matter of fact I'll go post that in his thread right now!

LOL The only other AMD that can beat me and you gotta go throw a rock at the hornets nest. :p :p :p

IIRC, JCs 53.06 is the time to beat :cool:

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by Caprid
LOL The only other AMD that can beat me and you gotta go throw a rock at the hornets nest. :p :p :p

IIRC, JCs 53.06 is the time to beat :cool:

Mwahaha yeah I thought you'd like that! I'm upset actually though cus @ once I had #1 AMD, and then you guys all bust out your prometeias and I just can't keep up anymore :P

[okra]

Which is why you need to get that darn Cryofreezer goin, Sys. :D

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by okra
Which is why you need to get that darn Cryofreezer goin, Sys. :D

Actually I just found a place that sells LN2 near me! How bout that? $100 for 25L + $5/day dewar rental. Sounds good to me!

[Jeff]

Thanks to some freezing weather I'm down to...

57.22 (225x11.5 nForce2) :D

Same XP2400+, just cooling it down a bit more.

[KAIN]

Sorry guys, will be back online at some point soonish :(

I've already changed hosts twice now :(

Starting to piss me off.

[Jeff]

No worries mate. Once you get the page back up, people will flock to it to update thier scores.

I'm just one who likes to use the same bench over and over and over again to track my progress... thus the reason I've posted soo much in this thread. :D

BTW, I'm down to...

56.88 (226x11.5 nForce2) :D

[Caprid]

I like this one too. Got my new board up and running. Got it pretty stable @230. Was just going to look for this thread and saw it on the 1st page :D

BTW, I'm down to...

56.88 (226x11.5 nForce2) :D

Nice work Jeff :cool:

[muzz]

WTG Jeff.......... I kinda stopped benching that since the updating stopped..... since Kain's gonna be back online...... I just may start that again.

Well done jeff :toast: :banana:

muzz

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by KAIN
Sorry guys, will be back online at some point soonish :(

I've already changed hosts twice now :(

Starting to piss me off.

Yikes :\ Do you just need some webspace man? If you do I'll hook you up on my site. It's only 1 html page ffs.

LMK via email: zack@maximumoc.com

[KAIN]

Nah not just the webspace matey, the SQL as as well and the bandwidth. I hit my limit one one host in a day a couple of months back and killed my hosting server :) So changed and then they had problems, so moved again.

Sorted now, not just webspace though, thats the recent problem :)

I've just been changing the whole way it works, so that took a while the other bits were just a complication!

[Pedro Rocha]

Back to IT7 :)

http://pprocha1.no.sapo.pt/PIFast_56_75.jpg

Prometeia MicroFreezer
P 4 3.066 @ 3.900
Abit IT7-Max2 v.2
Corsair XMS 3500 @ DDR452 2-5-2-2

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by KAIN
Nah not just the webspace matey, the SQL as as well and the bandwidth. I hit my limit one one host in a day a couple of months back and killed my hosting server :) So changed and then they had problems, so moved again.

Sorted now, not just webspace though, thats the recent problem :)

I've just been changing the whole way it works, so that took a while the other bits were just a complication!

K, just thought I'd ask :)

[shortcircuit]

Here's my current best, my 2700+ @ 2740 in an A7N8X / Prometia...

http://frodobunny.net/screenshots/pifastest.jpg

[Caprid]

Originally posted by KAIN
Sorry guys, will be back online at some point soonish :(


Well when you do get it back up, I'll make it easy for you to know were to place this one.....


http://caprid.homestead.com/files/pi52.99.jpg


Boo yah!! right on top :D :D :D That ones even worth a banana or two :banana: :banana: :p

8RDA 12.5X227

:cool:

[muzz]

WTG Cap!!!!!

:toast: :banana: :thumbsup:

[avicenna]

Originally posted by Caprid
Well when you do get it back up, I'll make it easy for you to know were to place this one.....

Boo yah!! right on top :D :D :D That ones even worth a banana or two :banana: :banana: :p

8RDA 12.5X227

:cool:

Woohoo thats a freakin insane score you got there!

Congrats! Way to go man:)

[mkleingeld]

Just did 59.92 second with a 176 x 21 = 3696ghz and have a picture here to proof it, but don't have webspace to put the picture :(

[sysfailur]

Caprid go ZOOOOOOOM!

[Jeff]

Man... that's flyin'!!! :thumbsup:

[sysfailur]

*Rubs KAINs belly*

[Caprid]

Originally posted by sysfailur
*Rubs KAINs belly*
http://216.40.249.192/mysmilies/contrib/blackeye/lol.gif

If any of my Alien seeking compatriots were wondering, that 52.99 Pifast score translates into a 1.7725 SETI (http://pages.tca.net/roelof/setispy/tlctop200.htm) time.

[Jeff]

That is just kick-ass Caprid!!! :toast:

I was/am happy breaking the 2hr barrier. :D

[sysfailur]

I's comin for you guys! 250mhz more and you're mine Caprid!!! :P 207xwhatever=2595mhz was my previous best @ 59.53s for reference.

http://www.maximumoc.com/img/hardware/asus_super_a7n8x/5738pifast.jpg

[Jeff]

Hey sys...

"*** ERROR in computation ***" :eek:

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by Jeff
Hey sys...

"*** ERROR in computation ***" :eek:

Ya, I noticed that too, but it finished and gave me a time, so I thought it was ok. Dunno what that's all about.

[JCviggen]

put my 2100+ to work ;) north bridge is still air cooled so the FSB isnt very high yet

http://users.pandora.be/JCviggen/pifastmax.JPG

[zakelwe]

Originally posted by mkleingeld
Just did 59.92 second with a 176 x 21 = 3696ghz and have a picture here to proof it, but don't have webspace to put the picture :(

Given your GF4 4400 3dm2001 score I believe it .. nice score by the way absolutely killed the rest of the competition ( including me :) ) . I hope to get 16k this weekend, I am just below.

Regards

Andy



PS Very nice score JC.

[macci]

Originally posted by sysfailur
Ya, I noticed that too, but it finished and gave me a time, so I thought it was ok. Dunno what that's all about.
It means that the calculation did complete but with errors. So the result is not valid.

Nice one JC :)

[Naasar]

Originally posted by JCviggen
put my 2100+ to work ;) north bridge is still air cooled so the FSB isnt very high yet

http://users.pandora.be/JCviggen/pifastmax.JPG

this is exactly the reason i got into WCing. Watching JC do his stuff on the umm "other" forum. nice score JC:toast:

i manage a measley 60.75 right now @ 2450mhz @ 213 fsb. memory at 2,2,2,3@ 2.7v:rolleyes:

[mkleingeld]

Originally posted by zakelwe
Given your GF4 4400 3dm2001 score I believe it .. nice score by the way absolutely killed the rest of the competition ( including me :) ) . I hope to get 16k this weekend, I am just below.

Regards

Andy



PS Very nice score JC.

Thanx! :toast:

I can do a bit more with the new p4g8x now.
56.48 seconds.

I wanted to go for the 17k 3d mark this evening but I cannot get the card overclocked above 320 anymore without it immediately crashing :( have to look into that. But i'm trying to convice myself that I can aford the 9800pro, not much success as of yet though :)

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by macci
It means that the calculation did complete but with errors. So the result is not valid.

Nice one JC :)

Ahh oh well. Well, me barton will be here tomorrow.

Speaking of bartons.... new record set by umekami10:

http://hem.spray.se/umeimak10/epoxnforce8rma/barton/superpipifast/pif2863oc229.09.jpg

from this thread: http://www.thenakedreview.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=333

[JCviggen]

Originally posted by sysfailur


Speaking of bartons.... new record set by umekami10:

http://hem.spray.se/umeimak10/epoxnforce8rma/barton/superpipifast/pif2863oc229.09.jpg
[/url]


I can take that easy... just need a MHz more FSB ;)

[full loaded]

I just did the test, 51,94sec
it wat on 215,87x10,5 (2266,68mhz) but this is surely not the best my systems does, I can run 2,8ghz so have to see it this weekend have to hit the 45sec.

[JCviggen]

Originally posted by full loaded
I just did the test, 51,94sec
it wat on 215,87x10,5 (2266,68mhz) but this is surely not the best my systems does, I can run 2,8ghz so have to see it this weekend have to hit the 45sec.

you're running the wrong version m8 ;)

[muzz]

Yep 6 test version only.

[Walrusbonzo]

Here is my PiFast.

http://crosontech.dns2go.com/pictures/pifast2.jpg

Good in it?

:D

[Fusion]

How do you justify a time like that with only 2.2ghz? :confused:

[Walrusbonzo]

I dunno..... :confused:

I've ran the test several times now and that's what I'm getting :eek:

[Walrusbonzo]

Ok, just rebooted......

1700+ at 2.3GHz @ 2.1v. FSB at 200MHz with RAM timmings of 6,2,2,2. 768mb RAM.

http://crosontech.dns2go.com/pictures/pifast3.jpg

:smileysex

[ctgilles]

I think I killed something on the motherboard :stick:

[sysfailur]

ctgilles, get that cpu-z screen out of the way I can't see the chick!

[sysfailur]

Heh, well.... no computational errors this time.

And hear me now. I aint done baby! Triple T's gonna bring the pain! :P

http://www.maximumoc.com/img/hardware/2800+barton/56s_pifast.jpg

[Walrusbonzo]

Can anyone beat my 50.78?

Why is my score so good when my CPU is at only 2.3GHz, I don't get this benchmark!

[Fusion]

Originally posted by Walrusbonzo
Can anyone beat my 50.78?

Why is my score so good when my CPU is at only 2.3GHz, I don't get this benchmark!

you've gotta be doing something wrong somewhere, that would be a world record :rolleyes: you must be using different settings? Look at sysfailurs score, and he's got a few more mhz than you :cool:

[Walrusbonzo]

Well, I'm just using the hexus pifast script! :stick:

[Fusion]

full loaded got a similar result to you at a similar clock speed, so both you and him must be running a different version :S

[JCviggen]

Originally posted by Fusion
full loaded got a similar result to you at a similar clock speed, so both you and him must be running a different version :S

I zipped my DIR, if the results remain too fast it must be the computar ;)

http://users.pandora.be/JCviggen/hexus_pifast.zip

[Walrusbonzo]

Yep, must be 'cause I've been using PiFast 4.2 and not 4.1 :(

Wish it was my PC :D

[Caprid]

:)


Originally posted by sysfailur
Ahh oh well. Well, me barton will be here tomorrow.

Speaking of bartons.... new record set by umekami10


:)


http://caprid.homestead.com/files/piB50.91.jpg


:)

[M@tt]

Well the PIfast Challenge returns :)

David @ Hexus.net has offered to Host for Free, PMM has done all the work and thanks to Jeff F for his help.

To submit your Pifast Bench or to Download the Pifast program
click here.... Pifast Challenge (http://pifast.hexus.net/pifast.php)


PMM will attempt to update as much as possible in the early stages, just to get the table going, after that expect Daily Updates after 7PM UK Time.

I hope you enjoy the tables :)

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by M@tt
Well the PIfast Challenge returns :)

David @ Hexus.net has offered to Host for Free, PMM has done all the work and thanks to Jeff F for his help.

To submit your Pifast Bench or to Download the Pifast program
click here.... Pifast Challenge (http://pifast.hexus.net/pifast.php)


PMM will attempt to update as much as possible in the early stages, just to get the table going, after that expect Daily Updates after 7PM UK Time.

I hope you enjoy the tables :)

Thank gawd! It was getting to the point where I was going to just offer to put it on my site... I could've done that no problem since the prob started. If it goes down again I'm slapping it on my site :P

[PMM]

did not take sys long ;)

Don't forget folks submit your screen captures in this thread as well.

[zakelwe]

Originally posted by PMM
did not take sys long ;)

Don't forget folks submit your screen captures in this thread as well.

Thanks PMM for doing this :) and to Dave at Hexus as well

I'll see if I can get a good score tonight.

Regards

Andy

[zakelwe]

Originally posted by PMM
did not take sys long ;)

Don't forget folks submit your screen captures in this thread as well.

Do you submit screen captures in the comments section, by using an URL, and then you take them out ? :confused:



Regards

Andy

[RootX]

Breaking the 57secs....

[M@tt]

Originally posted by zakelwe
Do you submit screen captures in the comments section, by using an URL, and then you take them out ? :confused:



Regards

Andy


Hello zakelwe

Just post the the screen shot in this thread :) please

[muzz]

Excellent!!!! wtg M@tt

Time to have some fum huh fellas........:D

[Caprid]

Is the Pifast bench you have for downloading the same as the old one? I'm figuring it is, just double checking.

[PMM]

yes same one.

[Caprid]

Thanks. You'll have my submission shortly then :)

Thanks, to everyone involved in resurrecting the page from the grave :toast:

[PMM]

Ok just done a ickle update :)

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by PMM
did not take sys long ;)

Don't forget folks submit your screen captures in this thread as well.

Hahah you know it! I am addicted to hexus pifast!

My screenshot is a bit up on this page somewhere's ;)

[zakelwe]

The problem with advertising it on xtremesystems.org of course is that even though I can get sub 1 minute my score is going to be dead last as it is about 58 seconds.

:rolleyes:

LOL

:D


Regards

Andy

[zakelwe]

PS Where are the Hexus guys on there ??

;)

[muzz]

Originally posted by zakelwe
The problem with advertising it on xtremesystems.org of course is that even though I can get sub 1 minute my score is going to be dead last as it is about 58 seconds.

:rolleyes:

LOL

:D


Regards

Andy

Looks like you'll have to push your gear a little harder with this group.......
If it makes ya feel any better my best is a little under 58 seconds.
I will be trying again though, as I didn't have alot of experience with this board when I was doing the benches... should be a little better now..... but not enough to really compete;)

[Nohto]

muzz, did you get better performance running single or dual channel on your 8RDA+? What dimm did you use, best mem timings? Thanks,
Nate

[muzz]

Definitely better scores running dual on my board.
I use slots 1+2 ( furthest and closest in relation to the cpu), with ram timings ( when I was testing pifast) of 5-2-2-2 I believe ( It can do lower, but it's fine for just putzin' around)..
I will get a better score than the 1 I posted here and at Kains site( which never made it there, as it went offline) now, but I am not foolish enough to think that with my cpu and cooling I can honestly compete with these guys.. but it is fun.:toast:

[PMM]

Originally posted by zakelwe
The problem with advertising it on xtremesystems.org of course is that even though I can get sub 1 minute my score is going to be dead last as it is about 58 seconds.



Nowt wrong with 58sec get it submitted :D

I'm holding off submitting a better score since I'm updating the tables that said its not gonna get near the top 3 :)

[zakelwe]

As Muzz says it is fun and it is also a good quick test for stability.

However, some people before have been getting very low scores with "average" systems .. when I say average no offence as that is similar to my spec, but average compared to the guys at the very top ( you all know who :) )

Here's a guy who ran it when I told him about it, he has a good XP2100 running 2300-2400MHz on nforce2 at about 210 FSB, so I'd assume a 60-64 second run or there abouts:-

Program : PiFast version 4.2, by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 10000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 1024 K
Physical memory used : ~ 61355 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Sun Mar 09 01:35:16 2003
End : Sun Mar 09 01:36:07 2003
Duration : 50.98 seconds
==================================================
==========
Total computation time : 50.98 seconds (~ 0.01 hours)
==================================================
==========

Are we all running the same version here ??

:confused: :confused:

Regards

Andy

[JCviggen]

thats v4.2 , you need 4.1 .... as you can guess, 4.1 is slower

[PMM]

If its what I saw the other day did he not say he had version 4.2
of pifast and just used the hexus batch file with it?

To maintain the standard I have kept with the orginal 4.1 version I have charted all the trusted results to compare against I have
more results than shown Table results ;)

[zakelwe]

Yes, I ran both and got :-

v 4.1

http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/pifast41.jpg

and with v 4.2

http://www.aocb77.dsl.pipex.com/pifast42.jpg

How are you going to split up the 41's from the 42's, say if someone gets a 61 second time apart from using intuition ? There is already confusion from new people trying it and thinking they have got a great score.

I think it is better if we all use 4.1 but for the moment I will put in my 4.2.

Regards

Andy

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by PMM
If its what I saw the other day did he not say he had version 4.2
of pifast and just used the hexus batch file with it?

To maintain the standard I have kept with the orginal 4.1 version I have charted all the trusted results to compare against I have
more results than shown Table results ;)

Good idea to stick with what was started with.

[sysfailur]

Btw PMM.. you should really have a section for motherboard!

People are putting it in their comments, but you should have a column for it. Make it prettier ;)

[PMM]

thats just me I was men't to combine it into comments I forgot
with the earlier ones but the latter ones I Included into comments.

Erm....... The whole point of using the Hexus Pifast is to download
the one supplied in the link not use the 4.2 from else where :rolleyes:

But hay I could very easily change it to 4.2 and scrap the old
that way you all have to use the latest and then theres no
messing or cheating.

I can declare all given results so far as version 4.1 and switch.

[M@tt]

Originally posted by PMM
thats just me I was men't to combine it into comments I forgot
with the earlier ones but the latter ones I Included into comments.

Erm....... The whole point of using the Hexus Pifast is to download
the one supplied in the link not use the 4.2 from else where :rolleyes:

But hay I could very easily change it to 4.2 and scrap the old
that way you all have to use the latest and then theres no
messing or cheating.

I can declare all given results so far as version 4.1 and switch.

I think we should leave it as it is, it allows people to compare to reviews of the latest hardware and IMO if people are sad enough to cheat, they will anyway.

I hope we would spot a rogue result that was submitted and ask for additional proof :)

[ctgilles]

Originally posted by sysfailur
ctgilles, get that cpu-z screen out of the way I can't see the chick!
Hehe, stratigically placed :)
www.ctgilles.net/bmf/files/wallpapers.rar 9.50Mb file and lotsa papers @ 1280*1024 and beyond :)

[Fusion]

ctgilles, cracking wallpaper bundle you have there :D :toast:

Back on topic, I've sumitted my result to the site, bringing up the rear in 19th place lol ;)

[mkleingeld]

Hey Andy, just saw your new 3dmark01se score. Congratulations with that! And thanx for your remark about me in there :)

[muzz]

Well I shaved a bit off my best score. still lame in comparison to other folks, but hey. still working on it.
8RDA+/2600+/ 2x256 XMS3500c2 2.9 vdimm/VDD1.8
11x229fsb 5-2-2-2 timings 2520mhzhttp://home.attbi.com/~gpl08/57.09_pifast_11x229_5-2-2-2_2520mhz.jpg

[sysfailur]

muzz, don't put yourself down. Anything under 60 seconds is nice!

ctgilles: Nice collection!

[muzz]

I'm cool with the score, my best was high 57's B4 tonight. so thats cool that I almost got to the high 56's........ I need better cooling.....gotta get the cpu down<15 degrees C... that was at about 28 deg. according to usdm, the sensors are low so that was prolly really about 38 degrees or so, which is killing my top end.
I'm happy with it..... FOR NOW!!!....
Thx Sys........ now go break that 56 barrier.....:toast:

[sysfailur]

Soon as I get distribution blocks and tubing, no prob!

[muzz]

I just went to the page..... I have the wrong score........ I don't know if I typed it wrong, or they did......... MATT can you fix my score so that it reads 57.09 instead of 57.03 ?
I just want it to be accurate..
If I mistyped it I apologize..... not trying to screw anyone.

[M@tt]

Sorry muzz, it was my mistake

It's fixed now :)

[muzz]

NP M@tt, thanks.......I really didn't care who's mistake, either way it was inadvertant.... like I said I just wanted it to reflect the truth is all.
I'm like that:D

Thanks Again M@tt

[macci]

My latest result:
http://www.solidhardware.com/macci/xp2100/hex_pi_2950.gif
XP2100 week 4, temps -7C, 2.2V. Did about 2400MHz 1.92V +10C air and retail cooler.
8RDA+ w/ aircooled NB, 2x256MB HyperX 3500 3-2-2-2 settings.

[Fusion]

Macci you own lol :) Just noticed your 7k score in 3d mark03 aswell, congrats :toast:

[taco]

omfg macci... air cooled??!? i thought my 2.7 air cooled was sweet.. i gotta get one of those 2100+ and another stick of ram.

http://www.angelfire.com/droid/newb2k/2.7ghz_taco.jpg

[macci]

hehhe no tace hell no its not aircooled :D
CPU core temp -7C under full load (=poorly installed dryice container :D). Didn't have much time to play w/ that yet but I'd say that it can do about the same speed w/ my R404 vapocooler.

[taco]

oh.. still thats sweet. if i had access to dry ice.. oh man that would be awsome, you peoples over in europe get to mess with all the cool chemicals and such. ;)

[Jeff]

http://www.adventurevision.com/somepictures/5598.gif

My new low... and with a SLK-800A no less. :eek: ;)

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by macci
hehhe no tace hell no its not aircooled :D
CPU core temp -7C under full load (=poorly installed dryice container :D). Didn't have much time to play w/ that yet but I'd say that it can do about the same speed w/ my R404 vapocooler.

macci: What liquid do you use in the dry ice container? Thx

[muzz]

Excellent work Jeff:thumbsup:

Sure seems like a sweet 2100+ bro:toast:

[mike.elmes]

Just tinkering with my best overall score on this. At the current setup I'm getting this:

[macci]

sys: the stuff is called masinol (http://www.solidhardware.com/macci/3gdryice/antifreeze.jpg) - gasoline antifreeze. Guess its basically ethanol.

[CodeRed]

Well here's my attempt.

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/screenies/pifast2847.jpg

I really need a better 8RDA+, this one just cant do dual channel well (every at 2V). Made up for the lack of FSB speed with the mem timings though :)

tried single channel (13x217) but got worse performance :(

[cpulloverclock]

11.5*230.5 Dual DDR = 2651MHz in wc with a 2500+
http://enormimo.site.voila.fr/photos/53.80.JPG

[CodeRed]

Here's a slightly better attempt.

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/screenies/pifast2823.jpg

Took all the voltage I dare give it, Vcore=2.125, Vdd=2.0, Vdimm=3.1

Did a 52.88 sec run at 13x219 (2-2-2-3 DC) but cant repeat it :( Shouldve taken the screen shot straight away.

[cpulloverclock]

2500+ always watercooled
233.86 10-2-2 cas2 at 2.9v
http://pifaste.site.voila.fr/52.89.JPG

[sysfailur]

macci: Thanks! -- And nice scores guys!

[M@tt]

http://www.kelham.freeserve.co.uk/52-67.jpg


XP 1700 12.5 x 228

Now to mode some bridges :D

[CodeRed]

Phew, the competetion is getting tough around here. Better lift my game before I get run over :)

M@tt, can you delete my 8RDA+ result (53.34 sec) from the tables. I dont really need two entries and the NF7-S one is faster.

[hipro5]

I CAN'T find my 52.45 score........Anyways.......Here you are again........Please IF you can, replace it with my older one.......... :D

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/png/Pi-fast_52.png

[sysfailur]

SOMEONE STICKY THIS THREAD ALREADY! :P

[CodeRed]

Sorry hipro, I cant let you beat me :D

http://www.users.tpg.com.au/spark69/nf7/pifast52.23.jpg

[hipro5]

Enjoy your entries for now , coz in a couple of weeks you'll be HISTORY....... :D :toast:

[sysfailur]

Originally posted by hipro5
Enjoy your entries for now , coz in a couple of weeks you'll be HISTORY....... :D :toast:

A couple of weeks huh? I wouldn't get too antsy... a couple of weeks I'll have a LN2 container and of course, the LN2 to go with it! :P

[hipro5]

Originally posted by sysfailur
A couple of weeks huh? I wouldn't get too antsy... a couple of weeks I'll have a LN2 container and of course, the LN2 to go with it! :P

:D :D :D

[JCviggen]

how do you guys like this :)

[ctgilles]

nice JC :D
sometimes I want my Prometeia back... nooooot :)
shuttle is nice and silent ;)

[hipro5]

You made it this time JC.... :D :toast:

[CodeRed]

JC,
You make it look too easy :D

Congrats on the No 1 score ... again :toast:

[JCviggen]

Originally posted by hipro5
You made it this time JC.... :D :toast:

Well if you beat me with a canterwood, thats hardly something to worry about ... the price difference is too huge to be a realistic threat :)
Still, I have some more in this rig. I made it at 3012 and 232 also but the bugger froze in MS paint lmao :D

[hipro5]

Originally posted by JCviggen
Well if you beat me with a canterwood, thats hardly something to worry about ... the price difference is too huge to be a realistic threat :)
Still, I have some more in this rig. I made it at 3012 and 232 also but the bugger froze in MS paint lmao :D

I just LOVE your style JC...... :D :toast:

[Kunaak]

I'll throw my hat into the ring.

2 tries and I got this.

54 something.
I'll work on it later.

nice test ;)

[M@tt]

:toast: Well done JCviggen

The chart is up to date now, I have removed some of the entries by the same people, I hope you all approve :)

[M@tt]

:D

http://www.kelham.freeserve.co.uk/5180.jpg

[Peckers]

Whopee! made 75s :p

http://130.236.239.34/stuff/16.6-146_small_mod.jpg

[LORD]

Thought I might put one in as well. I'll update with something more respectable later.

This was done while testing so didn't go for max clocks......:)

[CodeRed]

Nice time LORD, what speed was that at?

Still on plain water or are u using the pelts now

[Kunaak]

new High.

still testing...

[LORD]

Originally posted by CodeRed
Nice time LORD, what speed was that at?

Still on plain water or are u using the pelts now

It was at about the 2700 mark at the time. No pelts. No Ghetto cooling. Just testing fsb speeds.

How's the fsb situation?


http://www.bigbutton.com.au/~lord/wcpuid2690.jpg

[LORD EDIT: I did make a wcpuid shot but left it in th W2K partition]

[CodeRed]

LORD,
Thats even better considering its just water cooled. 2nd highest water cooled result behind cpulloverclock's Barton.

Be nice to take that chip for a run in the prom :D

BTW FSB is still limited to 219 @ high Vcore ... R404a comes on Saturday, maybe it wont matter :D

[LORD]

Originally posted by CodeRed
LORD,
Thats even better considering its just water cooled. 2nd highest water cooled result behind cpulloverclock's Barton.

Be nice to take that chip for a run in the prom :D

BTW FSB is still limited to 219 @ high Vcore ... R404a comes on Saturday, maybe it wont matter :D

In the Prom it could be a 3 gig + chip.......!? We'll see.;)

Get better NB cooling and stick some more volt's in there. That'll get the fsb up higher! :D

[JCviggen]

I did some more tweaking today, and I took down the 50s mark :)

http://users.pandora.be/JCviggen/PI.JPG

[PMM]

:eek: nice :toast:

[Naasar]

Originally posted by Ilúvatar
Whopee! made 75s :p

http://130.236.239.34/stuff/16.6-146_small_mod.jpg

dude, where did u get ur 1700 from? also, how much voltage are u runnin' through that puppy to get it at 2400mhz?:eek:

[Hognert]

http://home.no/deadeye/hexus_250.jpg

All I need now is a good cpu ;). Done with a crappy 1,6V 1700+ 0311 XPMW, Abit nf7-2 and one stick of bh-5 and one bh-6.

[muzz]

Excellent work guys!!!

JC...... that thing is a monster bro!!
Good Job:toast:

[Caprid]

Originally posted by JCviggen
I did some more tweaking today, and I took down the 50s mark :)

Was wondering when you were going to break 50, nice work! :cool:

[Kunaak]

Hognert

Oh my god....

jesus, congrats on the FSB.
holy jesus...

[GenTarkin]

here are my results my P4@3.5ghz
Program : PiFast version 4.1, by Xavier Gourdon
Computation of 10000000 digits of Pi
Method used : Chudnovsky
Size of FFT : 1024 K
Physical memory used : ~ 61163 K
Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg
------------------------------------------------------------
Computation run information :

Start : Wed Apr 30 23:11:43 2003
End : Wed Apr 30 23:12:47 2003
Duration : 63.75 seconds
================================================== ==========
Total computation time : 63.75 seconds (~ 0.02 hours)

[LORD]

All nice times there people.

JC, have to mention that is really an outstanding effort. :toast:

Hognert, if you did those times at that fsb, it's sick man.:D

[Hognert]

Originally posted by LORD

Hognert, if you did those times at that fsb, it's sick man.:D

Yeah its done at 11*250 :). Just ran it a few times and posted the best one.. sure it can do sub 52 if I work on it some.

Heres pcmark (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm=1269866) at 250 btw :).

[ctgilles]

excellent :D sweet times :toast:

[CodeRed]

JC,
just following your example :D

Squeezed out a 7-2-2-2 run ... ooohhh that hurt

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/nf7/pifast51.78.jpg

[ctgilles]

Shuttle :D
:banana:

[M@tt]

:toast: CodeRed I will have to try a little harder tomorrow

[reglisse]

you uses Version 4.1 of PIFAST but we use the last Version 4.2

[reglisse]

with the 4.2 version :)

http://membres.lycos.fr/reglissementhe/adm/img/pifast10m.jpg

[JCviggen]

Originally posted by reglisse
you uses Version 4.1 of PIFAST but we use the last Version 4.2



**PIfast challange uses Version 4.1 of PIFAST to maintain a standard please use per download link and submit 'Total computation time'.


4.2 is shorter, and so its also a bit easier. So for the bench, only 4.1 counts. doesnt matter that a faster version exists, the fastest 4.1 time will be the fastest in 4.2 anyway, only its a little harder and requires more stability. In other words, a better challenge than 4.2

[reglisse]

sorry but i'm french and my english is very bad ... :rolleyes:

i'm ok with you said, but for on my site we decide to take the 4.2 version for the bench and 50Millions of digits

the 4.1 version more difficult for the P4 ;)

[PMM]

Me and M@tt decided to keep the 4.1 version due to the fact
that results and validation would tie up with the results that
were once part of Kain's Pifast Challange before it wen't Off
line.

Kains Pifast always used the 4.1 version as hosted on Hexus
together with the Hexus batch file for setting the parameters
to do the calculation.

When David at Hexus offered us the hosting at Hexus.net we
set everything up as per before so those that competed in Kain's
Pifast challenge were able to re-submit there last scores as per
Kain's and carry on as normal which I knew were valid from cached pages of Kains Site.

It was dicussed if we were to use 4.2 but everyone prefered sticking with 4.1.

So 4.1. it shall be :)

[CodeRed]

Originally posted by M@tt
:toast: CodeRed I will have to try a little harder tomorrow

Try 7-2-2-2, it worked for me.

I aint finished yet, the board is still stock and my prom still runs R134a.

[hipro5]

Originally posted by PMM
Me and M@tt decided to keep the 4.1 version due to the fact
that results and validation would tie up with the results that
were once part of Kain's Pifast Challange before it wen't Off
line.

Kains Pifast always used the 4.1 version as hosted on Hexus
together with the Hexus batch file for setting the parameters
to do the calculation.

When David at Hexus offered us the hosting at Hexus.net we
set everything up as per before so those that competed in Kain's
Pifast challenge were able to re-submit there last scores as per
Kain's and carry on as normal which I knew were valid from cached pages of Kains Site.

It was dicussed if we were to use 4.2 but everyone prefered sticking with 4.1.

So 4.1. it shall be :)

One question.....Is it possible that Version 4.1 is "more optimised" for an AMD CPU???.....Perhaps the V.4.2 is more accurate for BOTH Intel and AMD....Just a question..... :)

[JCviggen]

actually I think 4.1 is more raw power code, whereas 4.2 "assists" the P4 in avoiding its weak points.... or you could say that its just optimized code which enables the P4 to make most of the optimisations

[xgman]

Duration : 59.61 secondson 4.1.

so what does that mean anyway.

[reglisse]

Originally posted by hipro5
One question.....Is it possible that Version 4.1 is "more optimised" for an AMD CPU???.....Perhaps the V.4.2 is more accurate for BOTH Intel and AMD....Just a question..... :) the V. 4.2 is "more optimised" for 512ko of the p4 ... it's all

[cpulloverclock]

Originally posted by JCviggen
I did some more tweaking today, and I took down the 50s mark :)

http://users.pandora.be/JCviggen/PI.JPG
Good job, nice oc
is it with ur 1700+?

[M@tt]

Originally posted by CodeRed
Try 7-2-2-2, it worked for me.

I aint finished yet, the board is still stock and my prom still runs R134a.

Will do, Thanks CodeRed

I also have a NF7-S V2.0 to try again (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12270) and the Prommie is having a service today ;) I am still using the 8RGA+ at the moment.

[JCviggen]

Originally posted by cpulloverclock

is it with ur 1700+?


yup :)
the CPU can run this higher, but the FSB wont let me... doing NF7 cap mod today I think

[hipro5]

Originally posted by JCviggen
actually I think 4.1 is more raw power code, whereas 4.2 "assists" the P4 in avoiding its weak points.... or you could say that its just optimized code which enables the P4 to make most of the optimisations

Is it because some AMD guys want that???.....just another question.......If an Intel guy benches the V.4.2 and an AMD guy as well , the "deference" between those two is it going to be LEES(in seconds) than the V.4.1...?????....I think as the software is getting better we SHOULD go on with it..!!!....It's like you benching 3DMark2000 and NOT the 3DMark2001 or 2003.....Just wondering.....

EDIT : I was just at Pi-fast's page and I DIDN'T read ANYTHING about "optimized code which enables the P4 to make most of the optimisations" in V.4.2.....It JUST says as the V.4.1 version about a bit faster and repaired some bugs(same as they did at V.4.1).....I think that something "fishy" around here..... :stick:

[CodeRed]

Ok hipro I'll bite (just this once), so whats your fastest v4.2 time

[reglisse]

yes but with pifast v 4.2, 10M is too short, 50M is good no short no long ... look my site for the best time

[hipro5]

Originally posted by CodeRed
Ok hipro I'll bite (just this once), so whats your fastest v4.2 time

I don't have V.4.2 "fixed" bench to test it......If someone has it please give me a link to download it.....Thanks in advance..... :)

[reglisse]

http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/PiProgram/download.html

[hipro5]

Originally posted by reglisse
http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/PiProgram/download.html

Thanks but.....I didn't ment that....I mean a "fixed" V.4.2 as the V.4.1 that you don't have to "put" numbers and the other things it asks you to run it........Just "click" and run..... ;)

[reglisse]

for 10M or 50M of digits ?

[reglisse]

:) sorry i don't understand all

for 50M of digit here :

http://membres.lycos.fr/reglissementhe/tele.php3


for 10M of digits

edit reglage.txt and change

4096 --> 1024

5000000 --> 1000000

[sysfailur]

Very nice benches people! :) I just RMA'ed my a7n8x. We'll see what I can do with a rev 2.0 *rawr*

[hipro5]

Originally posted by reglisse
:) sorry i don't understand all

for 50M of digit here :

http://membres.lycos.fr/reglissementhe/tele.php3


for 10M of digits

edit reglage.txt and change

4096 --> 1024

5000000 --> 1000000

Thanks A LOT...... :toast:

[hipro5]

.........NOW......Can someone with an AMD system bench this V.4.2 at about 2700MHz Please.......Thank you...... :)

[JCviggen]

Originally posted by hipro5
.........NOW......Can someone with an AMD system bench this V.4.2 at about 2700MHz Please.......Thank you...... :)

you ask, we bench :)

not exactly 2700, but only 10 MHz off

[hipro5]

Originally posted by JCviggen
you ask, we bench :)

not exactly 2700, but only 10 MHz off

Thanks JC....... ;) :toast:

Now.......I think that IF we ALL try the V.4.2 one , the Intel "times" are going to be FASTER than the AMD's ones.......Bet anyone???? :D

I think THAT'S why you ALL AMD guys "insist" for V.4.1 which "could" have a "bug" for Intel CPU's..... :stick:

[JCviggen]

Originally posted by hipro5
Thanks JC....... ;) :toast:

Now.......I think that IF we ALL try the V.4.2 one , the Intel "times" are going to be FASTER than the AMD's ones.......Bet anyone???? :D

I think THAT'S why you ALL AMD guys "insist" for V.4.1 which "could" have a "bug" for Intel CPU's..... :stick:


Hipro,

I wouldnt say there's a "bug" in it for Intel CPU's...
I've been doing a little google, and the use of 4.1/4.2 is about 50/50.
Basically, most of the rankings on the net use 4.1 simply because most results are already like this. Only after the rankings started came 4.2. Now if anyone were to start a new ranking, it would be only normal that 4.2 would be used.
I think in 4.1, AMD's have a too big advantage over the P4. However, in 4.2 it looks to me like the P4 is too far ahead. So I guess to be exact, you should combine the time of the old one with the new one and take the average :D

a 3 GHz XP is definately the equal of a 4 GHz+ P4

Originally posted by hipro5
Enjoy your entries for now , coz in a couple of weeks you'll be HISTORY....... :D :toast:

so, how about you make good on that "promise" instead of §§§§§ing about the version ;)

[hipro5]

Originally posted by JCviggen
Hipro,

I wouldnt say there's a "bug" in it for Intel CPU's...
I've been doing a little google, and the use of 4.1/4.2 is about 50/50.
Basically, most of the rankings on the net use 4.1 simply because most results are already like this. Only after the rankings started came 4.2. Now if anyone were to start a new ranking, it would be only normal that 4.2 would be used.
I think in 4.1, AMD's have a too big advantage over the P4. However, in 4.2 it looks to me like the P4 is too far ahead. So I guess to be exact, you should combine the time of the old one with the new one and take the average :D

a 3 GHz XP is definately the equal of a 4 GHz+ P4



so, how about you make good on that "promise" instead of §§§§§ing about the version ;)

:D :D :D :toast:

I'm just.........WAITING for the ABIT Canterwood Mobo and the unlocked P4 3.06GHz and I'LL BE BACK....... ;) :D

[JCviggen]

im sorry for the continuing flow of scores, but you have to understand, I dont have a gfx card to do 3D, I'm bored as hell down here and I gotto do sumthin.... :)

[avicenna]

Originally posted by JCviggen
im sorry for the continuing flow of scores, but you have to understand, I dont have a gfx card to do 3D, I'm bored as hell down here and I gotto do sumthin.... :)

Hahah keep ´em coming, great work!

[CodeRed]

Originally posted by JCviggen
im sorry for the continuing flow of scores, but you have to understand, I dont have a gfx card to do 3D, I'm bored as hell down here and I gotto do sumthin.... :)

Outstanding, truly outstanding.

:toast:

Now hurry up and get a gfx card so the rest of us can catch up :D

[muzz]

I thought everyone was using the same version from Hexus?
If not maybe they should be.

[hipro5]

Originally posted by muzz
I thought everyone was using the same version from Hexus?
If not maybe they should be.

They ALL DO ..... V.4.1 .... ;)

[CodeRed]

Slowly improving my score

http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/r404/pifast3.jpg

really need a better mobo, I aint near this chips limit yet.

[Tom Holck]

try an Intel 1102 FSB

[CodeRed]

Originally posted by Tom Holck
try an Intel 1102 FSB


Looks like the AMD party is over. Take cover everyone, the invasion of the Canterwoods is about to start :D

Nice result BTW :toast:






Do I switch to the dark side? this is the question
:wave: AMD

[hipro5]

WELL DONE Tom........ :toast: :banana: :banana:

With what CPU is this benchie??? :D

[Tom Holck]

Originally posted by hipro5
WELL DONE Tom........ :toast: :banana: :banana:

With what CPU is thiw bencie??? :D



It's a P4 3000/800;)

I first tried it in the old Abit IT7Max2 v2 and it was not better than the old 3.066, so it's the FSB that do the trick.

-and the prommy mod -you now:D

desent ram will cut 1 sek or so...

[hipro5]

Originally posted by Tom Holck
It's a P4 3000/800;)

I first tried it in the old Abit IT7Max2 v2 and it was not better than the old 3.066, so it's the FSB that do the trick.

-and the prommy mod -you now:D

desent ram will cut 1 sek or so...

Coollll.......Have you tried the P4 3.06GHz on this Mobo to see how it does???......and DO you remember the FPO/BATCH of your new CPU P4 3GHz(800fsb)....Thanks in advance...... :D

[Tom Holck]

The FPO/Batch # : L309A569

I think the 3000 is better than the 2.80, 2.66 etc in the first time of producktion.

The 3.066 perform like your dual DDR board. The mem can be tweeaked a little better (1.33 1.60 2.00 2.5 2.66 etc)
It can NOT go at 800 (fsb200 x 23 = 4600 :rolleyes: :D )

JC Viggens and others statement on the max fsb on Abit IT7:
IT7Max2 v 1 (reed and blue) IT7Max2 v 1.1 and IT7Max2 v 2
are not precise. With 3000/800 They can all go almost 200
(with voltmod etc etc)
-But that history now.

Hope you get your Springdale sune
:banana: :banana: :banana:

[Spec3]

Abit NF7-S
OCZ pc3500EL
XP1700 0308XPMW
:toast:

[Spec3]

Ah sorry that was ver 4.2 I didn't see it had to be 4.1

Here is 4.1 at the same settings

[Tom Holck]

4.1
:D :D :D

[Tom Holck]

4.2
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

[macci]

3.0@4109MHz on IC7 2-5-2-2 5:4 => 49.70 so far :D
screenshot coming once I finish the benching session (mark2001 over 24k too..) ;)

[M@tt]

FYI the chart made http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9348 today :)

[Intronic]

4.1:

http://members.lycos.nl/cncgzone/pifast.jpg

Going to try @ higher fsb later

[macci]

http://www.solidhardware.com/macci/P43G/hex_4116_s.gif (http://www.solidhardware.com/macci/P43G/hex_4116.gif)
(click for full screenshot)

3.0@4116MHz (274.4FSB, 5:4mem @220MHz 2-5-2-2)
IC7
R404 cooling

[M@tt]

Guys you will have to bare with us a little on updates, we had 120 + results today because of the The inquirer link, it's going to take a little time to wade through that lot :D

[Teus]

0m56s - Teus - xp1700+ @ 1995 (10.5*190) - DDR PC3500

[hipro5]

GOOD WORK macci...... :toast:

Now......Let's see.......If Intel CPU's "grab" the three first places in Pi-fast bench , then we have to CHANGE the Version bench to the V.4.2 one.......We have spent enough time with this V.4.1 one which WAS good for the AMD's CPU's.....We HAVE to be "equal".....We have passed some months with V.4.1 and NOW we have to pass some months with V.4.2 .....AM I wrong???..... :)

[Tom Holck]

Originally posted by macci
3.0@4109MHz on IC7 2-5-2-2 5:4 => 49.70 so far :D
screenshot coming once I finish the benching session (mark2001 over 24k too..) ;)


:rolleyes:
Nice job, but tell me, I now You have tried AlbatronPX865PE pro too, how can IC7 bee so mutch faster than Albatron. Du you sink, that it is the difference between 875 versus 865 ??

Here is my best so far with Albatron
3.0@4162 on AlbatronPX865PE 2-5-2-2 (444) => 50.06

[macci]

Yup the chipset is making the difference here.

its almost 1000Marks in 3DMArk2001
http://www.solidhardware.com/macci/P43G/875vs865pe.gif

Now I'd really like to figure out if it was possible to enable PAT on 865PE chipset. Cos if that could be done I might be using the albatron 865PE Pro too (excellent price/performance ratio) :)

[PMM]

Tom Holck result entered depending how many submissions
arrive over the weekend it will be prob Sunday when I do the next update.

/PMM

[LORD]

I forgot to update...... Here is one I did earlier.
Bit slow when compared to the 50 and under boy's. I'll have another one soon. With hopefully a higher fsb....:)

http://www.bigbutton.com.au/~lord/HPiF-236x12-2226_5180.jpg

[LORD EDIT: Wrong pic]

[Nikita]

8RDA+ Rev1.1 12x220 DC Mode


http://www.hpautoelectrics.com/OverClocker73/8RDA+/12x220%20DC%20Mode%20Stable.JPG

[Nikita]

Hmmm…almost 1sec with out doing a thing!!

8RDA+ Rev1.1
XP2100+@12x220 DC Mode


http://www.hpautoelectrics.com/OverClocker73/8RDA+/12x220%20DC%20Mode%20Pifast%2055.75.JPG

[Nikita]

Update.....

11.5x227 DC Mode


http://www.hpautoelectrics.com/OverClocker73/8RDA+/11.5x227%20DC%20Mode%20Pifast%2055.44.JPG

[LORD]

Can't say how much is left in this chip at the moment. We'll see how things progress....:)

http://www.bigbutton.com.au/~lord/HPiF-233x12-5_51-03.jpg

[Creative]

:eek: Lord thats insane :eek:

This is my current best ; (i didnt have a screenie with just pifast in it soz guys so had to do this one ;) )

3925MHz 280fsb 2-6-3-2 5:4

[Nikita]

Originally posted by Creative
:eek: Lord thats insane :eek:

This is my current best ; (i didnt have a screenie with just pifast in it soz guys so had to do this one ;) )

3925MHz 280fsb 2-6-3-2 5:4


Creative, can u post a full screenie of Pifast mate!!!
With this one we can’t see if the computation it’s OK or Not!!!

Thanks.

[CodeRed]

Originally posted by LORD
Can't say how much is left in this chip at the moment. We'll see how things progress....:)




Excellent work there buddy. :toast:
Good to see all that hard work paying off.

[Tom Holck]

Originally posted by macci
3.0@4109MHz on IC7 2-5-2-2 5:4 => 49.70 so far :D
screenshot coming once I finish the benching session (mark2001 over 24k too..) ;)


Change my Albatron to Abit IC7 G:

:banana: :banana:

This is at 4216 Mhz Mem going 450 at 2-5-2-2

[PMM]

Nice one Tom :slobber:

I've put it up :)

[hipro5]

Coooollllll............What have you done Tom with the Prommie????....R505 maybe???..... :D :toast:

[muzz]

Excellent clock there Tom !!:banana: :toast:

[Creative]

Originally posted by Nikita
Creative, can u post a full screenie of Pifast mate!!!
With this one we can’t see if the computation it’s OK or Not!!!

Thanks.
Will do.....Ill edit this post and just add it here when I get it done :)

[Jeff]

Originally posted by Tom Holck
Change my Albatron to Abit IC7 G:

:banana: :banana:

This is at 4216 Mhz Mem going 450 at 2-5-2-2

Incredible time there Tom! :slobber: :toast: ;)

[Creative]

PiFast.....3925mhz.....280fsb.....2-6-3-2.....5:4 mode

Cheers :)

ps
hope this is now sufficient :)

pps
Also got a new time while running again :D
heeehe

[Tom Holck]

Still 4216 Mhz. now memsettings 2-5-2-2 fast...
And an extra fan.
can almost do 4225 freese at 0..


:D :D

[PMM]

Better push m8y I have a 4500mhz result sitting in me database ;) awaiting validating.... shame he gave me a duff
Email addy :lol: not sure if its right to be honest but if it is
it ownz ya all :D

[hipro5]

JUST......Testing......NOT finished YET......... :D

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Pi-fast_49.06_png.png

[Tom Holck]

Originally posted by hipro5
JUST......Testing......NOT finished YET......... :D

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Pi-fast_49.06_png.png

Nice work there Hipro5

I am also feeling lonely on the top

:D:

:toast:

[hipro5]

Originally posted by Tom Holck
Nice work there Hipro5

I am also feeling lonely on the top

:D:

:toast:

Thanks Tom......a LOT.......... ;)

I think that it whould be better IF I could run my Ram at Cas 2-5-2-2 and not at 2-5-3-2 that I did......I'll Modd the mobo "different" so as to get 3.2-3.3Vmem and run at most aggressive timings..... :D

[Estide]

No comment :)

[hipro5]

Ooooopppppsssss........ Look who's first(for the time been) at Pi-fast........:toast: :banana: :D

FINALLY with Cas 2-5-2-2 .......

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Pi-fast_48.35_png.png

[cpulloverclock]

Originally posted by hipro5
Ooooopppppsssss........ Look who's first(for the time been) at Pi-fast........:toast: :banana: :D

FINALLY with Cas 2-5-2-2 .......

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Pi-fast_48.35_png.png nice score :toast:

[cpulloverclock]

hipro u can use ur P4@4.2 with other bench like cpumark, sandra cpu (HP enabled) ...?

[hipro5]

Thanks guys....... :toast:

I can use it for almost EVERYTHING at that speed EXCEPT S-Sandra Arithmetic with th HT enabled......I can do this only at this frequency and a litlle bit more than this.......;)

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Arithmetic_4144_png.png

[Petrus]

P42.8C@4097MHz Corsair XMS3500 4:5 2-2-2-5

http://clarisseau.homestead.com/files/IntelSystem/P4hexus-pifast-.gif

[cpulloverclock]

Originally posted by hipro5
Thanks guys....... :toast:

I can use it for almost EVERYTHING at that speed EXCEPT S-Sandra Arithmetic with th HT enabled......I can do this only at this frequency and a litlle bit more than this.......;)

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Arithmetic_4144_png.png thx ;)

[Estide]

@hipro5 wich Ram you use zo get 276FSB?!? An whith wich Bandwith?!?

ThX Estide

[[NH]Woxxman]

Originally posted by hipro5
Ooooopppppsssss........ Look who's first(for the time been) at Pi-fast........:toast: :banana: :D

FINALLY with Cas 2-5-2-2 .......

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Pi-fast_48.35_png.png

That's one great result Hipro5! Have been wondering when the bandwidth king would really enter the Canterwood scene. ;)

As for memory bandwidth.. can we expect some results rivalling that of Maccis?
Would love to see some buffered 7000+ and unbuffered 4000+ scores!

Anyways, keep up the great work Hipro5! :toast:

[hipro5]

Originally posted by Estide
@hipro5 wich Ram you use zo get 276FSB?!? An whith wich Bandwith?!?

ThX Estide

I use 2 x 256Mb Kingston Value Ram DDR400(PC3200)with Winbond BH-5 chips onboard at 3.05-07 Vmem with(now) Cas 2-2-2-5........The Bandwidth is about 6200MB/s in S-Sandra.......

[hipro5]

Originally posted by [NH]Woxxman
That's one great result Hipro5! Have been wondering when the bandwidth king would really enter the Canterwood scene. ;)

As for memory bandwidth.. can we expect some results rivalling that of Maccis?
Would love to see some buffered 7000+ and unbuffered 4000+ scores!

Anyways, keep up the great work Hipro5! :toast:

Thanks man...... :toast:

As for Memory Bandwidth benchies......I'm not interesteed for the time been.....Perhaps later on I'll get a P4 2.4GHz and try it....... ;)

[hipro5]

Originally posted by Petrus
P42.8C@4097MHz Corsair XMS3500 4:5 2-2-2-5

http://clarisseau.homestead.com/files/IntelSystem/P4hexus-pifast-.gif

That's COOOOLLLLL Petrus with the P4 2.8GHz.......Good Mem bandwidth as well I think....... ;) :toast:

[Estide]

Thx hipro5

I will get the kingston 2700 with bh6 chips... I hope that these chips will go higher then my Twinmos Winbond bh5....

CyA

[[NH]Woxxman]

Originally posted by hipro5
Thanks man...... :toast:

As for Memory Bandwidth benchies......I'm not interesteed for the time been.....Perhaps later on I'll get a P4 2.4GHz and try it....... ;)

Ok I understand. :)

And as you say, you will need a nice 2.4C to get those results. But I'm not the one to complain about a 48.35 run at pifast... :D


Petrus: That's some great score you got there man! Now go and break that 49 sec barrier :toast:

[hipro5]

Originally posted by Estide
Thx hipro5

I will get the kingston 2700 with bh6 chips... I hope that these chips will go higher then my Twinmos Winbond bh5....

CyA

IF you feed them with Vmem,they will "rock".......Try to find "W248" or "W251" production date.....This is written below the Winbond logo....... ;)

[NoStra]

Done some benches...

Dual Channel 2-6-2-2

http://213.51.192.130/2464mhz224mhz.jpg

[Estide]

I'm very happy that I find Kingston Bh6 in Germany so to become a "stepping" is too difficult... :( maybe I have great luck and I catch some W248 :) but my luck is'nt very high in the last time :(
But If the Kingston wouldn't "rock" *g* I will test the V-Data 2700 ;) :)

have a good day
Estide

[MrIcee]

As requested, making this excellent thread sticky:)

Randi:D

[Petrus]

Getting a litle better :) I think my Corsairs are maximized as my 3.3 line is crap: 3.09v under load :brick:

http://clarisseau.homestead.com/files/IntelSystem/Hpifast48sec.gif

[hipro5]

Oooooopppppsssss........(again) Look who has "broke" the 48sec barrier........ :D :banana:

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Pi-fast_47.96_png.png

[cpulloverclock]

Originally posted by hipro5
Oooooopppppsssss........(again) Look who has "broke" the 48sec barrier........ :D :banana:

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Pi-fast_47.96_png.png good job as usual

[sysfailur]

Hipro5....ownage man! I love it!

[[NH]Woxxman]

Originally posted by hipro5
Oooooopppppsssss........(again) Look who has "broke" the 48sec barrier........ :D :banana:

http://www.pctech.gr/hipro5/photos/P4_3@4000/png/Pi-fast_47.96_png.png

That's just plain mean, Petrus was about to catch up and then you go and do this... :D

What have you changed since your 48.35 sec score? The CPU speed is lower now so I guess something else has been done. :)

[hipro5]

Thanks guys....... :D :toast:

I've changed the .......Memory modules......Now I'm with AGAIN 2 x 256Mb Kingston Value Ram DDR400(PC3200).....BUT with the CH-5 chips on board......I think that they are faster(overal in read - write)) than the BH-5 ones but they need burn-in to go BETTER......I'm still "burning-in" them........

[Jupiler]

Awesome performance, hipro5. As usual :toast:

Here's my score : 50.14 sec
2.8C at 3994Mhz, P4C800

[hipro5]

Originally posted by Jupiler
Awesome performance, hipro5. As usual :toast:

Here's my score : 50.14 sec
2.8C at 3994Mhz, P4C800

Thanks Jupiler..... :toast:

What's holding you back and can't bench higher???.....

[Jupiler]

Originally posted by hipro5
Thanks Jupiler..... :toast:

What's holding you back and can't bench higher???.....

CPU I guess.
Raised the FSB by 1 Mhz and voltage by 0.25V (1.80 to 1.825V) but as soon as I started Pifast, the system rebooted.
The P4C800 overvolts like crazy and I don't wanna kill the cpu.
Seems like 4Ghz is a magic barrier that this sucker can't/won't pass. :mad:
35sec in SuperPi, BTW ;)