View Full Version : testing my ddr 500 A-data.. 342 fsb..
eviLRuLeZ
05-15-2004, 10:33 AM
:hello:
i'm testing my ddr 500 A-data today, I put multiplier 4 and then i began to increase fsb.. i reach 342 at the moment but latency isn't that good i think.. (52 ns)..
I put 2.9v . no vddr mod at the moment.
my system : shuttle an50r
a64 3200+
2x256 ddr 500 A-data
what multiplier is the best in order to have best performance?
is 340 normal..? i heard that multiplier .5 aren't that good.. i didnt test that much under .5 multiplier..
http://www.multimania.com/undeadz/test1.jpg
Boyne7
05-15-2004, 10:36 AM
its not actually running 340fsb... its a glitch with the 4x and .5 multipliers
eviLRuLeZ
05-15-2004, 10:38 AM
ok
how can i reach a high fsb then? with which multiplier?
Formann
05-15-2004, 11:19 AM
Since 5 is the lowest ram-divider, your ram is running @ 273Mhz
(342/5) * 4 = 273
To run 1:1 you need to run 5 or above, and no half multis.
eviLRuLeZ
05-15-2004, 11:24 AM
ok i'm going to test with multiplier above 5 and no half multis too :D
i'll post screenshots here ;)
thx Formann :)
althes
05-15-2004, 12:15 PM
they have to fix that bug.Bt 273 is still good.
saaya
05-15-2004, 12:29 PM
thats average for hynix chips, nice board though it seems, and nice cpu.
eviLRuLeZ
05-15-2004, 01:47 PM
bios is last, 26
i hope i'll reach more than 273 tonight :D
eviLRuLeZ
05-16-2004, 03:47 AM
finally tested my mem..
http://www.multimania.com/undeadz/test.jpg
Djake
05-16-2004, 04:07 AM
Try to test the memory in Sisoftsandra.
eviLRuLeZ
05-16-2004, 04:09 AM
it reached something like 295 now under sandra
http://www.multimania.com/undeadz/sandra.jpg
Djuice
05-16-2004, 05:28 AM
nice... great results.
Formann
05-16-2004, 05:36 AM
Nice scores.. And nice sticks. How much voltage are you feeding“em ?
eviLRuLeZ
05-16-2004, 05:58 AM
2.9v only
i need to do vddr mod in order to see if they can reach a better frequency :D
300 shud be np with a little more volts:D
tried lowering the timings a little? ..
Djuice
05-16-2004, 06:34 AM
If you are after performance then lowering the timings would incerase ever so slightly.
thomas66
05-16-2004, 06:37 AM
would be interesting to know if these chips could run
better timings lets say
230 fsb 1:1 - 2-3-3-6 or 2-3-2-6
eviLRuLeZ
05-16-2004, 09:06 AM
ok i'm going to test better timings ;)
i have run 2.5 4 3 5 but its stable only under 255 mhz though.
i tested 3 4 4 5 too. stable around 270,280 but no more.
macci
05-16-2004, 09:22 AM
Nice clocks and buffered :toast:
How is the 'real world speed' at those timings ?
aka unbuffered (http://www.akiba-pc.com/e107_images/articles/30c/memsettings.gif) Sandra mem
blinky
05-16-2004, 10:09 AM
Originally posted by thomas66
would be interesting to know if these chips could run
better timings lets say
230 fsb 1:1 - 2-3-3-6 or 2-3-2-6 im curious about this aswell, especially 2-3-2-6
saaya
05-16-2004, 10:21 AM
hynix can run cas2? 300mhz is nice, most hynic sticks crap out at 280
eviLRuLeZ
05-16-2004, 10:26 AM
it doesnt even boot with cas 2 :D
macci, where can I find this screen setup in sandra?
i reached 297 on sandra, i try to reach 300 @2.9 but its getting hard :/
saaya
05-16-2004, 10:46 AM
is it running hot? ramsinks could give you a nice 5mhz boost.
Originally posted by eviLRuLeZ
where can I find this screen setup in sandra?
right click on memory bandwidth benchmark and then click on module options :thumbsup:
thomas66
05-16-2004, 11:02 AM
evilrule,
did you try to run them at lower fsb at 2-3-3-6 or something?
you just said that they dont boot at cas 2 does it mean also at lower fsb?
eviLRuLeZ
05-16-2004, 11:10 AM
Originally posted by saaya
is it running hot? ramsinks could give you a nice 5mhz boost.
no, it seems not to be hot but it already has heatsink on it.
it's DDR 500 Vitesta with heatsink
i reached 297, i screened, now i aim 300 and tomorrow i'll do vddr mod :)
thx JWB :)
it's not booting at cas 2, 200 fsb .. thomas66 :/
thomas66
05-16-2004, 11:20 AM
ok thanks evilrule
that means for me iam not going to buy them probably...
grrr... thats a shame cause they are real good value
also in germany
althes
05-16-2004, 11:34 AM
Have you run 3dmark any scores
eviLRuLeZ
05-16-2004, 11:46 AM
no 3dmark scores since my gfx card sux :)
(Gf 4 mx 440..)
i'm waiting for X800 or 6800.. ;)
SKYNET
05-19-2004, 09:09 AM
295 is a wall :(
2.95V
http://downhill666.bei.t-online.de/Rechner/295_big.gif
eviLRuLeZ
05-20-2004, 12:59 PM
no i hit 297 with 2.9
i have to buy components to mod vddr.. :)
http://www.multimania.com/undeadz/297sandra.jpg
althes
05-20-2004, 06:03 PM
excellent 300 is in your reach
Marblehead
05-21-2004, 07:52 PM
Lo guys, kinda new here;)
Post my Adata vitesta DDR 500 timings @ low cas 2-3-3-6 @ 3.2V
They love voltage but my mobo (IS7-E voltmodded) craps out @ 3.2V.
http://users.telenet.be/Kiara_oliver/adatatimings.JPG
http://users.telenet.be/Kiara_oliver/adatatimings1.GIF
Hit a Abit wall @ 1:1 290fsb 2.750V
3-4-4-8
http://users.telenet.be/Kiara_oliver/tes11.GIF
althes
05-22-2004, 02:29 PM
nice marble
bias_hjorth
05-22-2004, 02:37 PM
Originally posted by eviLRuLeZ
no i hit 297 with 2.9
i have to buy components to mod vddr.. :)
your not running 1:1 -- CPU-z bug at 6x multiplier..
Formann
05-22-2004, 04:00 PM
Originally posted by bias_hjorth
your not running 1:1 -- CPU-z bug at 6x multiplier..
AFAIK there is no bug with the 6x MP .. only with 4x and .5 MP.
I think his RAM is running 297Mhz.. cause of his sandra-score:
4589 MB/s .. 4589/8 = 573.6Mhz effective. ~287Mhz actuall speed.
Thats 287 Mhz with 100% bandwidth efficiency .. lets presume he has 97% bandwidth efficiency, which is realistic, we get: 297*0.97 = 288Mhz..
I would actually bet money on it :D
bias_hjorth
05-23-2004, 03:07 AM
my mistake.. I remember it all wrong I guess :)
Originally posted by eviLRuLeZ
no, it seems not to be hot but it already has heatsink on it.
it's DDR 500 Vitesta with heatsink
evilRuLeZ, how bout taking off the heat spreaders, see what happens, if it actually helps out your overclock.
-K
althes
05-23-2004, 12:07 PM
the heat spreaders just trap heat imho
eviLRuLeZ
05-23-2004, 02:27 PM
taking off heatspreaders won't be good I think but i'll test ;)
just have to buy components tomorrow to do vddr mod.. i didn't have any time to do it until now.. :/
CrashOv3r1De
05-24-2004, 03:07 PM
Nice wish I could have that ram then 3ghz will be in reach without a vmod :)
My A-data have been up and running 273Mhz 2.5-3-3-6@3.2V... But was CPU limited...
Now they are runnin 2.5-3-3-6@253Mhz... They wont even boot at lower timings but they are 200% stable...
Tried lowest timings@200Mhz didnt work...
damsxx
06-01-2004, 10:30 PM
nice results evilrulez
Marseille powaaaaaaaaaa :toast:
eviLRuLeZ
06-02-2004, 03:38 AM
:D
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.