Ethernal question: 2.8 M0 or 2.8 Prescott?

[Sir Lancelot]

The subject says it al....


Which one is better for a Prommy Mach2 purpose?




Thnkx

[[_Silence_]]

Originally posted by Sir Lancelot
The subject says it al....


Which one is better for a Prommy Mach2 purpose?




Thnkx

Hey Sir Lancelot, epá se fosse a ti arranjava um 2.8c m0 poix facilmente dá 300FSB na tua prommy. O prescott só vale apena arranjar em futuras revisions, para já n vale apena.

[Kanavit]

hmm, M0 stepping is the failed EE cache chips. So that would be a good overclocking chip for air cooler. Prescott runs hotter , so that would be a good chip for your Mach II cooler.

[st0nedpenguin]

A hot chip isn't better for any type of cooling...

[lalPOOO]

I would go M0 simply because its cheaper, but also because the prescots aren't really doing too well.

[nailbomb]

M0 I'd say, allthou Macci got a killer Super PI score in the OC'ing forum.

[cpulloverclock]

3.0C with a new core...--> 4300-4500MHz

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=29262

http://membres.lycos.fr/ftpad/images/3.0C/

[ant1]

Same problem here. My 3.0 sucks and I can´t decide what to buy Prescott or M0... How much faster is a M0 @4ghz compared to 4ghz Prescott?

[r4z]

i can buy a prescott 2.8@3.5ghz vcore default or p4 2.8@3.4ghz vcore def., i'm seriously thinking about this prescott ( i'll pay it 190€ )

[daos]

man that thread about the new 3.0c stepping is incredible. i might just go back to it. i wonder if any of them want to sell thier chips. hmmm.... ;)