M 0 or N O?

[wespwnzu]

I am running an a64 3200+ setup, but i was considering switching to a 2.8e m0, I know i can achieve better clocks, but performance wise, would it be better? I just got my prommy and i was thinking that 4 ghz+ maybe more powerful than 2.6 is what im probably going to get on my a64.

[saaya]

:ROTF: lol love your avatar :D

[wespwnzu]

not helping~!!!! =/ ;D

[saaya]

if you go fo the P4 a64pwnzu :D

[a5h]

read some threads about the prescott ...they aren't near as good as A64. i'd stay stick with the A64. if ur a 3dmark whore ...then A64 will ownz0r 2.8e

[st0nedpenguin]

I'll swap you my P4 rig for your A-64, it'll do 3.2GHz on stock voltage, no more, no less!

All joking aside, keep the A-64 mate, I would.

[[_Silence_]]

Originally posted by wespwnzu
I am running an a64 3200+ setup, but i was considering switching to a 2.8e m0

There is no 2.8E m0, there's only the 2.8C m0.

Personally i have an 2.8C m0 and an A64 3000+ (51Kb cache), both on r404a prommies, and the A64 kicks P4 ass, even with the 512Kb cache, that is half the 3200+ cache, so u should go with the 3200+.

[enzoR]

prescott sucks untill intel gets them above 4.6ghz

[[_Silence_]]

Originally posted by enzoR
prescott sucks untill intel gets them above 4.6ghz

Prescott sucks until the next revision

[Karnivore]

Originally posted by diogojcr
Prescott sucks until the next revision


And quite possibly beyond.....

[skate2snow]

nothing is saying they will diffinetly be better;). Like everybody was saying they was going to be some great OCer(exept JCviggen that was right:D), and now you see how theyre........

[lalPOOO]

People were really just saying to keep an open mind. Theres no real point to saying that something sucks before you've seen any proof.

[saaya]

well jcviggen had them before they were released and he told everybody they sucked, people just didnt believe him even though he had a proof! ;)

partly because fugger told them that they oc nicely, but that was with r507...