Hell-Fire
02-20-2004, 06:02 PM
Well, a bit ago I started a thread about removing the shim on the 9800 Pro. I knew that it was a good thing to remove on the 9700 Pro, but wasnt sure about the newer design layout.
I got some good posts from members, and decided to leave it on. I think it was mdzcpa that suggested ye ole grease trick to check for contact. Its amazing how you can forget the simple things that can work the best.
Well, I was making solid contact all around the core after doing the check with the block and some thermal on the core. SO, left shim on and bolted down my MCW50-T.
Today, I tear the rig apart to prepare it for a move to a bigger enclosure as I cant get to anything in the case due to the shear volume of hose in its current case.
When I unhooked the block and cleaned its face, I noticed that I could read some of the core stepping numbers on the cold plate. :eek:
Now, since the card has been running fine and I got 21k marks on a slight overclock of the system, I am assuming that all is well, but some input would be nice as to whether I tightened down to far.
Thanks.
I got some good posts from members, and decided to leave it on. I think it was mdzcpa that suggested ye ole grease trick to check for contact. Its amazing how you can forget the simple things that can work the best.
Well, I was making solid contact all around the core after doing the check with the block and some thermal on the core. SO, left shim on and bolted down my MCW50-T.
Today, I tear the rig apart to prepare it for a move to a bigger enclosure as I cant get to anything in the case due to the shear volume of hose in its current case.
When I unhooked the block and cleaned its face, I noticed that I could read some of the core stepping numbers on the cold plate. :eek:
Now, since the card has been running fine and I got 21k marks on a slight overclock of the system, I am assuming that all is well, but some input would be nice as to whether I tightened down to far.
Thanks.