PDA

View Full Version : Techsweden.org 3DmarkTeam..[Stinger takes 29825]



gabbax
12-31-2003, 12:19 PM
Wanna congrat my mate, in the Team. this is some serious points.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7391797.

Xtreme, we are coming for ya;)

DeBastaard
12-31-2003, 12:22 PM
Good luck keeping up with Xtreme :D :D :D

Anyway, nice score man , wish i had something like that ! :D

gabbax
12-31-2003, 12:40 PM
Na Mickey, uve wrong about that clocks u wright:) u see we have swedish champion ship going on, so he will prop tell u the clock after this night..

no threre is no bug

gabbax
12-31-2003, 01:23 PM
Well, Mr:MM il let ya know after midnight swedish time(if he let me post it. its some good klocks?

macci
12-31-2003, 01:29 PM
:toast:
Way to Go! :D

faruquehabib
12-31-2003, 02:08 PM
macci: nice website! :toast:

macci
12-31-2003, 04:57 PM
Thanks :)

I'm guessing Stinger's card clocks are 621/468. Let me know how close I hit ;)

Happy New Year½!
w00t its 2004! :D

Naughtyboy
12-31-2003, 05:36 PM
We have a "Swedish Champion ship" in 3DMark and "Max % OC" ...going on every year here in Sweden.
Stinger just got the "grand prize"..he hit a "Bulls Eye"..... he is nr1 for second time in 3DMark01.

pik-ard v1.1
12-31-2003, 06:26 PM
thats an insane score for less then 2.8ghz.

the orb reads the fsb at 251, and most of the time, if it reads incorrectly, its gonna be either 0, 200, or somehting insane like 235250. 11 x 251 = 2761, which is only 2mhz over what his reads as, so im guessing it is 251 1:1 2-2-2-x.

with a cpu clock that low, i wouldnt be surprised if he has the world record for video clocks. 665/470 anyone? ;)

QuadDamage
12-31-2003, 08:42 PM
hmm, looks like he's got a 3400+? It's not an FX chip and there's no way he could bench at 11x with a 3200+. and he's video is around 610/465.

luihed
12-31-2003, 08:57 PM
Originally posted by pik-ard v1.1
thats an insane score for less then 2.8ghz.

the orb reads the fsb at 251, and most of the time, if it reads incorrectly, its gonna be either 0, 200, or somehting insane like 235250. 11 x 251 = 2761, which is only 2mhz over what his reads as, so im guessing it is 251 1:1 2-2-2-x.

with a cpu clock that low, i wouldnt be surprised if he has the world record for video clocks. 665/470 anyone? ;)


Im thinking he booted at 251fsb and use clockgen and did 276fsb 1:1...... I just dont think he can have those lobby scores at 251fsb...... well thats what I think anyways....

I dont think he can clock his 9800xt that high with only a prommie..... my guess is 625/465.....

pik-ard v1.1
12-31-2003, 09:13 PM
Originally posted by luihed
Im thinking he booted at 251fsb and use clockgen and did 276fsb 1:1...... I just dont think he can have those lobby scores at 251fsb...... well thats what I think anyways....

I dont think he can clock his 9800xt that high with only a prommie..... my guess is 625/465.....
ah... hadnt thought aobut clockgen, but that could be it also. ;)

charlie
12-31-2003, 09:28 PM
I said a LOOONNG time ago that the 3400+ at 1:1 2,5,2 would scream....guess it does :D

C

Geforce4ti4200
01-01-2004, 12:28 AM
from his details, it looks like hes got an a64 3400+ running at 1:1 ram with aggressive timings and by his nature score, hes probably 10MHz clocked lower than Macci's 9800xt he should still put his video clocks and what cpu/fsb in the description, he was too vague but nice score and maybe he can pull 30k ;)

Soulburner
01-01-2004, 03:07 AM
He probably didn't because he's not done yet.

Stinger
01-01-2004, 05:37 AM
Hi guys sorry for the late answer on my clocks. That run was done at 275mhz fsb 1:1 2-2-11-2 video at 630/465

GJ
01-01-2004, 05:48 AM
3200+ then,not 3400+,right?

Stinger
01-01-2004, 05:51 AM
3200+

GJ
01-01-2004, 05:57 AM
Shouldnt you update your sig cause you got 98xt now...

Stinger
01-01-2004, 06:26 AM
Thanks MM and Yea you right my ldt speed was 2x

macci
01-01-2004, 08:23 AM
630GPU :toast:

how did you got it going that fast? :D
new card or some new tricks? ;)

Congrats.

btw, does running 2x256 instead of 1x256 make a big difference on nf3?? LOL I never tested it on NF3!

unrealneo
01-01-2004, 08:48 AM
'grats stinger!

awesome clocks!:cool:

Stinger
01-01-2004, 01:10 PM
Thanks macci, its 120-140 points different from 1x256 to 2x256. better cooling and more volt did it.

Marquzz
01-01-2004, 03:33 PM
No, kingston 3200. I've got the same and running 270 2-2-5-2

STEvil
01-01-2004, 06:00 PM
KVR probably.

Zejtan
01-01-2004, 07:00 PM
ICE ICE BABY =)
i dont know §§§§ about 3dmark this n that, but i know some things in his system stands in techsweden-quality =)
and i do know that he is the king at .techsweden for now and a long time forward,
grats Stinger

Stinger
01-02-2004, 12:05 AM
MM Its khx3200/256 they are so damn good so I bought four of them :-)

luihed
01-02-2004, 01:23 AM
Weve got the exact same rig almost stinger cept teh two prommies........ BTW what do I get for getting the best guess of your specs ( my guess 276 x 10 1:1 and 625/465 ) :D

Stinger
01-02-2004, 01:54 AM
Luihed-->Hehe I saw that very good I'm impressed :-)
Zejtan--> you are the king of cooling if it wasnt for you I'v never scored so high. Thank you my friend.

TodB
01-02-2004, 05:44 AM
Originally posted by MickeyMouse
stinger nice work my man what was your LDT speed?? 2x I take it right? ;) 2.5x would give ya 30.5k in a sec., but untill nf3 250 we 240+ nf3 users need to settle for the 2x LDT. :)

Well I got GB K8N Pro, rev A4.... I can run 280FSB 1:1 at 2.5LDT anyday I want ..... but that's with a 8x multi and 3.0-8-4-4 (A-DATA Vitesta DDR500) memory latencies..... is there any difference between 2.0 and 2.5 LDT with weak and strong latencies and multiplier.... I mean with 10x multi and 2.0-5-2-2 memory will it be tough to run 2.5LDT?

TodB
01-02-2004, 09:26 AM
Yeah, I know what it is....

My point was not that... read my post again, please....

FUGGER
01-02-2004, 11:46 AM
nice 1 stinger, grats!

Zejtan
01-02-2004, 11:56 AM
FUGGER:
Is there a homepage or something that shows the speccs of your cooling system ? have been looking around a little bit but havent found anything.

TodB
01-02-2004, 01:20 PM
Originally posted by MickeyMouse
ahhh maybe the LDT is also "LATENCY" dependant so to speak???

my bad didnt fully read your post but great point.. now someone like mr.icee needs to test :)

You really are a jocker, you just can't be something else..... I've asked a simple Q but no - you just can't answer plain and simple... :mad:

I asked those (and you too) who have NF3 boards if lower multies and/or lower memory latencies affects the LDT MAX speed and thus the LDT divider..... just that - plain and simple!

Just forget it....

FUGGER
01-03-2004, 06:26 PM
My specs change constantly.

My sig is what my benchmark system is made of.

pik-ard v1.1
01-03-2004, 09:58 PM
stingers score has disapeared from the ORB, and i get a wierd error when i click the link at the first post of this thread... :(

charlie
01-04-2004, 12:55 AM
strange...

Naughtyboy
01-04-2004, 02:55 AM
I can´t login to "The Orb" at all....!?!?!?

TodB
01-04-2004, 05:53 AM
Originally posted by MickeyMouse
wohhhh slow down I was not joking I was saying that I neevr tried to see if lower ram timings alow you in incease thre LDT while ya raise the FSB, but answer me this whats the point of 3x LDT at 3-3-3-3c timings at 270mhz 1:1 what 2-2-2-2c at 2x LDT at 270 will wipe the floor with it..

OK, my bad.....

So it seems that my board is able to keep a higher HT divider despite the higher FSB/HT speed.... that's nice... If I can find nice BH-5 memory I'll try to see if I can stay @ tight latencies and high FSB...

Penti
01-04-2004, 11:16 AM
Originally posted by pik-ard v1.1
stingers score has disapeared from the ORB, and i get a wierd error when i click the link at the first post of this thread... :(

He got a higher score up Stinger's 30 012
But just a few hours a go he had a 29 967 score or something like that up.

Stinger
01-04-2004, 11:57 AM
Thanks all

Naughtyboy
01-04-2004, 12:30 PM
Way to go dear friend.....!!!! :slobber: :D :D

U rokk...... :banana: :banana: :banana:

pik-ard v1.1
01-04-2004, 03:38 PM
Originally posted by Penti
He got a higher score up Stinger's 30 012
But just a few hours a go he had a 29 967 score or something like that up.
the 30k one wasnt up for a bit, and neither was the 29.8k score. ;)

good job stinger.:banana: